Blockonomi
Verifizierter Creator
A guide to Cryptocurrencies, Technology and the Blockchain Economy #cryptocurrency #blockchain #fintech
0 Following
14.9K+ Follower
9.6K+ Like gegeben
1.1K+ Geteilt
$1,72 Mrd. von Bitcoin-ETFs in einer 5-tägigen Abflussserie abgehoben: Was kommt als Nächstes?
TLDR:
Bitcoin-ETFs verzeichneten $1,72 Mrd. an Abflüssen, da die Marktstimmung fragil und vorsichtig bleibt.
Der Fear & Greed Index signalisiert „Extreme Angst“, während Bitcoin um $89K schwebt.
Mangel an Katalysatoren und volatile Stimmung lassen die Preisbewegung von Bitcoin ungewiss.
ETF-Abflüsse und gedämpfte Preisbewegungen spiegeln sich verändernde Risikobereitschaften unter den Investoren wider.
Bitcoin-ETFs sehen sich einer anhaltenden Abhebungswelle gegenüber. In nur fünf Tagen wurden $1,72 Milliarden abgehoben, was auf Vorsicht bei den Investoren hinweist.
Dies geschieht, obwohl Bitcoin seit November Schwierigkeiten hat, über $100.000 zu brechen; Stimmungsindikatoren zeigen ein Umfeld der „Extremen Angst“. Mit einem risikoscheuen Verhalten, das dominiert, beobachten die Marktteilnehmer genau die Anzeichen einer Trendwende oder eines weiteren Preisrückgangs.
Bitcoin-ETFs verzeichneten $1,72 Mrd. an Abflüssen, da die Marktstimmung fragil und vorsichtig bleibt.
Der Fear & Greed Index signalisiert „Extreme Angst“, während Bitcoin um $89K schwebt.
Mangel an Katalysatoren und volatile Stimmung lassen die Preisbewegung von Bitcoin ungewiss.
ETF-Abflüsse und gedämpfte Preisbewegungen spiegeln sich verändernde Risikobereitschaften unter den Investoren wider.
Bitcoin-ETFs sehen sich einer anhaltenden Abhebungswelle gegenüber. In nur fünf Tagen wurden $1,72 Milliarden abgehoben, was auf Vorsicht bei den Investoren hinweist.
Dies geschieht, obwohl Bitcoin seit November Schwierigkeiten hat, über $100.000 zu brechen; Stimmungsindikatoren zeigen ein Umfeld der „Extremen Angst“. Mit einem risikoscheuen Verhalten, das dominiert, beobachten die Marktteilnehmer genau die Anzeichen einer Trendwende oder eines weiteren Preisrückgangs.
Binance verzeichnet wöchentlichen Abfluss von 6 Milliarden Dollar, während Bitcoin, Ethereum und Stablecoins die Börse verlassen
TLDR:
Die kombinierten Abflüsse von Bitcoin und Ethereum überstiegen 3,3 Milliarden Dollar und markieren den höchsten wöchentlichen Exodus seit dem 10. November.
Tether auf Ethereum verzeichnete einen Abzug von 3,11 Milliarden Dollar, während das Tron-Netzwerk gleichzeitig 905 Millionen Dollar an USDT-Zuflüssen erhielt.
Gleichzeitige Abzüge von Risikoanlagen und Stablecoins gehen typischerweise einer erhöhten Volatilität voraus, anstatt klarer Trends.
Großangelegte Abflüsse von Börsen deuten darauf hin, dass Händler in die Selbstverwahrung wechseln oder auf Bedenken hinsichtlich der Marktunsicherheit reagieren.
Binance erlebte den größten wöchentlichen Abzug von Vermögenswerten seit dem 10. November, mit über 6 Milliarden Dollar, die die Börse über mehrere Blockchain-Netzwerke verließen.
Die kombinierten Abflüsse von Bitcoin und Ethereum überstiegen 3,3 Milliarden Dollar und markieren den höchsten wöchentlichen Exodus seit dem 10. November.
Tether auf Ethereum verzeichnete einen Abzug von 3,11 Milliarden Dollar, während das Tron-Netzwerk gleichzeitig 905 Millionen Dollar an USDT-Zuflüssen erhielt.
Gleichzeitige Abzüge von Risikoanlagen und Stablecoins gehen typischerweise einer erhöhten Volatilität voraus, anstatt klarer Trends.
Großangelegte Abflüsse von Börsen deuten darauf hin, dass Händler in die Selbstverwahrung wechseln oder auf Bedenken hinsichtlich der Marktunsicherheit reagieren.
Binance erlebte den größten wöchentlichen Abzug von Vermögenswerten seit dem 10. November, mit über 6 Milliarden Dollar, die die Börse über mehrere Blockchain-Netzwerke verließen.
Polymarket Predicts 77% Chance of US Government Shutdown This January
TLDR:
Polymarket’s odds now show a 77% chance of a US government shutdown by January’s end, a 67% rise in 24 hours.
Senator Schumer’s refusal to vote on the DHS funding sparks fears of a prolonged shutdown and regulatory delay.
Trump’s prediction of a ‘Democrat shutdown’ fuels growing uncertainty about the timeline for the CLARITY Act.
Coinbase CEO Brian Armstrong opposes the current version of the CLARITY Act, citing concerns over tokenized equities and privacy risks.
Polymarket has priced in a 77% chance of a U.S. government shutdown before January ends, marking a sharp increase in shutdown odds.
This uncertainty comes amid mounting political tension around funding issues, with the potential to delay the CLARITY Act. The surge in odds has put the crypto industry on high alert for further regulatory delays.
Shutdown Odds Surge, Potentially Jeopardizing the CLARITY Act
Polymarket’s latest data reveals that the odds of a U.S. government shutdown have spiked to 77% by the end of January 2026. This represents a dramatic 67% increase within just 24 hours, raising alarms in the political and financial sectors.
The primary catalyst for this surge is the ongoing political gridlock over government funding. Particularly regarding the Department of Homeland Security (DHS) bill.
Senate Majority Leader Chuck Schumer recently announced that Senate Democrats would oppose funding the DHS if the bill included provisions they find objectionable. Starting with those related to ICE enforcement.
His remarks, along with Trump’s warning of a “Democrat shutdown,” have ignited fears that Congress may fail to pass crucial funding before the deadline. This, in turn, could trigger another lengthy government shutdown.
The last one in late 2025, caused significant disruptions in legislative processes. This would delay efforts to pass bills like the CLARITY Act which aims to bring clarity to the digital asset.
The CLARITY Act, which has already faced delays due to the prior government shutdown, now risks even further setbacks. However, with the current political climate and the looming threat of another shutdown, the chances of it being enacted appear slim.
Trump’s Shutdown Prediction Adds to Industry Concerns
In addition to the concerns raised by Schumer’s opposition, former President Donald Trump has further fueled uncertainty by predicting that a shutdown is likely. Speaking to Fox Business, Trump stated, “We’re probably going to end up in another Democrat shutdown.”
While Trump’s comment was somewhat vague, it underscores the volatile political landscape in Washington. The crypto industry has expressed its frustration over the stalled regulatory framework.
Trump’s remarks only add fuel to the prolonged uncertainty surrounding the fate of the CLARITY Act. Alongside the possibility of a government shutdown, has created a sense of dread among crypto stakeholders.
Many in the industry were hopeful that the legislation would provide much-needed clarity on the classification of digital assets, stablecoin regulations. However these efforts now seem more vulnerable than ever.
Furthermore, the situation is exacerbated by the recent withdrawal of Coinbase’s support for the bill. CEO Brian Armstrong voiced concerns over several provisions in the CLARITY Act.
He described it as a “de facto ban” on tokenized equities and restrictive regulations on decentralized finance (DeFi). With major players like Coinbase distancing themselves from the bill, the chances of passing remain slim, leaving the crypto industry in a state of limbo.
As the deadline for government funding approaches, the future of the CLARITY Act hangs in the balance. With political infighting and regulatory uncertainty casting long shadows over the crypto landscape.
The post Polymarket Predicts 77% Chance of US Government Shutdown This January appeared first on Blockonomi.
Polymarket’s odds now show a 77% chance of a US government shutdown by January’s end, a 67% rise in 24 hours.
Senator Schumer’s refusal to vote on the DHS funding sparks fears of a prolonged shutdown and regulatory delay.
Trump’s prediction of a ‘Democrat shutdown’ fuels growing uncertainty about the timeline for the CLARITY Act.
Coinbase CEO Brian Armstrong opposes the current version of the CLARITY Act, citing concerns over tokenized equities and privacy risks.
Polymarket has priced in a 77% chance of a U.S. government shutdown before January ends, marking a sharp increase in shutdown odds.
This uncertainty comes amid mounting political tension around funding issues, with the potential to delay the CLARITY Act. The surge in odds has put the crypto industry on high alert for further regulatory delays.
Shutdown Odds Surge, Potentially Jeopardizing the CLARITY Act
Polymarket’s latest data reveals that the odds of a U.S. government shutdown have spiked to 77% by the end of January 2026. This represents a dramatic 67% increase within just 24 hours, raising alarms in the political and financial sectors.
The primary catalyst for this surge is the ongoing political gridlock over government funding. Particularly regarding the Department of Homeland Security (DHS) bill.
Senate Majority Leader Chuck Schumer recently announced that Senate Democrats would oppose funding the DHS if the bill included provisions they find objectionable. Starting with those related to ICE enforcement.
His remarks, along with Trump’s warning of a “Democrat shutdown,” have ignited fears that Congress may fail to pass crucial funding before the deadline. This, in turn, could trigger another lengthy government shutdown.
The last one in late 2025, caused significant disruptions in legislative processes. This would delay efforts to pass bills like the CLARITY Act which aims to bring clarity to the digital asset.
The CLARITY Act, which has already faced delays due to the prior government shutdown, now risks even further setbacks. However, with the current political climate and the looming threat of another shutdown, the chances of it being enacted appear slim.
Trump’s Shutdown Prediction Adds to Industry Concerns
In addition to the concerns raised by Schumer’s opposition, former President Donald Trump has further fueled uncertainty by predicting that a shutdown is likely. Speaking to Fox Business, Trump stated, “We’re probably going to end up in another Democrat shutdown.”
While Trump’s comment was somewhat vague, it underscores the volatile political landscape in Washington. The crypto industry has expressed its frustration over the stalled regulatory framework.
Trump’s remarks only add fuel to the prolonged uncertainty surrounding the fate of the CLARITY Act. Alongside the possibility of a government shutdown, has created a sense of dread among crypto stakeholders.
Many in the industry were hopeful that the legislation would provide much-needed clarity on the classification of digital assets, stablecoin regulations. However these efforts now seem more vulnerable than ever.
Furthermore, the situation is exacerbated by the recent withdrawal of Coinbase’s support for the bill. CEO Brian Armstrong voiced concerns over several provisions in the CLARITY Act.
He described it as a “de facto ban” on tokenized equities and restrictive regulations on decentralized finance (DeFi). With major players like Coinbase distancing themselves from the bill, the chances of passing remain slim, leaving the crypto industry in a state of limbo.
As the deadline for government funding approaches, the future of the CLARITY Act hangs in the balance. With political infighting and regulatory uncertainty casting long shadows over the crypto landscape.
The post Polymarket Predicts 77% Chance of US Government Shutdown This January appeared first on Blockonomi.
SUI Group wechselt zu einem operativen Geschäftsmodell mit einer Erhöhung um 450 Millionen Dollar und dem Start des Protokoll-Datenschutzes
TLDR:
Sui Group hat 450 Millionen Dollar in PIPE-Finanzierung gesammelt, um die Beteiligungen von 3 % auf 5 % des zirkulierenden Angebots von SUI zu erhöhen.
SuiUSDE-Stablecoin leitet 90 % der Gebühren dazu, SUI-Token zu kaufen oder Projekte im Sui-eigenen DeFi-Ökosystem zu finanzieren.
Protokollebene Datenschutz mit ZK-Überprüfungen verbirgt Transaktionsdetails bei gleichzeitiger Einhaltung der regulatorischen Anforderungen.
Institutionelle Zuflüsse erreichten wöchentlich 5,7 Millionen Dollar, da sich Sui als bankenfreundliche Blockchain-Infrastruktur positioniert.
Das an der Nasdaq gelistete Sui Group Holdings hat einen grundlegenden Wandel von einer stiftungsunterstützten digitalen Vermögensverwaltung zu einem Geschäftsmodell angekündigt, das sich auf den Erwerb von SUI und die Erzeugung wiederkehrender Erträge konzentriert.
Sui Group hat 450 Millionen Dollar in PIPE-Finanzierung gesammelt, um die Beteiligungen von 3 % auf 5 % des zirkulierenden Angebots von SUI zu erhöhen.
SuiUSDE-Stablecoin leitet 90 % der Gebühren dazu, SUI-Token zu kaufen oder Projekte im Sui-eigenen DeFi-Ökosystem zu finanzieren.
Protokollebene Datenschutz mit ZK-Überprüfungen verbirgt Transaktionsdetails bei gleichzeitiger Einhaltung der regulatorischen Anforderungen.
Institutionelle Zuflüsse erreichten wöchentlich 5,7 Millionen Dollar, da sich Sui als bankenfreundliche Blockchain-Infrastruktur positioniert.
Das an der Nasdaq gelistete Sui Group Holdings hat einen grundlegenden Wandel von einer stiftungsunterstützten digitalen Vermögensverwaltung zu einem Geschäftsmodell angekündigt, das sich auf den Erwerb von SUI und die Erzeugung wiederkehrender Erträge konzentriert.
Bitcoin-Investoren verzeichnen die ersten Nettverluste seit Oktober 2023, während die Bärenmarktindikatoren aufleuchten
TLDR:
Bitcoin-Investoren haben seit Dezember 6,1 Milliarden Dollar an Verlusten realisiert, die erste negative Phase seit 15 Monaten.
Die netto realisierten Gewinne fielen auf 2,5M BTC und entsprechen den Niveaus von März 2022, als der Bärenmarkt begann.
Zwei Drittel des Bitcoin-Angebots bleiben profitabel, während ein Drittel bei den aktuellen Preisniveaus im Minus ist.
Das MVRV-Verhältnis kühlte auf 1,5x ab, was auf frühe Bärenbedingungen hinweist, anstatt auf eine tiefgreifende Bärenmarkt-Kapitulationsphase.
Bitcoin-Inhaber verzeichnen zum ersten Mal seit über einem Jahr Nettverluste, laut aktuellen On-Chain-Daten von CryptoQuant.
Bitcoin-Investoren haben seit Dezember 6,1 Milliarden Dollar an Verlusten realisiert, die erste negative Phase seit 15 Monaten.
Die netto realisierten Gewinne fielen auf 2,5M BTC und entsprechen den Niveaus von März 2022, als der Bärenmarkt begann.
Zwei Drittel des Bitcoin-Angebots bleiben profitabel, während ein Drittel bei den aktuellen Preisniveaus im Minus ist.
Das MVRV-Verhältnis kühlte auf 1,5x ab, was auf frühe Bärenbedingungen hinweist, anstatt auf eine tiefgreifende Bärenmarkt-Kapitulationsphase.
Bitcoin-Inhaber verzeichnen zum ersten Mal seit über einem Jahr Nettverluste, laut aktuellen On-Chain-Daten von CryptoQuant.
Korea University Joins Injective as Validator in Strategic Blockchain Partnership
TLDR:
Korea University ranked first in the 2026 K Universities Global Excellence Rankings for education quality
Partnership makes Korea University both a validator and research partner in Injective’s global network
Joint research will focus on real-world asset tokenization structures for the Korean financial market
The institute leads government-funded research on smart contract security across the complete development cycle
Korea University’s Blockchain Research Institute has formed a strategic partnership with Injective, marking a notable development in the country’s blockchain sector.
The collaboration positions the institution as both a validator and research partner within the Injective ecosystem.
This move strengthens Injective’s presence in the Asia-Pacific region while connecting academic research with blockchain infrastructure.
The partnership focuses on production-grade systems and institutional readiness for decentralized finance applications.
Academic Institution Enters Blockchain Validation
Korea University secured first place in The Korea Times K Universities Global Excellence Rankings for 2026.
The institution maintains a strong record in education quality, research output, and graduate outcomes. As Korea’s oldest university, it has shaped the nation’s academic and technological development for decades.
The Blockchain Research Institute operates within the College of Informatics. Since 2020, the institute has conducted research on blockchain and digital asset technologies. The work spans multiple sectors including finance, public systems, and enterprise infrastructure.
The institute currently leads a government-funded research initiative. The project receives support from the Institute of Information and Communications Technology Planning and Evaluation.
The research focuses on smart contract security across the entire lifecycle from design through execution.
This expertise matches well with Injective’s technical framework. The platform launched its native EVM layer in November 2025.
The system includes MEV-resistant infrastructure and atomic transaction processing designed for institutional requirements.
Research Focus on Real-World Asset Tokenization
Korea University will operate as a validator within the Injective network. The role extends beyond technical contributions to ecosystem development and global expansion.
Both parties plan joint research on real-world asset tokenization and onchain financial structures in Korea.
According to Andrew Kang, Head of Korea at Injective, academic partnerships build long-term trust and sustainable growth.
He stated that the collaboration aims to advance research and discussion around onchain finance and RWA adoption in Korea and Asia.
The research will examine structural feasibility and regulatory compatibility from the start. Analysis will cover disclosure obligations, compliance constraints, and operational requirements within the Korean financial systems.
Injective’s RWA module provides institutions with compliance-focused solutions for permissioned asset-backed tokens.
In a statement, Professor Inho Lee, Director of the Blockchain Research Institute, explained that the partnership enables practical studies applicable to industry and regulatory environments.
He emphasized that the focus remains on digital assets and RWA structures suitable for the Korean market. The collaboration represents a shift toward active academic participation in blockchain ecosystems rather than external observation.
The post Korea University Joins Injective as Validator in Strategic Blockchain Partnership appeared first on Blockonomi.
Korea University ranked first in the 2026 K Universities Global Excellence Rankings for education quality
Partnership makes Korea University both a validator and research partner in Injective’s global network
Joint research will focus on real-world asset tokenization structures for the Korean financial market
The institute leads government-funded research on smart contract security across the complete development cycle
Korea University’s Blockchain Research Institute has formed a strategic partnership with Injective, marking a notable development in the country’s blockchain sector.
The collaboration positions the institution as both a validator and research partner within the Injective ecosystem.
This move strengthens Injective’s presence in the Asia-Pacific region while connecting academic research with blockchain infrastructure.
The partnership focuses on production-grade systems and institutional readiness for decentralized finance applications.
Academic Institution Enters Blockchain Validation
Korea University secured first place in The Korea Times K Universities Global Excellence Rankings for 2026.
The institution maintains a strong record in education quality, research output, and graduate outcomes. As Korea’s oldest university, it has shaped the nation’s academic and technological development for decades.
The Blockchain Research Institute operates within the College of Informatics. Since 2020, the institute has conducted research on blockchain and digital asset technologies. The work spans multiple sectors including finance, public systems, and enterprise infrastructure.
The institute currently leads a government-funded research initiative. The project receives support from the Institute of Information and Communications Technology Planning and Evaluation.
The research focuses on smart contract security across the entire lifecycle from design through execution.
This expertise matches well with Injective’s technical framework. The platform launched its native EVM layer in November 2025.
The system includes MEV-resistant infrastructure and atomic transaction processing designed for institutional requirements.
Research Focus on Real-World Asset Tokenization
Korea University will operate as a validator within the Injective network. The role extends beyond technical contributions to ecosystem development and global expansion.
Both parties plan joint research on real-world asset tokenization and onchain financial structures in Korea.
According to Andrew Kang, Head of Korea at Injective, academic partnerships build long-term trust and sustainable growth.
He stated that the collaboration aims to advance research and discussion around onchain finance and RWA adoption in Korea and Asia.
The research will examine structural feasibility and regulatory compatibility from the start. Analysis will cover disclosure obligations, compliance constraints, and operational requirements within the Korean financial systems.
Injective’s RWA module provides institutions with compliance-focused solutions for permissioned asset-backed tokens.
In a statement, Professor Inho Lee, Director of the Blockchain Research Institute, explained that the partnership enables practical studies applicable to industry and regulatory environments.
He emphasized that the focus remains on digital assets and RWA structures suitable for the Korean market. The collaboration represents a shift toward active academic participation in blockchain ecosystems rather than external observation.
The post Korea University Joins Injective as Validator in Strategic Blockchain Partnership appeared first on Blockonomi.
Ethereum redefiniert digitale Kunst: Wenn das Netzwerk zum Medium wird
TLDR:
Ethereum ermöglicht Kunst, die vollständig auf der Blockchain existiert und Netzwerkbeteiligung erfordert, um zu funktionieren.
CryptoPunks und Autoglyphs zeigen ein protokollorientiertes Design, das das Netzwerk selbst zum Medium macht.
Eigentum und Wert werden durch Konsens bestimmt, nicht durch Museen oder zentralisierte Institutionen.
Die ∞ETH NODE-Skulptur visualisiert die Echtzeitaktivität von Ethereum sowohl als Kunst als auch als Datenerfahrung.
Ethereum verändert die Art und Weise, wie digitale Kunst geschaffen und bewahrt wird, indem es das Netzwerk selbst als Medium nutzt. Im Gegensatz zur traditionellen digitalen Kunst erfordert vernetzte Kunst die Blockchain für ihre Funktion, Speicherung und Ausführung.
Ethereum ermöglicht Kunst, die vollständig auf der Blockchain existiert und Netzwerkbeteiligung erfordert, um zu funktionieren.
CryptoPunks und Autoglyphs zeigen ein protokollorientiertes Design, das das Netzwerk selbst zum Medium macht.
Eigentum und Wert werden durch Konsens bestimmt, nicht durch Museen oder zentralisierte Institutionen.
Die ∞ETH NODE-Skulptur visualisiert die Echtzeitaktivität von Ethereum sowohl als Kunst als auch als Datenerfahrung.
Ethereum verändert die Art und Weise, wie digitale Kunst geschaffen und bewahrt wird, indem es das Netzwerk selbst als Medium nutzt. Im Gegensatz zur traditionellen digitalen Kunst erfordert vernetzte Kunst die Blockchain für ihre Funktion, Speicherung und Ausführung.
MicroStrategy kontrolliert 3% von Bitcoin, da die Unternehmensakkumulation neue Höchststände erreicht.
TLDR:
MicroStrategy besitzt jetzt über 700.000 BTC, was mehr als 3% des Gesamtangebots entspricht.
Durchschnittlicher Kostenbasis von 71.000 $ pro BTC, aktueller Wert zeigt einen unrealisierten Gewinn von 13 Mrd. $.
US-Verwahrungs-Wallets haben im vergangenen Jahr 577.000 BTC hinzugefügt, was 53 Mrd. $ wert ist.
Die Akkumulation durch Unternehmen und Institutionen verstärkt den Wettbewerb um das verfügbare Bitcoin-Angebot.
Die Unternehmensakkumulation von Bitcoin verändert weiterhin den Markt, da große Unternehmen bedeutende Positionen sichern. MicroStrategy (MSTR) hat sich als führender Unternehmensinhaber etabliert und besitzt jetzt über 3% des gesamten Bitcoin-Angebots.
MicroStrategy besitzt jetzt über 700.000 BTC, was mehr als 3% des Gesamtangebots entspricht.
Durchschnittlicher Kostenbasis von 71.000 $ pro BTC, aktueller Wert zeigt einen unrealisierten Gewinn von 13 Mrd. $.
US-Verwahrungs-Wallets haben im vergangenen Jahr 577.000 BTC hinzugefügt, was 53 Mrd. $ wert ist.
Die Akkumulation durch Unternehmen und Institutionen verstärkt den Wettbewerb um das verfügbare Bitcoin-Angebot.
Die Unternehmensakkumulation von Bitcoin verändert weiterhin den Markt, da große Unternehmen bedeutende Positionen sichern. MicroStrategy (MSTR) hat sich als führender Unternehmensinhaber etabliert und besitzt jetzt über 3% des gesamten Bitcoin-Angebots.
Nigerias Krypto-Sandbox stößt auf die erste Hürde: Quidax stellt den Peer-to-Peer-Service ein
TLDR:
Quidax beendet den P2P-Handel und verweist auf Benutzerpräferenzen und regulatorische Vorsicht innerhalb des Sandboxes.
SEC kennzeichnet intransparente P2P-Ströme, Off-Plattform-Abrechnungen und Dominanz ausländischer Plattformen.
Lizenzierungsverzögerungen und höhere Kapitalanforderungen stellen Compliance-Herausforderungen für Börsen dar.
Quidax streicht 35 Token, um die Plattform an die regulatorischen Erwartungen Nigerias anzupassen.
Nigerias Krypto-Sandbox hat ihre erste bemerkenswerte Herausforderung erlebt, da Quidax, eine vorläufig lizenzierte digitale Vermögensbörse, die Schließung ihrer Peer-to-Peer (P2P)-Handelsplattform ankündigte.
Quidax beendet den P2P-Handel und verweist auf Benutzerpräferenzen und regulatorische Vorsicht innerhalb des Sandboxes.
SEC kennzeichnet intransparente P2P-Ströme, Off-Plattform-Abrechnungen und Dominanz ausländischer Plattformen.
Lizenzierungsverzögerungen und höhere Kapitalanforderungen stellen Compliance-Herausforderungen für Börsen dar.
Quidax streicht 35 Token, um die Plattform an die regulatorischen Erwartungen Nigerias anzupassen.
Nigerias Krypto-Sandbox hat ihre erste bemerkenswerte Herausforderung erlebt, da Quidax, eine vorläufig lizenzierte digitale Vermögensbörse, die Schließung ihrer Peer-to-Peer (P2P)-Handelsplattform ankündigte.
Pi App Studio 2026: Build Custom Apps and Integrate Pi Payments Easily
TLDR:
Pioneers can now build custom apps directly in Pi Browser without technical skills.
In-app Pi payments allow premium features and one-time purchases during single sessions.
Ad-supported deployment enables low-cost experimentation for creators with small balances.
Community feedback through surveys rewards users with Pi credits for app creation.
Pi App Studio is introducing new tools that enable users to build and run custom apps directly inside the Pi Browser. These updates focus on expanding access for creators, even without technical skills, and increasing Pi’s real-world utility.
The platform now supports interactive Pi payment integration, ad-supported deployment, and a community-wide creator event. Pioneers can provide feedback through a survey, earning Pi credits for app creation and experimentation.
Community Engagement and Creator Event
Pi Network is launching a creator event that encourages pioneers to explore the App Studio and provide feedback.
The Pi Core Team tweeted, “Build Your Own Custom App in Pi Browser! You can create and run custom apps directly inside the Pi Browser — start building powerful Pi Apps today and become part of the Pi ecosystem.” This reinforces the platform’s accessibility for new and non-technical creators.
Build Your Own Custom App in Pi Browser!
You can create and run custom apps directly inside the Pi Browser — but not in the Pi Desktop App
Start building powerful Pi Apps today and become part of the Pi ecosystem
Watch the full step-by-step tutorial on… pic.twitter.com/lQ0wxLKXY2
— Pi Core Team ᵖⁱ ⁿᵉᵗʷᵒʳᵏ (@PiCoreGroup) January 25, 2026
Users who complete the survey can share insights on useful apps and App Studio experiences. The first 10,000 qualified responses will receive five Pi credits, which can be used exclusively for app creation and customization. This initiative encourages experimentation while lowering the barriers to entry for new creators.
The survey also allows pioneers to highlight innovative app use cases or suggest improvements. Gathering structured feedback helps the Pi Core Team prioritize updates and optimize the platform for non-technical users. This iterative approach ensures that app development remains community-driven.
Pioneers are encouraged to showcase their creations within the Pi Browser, as full deployment and experimentation are supported there.
The event provides a clear pathway for creators to test ideas, refine apps, and explore monetization opportunities using Pi credits, while contributing to the growing Pi ecosystem.
Payment Integration and Ad-Supported Deployment
Pi App Studio now allows in-app Pi payments through a simple interactive setup, without requiring coding skills. According to the team, creators can integrate payments to enable premium features or one-time purchases, although payments currently apply only during a single session.
This lays the groundwork for future mainnet-enabled transactions. Pioneers must create a new custom app and include “Pi payment” in their prompt to activate the feature.
Another update introduces ad-supported deployment, designed to reduce costs for non-mainnet users or those with low Pi balances.
When an App Studio balance drops below 0.25 Pi, creators can deploy apps by watching ads. This encourages continuous testing and lowers financial barriers for experimentation.
The combination of in-app payments and ad-supported deployment allows creators to explore monetization models while maintaining low financial risk.
Pioneers can unlock premium functions, test interactive features, and gain practical experience in app management within the Pi ecosystem.
The Pi Core Team also emphasized community participation, noting that the updates are designed to empower creators, encourage experimentation, and foster real utility within Pi.
These enhancements mark a clear step toward making Pi App Studio a central hub for innovation and app development.
The post Pi App Studio 2026: Build Custom Apps and Integrate Pi Payments Easily appeared first on Blockonomi.
Pioneers can now build custom apps directly in Pi Browser without technical skills.
In-app Pi payments allow premium features and one-time purchases during single sessions.
Ad-supported deployment enables low-cost experimentation for creators with small balances.
Community feedback through surveys rewards users with Pi credits for app creation.
Pi App Studio is introducing new tools that enable users to build and run custom apps directly inside the Pi Browser. These updates focus on expanding access for creators, even without technical skills, and increasing Pi’s real-world utility.
The platform now supports interactive Pi payment integration, ad-supported deployment, and a community-wide creator event. Pioneers can provide feedback through a survey, earning Pi credits for app creation and experimentation.
Community Engagement and Creator Event
Pi Network is launching a creator event that encourages pioneers to explore the App Studio and provide feedback.
The Pi Core Team tweeted, “Build Your Own Custom App in Pi Browser! You can create and run custom apps directly inside the Pi Browser — start building powerful Pi Apps today and become part of the Pi ecosystem.” This reinforces the platform’s accessibility for new and non-technical creators.
Build Your Own Custom App in Pi Browser!
You can create and run custom apps directly inside the Pi Browser — but not in the Pi Desktop App
Start building powerful Pi Apps today and become part of the Pi ecosystem
Watch the full step-by-step tutorial on… pic.twitter.com/lQ0wxLKXY2
— Pi Core Team ᵖⁱ ⁿᵉᵗʷᵒʳᵏ (@PiCoreGroup) January 25, 2026
Users who complete the survey can share insights on useful apps and App Studio experiences. The first 10,000 qualified responses will receive five Pi credits, which can be used exclusively for app creation and customization. This initiative encourages experimentation while lowering the barriers to entry for new creators.
The survey also allows pioneers to highlight innovative app use cases or suggest improvements. Gathering structured feedback helps the Pi Core Team prioritize updates and optimize the platform for non-technical users. This iterative approach ensures that app development remains community-driven.
Pioneers are encouraged to showcase their creations within the Pi Browser, as full deployment and experimentation are supported there.
The event provides a clear pathway for creators to test ideas, refine apps, and explore monetization opportunities using Pi credits, while contributing to the growing Pi ecosystem.
Payment Integration and Ad-Supported Deployment
Pi App Studio now allows in-app Pi payments through a simple interactive setup, without requiring coding skills. According to the team, creators can integrate payments to enable premium features or one-time purchases, although payments currently apply only during a single session.
This lays the groundwork for future mainnet-enabled transactions. Pioneers must create a new custom app and include “Pi payment” in their prompt to activate the feature.
Another update introduces ad-supported deployment, designed to reduce costs for non-mainnet users or those with low Pi balances.
When an App Studio balance drops below 0.25 Pi, creators can deploy apps by watching ads. This encourages continuous testing and lowers financial barriers for experimentation.
The combination of in-app payments and ad-supported deployment allows creators to explore monetization models while maintaining low financial risk.
Pioneers can unlock premium functions, test interactive features, and gain practical experience in app management within the Pi ecosystem.
The Pi Core Team also emphasized community participation, noting that the updates are designed to empower creators, encourage experimentation, and foster real utility within Pi.
These enhancements mark a clear step toward making Pi App Studio a central hub for innovation and app development.
The post Pi App Studio 2026: Build Custom Apps and Integrate Pi Payments Easily appeared first on Blockonomi.
Eric Trump: Krypto wird in der Entwicklungsländer nötiger als in den USA
TLDR:
Eric Trump sagt, dass Entwicklungsländer mehr Krypto benötigen als die USA für den finanziellen Zugang.
Amerikanische Bitcoin-Minen nutzen kostengünstige Energie effizient in West Texas für globales Wachstum.
Staatsfonds übernehmen Bitcoin, um sich gegen Inflation und instabile Währungen abzusichern.
Die Krypto-Adoption nimmt in Asien zu, was die Finanzsysteme schneller, günstiger und transparenter macht.
Eric Trump sagte, dass Staatsfonds schnell in Krypto eintreten, aufgrund von Bedenken über instabile Währungen und veraltete Bankensysteme.
Eric Trump sagt, dass Entwicklungsländer mehr Krypto benötigen als die USA für den finanziellen Zugang.
Amerikanische Bitcoin-Minen nutzen kostengünstige Energie effizient in West Texas für globales Wachstum.
Staatsfonds übernehmen Bitcoin, um sich gegen Inflation und instabile Währungen abzusichern.
Die Krypto-Adoption nimmt in Asien zu, was die Finanzsysteme schneller, günstiger und transparenter macht.
Eric Trump sagte, dass Staatsfonds schnell in Krypto eintreten, aufgrund von Bedenken über instabile Währungen und veraltete Bankensysteme.
Fed plant Dollar-Yen-Bewegungen: Was das für Krypto bedeutet
TLDR:
Die Fed könnte Dollar verkaufen und Yen kaufen, ein seltener Schritt, der in diesem Jahrhundert nicht gesehen wurde.
Koordinierte US-Japan-Interventionen haben historisch gesehen die globale Liquidität und Vermögenswerte gesteigert.
Bitcoin hat eine starke inverse Korrelation zum Dollar und könnte langfristig profitieren.
Die Stärke des Yen stellt kurzfristige Risiken dar, aber die Schwäche des Dollars begünstigt das Wachstum von Krypto.
Die US-Notenbank Fed bereitet Berichten zufolge den Verkauf von Dollar und den Kauf von japanischen Yen vor, was einen seltenen Schritt darstellt, der in diesem Jahrhundert nicht gesehen wurde. Die New Yorker Fed hat Zinssatzprüfungen durchgeführt, ein wichtiger Schritt, der typischerweise einer Währungsintervention vorausgeht.
Die Fed könnte Dollar verkaufen und Yen kaufen, ein seltener Schritt, der in diesem Jahrhundert nicht gesehen wurde.
Koordinierte US-Japan-Interventionen haben historisch gesehen die globale Liquidität und Vermögenswerte gesteigert.
Bitcoin hat eine starke inverse Korrelation zum Dollar und könnte langfristig profitieren.
Die Stärke des Yen stellt kurzfristige Risiken dar, aber die Schwäche des Dollars begünstigt das Wachstum von Krypto.
Die US-Notenbank Fed bereitet Berichten zufolge den Verkauf von Dollar und den Kauf von japanischen Yen vor, was einen seltenen Schritt darstellt, der in diesem Jahrhundert nicht gesehen wurde. Die New Yorker Fed hat Zinssatzprüfungen durchgeführt, ein wichtiger Schritt, der typischerweise einer Währungsintervention vorausgeht.
Spekulation über die Partnerschaft zwischen Ripple und Ondo befeuert die institutionelle Ertragsnarrative auf dem XRP Ledger
TLDR:
Kommentare deuten darauf hin, dass RLUSD und Ondos USDY integriert werden könnten, um eine Ertragsnutzbarkeit auf dem XRP Ledger bereitzustellen.
Ripple Custody über Metaco wird als potenzieller Vertrauenslayer für Ondos tokenisierte Schatzamtsvermögen angesehen.
Die native Bereitstellung von Ondo-Produkten auf XRPL könnte kontinuierliche Minting- und Einlösungszyklen ermöglichen.
Technische Marktanalysen verknüpfen die Preisstruktur-Narrative von XRP mit den Erwartungen an ein wachsendes Ökosystem.
Die Diskussionen über die Partnerschaft zwischen Ripple und Ondo gewinnen an Aufmerksamkeit, da die Marktteilnehmer potenzielle Entwicklungen im Zusammenhang mit dem bevorstehenden Ondo-Gipfel bewerten.
Kommentare deuten darauf hin, dass RLUSD und Ondos USDY integriert werden könnten, um eine Ertragsnutzbarkeit auf dem XRP Ledger bereitzustellen.
Ripple Custody über Metaco wird als potenzieller Vertrauenslayer für Ondos tokenisierte Schatzamtsvermögen angesehen.
Die native Bereitstellung von Ondo-Produkten auf XRPL könnte kontinuierliche Minting- und Einlösungszyklen ermöglichen.
Technische Marktanalysen verknüpfen die Preisstruktur-Narrative von XRP mit den Erwartungen an ein wachsendes Ökosystem.
Die Diskussionen über die Partnerschaft zwischen Ripple und Ondo gewinnen an Aufmerksamkeit, da die Marktteilnehmer potenzielle Entwicklungen im Zusammenhang mit dem bevorstehenden Ondo-Gipfel bewerten.
Ethereum Holds $3,000 as Derivatives Liquidity Concentrates on Binance, Signaling Strategic Accum...
TLDR:
Ethereum’s stability near $3,000 shows the market absorbed deleveraging without forced liquidations.
Total ETH derivatives open interest fell to $16.9B, reflecting reduced leverage across exchanges.
Binance open interest remains elevated, indicating liquidity concentration on the deepest venue.
Analysts view the consolidation phase as long-term accumulation ahead of a major expansion move.
Ethereum has maintained stability around the $3,000 level while open interest across derivatives platforms undergoes a significant redistribution, revealing shifting trader behavior in the current market environment.
Market Positioning Reflects Strategic Accumulation Phase
Veteran analyst Scient from Crypto_Scient has identified Ethereum as presenting one of the strongest technical setups in the cryptocurrency sector.
The analyst outlined a long-term accumulation strategy targeting price levels between $1,900 and $2,000.
This approach centers on building positions during the current consolidation phase rather than pursuing short-term leveraged trades.
According to Scient’s assessment, the market appears to be experiencing a period of reduced liquidity and sideways movement.
$ETH
Arguably the best chart in the crypto market.
This year, my focus is on accumulating ETH on dips, ideally all the way down into the $1900–$2000 zone if the market gives the opportunity.
Markets might feel boring and illiquid right now, but once this phase ends, the next… pic.twitter.com/BTkgqUOego
— Scient (@Crypto_Scient) January 24, 2026
However, this phase typically precedes stronger expansionary moves. The timeframe for this thesis extends 12 to 18 months into the future.
Market participants should prepare for substantial upward momentum once the consolidation period concludes.
The analyst emphasized that current market conditions may feel uneventful to traders accustomed to high volatility. Yet the foundation being built during this time could support a rally surpassing previous cycles.
The comparison to traditional assets like metals suggests the anticipated move could exceed conventional market expectations.
Whether the current choppy trading environment persists for another month or extends six months remains uncertain.
Nonetheless, the technical structure supports an eventual bullish phase of considerable magnitude.
Derivatives Data Reveals Concentrated Liquidity on Binance
Recent analysis from Arab Chain highlights a notable divergence in Ethereum derivatives markets across different trading platforms.
Total open interest has declined to approximately $16.9 billion, marking the lowest reading since mid-December.
This reduction indicates traders have been unwinding leveraged positions across the broader derivatives ecosystem.
Binance data presents a contrasting picture with current open interest hovering around $7.5 billion. This figure exceeds the December average range of $6.8 to $7.4 billion.
The discrepancy between overall market trends and Binance-specific metrics points to a consolidation of trading activity.
Liquidity has not exited the derivatives market entirely but has migrated toward the exchange offering deeper order books.
Large traders appear to have reduced aggregate exposure while maintaining concentrated positions on the platform with superior pricing efficiency.
This behavior indicates sophisticated risk management rather than wholesale market abandonment.
Ethereum’s price stability near $3,000 throughout this deleveraging process demonstrates the market absorbed position closures without triggering cascading liquidations.
The absence of forced selling pressure suggests underlying demand remains robust. With Binance maintaining elevated open interest relative to December levels, an active derivatives base continues supporting potential directional moves.
The current market structure combines reduced overall leverage with concentrated liquidity on the primary exchange.
This configuration typically precedes periods of increased volatility once directional conviction returns to market participants.
The post Ethereum Holds $3,000 as Derivatives Liquidity Concentrates on Binance, Signaling Strategic Accumulation appeared first on Blockonomi.
Ethereum’s stability near $3,000 shows the market absorbed deleveraging without forced liquidations.
Total ETH derivatives open interest fell to $16.9B, reflecting reduced leverage across exchanges.
Binance open interest remains elevated, indicating liquidity concentration on the deepest venue.
Analysts view the consolidation phase as long-term accumulation ahead of a major expansion move.
Ethereum has maintained stability around the $3,000 level while open interest across derivatives platforms undergoes a significant redistribution, revealing shifting trader behavior in the current market environment.
Market Positioning Reflects Strategic Accumulation Phase
Veteran analyst Scient from Crypto_Scient has identified Ethereum as presenting one of the strongest technical setups in the cryptocurrency sector.
The analyst outlined a long-term accumulation strategy targeting price levels between $1,900 and $2,000.
This approach centers on building positions during the current consolidation phase rather than pursuing short-term leveraged trades.
According to Scient’s assessment, the market appears to be experiencing a period of reduced liquidity and sideways movement.
$ETH
Arguably the best chart in the crypto market.
This year, my focus is on accumulating ETH on dips, ideally all the way down into the $1900–$2000 zone if the market gives the opportunity.
Markets might feel boring and illiquid right now, but once this phase ends, the next… pic.twitter.com/BTkgqUOego
— Scient (@Crypto_Scient) January 24, 2026
However, this phase typically precedes stronger expansionary moves. The timeframe for this thesis extends 12 to 18 months into the future.
Market participants should prepare for substantial upward momentum once the consolidation period concludes.
The analyst emphasized that current market conditions may feel uneventful to traders accustomed to high volatility. Yet the foundation being built during this time could support a rally surpassing previous cycles.
The comparison to traditional assets like metals suggests the anticipated move could exceed conventional market expectations.
Whether the current choppy trading environment persists for another month or extends six months remains uncertain.
Nonetheless, the technical structure supports an eventual bullish phase of considerable magnitude.
Derivatives Data Reveals Concentrated Liquidity on Binance
Recent analysis from Arab Chain highlights a notable divergence in Ethereum derivatives markets across different trading platforms.
Total open interest has declined to approximately $16.9 billion, marking the lowest reading since mid-December.
This reduction indicates traders have been unwinding leveraged positions across the broader derivatives ecosystem.
Binance data presents a contrasting picture with current open interest hovering around $7.5 billion. This figure exceeds the December average range of $6.8 to $7.4 billion.
The discrepancy between overall market trends and Binance-specific metrics points to a consolidation of trading activity.
Liquidity has not exited the derivatives market entirely but has migrated toward the exchange offering deeper order books.
Large traders appear to have reduced aggregate exposure while maintaining concentrated positions on the platform with superior pricing efficiency.
This behavior indicates sophisticated risk management rather than wholesale market abandonment.
Ethereum’s price stability near $3,000 throughout this deleveraging process demonstrates the market absorbed position closures without triggering cascading liquidations.
The absence of forced selling pressure suggests underlying demand remains robust. With Binance maintaining elevated open interest relative to December levels, an active derivatives base continues supporting potential directional moves.
The current market structure combines reduced overall leverage with concentrated liquidity on the primary exchange.
This configuration typically precedes periods of increased volatility once directional conviction returns to market participants.
The post Ethereum Holds $3,000 as Derivatives Liquidity Concentrates on Binance, Signaling Strategic Accumulation appeared first on Blockonomi.
Analyst widerlegt den Mythos der Gold-Bitcoin-Korrelation und erklärt, warum die Rotationstheorie scheitert
TLDR:
Gold und Bitcoin zeigen keine stabile Korrelation über die Marktzyklen hinweg und bewegen sich oft unabhängig.
Gold fungiert als risikoarmer Vermögenswert, während Bitcoin als risikobehaftet agiert, getrieben von unterschiedlichen Faktoren.
Das Kapital rotiert nicht mechanisch von Gold zu Bitcoin, wenn die Edelmetalle ihren Höhepunkt erreichen, zeigen Daten.
Bitcoin-Rallyes erfordern eine Expansion der Liquidität, nicht nur eine Rotation weg von Gold oder anderen Vermögenswerten.
Die Beziehung zwischen Gold und Bitcoin sorgt weiterhin für Debatten unter Investoren, die Klarheit darüber suchen, wie diese Vermögenswerte interagieren.
Gold und Bitcoin zeigen keine stabile Korrelation über die Marktzyklen hinweg und bewegen sich oft unabhängig.
Gold fungiert als risikoarmer Vermögenswert, während Bitcoin als risikobehaftet agiert, getrieben von unterschiedlichen Faktoren.
Das Kapital rotiert nicht mechanisch von Gold zu Bitcoin, wenn die Edelmetalle ihren Höhepunkt erreichen, zeigen Daten.
Bitcoin-Rallyes erfordern eine Expansion der Liquidität, nicht nur eine Rotation weg von Gold oder anderen Vermögenswerten.
Die Beziehung zwischen Gold und Bitcoin sorgt weiterhin für Debatten unter Investoren, die Klarheit darüber suchen, wie diese Vermögenswerte interagieren.
Kolumbiens AFP Protección startet Bitcoin-Fonds für qualifizierte Pensionsinvestoren
TLDR:
AFP Protección verwaltet 55 Milliarden USD für 8,5 Millionen Kunden im Pensionsmarkt Kolumbiens.
Der Bitcoin-Fonds erfordert eine persönliche Beratung und zielt auf langfristige Diversifizierung ab, nicht auf Spekulation.
Der obligatorische Pensionsmarkt Kolumbiens erreichte 527,3 Billionen Pesos mit 48,8 % im Ausland investiert.
Protección folgt Skandia als zweitem großen Verwalter, der Bitcoin-Pensions-Exposure anbietet.
Der zweitgrößte Pensionsfondsverwalter Kolumbiens, AFP Protección, plant die Einführung eines Bitcoin-Exposure-Fonds, der sich auf langfristige Diversifizierung konzentriert.
AFP Protección verwaltet 55 Milliarden USD für 8,5 Millionen Kunden im Pensionsmarkt Kolumbiens.
Der Bitcoin-Fonds erfordert eine persönliche Beratung und zielt auf langfristige Diversifizierung ab, nicht auf Spekulation.
Der obligatorische Pensionsmarkt Kolumbiens erreichte 527,3 Billionen Pesos mit 48,8 % im Ausland investiert.
Protección folgt Skandia als zweitem großen Verwalter, der Bitcoin-Pensions-Exposure anbietet.
Der zweitgrößte Pensionsfondsverwalter Kolumbiens, AFP Protección, plant die Einführung eines Bitcoin-Exposure-Fonds, der sich auf langfristige Diversifizierung konzentriert.
Russia Bans WhiteBit Crypto Exchange Over Alleged $11M Ukraine Military Funding
TLDR:
Russia designated WhiteBit and parent company W Group as undesirable organizations under new ruling.
Exchange management allegedly transferred $11 million to Ukraine’s armed forces, including $0.9M for drone purchases.
WhiteBit accused of running gray schemes that enabled illegal withdrawal of funds from Russia’s borders.
Platform reportedly provides technical infrastructure support to United24’s cryptocurrency donation system.
WhiteBit, a prominent Ukrainian cryptocurrency exchange, has been classified as an undesirable organization by Russia’s Prosecutor General.
The designation extends to W Group, the exchange’s parent company, and all associated affiliates.
Russian authorities allege the platform facilitated illegal fund transfers from Russia and provided financial support to Ukraine’s military operations. The action represents another escalation in the ongoing tension between the two nations.
Exchange Accused of Facilitating Illegal Fund Transfers
Russia’s Prosecutor General’s Office claims WhiteBit enabled various unauthorized transactions through its platform. These activities allegedly included gray schemes designed to move money out of Russian territory.
The supervisory authority maintains that such operations violated current regulations governing financial transactions.
The designation affects not only WhiteBit but also encompasses W Group and its subsidiaries. Russian law enforcement believes the group’s websites served as channels for questionable financial activities.
Russia’s Prosecutor General has designated Ukrainian crypto exchange WhiteBit as an “undesirable organization,” alleging it was used to illegally move funds out of Russia and to finance Ukraine’s armed forces. The designation also covers WhiteBit’s parent company W Group and its…
— Wu Blockchain (@WuBlockchain) January 25, 2026
The platforms allegedly processed transactions that circumvented established legal frameworks. Such accusations form the basis of the undesirable organization classification.
WhiteBit began operations in 2018 under the leadership of Ukrainian entrepreneurs. The exchange has grown substantially since its inception.
Platform operators claim their user base exceeds 8 million individuals across various markets. Daily trading volumes reportedly reach $11 billion on spot markets and $40 billion on futures markets.
The exchange operates without registration in Russia under current cryptocurrency regulations. Russian authorities maintain that no crypto exchanges hold proper registration within their jurisdiction.
The Bank of Russia continues working on legislative amendments to regulate exchanges and crypto exchangers. These regulatory changes are expected to be finalized by July 1.
Alleged Military Support and Donation Platform Cooperation
Russian authorities assert WhiteBit’s management transferred approximately $11 million to Ukraine since 2022. The funds allegedly supported various military initiatives undertaken by Ukrainian forces.
Among these transfers, roughly $0.9 million reportedly went toward drone procurement. These claims form a central component of the Prosecutor General’s justification for the designation.
The Russian agency also highlighted WhiteBit’s partnership with Ukraine’s Ministry of Foreign Affairs. This cooperation allegedly involved technical assistance to the United24 fundraising platform.
United24 operates as a donation channel accepting cryptocurrency contributions for Ukrainian needs. The platform collects digital assets to support various national initiatives.
Law enforcement officials believe WhiteBit provides ongoing technical infrastructure support to United24. This arrangement enables the fundraising platform to process cryptocurrency donations efficiently.
The collaboration between the exchange and government-affiliated entities raised concerns among Russian authorities. Such connections contributed to the decision to label the organization as undesirable.
Starting July 1, 2027, the Central Bank of the Russian Federation plans to implement penalties for unauthorized cryptocurrency intermediary activities.
These measures aim to establish accountability for platforms operating outside regulatory frameworks.
The initiative reflects broader efforts to control cryptocurrency-related operations within Russian borders. Authorities continue developing comprehensive oversight mechanisms for the digital asset sector.
The post Russia Bans WhiteBit Crypto Exchange Over Alleged $11M Ukraine Military Funding appeared first on Blockonomi.
Russia designated WhiteBit and parent company W Group as undesirable organizations under new ruling.
Exchange management allegedly transferred $11 million to Ukraine’s armed forces, including $0.9M for drone purchases.
WhiteBit accused of running gray schemes that enabled illegal withdrawal of funds from Russia’s borders.
Platform reportedly provides technical infrastructure support to United24’s cryptocurrency donation system.
WhiteBit, a prominent Ukrainian cryptocurrency exchange, has been classified as an undesirable organization by Russia’s Prosecutor General.
The designation extends to W Group, the exchange’s parent company, and all associated affiliates.
Russian authorities allege the platform facilitated illegal fund transfers from Russia and provided financial support to Ukraine’s military operations. The action represents another escalation in the ongoing tension between the two nations.
Exchange Accused of Facilitating Illegal Fund Transfers
Russia’s Prosecutor General’s Office claims WhiteBit enabled various unauthorized transactions through its platform. These activities allegedly included gray schemes designed to move money out of Russian territory.
The supervisory authority maintains that such operations violated current regulations governing financial transactions.
The designation affects not only WhiteBit but also encompasses W Group and its subsidiaries. Russian law enforcement believes the group’s websites served as channels for questionable financial activities.
Russia’s Prosecutor General has designated Ukrainian crypto exchange WhiteBit as an “undesirable organization,” alleging it was used to illegally move funds out of Russia and to finance Ukraine’s armed forces. The designation also covers WhiteBit’s parent company W Group and its…
— Wu Blockchain (@WuBlockchain) January 25, 2026
The platforms allegedly processed transactions that circumvented established legal frameworks. Such accusations form the basis of the undesirable organization classification.
WhiteBit began operations in 2018 under the leadership of Ukrainian entrepreneurs. The exchange has grown substantially since its inception.
Platform operators claim their user base exceeds 8 million individuals across various markets. Daily trading volumes reportedly reach $11 billion on spot markets and $40 billion on futures markets.
The exchange operates without registration in Russia under current cryptocurrency regulations. Russian authorities maintain that no crypto exchanges hold proper registration within their jurisdiction.
The Bank of Russia continues working on legislative amendments to regulate exchanges and crypto exchangers. These regulatory changes are expected to be finalized by July 1.
Alleged Military Support and Donation Platform Cooperation
Russian authorities assert WhiteBit’s management transferred approximately $11 million to Ukraine since 2022. The funds allegedly supported various military initiatives undertaken by Ukrainian forces.
Among these transfers, roughly $0.9 million reportedly went toward drone procurement. These claims form a central component of the Prosecutor General’s justification for the designation.
The Russian agency also highlighted WhiteBit’s partnership with Ukraine’s Ministry of Foreign Affairs. This cooperation allegedly involved technical assistance to the United24 fundraising platform.
United24 operates as a donation channel accepting cryptocurrency contributions for Ukrainian needs. The platform collects digital assets to support various national initiatives.
Law enforcement officials believe WhiteBit provides ongoing technical infrastructure support to United24. This arrangement enables the fundraising platform to process cryptocurrency donations efficiently.
The collaboration between the exchange and government-affiliated entities raised concerns among Russian authorities. Such connections contributed to the decision to label the organization as undesirable.
Starting July 1, 2027, the Central Bank of the Russian Federation plans to implement penalties for unauthorized cryptocurrency intermediary activities.
These measures aim to establish accountability for platforms operating outside regulatory frameworks.
The initiative reflects broader efforts to control cryptocurrency-related operations within Russian borders. Authorities continue developing comprehensive oversight mechanisms for the digital asset sector.
The post Russia Bans WhiteBit Crypto Exchange Over Alleged $11M Ukraine Military Funding appeared first on Blockonomi.
Bitcoin Whales Scoop Up 104,000 BTC: What This Means for Price Action Ahead
TLDR:
Bitcoin whales holding 1,000+ BTC accumulated 104,340 coins, marking a 1.5% increase in whale holdings total.
Daily transactions exceeding $1 million reached two-month highs, signaling active whale repositioning.
Analysis shows Bitcoin performs independently from gold with no clear evidence of sustained rotation.
Whale accumulation during consolidation historically precedes volatility as supply tightens on exchanges.
Bitcoin’s largest holders have executed a significant accumulation spree, adding over 104,000 coins to their wallets in recent activity.
This strategic positioning by whales holding at least 1,000 BTC comes amid renewed debate about the cryptocurrency’s relationship with traditional assets like gold.
The accumulation represents a 1.5% increase in holdings among this influential cohort, raising questions about potential market movements ahead.
Major Holders Execute Strategic Accumulation
Wallets containing a minimum of 1,000 BTC have collectively accumulated 104,340 coins according to data from market intelligence platform Santiment.
This represents a notable shift in distribution as the largest holders increase their control over the circulating supply.
The accumulation pattern suggests coordinated confidence among institutional investors and high-net-worth participants who possess substantial market knowledge.
Large Bitcoin whales are accumulating at an encouraging pace, wallets with at least 1K $BTC have collectively accumulated 104,340 more coins (a +1.5% rise). Additionally, the amount of $1M+ daily transfers is back up to 2-month high levels.
Chart: https://t.co/CJOfiOBbWU pic.twitter.com/4loxDFtUdb
— Santiment (@santimentfeed) January 25, 2026
Transaction activity among major holders has surged to levels not witnessed in the past two months. Daily transfers exceeding $1 million have climbed back to these elevated thresholds, indicating active repositioning within the whale community.
This uptick in large-value movements typically signals preparation for potential volatility or strategic entries ahead of anticipated price action.
The timing of this accumulation phase deserves attention given current market conditions. Bitcoin has entered a consolidation period following recent price fluctuations, creating an environment where sophisticated investors often build positions with minimal market impact.
Whales have historically leveraged these quieter periods to accumulate without driving premiums.
What makes this accumulation particularly noteworthy is its scale and concentration. A 1.5% increase across the whale cohort translates to meaningful changes in available supply for other market participants.
Reduced liquidity on exchanges combined with growing whale holdings could amplify price movements when demand catalysts emerge.
Market Independence Challenges Rotation Theory
While whales accumulate Bitcoin aggressively, new research from analyst Darkfost challenges prevailing narratives about capital flowing from gold into digital assets.
Using 180-day moving averages as benchmarks, the analysis examined periods when Bitcoin outperformed gold and vice versa.
The results showed nearly equal distribution between positive and negative signals, contradicting expectations of sustained rotation.
Throughout this cycle, many have talked about a rotation of capital from gold into Bitcoin.
Well, those people are still waiting…
This chart illustrates periods where BTC outperforms or underperforms depending on gold’s trend.
It provides two signals :
Positive = BTC >… pic.twitter.com/nKWKUry9F7
— Darkfost (@Darkfost_Coc) January 24, 2026
The study reveals that Bitcoin continues evolving independently without clear evidence of systematic capital migration from precious metals.
Market participants anticipating a definitive shift from gold to Bitcoin have found limited support in the data. This independence suggests both assets serve distinct purposes within investment portfolios rather than competing directly for the same capital.
Even during periods when Bitcoin trades above its 180-day moving average while gold trades below, establishing causation remains problematic.
Multiple macroeconomic factors influence both assets simultaneously through different transmission mechanisms. Interest rate policies, currency fluctuations, and risk sentiment affect gold and Bitcoin via separate channels that rarely align perfectly.
The absence of clear correlation carries implications for understanding current whale accumulation. If Bitcoin operates independently from gold, the recent buying activity likely responds to cryptocurrency-specific catalysts rather than broader safe-haven rotation dynamics.
This could include anticipated regulatory developments, institutional adoption trends, or technical setup expectations unique to digital asset markets.
Looking ahead, the combination of whale accumulation and asset independence creates an uncertain outlook. On one hand, concentrated buying by informed participants historically precedes upward price pressure as supply tightens.
On the other hand, the lack of supportive rotation from traditional assets means Bitcoin must generate its own demand catalysts to justify higher valuations.
Market observers will monitor whether this accumulation represents conviction in near-term appreciation or simply opportunistic positioning during consolidation.
The post Bitcoin Whales Scoop Up 104,000 BTC: What This Means for Price Action Ahead appeared first on Blockonomi.
Bitcoin whales holding 1,000+ BTC accumulated 104,340 coins, marking a 1.5% increase in whale holdings total.
Daily transactions exceeding $1 million reached two-month highs, signaling active whale repositioning.
Analysis shows Bitcoin performs independently from gold with no clear evidence of sustained rotation.
Whale accumulation during consolidation historically precedes volatility as supply tightens on exchanges.
Bitcoin’s largest holders have executed a significant accumulation spree, adding over 104,000 coins to their wallets in recent activity.
This strategic positioning by whales holding at least 1,000 BTC comes amid renewed debate about the cryptocurrency’s relationship with traditional assets like gold.
The accumulation represents a 1.5% increase in holdings among this influential cohort, raising questions about potential market movements ahead.
Major Holders Execute Strategic Accumulation
Wallets containing a minimum of 1,000 BTC have collectively accumulated 104,340 coins according to data from market intelligence platform Santiment.
This represents a notable shift in distribution as the largest holders increase their control over the circulating supply.
The accumulation pattern suggests coordinated confidence among institutional investors and high-net-worth participants who possess substantial market knowledge.
Large Bitcoin whales are accumulating at an encouraging pace, wallets with at least 1K $BTC have collectively accumulated 104,340 more coins (a +1.5% rise). Additionally, the amount of $1M+ daily transfers is back up to 2-month high levels.
Chart: https://t.co/CJOfiOBbWU pic.twitter.com/4loxDFtUdb
— Santiment (@santimentfeed) January 25, 2026
Transaction activity among major holders has surged to levels not witnessed in the past two months. Daily transfers exceeding $1 million have climbed back to these elevated thresholds, indicating active repositioning within the whale community.
This uptick in large-value movements typically signals preparation for potential volatility or strategic entries ahead of anticipated price action.
The timing of this accumulation phase deserves attention given current market conditions. Bitcoin has entered a consolidation period following recent price fluctuations, creating an environment where sophisticated investors often build positions with minimal market impact.
Whales have historically leveraged these quieter periods to accumulate without driving premiums.
What makes this accumulation particularly noteworthy is its scale and concentration. A 1.5% increase across the whale cohort translates to meaningful changes in available supply for other market participants.
Reduced liquidity on exchanges combined with growing whale holdings could amplify price movements when demand catalysts emerge.
Market Independence Challenges Rotation Theory
While whales accumulate Bitcoin aggressively, new research from analyst Darkfost challenges prevailing narratives about capital flowing from gold into digital assets.
Using 180-day moving averages as benchmarks, the analysis examined periods when Bitcoin outperformed gold and vice versa.
The results showed nearly equal distribution between positive and negative signals, contradicting expectations of sustained rotation.
Throughout this cycle, many have talked about a rotation of capital from gold into Bitcoin.
Well, those people are still waiting…
This chart illustrates periods where BTC outperforms or underperforms depending on gold’s trend.
It provides two signals :
Positive = BTC >… pic.twitter.com/nKWKUry9F7
— Darkfost (@Darkfost_Coc) January 24, 2026
The study reveals that Bitcoin continues evolving independently without clear evidence of systematic capital migration from precious metals.
Market participants anticipating a definitive shift from gold to Bitcoin have found limited support in the data. This independence suggests both assets serve distinct purposes within investment portfolios rather than competing directly for the same capital.
Even during periods when Bitcoin trades above its 180-day moving average while gold trades below, establishing causation remains problematic.
Multiple macroeconomic factors influence both assets simultaneously through different transmission mechanisms. Interest rate policies, currency fluctuations, and risk sentiment affect gold and Bitcoin via separate channels that rarely align perfectly.
The absence of clear correlation carries implications for understanding current whale accumulation. If Bitcoin operates independently from gold, the recent buying activity likely responds to cryptocurrency-specific catalysts rather than broader safe-haven rotation dynamics.
This could include anticipated regulatory developments, institutional adoption trends, or technical setup expectations unique to digital asset markets.
Looking ahead, the combination of whale accumulation and asset independence creates an uncertain outlook. On one hand, concentrated buying by informed participants historically precedes upward price pressure as supply tightens.
On the other hand, the lack of supportive rotation from traditional assets means Bitcoin must generate its own demand catalysts to justify higher valuations.
Market observers will monitor whether this accumulation represents conviction in near-term appreciation or simply opportunistic positioning during consolidation.
The post Bitcoin Whales Scoop Up 104,000 BTC: What This Means for Price Action Ahead appeared first on Blockonomi.
BlackRocks RWA-Vorstoß signalisiert die Strategie zur Tokenisierung von US-Aktien angesichts einer Schuldenkrise von 36 Billionen Dollar
TLDR:
Die Tokenisierung von 68 Billionen Dollar in US-Aktien könnte die Nachfrage nach Stablecoins steigern und den Druck auf die Bundesverschuldung absorbieren.
Das Mar-a-Lago-Abkommen scheiterte, als Schweden, Dänemark und Indien die Staatsanleihenbestände amid globaler Veränderungen reduzierten.
BlackRocks RWA-Erweiterung stimmt mit den strategischen Interessen der USA über wirtschaftliche Überlegungen hinaus überein.
Ethereum wird als globale Kapitalabrechnungsschicht positioniert, die durch geopolitische Bedürfnisse der Bilanz getrieben wird.
Die Tokenisierung von US-Aktien durch reale Vermögenswerte hat sich zur vielversprechendsten Strategie entwickelt, um der zunehmenden Schuldenkrise Amerikas zu begegnen. Marktbeobachter weisen auf BlackRocks aggressive Expansion in RWA als Beweis für diesen strategischen Wandel hin.
Die Tokenisierung von 68 Billionen Dollar in US-Aktien könnte die Nachfrage nach Stablecoins steigern und den Druck auf die Bundesverschuldung absorbieren.
Das Mar-a-Lago-Abkommen scheiterte, als Schweden, Dänemark und Indien die Staatsanleihenbestände amid globaler Veränderungen reduzierten.
BlackRocks RWA-Erweiterung stimmt mit den strategischen Interessen der USA über wirtschaftliche Überlegungen hinaus überein.
Ethereum wird als globale Kapitalabrechnungsschicht positioniert, die durch geopolitische Bedürfnisse der Bilanz getrieben wird.
Die Tokenisierung von US-Aktien durch reale Vermögenswerte hat sich zur vielversprechendsten Strategie entwickelt, um der zunehmenden Schuldenkrise Amerikas zu begegnen. Marktbeobachter weisen auf BlackRocks aggressive Expansion in RWA als Beweis für diesen strategischen Wandel hin.
Quantum Computing Timeline Misconceptions Drive Premature Blockchain Security Response, Says A16z...
TLDR:
Cryptographically relevant quantum computers are unlikely before 2030 despite corporate claims of imminent breakthroughs.
Harvest-now-decrypt-later attacks demand immediate post-quantum encryption deployment for long-term confidentiality.
Digital signatures and zkSNARKs lack the harvest-now-decrypt-later vulnerability, allowing deliberate migration timelines.
Bitcoin faces unique governance and abandoned coin challenges requiring early planning independent of the quantum timeline.
Quantum computing poses distinct risks to different cryptographic systems with varying urgency levels, according to recent analysis from a16z crypto.
Encryption faces immediate harvest-now-decrypt-later attacks requiring swift post-quantum deployment despite performance costs.
Digital signatures and zero-knowledge proofs lack this vulnerability, allowing deliberate migration timelines. Misconceptions about quantum threat proximity distort security priorities across blockchain networks.
Cryptographically Relevant Quantum Computers Remain a Distant Reality
Public progress toward cryptographically relevant quantum computers contradicts claims of imminent arrival before 2030.
No current platform across trapped ions, superconducting qubits, or neutral atom systems approaches the hundreds of thousands of physical qubits required for running Shor’s algorithm against RSA-2048 or secp256k1.
Systems exceeding 1,000 physical qubits lack the gate fidelities and qubit connectivity necessary for cryptographically relevant computation.
A16z Crypto’s analysis addresses widespread confusion stemming from corporate announcements and media coverage. The firm noted that “timelines to a cryptographically relevant quantum computer are frequently overstated—leading to calls for urgent, wholesale transitions to post-quantum cryptography.”
https://t.co/Xb0vvVVUvm
— a16z crypto (@a16zcrypto) January 24, 2026
Quantum error correction demonstrations remain limited to a handful of logical qubits. Cryptanalysis requires thousands of high-fidelity, fault-tolerant logical qubits with sustained error-corrected circuit depth.
Companies stretching terminology around logical qubits create false perceptions of advancement. Recent claims of 48 logical qubits using distance-2 codes with only two physical qubits per logical qubit misrepresent capabilities.
Distance-2 codes detect errors without correcting them. Real fault-tolerant logical qubits demand hundreds to thousands of physical qubits each.
Many roadmaps reference logical qubits supporting only Clifford operations, which classical computers can efficiently simulate and cannot run Shor’s algorithm.
Harvest-Now-Decrypt-Later Attacks Drive Encryption Migration Urgency
Nation-state adversaries currently archive encrypted communications for future decryption when quantum computers exist.
This reality necessitates immediate post-quantum encryption deployment for data requiring long-term confidentiality spanning 10 to 50 years.
Chrome, Cloudflare, Apple’s iMessage, and Signal have deployed hybrid post-quantum encryption combining ML-KEM with classical schemes like X25519.
The analysis distinguished between encryption and signature vulnerabilities. A16z crypto explained that “post-quantum encryption demands immediate deployment despite its costs: harvest-now-decrypt-later attacks are already underway.”
Digital signatures operate under different threat parameters than encryption systems. Past signatures generated before a quantum computer cannot be forged, regardless of future cryptanalysis capabilities.
Zero-knowledge proofs maintain post-quantum security for their zero-knowledge property even when using elliptic curve cryptography. No confidential information exists to harvest for later decryption.
Any zkSNARK proof generated before cryptographically relevant quantum computer emergence remains trustworthy. Only after quantum computer arrival can attackers construct convincing proofs of false statements. This timeline removes the harvest-now-decrypt-later vulnerability from zkSNARK systems.
Bitcoin Faces Unique Migration Challenges Beyond Quantum Timeline
Bitcoin’s governance speed and abandoned coin problem create urgency independent of quantum computing progress. Protocol changes proceed slowly with contentious issues risking damaging hard forks.
Active migration requirements mean abandoned quantum-vulnerable coins cannot receive protection. Estimates place potentially abandoned quantum-vulnerable BTC in the millions worth hundreds of billions at current prices.
The research emphasized Bitcoin’s special circumstances requiring early planning. A16z crypto stated that “the real challenge in navigating a successful migration to post-quantum cryptography is matching urgency to actual threats.”
Quantum attacks will target individual public keys sequentially rather than breaking all encryption simultaneously. Early quantum attacks will be expensive and slow.
Low transaction throughput compounds Bitcoin’s migration challenges. Migrating all quantum-vulnerable funds to post-quantum addresses requires months at current transaction rates.
The community must resolve governance, coordination, and technical logistics before a quantum computers. Other blockchains face quantum-vulnerable fund challenges, but Bitcoin’s earliest transactions using pay-to-public-key outputs create exceptional exposure combined with age, value concentration, and governance rigidity.
The post Quantum Computing Timeline Misconceptions Drive Premature Blockchain Security Response, Says A16z Crypto appeared first on Blockonomi.
Cryptographically relevant quantum computers are unlikely before 2030 despite corporate claims of imminent breakthroughs.
Harvest-now-decrypt-later attacks demand immediate post-quantum encryption deployment for long-term confidentiality.
Digital signatures and zkSNARKs lack the harvest-now-decrypt-later vulnerability, allowing deliberate migration timelines.
Bitcoin faces unique governance and abandoned coin challenges requiring early planning independent of the quantum timeline.
Quantum computing poses distinct risks to different cryptographic systems with varying urgency levels, according to recent analysis from a16z crypto.
Encryption faces immediate harvest-now-decrypt-later attacks requiring swift post-quantum deployment despite performance costs.
Digital signatures and zero-knowledge proofs lack this vulnerability, allowing deliberate migration timelines. Misconceptions about quantum threat proximity distort security priorities across blockchain networks.
Cryptographically Relevant Quantum Computers Remain a Distant Reality
Public progress toward cryptographically relevant quantum computers contradicts claims of imminent arrival before 2030.
No current platform across trapped ions, superconducting qubits, or neutral atom systems approaches the hundreds of thousands of physical qubits required for running Shor’s algorithm against RSA-2048 or secp256k1.
Systems exceeding 1,000 physical qubits lack the gate fidelities and qubit connectivity necessary for cryptographically relevant computation.
A16z Crypto’s analysis addresses widespread confusion stemming from corporate announcements and media coverage. The firm noted that “timelines to a cryptographically relevant quantum computer are frequently overstated—leading to calls for urgent, wholesale transitions to post-quantum cryptography.”
https://t.co/Xb0vvVVUvm
— a16z crypto (@a16zcrypto) January 24, 2026
Quantum error correction demonstrations remain limited to a handful of logical qubits. Cryptanalysis requires thousands of high-fidelity, fault-tolerant logical qubits with sustained error-corrected circuit depth.
Companies stretching terminology around logical qubits create false perceptions of advancement. Recent claims of 48 logical qubits using distance-2 codes with only two physical qubits per logical qubit misrepresent capabilities.
Distance-2 codes detect errors without correcting them. Real fault-tolerant logical qubits demand hundreds to thousands of physical qubits each.
Many roadmaps reference logical qubits supporting only Clifford operations, which classical computers can efficiently simulate and cannot run Shor’s algorithm.
Harvest-Now-Decrypt-Later Attacks Drive Encryption Migration Urgency
Nation-state adversaries currently archive encrypted communications for future decryption when quantum computers exist.
This reality necessitates immediate post-quantum encryption deployment for data requiring long-term confidentiality spanning 10 to 50 years.
Chrome, Cloudflare, Apple’s iMessage, and Signal have deployed hybrid post-quantum encryption combining ML-KEM with classical schemes like X25519.
The analysis distinguished between encryption and signature vulnerabilities. A16z crypto explained that “post-quantum encryption demands immediate deployment despite its costs: harvest-now-decrypt-later attacks are already underway.”
Digital signatures operate under different threat parameters than encryption systems. Past signatures generated before a quantum computer cannot be forged, regardless of future cryptanalysis capabilities.
Zero-knowledge proofs maintain post-quantum security for their zero-knowledge property even when using elliptic curve cryptography. No confidential information exists to harvest for later decryption.
Any zkSNARK proof generated before cryptographically relevant quantum computer emergence remains trustworthy. Only after quantum computer arrival can attackers construct convincing proofs of false statements. This timeline removes the harvest-now-decrypt-later vulnerability from zkSNARK systems.
Bitcoin Faces Unique Migration Challenges Beyond Quantum Timeline
Bitcoin’s governance speed and abandoned coin problem create urgency independent of quantum computing progress. Protocol changes proceed slowly with contentious issues risking damaging hard forks.
Active migration requirements mean abandoned quantum-vulnerable coins cannot receive protection. Estimates place potentially abandoned quantum-vulnerable BTC in the millions worth hundreds of billions at current prices.
The research emphasized Bitcoin’s special circumstances requiring early planning. A16z crypto stated that “the real challenge in navigating a successful migration to post-quantum cryptography is matching urgency to actual threats.”
Quantum attacks will target individual public keys sequentially rather than breaking all encryption simultaneously. Early quantum attacks will be expensive and slow.
Low transaction throughput compounds Bitcoin’s migration challenges. Migrating all quantum-vulnerable funds to post-quantum addresses requires months at current transaction rates.
The community must resolve governance, coordination, and technical logistics before a quantum computers. Other blockchains face quantum-vulnerable fund challenges, but Bitcoin’s earliest transactions using pay-to-public-key outputs create exceptional exposure combined with age, value concentration, and governance rigidity.
The post Quantum Computing Timeline Misconceptions Drive Premature Blockchain Security Response, Says A16z Crypto appeared first on Blockonomi.
Melde dich an, um weitere Inhalte zu entdecken