I kept coming back to one detail while reading through Dusk’s docs: privacy here doesn’t seem to mean making everything invisible.
The idea of selective disclosure is what caught my attention.
You can have information that stays private, while still proving something specific when it actually needs to be verified. That feels much closer to how financial systems work in the real world.
The more I looked at the architecture, the more I wondered whether this is the harder problem Dusk is actually trying to solve.
Not “how do we hide transactions?”
But “how do we keep sensitive information private without making the whole system impossible to verify?”
I don’t have a neat answer to that yet. I just found the distinction more interesting than the usual privacy-chain narrative.
$DUSK @Dusk
#dusk
The idea of selective disclosure is what caught my attention.
You can have information that stays private, while still proving something specific when it actually needs to be verified. That feels much closer to how financial systems work in the real world.
The more I looked at the architecture, the more I wondered whether this is the harder problem Dusk is actually trying to solve.
Not “how do we hide transactions?”
But “how do we keep sensitive information private without making the whole system impossible to verify?”
I don’t have a neat answer to that yet. I just found the distinction more interesting than the usual privacy-chain narrative.
$DUSK @Dusk
#dusk
