๐‡๐จ๐ฐ ๐ญ๐จ ๐ซ๐ž๐š๐ ๐ญ๐จ๐ค๐ž๐ง ๐ฌ๐ž๐œ๐ฎ๐ซ๐ข๐ญ๐ฒ ๐ฐ๐š๐ซ๐ง๐ข๐ง๐ ๐ฌ ๐จ๐ง ๐š ๐ƒ๐„๐— .

A token warning isn't an investment rating.

It's a signal telling you what to investigate next.

STON.fi provides a useful real-world example ๐Ÿ‘‡

1๏ธโƒฃ Fake

A token may imitate another token by copying its name, symbol, or identity.

โ†’ Verify the contract address using the project's official sources.

2๏ธโƒฃ Honeypot

A token may be purchasable but have restrictions that prevent normal selling.

โ†’ Investigate the token's transfer and selling mechanics.

3๏ธโƒฃ Taxable

The token includes an additional fee mechanism on swaps or transfers.

โ†’ Check how the tax works and how it affects the amount you receive.

4๏ธโƒฃ Suspicious

The token raises concerns that require additional attention.

โ†’ Research the project, branding, documentation, contract, and activity.

5๏ธโƒฃ DMCA Notice

STON.fi uses this label for tokens associated with an intellectual-property complaint.

โ†’ Understand what the notice concerns and investigate the token's legitimacy and authorization.

The important part:

A warning isn't automatically a verdict.

And no warning doesn't mean zero risk.

Interface labels are based on detectable signals and documented inputs. They can't identify every possible problem with a token.

So when you see a warning:

๐–๐š๐ซ๐ง๐ข๐ง๐  โ†’ ๐ˆ๐ง๐ฏ๐ž๐ฌ๐ญ๐ข๐ ๐š๐ญ๐ž โ†’ ๐•๐ž๐ซ๐ข๐Ÿ๐ฒ โ†’ ๐”๐ง๐๐ž๐ซ๐ฌ๐ญ๐š๐ง๐

Before signing a transaction, make sure you know what you're interacting with.

That screenshot of STON.fi's Fake label is a perfect example of why the label should be treated as a starting point for verificationโ€”not the end of your research.