Why I Don’t Read Bitcoin Dominance the Way I Used To Whenever $BTC dominance starts climbing, the usual conclusion is that investors are abandoning altcoins and moving back into Bitcoin. Sometimes that's exactly what's happening, but dominance is a ratio, which makes the story more complicated. It can rise because Bitcoin is performing well, because altcoins are falling faster, or simply because capital is behaving very differently across different parts of the market. Stablecoins make the picture even more interesting. A trader moving from an altcoin into USDT has reduced their crypto risk without buying a single satoshi, yet changes elsewhere in the market can still affect how Bitcoin dominance looks. The same percentage on a chart can therefore represent very different market environments depending on what's happening to total market capitalization and stablecoin supply. That's why I think dominance becomes much more useful when you stop treating it as a standalone bullish or bearish signal. I usually want to know whether Bitcoin's market cap is actually expanding, what ETH and larger altcoins are doing, and whether money is entering crypto or simply rotating between assets already inside it. $BTC dominance tells you who is gaining share; it doesn't necessarily tell you where the money came from. #BTC Price Analysis# #Bitcoin Price Prediction: What is Bitcoins next move?#