There was a time when a trading partner suggested that we continue our conversation on another application because they thought it would be more convenient. At that moment, I also thought: it is just a matter of where we communicate; the transaction can still be completed as usual.
But then I asked myself: if the order has already been created on Binance P2P, why should I move an important part of the transaction outside that very order? When information is scattered across different places, it will certainly become more difficult to keep track of the entire process.
I decided to keep the conversation within the order chat and only rely on information relevant to the active transaction. This gave me a clearer record of the entire communication process in case I needed to review it later.
I also realized that “trading off-platform” is not simply a matter of convenience. When both parties start making separate arrangements outside the order, that information may no longer remain within the context of the original transaction.
The fact that someone wants to continue communicating through another channel does not automatically prove that they have bad intentions. However, I also have no reason to leave the official trading environment when the platform already provides tools for communication and order processing.
The lesson I take away is: the less fragmented my information is, the easier it is for me to stay in control of the transaction. In P2P trading, convenience only matters when it does not reduce my ability to verify the transaction and protect myself.
#binancep2pantoan @Binance Vietnam $TUT $BLUAI $BTC
But then I asked myself: if the order has already been created on Binance P2P, why should I move an important part of the transaction outside that very order? When information is scattered across different places, it will certainly become more difficult to keep track of the entire process.
I decided to keep the conversation within the order chat and only rely on information relevant to the active transaction. This gave me a clearer record of the entire communication process in case I needed to review it later.
I also realized that “trading off-platform” is not simply a matter of convenience. When both parties start making separate arrangements outside the order, that information may no longer remain within the context of the original transaction.
The fact that someone wants to continue communicating through another channel does not automatically prove that they have bad intentions. However, I also have no reason to leave the official trading environment when the platform already provides tools for communication and order processing.
The lesson I take away is: the less fragmented my information is, the easier it is for me to stay in control of the transaction. In P2P trading, convenience only matters when it does not reduce my ability to verify the transaction and protect myself.
#binancep2pantoan @Binance Vietnam $TUT $BLUAI $BTC