Bridge hacks have cost DeFi users billions, Yet 95% of traders still use lock-and-mint bridges
Let me to introduce you to how HTLCs + RFQs work and why its the best👇
The Problem with Traditional Bridges When you use a normal bridge is that when you lock Asset A in a pool and receive a wrapped version of Asset B. You are taking on 3 major risks
- Smart contract pool exploits
- Wrapped token de-pegging
- High slippage during slow confirmations
As a result, here are The 3 Core Execution Models To fix this.
> Atomic Swaps which are P2P & trustless, but matching is painfully slow
> HTLCs: Smart contracts that auto-refund if a trade fails.
> RFQ: Market makers compete to give you firm, zero-drift quotes.
Here’s why the Hybrid Model (RFQ + HTLC) is better
- Independent RFQ is fast, but needs bulletproof settlement.
- Independent HTLC is secure, but lacks liquid matching.
So to have a perfect solution, it needs to be Combined so we can have👇
- Institutional-grade pricing (via RFQ resolvers)
- Cryptographic safety guarantees (via HTLCs)
STONfi’s Omniston Executes this perfectly.
Omniston (built by STONfi) uses this exact architecture such that when traders sign a quote request, Resolvers compete to give you the best rate.
Paired HTLCs lock assets on both chains simultaneously then the swap completes natively without any wrapped tokens involved.
- [The "Zero Loss" Guarantee]
Under a paired HTLC flow, there are only 3 possible outcomes. Both parties get their quoted tokens.
If the Resolver fails → You get automatically refunded.
Secret isn't revealed → Resolver gets refunded.
There is NO scenario where your funds vanish
Native atomic swaps via resolver-based HTLCs are becoming the industry standard for a reason and you can get that while trading with STONfi OMNIston feature.
You’re welcome —-> app.ston.fi
$GRAM #crosschain
Let me to introduce you to how HTLCs + RFQs work and why its the best👇
The Problem with Traditional Bridges When you use a normal bridge is that when you lock Asset A in a pool and receive a wrapped version of Asset B. You are taking on 3 major risks
- Smart contract pool exploits
- Wrapped token de-pegging
- High slippage during slow confirmations
As a result, here are The 3 Core Execution Models To fix this.
> Atomic Swaps which are P2P & trustless, but matching is painfully slow
> HTLCs: Smart contracts that auto-refund if a trade fails.
> RFQ: Market makers compete to give you firm, zero-drift quotes.
Here’s why the Hybrid Model (RFQ + HTLC) is better
- Independent RFQ is fast, but needs bulletproof settlement.
- Independent HTLC is secure, but lacks liquid matching.
So to have a perfect solution, it needs to be Combined so we can have👇
- Institutional-grade pricing (via RFQ resolvers)
- Cryptographic safety guarantees (via HTLCs)
STONfi’s Omniston Executes this perfectly.
Omniston (built by STONfi) uses this exact architecture such that when traders sign a quote request, Resolvers compete to give you the best rate.
Paired HTLCs lock assets on both chains simultaneously then the swap completes natively without any wrapped tokens involved.
- [The "Zero Loss" Guarantee]
Under a paired HTLC flow, there are only 3 possible outcomes. Both parties get their quoted tokens.
If the Resolver fails → You get automatically refunded.
Secret isn't revealed → Resolver gets refunded.
There is NO scenario where your funds vanish
Native atomic swaps via resolver-based HTLCs are becoming the industry standard for a reason and you can get that while trading with STONfi OMNIston feature.
You’re welcome —-> app.ston.fi
$GRAM #crosschain