The more I look at tokenization, the more I think we’re asking the wrong question.
Everyone asks: “Can this asset be put onchain?”
But imagine the asset is already there.
Now an investor wants to buy it. Another wants to sell it. The issuer needs to enforce who can hold it. A regulator may need evidence later. And somewhere in between, sensitive information still shouldn’t become public data.
That’s the interesting part of @Dusk_Foundation for me. Its market infrastructure is being designed around the whole workflow — eligibility, controlled transfers, privacy, disclosure and settlement — rather than treating a token as the finished product.
Maybe the real breakthrough in RWA won’t be creating more tokens.
Maybe it will be making those tokens actually behave like financial assets.
What part of that workflow do you think is hardest to solve?
$DUSK #dusk @Dusk
Everyone asks: “Can this asset be put onchain?”
But imagine the asset is already there.
Now an investor wants to buy it. Another wants to sell it. The issuer needs to enforce who can hold it. A regulator may need evidence later. And somewhere in between, sensitive information still shouldn’t become public data.
That’s the interesting part of @Dusk_Foundation for me. Its market infrastructure is being designed around the whole workflow — eligibility, controlled transfers, privacy, disclosure and settlement — rather than treating a token as the finished product.
Maybe the real breakthrough in RWA won’t be creating more tokens.
Maybe it will be making those tokens actually behave like financial assets.
What part of that workflow do you think is hardest to solve?
$DUSK #dusk @Dusk