THE MONEY REACHED THE RIGHT SELLER.
THE PROBLEM WAS THAT IT WENT TO THE BANK ACCOUNT FROM THE LAST TRADE.
This is a P2P mistake I think repeat buyers can overlook very easily.
Imagine I’ve traded with the same merchant before.
Their old bank beneficiary is still saved in my banking app.
Today I open another Binance P2P order with the same merchant.
The profile looks familiar.
The terms look fine.
The order amount is 18,735,000 VND.
Instead of copying the payment details from the new order, I tap the saved beneficiary from the previous trade and send 18,735,000 VND.
The seller receives it.
So now several things look completely right:
Right merchant.
Right amount.
Real money in the seller’s bank account.
But the current Binance P2P order shows a different payment account.
That changes the question.
It is no longer simply:
“Did the seller receive my money?”
They did.
The question becomes:
“Did I make the payment according to the payment information of this order?”
Those are not always the same thing.
This is why, before transferring, I don’t want to rely on a familiar name in my banking app just because I’ve traded with that person before.
I want the beneficiary I’m paying today to match the payment details shown in the active order today.
If the mistake has already happened, I would not move the conversation to Telegram, create another private arrangement, or assume that because the seller received the money they should simply release the crypto.
I would keep the current order, chat, bank record and Order ID together and use the Binance P2P Appeal/Support process to resolve the mismatch.
Escrow protects the crypto while the active order is being handled, but it cannot make an old bank beneficiary become the payment account written in a new order.
That is what makes this mistake easy to miss:
nothing has to look fake.
The person can be right.
The money can be right.
And the payment can still belong to the wrong set of instructions.
#binancep2pantoan @Binance Vietnam
THE PROBLEM WAS THAT IT WENT TO THE BANK ACCOUNT FROM THE LAST TRADE.
This is a P2P mistake I think repeat buyers can overlook very easily.
Imagine I’ve traded with the same merchant before.
Their old bank beneficiary is still saved in my banking app.
Today I open another Binance P2P order with the same merchant.
The profile looks familiar.
The terms look fine.
The order amount is 18,735,000 VND.
Instead of copying the payment details from the new order, I tap the saved beneficiary from the previous trade and send 18,735,000 VND.
The seller receives it.
So now several things look completely right:
Right merchant.
Right amount.
Real money in the seller’s bank account.
But the current Binance P2P order shows a different payment account.
That changes the question.
It is no longer simply:
“Did the seller receive my money?”
They did.
The question becomes:
“Did I make the payment according to the payment information of this order?”
Those are not always the same thing.
This is why, before transferring, I don’t want to rely on a familiar name in my banking app just because I’ve traded with that person before.
I want the beneficiary I’m paying today to match the payment details shown in the active order today.
If the mistake has already happened, I would not move the conversation to Telegram, create another private arrangement, or assume that because the seller received the money they should simply release the crypto.
I would keep the current order, chat, bank record and Order ID together and use the Binance P2P Appeal/Support process to resolve the mismatch.
Escrow protects the crypto while the active order is being handled, but it cannot make an old bank beneficiary become the payment account written in a new order.
That is what makes this mistake easy to miss:
nothing has to look fake.
The person can be right.
The money can be right.
And the payment can still belong to the wrong set of instructions.
#binancep2pantoan @Binance Vietnam