SP Cryptozone

🚨 TARIFFS AFFECT THE LITTLE GUY — EXEMPTIONS BENEFIT THE POWERFUL 🚨
The rationale for implementing tariffs is usually well-known:

"Reinforcing domestic production and securing the workforce are the primary goals of the policy."

However, the actual consequences reveal a different narrative.

🧾 Who Bears the Costs?

When broad tariffs are enacted, the burden extends beyond foreign suppliers. It trickles down and affects:

• Smaller manufacturers obtaining components
• Independent vendors bringing in products
• Farmers experiencing increased costs for equipment and inputs
• Regular consumers facing elevated prices

These groups lack extensive legal resources or insider connections.
They aren’t able to negotiate specific exemptions.
They simply absorb the financial burden.

🏢 The Inside Track: Exemptions for the Influential

Meanwhile, large companies—especially those with connections to politicians—often discover ways to bypass the regulations:

• Specific product exclusions
• Brief halts in tariffs
• Unique classifications
• Loopholes in regulations

Tariffs don't vanish.
They are enforced selectively.

This results in a distinct separation:

Group A: Major companies with lobbyists, legal departments, and access to policymakers
Group B: Smaller and mid-sized enterprises that lack influence

⚖️ The Discrepancy Between Policy Aims and Actual Outcomes

Tariffs are promoted as mechanisms to enhance domestic productivity. In reality, they frequently:

• Raise expenses for smaller local producers
• Bolster the market power of major players
• Shift the competitive landscape towards size rather than innovation
• Favor political connections over market efficiency

Rather than establishing equilibrium, the system commonly perpetuates existing power dynamics.

🏗️ Why Big Companies Handle Challenges Better

Large enterprises can:

• Swiftly adjust supply chains
• Withstand immediate financial fluctuations
• Modify international pricing
• Influence regulations before their finalization

Smaller firms lack this adaptability.
They work with narrower profit margins—and have fewer opportunities for recovery.

$MOVE $ME $BERA

🚨 SEC Chair Faces Pressure Over Stalled Justin Sun Investigation.
The U. S. Securities and Exchange Commission is experiencing increased scrutiny for pulling back on several significant enforcement actions in the crypto space, with the suspension of the investigation into Tron founder Justin Sun becoming a focal point during a heated House Financial Services Committee meeting.

SEC Chair Paul Atkins was rigorously questioned by Democratic representatives, who inquired why the agency had paused its inquiry into Sun despite serious allegations. In 2023, the SEC accused Sun of orchestrating over 600,000 wash trades to artificially inflate the value of the TRX token. However, by 2025, the case was quietly shelved as the agency referenced talks surrounding a “potential settlement. ”

Political Connections Under Examination

Representative Maxine Waters expressed concerns that Sun’s alleged connections to President Donald Trump could have swayed the SEC’s choices. She highlighted Sun's connection to the Trump-associated World Liberty Financial project and questioned if such political affiliations now protect certain cryptocurrency figures from regulatory consequences.

Atkins avoided discussing any specific investigations, citing legal restrictions that prohibit him from publicly addressing particular cases. Nevertheless, he offered to provide updates to lawmakers privately “within the constraints of SEC regulations. ”

The discussion underscored a clear partisan divide. Democrats criticized the SEC for neglecting its responsibility to combat fraud, particularly after it stepped back from enforcement actions involving crucial industry participants like Binance, Ripple, Coinbase, and Kraken. The agency’s new leadership has defended this transition, rejecting what they call the previous administration's approach of “regulation through enforcement. ”

Republicans Advocate for Regulatory Clarity

Republican lawmakers focused more on the SEC’s upcoming rulemaking initiatives rather than enforcement issues. Atkins confirmed that the agency is developing a formal regulatory structure in line with the House-approved Clarity Act, collaborating closely with the Commodity Futures Trading Commission (CFTC) under a joint effort referred to as Project Crypto. The objective is to clearly define oversight duties between the two regulatory bodies.

When questioned about the SEC's continued pursuit of fraud cases within cryptocurrency markets, Atkins simply stated: “Anything that qualifies as securities. ”

Stablecoin Oversight Advances

There is also growing regulatory activity surrounding stablecoins. The CFTC has recently updated its guidance, allowing national trust banks to issue payment stablecoins backed by a broader array of collateral. Simultaneously, the National Credit Union Administration (NCUA) has presented new proposed regulations for managing stablecoin issuer applications.

These advancements are viewed as significant movements toward enacting the GENIUS Act, the first major federal legislation for the cryptocurrency sector, which was passed last year.

Controversy Spans More Than a Single Case

Waters mentioned accusations from a woman identifying herself as Sun’s prior partner, stating that she has proof of TRX price manipulation. Representatives for Tron chose not to respond to these allegations or the congressional hearing.

On a larger scale, Democrats expressed doubts about whether the SEC is prioritizing political factors over safeguarding investors. Atkins refrained from discussing any involvement by businesses associated with the Trump family, restating that he was unable to comment on those issues.

Regulatory Countdown Is Underway

The cryptocurrency sector is intently observing if the SEC will finalize regulations before the Senate progresses with the Clarity Act. Due to recent delays in the legislative process, the SEC may establish the regulatory framework for digital currencies long before Congress takes action.

The hearing highlighted the ongoing challenge in Washington to maintain a balance between fostering innovation and ensuring market integrity. Republicans contend that clear regulations are crucial for retaining blockchain firms in the U. S., while Democrats caution that relaxing enforcement could put retail investors at risk of fraud and manipulation.

Main Points

• Legislators asked why the SEC has halted its case against Justin Sun, expressing worries about potential political influence.
• The SEC intends to implement cryptocurrency rules that align with the Clarity Act in conjunction with the CFTC.
• Oversight of stablecoins is progressing as several regulatory bodies introduce new guidelines.

$BTC

#CryptoNewsLive

🚨 TRUMP’S 2026 MARKET STRATEGY IS FORMING — AND MANY ARE INTERPRETING IT INCORRECTLY
General opinion suggests that 2026 will be favorable.

That belief might prove to be a mistake.

Stocks, cryptocurrency, and real estate are all at risk — and an abrupt downturn may occur initially.

If you possess investments, here’s the guide you need to comprehend:

1⃣ THE DECLINE

The U. S. economy is beginning to show weaknesses:

• Job losses are increasing
• Company bankruptcies are on the rise
• Credit issues are becoming widespread
• Demand for housing is quickly diminishing
• There are many more sellers than buyers

Under these circumstances, a short-term drop within the next 2–3 months seems very likely — akin to what was experienced in early 2025.

Possible losses if pressure mounts:

• S&P 500: –10% to –15%
• Nasdaq: –15% to –20%

Cryptocurrency won’t escape this impact.
In fact, it will probably perform worse — with risks of forced selling and capitulation.

2⃣ THE TARGET

As the markets decline, focus shifts to the Federal Reserve.

Trump is anticipated to place blame on Jerome Powell — and possibly the Supreme Court if tariff strategies encounter opposition.

Powell's tenure expires in May 2026, rendering him politically vulnerable.

The message will be straightforward and repeated often:

• Interest rates remained excessively high
• Liquidity was restricted
• Policies became tighter despite economic weakness

The true aim: ensure Powell's influence diminishes once his role ends — paving the way for a fresh policy approach under Kevin Warsh.

3⃣ THE SHIFT

Once there’s a change in leadership at the Fed, policies will be adjusted.

Warsh has already suggested a readiness to implement aggressive measures:

• Control over the yield curve
• Reduction of long-term interest rates
• Lowering borrowing costs throughout the economy

More affordable credit promotes liquidity.
Liquidity supports asset inflation.

Additionally, several factors could align:

• A potential $2,000 tariff rebate
• Widespread tax cuts
• Approval of crypto-friendly legislation such as the CLARITY Act

The clear goal: reinflate the markets.

4⃣ THE POLITICS

The U. S. midterm elections will occur in the fourth quarter of 2026, and current odds show Republicans facing challenges.

However, rising markets and cash availability for consumers can quickly alter narratives.

• Dividend payments improve sentiment
• Tax relief assists small enterprises
• Asset values rebound — and past troubles are forgotten

Powell will carry the responsibility for the previous downturn.

THE TIMELINE

Early 2026 → Market decline + blame placed on the Fed
Mid 2026 → New Chair + unlocking of liquidity
Late 2026 → Recovery leading into elections

The upcoming months may be eventful.

What comes after?
Strategic acquisition could lead to a significant rally into Q3–Q4 2026.

I have been predicting Bitcoin cycles for over a decade.

And I’ll be paying close attention to how this one develops.

Stay alert.
Enable notifications.

$GHST

$POWER

$FHE

🚨 Bill Gates Predicted It Early: U. S. Tech Limitations Didn't Hinder China — They Boosted It.
The effort to technologically cut off China has hit a critical point. Before current data confirmed it, Bill Gates cautioned that isolating China wouldn’t diminish its strength — it would compel it to innovate more quickly. The figures from 2024 to 2025 clearly illustrate this now.

Instead of experiencing a slowdown, China adjusted — and sped up its progress.

Here’s what truly transpired:

🔹 Huawei Did Not Surrender — It Reinvented Itself
In the face of extensive sanctions, Huawei allocated over 1.1 trillion yuan to research and development over a decade. What was the result?

The Kirin chipset for the Mate 60 Pro

HarmonyOS, now operating on more than 800 million devices
The alleged technological “blockade” failed to be effective.

🔹 SMIC Grew Rather Than Shrunk
Instead of diminishing, SMIC has seen its revenue double since 2018, rising to become the second-largest semiconductor foundry in the world by revenue.

🔹 AI Chose a Unique Course
Although advanced chips faced limitations, China improved its software and training efficiencies. DeepSeek-R1 showcased that first-class AI models can be developed at a small fraction of the cost found in Silicon Valley, debunking the belief that cutting-edge AI mandates unrestricted access to U. S. hardware.

🔹 Consequences for the U. S. Tech Industry
This situation is not one-sided. Companies like NVIDIA, Qualcomm, and Intel are feeling the impact. Market analysts predict that the U. S. could potentially forfeit as much as 18% of the global semiconductor market share as the decoupling process speeds up. Meanwhile, China’s exports of integrated circuits surged by 17.4% in 2024, despite growing job pressures in Silicon Valley.

The key point:
Creativity is not confined by geography. When obstacles are erected, competitors don’t give up — they develop new solutions. China has swiftly transitioned from reliance to self-sufficiency, quicker than many anticipated.

$RIVER $GPS $PIPPIN

Thus, the critical question lingers:
Are we witnessing the decline of U. S. technological supremacy, or are we entering a new, multipolar landscape in technology?

Let’s discuss. 👇

#DeepSeek #TechDecoupling #GlobalMarkets #InnovationShift