I have started treating P2P evidence like luggage.
more is not automatically better.
honestly... i only care whether the right pieces are there when i need them.
imagine a 27,450,000 VNĐ Binance P2P Order.
before trading, i check the counterparty profile, completion rate, payment details and account name.
if i am selling, i verify the actual 27,450,000 VNĐ in my own bank account before Release.
then i keep the Order ID, payment confirmation and relevant chat history.
that part is easy.
the harder question comes when Binance Support asks for additional evidence.
what exactly proves this Order?
that is how i think about a bank transaction record now.
the useful details are the ones that connect the banking activity to the P2P trade: the relevant date, amount and transaction information requested for verification.
everything unrelated to that specific request?
i do not assume Support needs it.
i follow the instructions given through the official Binance channel and provide the evidence actually requested.
that feels obvious...
until one document contains months of unrelated financial activity beside the single transaction that matters.
so i keep my records organized from the beginning.
one Order.
one payment trail.
one relevant conversation.
if something becomes inconsistent, i keep everything inside Binance P2P and use Appeal or Binance Support instead of sending documents through unofficial routes.
my personal view is simple: good evidence is not the biggest file you can produce.
it is the clearest connection between what the Order says and what actually happened.
@Binance Vietnam #BinanceP2PAnToan
when you save P2P records, do you collect everything... or only what would actually help verify the Order later?