Der Trust wird bereits OTC unter dem Ticker ZCSH gehandelt, aber Grayscales neueste SEC-Einreichung verfolgt weiterhin den Plan, die Anteile an der NYSE Arca zu listen. Warum ist das wichtig?
Dadurch erhielten Anleger eine weitere regulierte Handelsplattform, um Zcash-Exposure zu erhalten, ohne die $ZEC direkt selbst zu halten.
Das Interessante daran ist, dass es sich nicht nur um ein weiteres Krypto-Listing handelt. Zcash basiert auf datenschutzorientierter Technologie, was es aus regulatorischer Sicht zu einem besonders interessanten Asset gemacht hat.
Das Listing hängt weiterhin vom erforderlichen regulatorischen Prozess ab, daher ist es zu früh, das als erledigten Deal zu bezeichnen.
Glaubst du, dass ein Listing an der NYSE Arca die Art verändern würde, wie traditionelle Anleger datenschutzorientierte Kryptoassets bewerten?
A breakout isn't always about one piece of news. Sometimes it's a combination of sentiment, liquidity, and market positioning finally moving in the same direction.
The bigger question now isn't just whether BTC can touch $70K. It's whether it has the structural support to hold above it.
Which factor do you think matters more for holding this level right now—political sentiment or macro liquidity? Let me know below. 👇
I’ve been looking into TermMax and one thing that stood out to me is how much of the system revolves around maturity. FT can be traded before maturity, but at maturity it can be redeemed for its face value. I’m curious to see how that relationship actually plays out in the market. $TMX #TermMax @TermMax
The SEC just proposed a pretty big new framework for crypto.
But there’s one thing getting lost in the headlines: It’s still a proposal, not a new law.
The proposal includes a possible $5M token-offering exemption over four years, a $75M exemption over 12 months, and a safe-harbor framework for certain crypto assets.
If these rules eventually go through, they could make it easier for some crypto projects to raise money and build their networks without going through the same process as a traditional public offering. But nothing changes overnight.
There’s a 60-day public comment period, and the proposal can still be changed before anything becomes final.
Instead of asking if crypto is “finally regulated,” what do you think actually makes it into the final rules? Let me know below. 👇
A detail in TermMax’s lending mechanism caught my attention: a Lending Range Order can use a pricing curve where lower rates apply to the initial portion, while higher rates apply as more of the order is filled.
That made me look at the order itself differently. The rate isn’t necessarily one fixed value across the whole order.
I want to see how this behaves when the order is actually being filled. #TermMax @TermMax
A 3× Bitcoin ETF does NOT necessarily mean 3× Bitcoin's return over a month.
The SEC is reviewing a proposal involving six 3× leveraged commodity products, including exposure linked to $BTC and $ETH .
The important detail is how these products work.
They target leveraged performance on a daily basis, using derivatives rather than simply holding spot crypto. Because the leverage resets daily, compounding can cause the product's multi-day return to differ significantly from 3× the underlying asset's return.
That difference becomes especially important when the underlying market is volatile or moves sideways.
So the interesting story isn't just “3× BTC is coming.”
The next important crypto signal may not come from crypto itself.
On August 19, the Fed will release the minutes from its July 28–29 meeting. With $BTC around $63K–$64K, these minutes could give markets more detail on how policymakers viewed inflation, employment and the economic outlook.
The important part isn't predicting a “pump” or “dump.”
It's understanding what policymakers discussed, where uncertainty remains, and how that could shape expectations for future monetary policy.
For crypto, macro conditions matter—but they shouldn't be reduced to a single headline or trading signal.
I initially thought TermMax was mainly about lending at a fixed rate.
Its docs describe a lending range order where the lender sets the amount, maturity, and a pricing curve. When matched, FTs represent the principal and interest portions, while XTs are used in the exchange process and GT records the collateralized debt position. FTs can also be sold on the open market before maturity.
That made me look at it differently.
The pricing curve means the lending rate can change as more of the order is filled, rather than applying one rate across the entire order.
What I’m curious about is how these curves behave in practice as orders get partially filled and FTs trade before maturity.
Tracking the growth of decentralized ecosystems reveals how crucial user experience is. It is great to see how @grvt_io is addressing these challenges directly. Building a secure and highly scalable environment is exactly what web3 needs right now. Excited to see what milestones are coming up next for this platform! #grvt
Anmelden und weiter Inhalte entdecken
Krypto-Nutzer weltweit auf Binance Square kennenlernen
⚡️ Bleib in Sachen Krypto stets am Puls.
💬 Die weltgrößte Kryptobörse vertraut darauf.
👍 Erhalte verlässliche Einblicke von verifizierten Creators.