Why is nobody talking about creators getting paid on volume instead of by dumping the chart?
You have probably watched a launch bleed out the moment the wallet behind it started selling, or sat in $BTC because you could not tell whether the person promoting the coin was ever on your side.
Here is the actual split. Every trade carries a 1% fee, and 40% of that fee goes to the creator's wallet automatically, both while price is still moving on the curve and after liquidity sits in the pool. There is no claim step and no announcement when it hits. The stream just runs.
That is a different incentive than the usual story. A creator who wants the fee keeps caring about volume, and volume needs people willing to trade both ways, including into $USDT when they take profit. It does not make a bad launch good, and it does not stop someone from selling a bag. It does mean the quiet paycheck is tied to activity on $BNB rather than to one violent exit.
Where do you think this goes from here, alignment or just a nicer looking rug?
#BNB #DeFi #Crypto
You have probably watched a launch bleed out the moment the wallet behind it started selling, or sat in $BTC because you could not tell whether the person promoting the coin was ever on your side.
Here is the actual split. Every trade carries a 1% fee, and 40% of that fee goes to the creator's wallet automatically, both while price is still moving on the curve and after liquidity sits in the pool. There is no claim step and no announcement when it hits. The stream just runs.
That is a different incentive than the usual story. A creator who wants the fee keeps caring about volume, and volume needs people willing to trade both ways, including into $USDT when they take profit. It does not make a bad launch good, and it does not stop someone from selling a bag. It does mean the quiet paycheck is tied to activity on $BNB rather than to one violent exit.
Where do you think this goes from here, alignment or just a nicer looking rug?
#BNB #DeFi #Crypto
