Binance Square

CryptoQuant Quicktake

image
Verificeret skaber
CryptoQuant.com - Leading On-chain Data/Analytics Provider
0 Følger
22.4K+ Følgere
25.7K+ Synes godt om
1.8K+ Delt
Opslag
·
--
Artikel
Here Is the Analysis of What the XRP NVT Ratio Is SignalingThe NVT Ratio (Network Value to Transaction) acts like a "PE Ratio" for crypto. High NVT: Suggests the market cap is outgrowing the actual volume being transferred on the ledger (potentially overvalued or a speculative bubble). Low NVT: Suggests the network is being used heavily relative to its price (potentially undervalued or a strong organic base). Analysis of the Chart Trends The "De-leveraging" of Valuation: Looking at the transition from late 2025 into early 2026, the chart shows a significant "cooling off." The massive spikes in NVT seen in 2025 have leveled out. Current Positioning (170.2):* The current NVT value of 170.2 sits in a "neutral-to-low" historical range compared to the 2025 peaks. This indicates that the current price of $1.37 is much better supported by actual on-chain transaction volume than it was during the speculative spikes of last year. Price/NVT Convergence: In April 2026, the blue NVT line is showing tighter, more frequent oscillations. This "volatility compression" usually precedes a major move. It suggests that while the price has been range-bound, the underlying network utility is keeping pace. Real-World Context (April 2026) This technical data aligns with the current news cycle: Institutional Adoption: With $1 billion now sitting in spot XRP ETFs (as of mid-April), the ledger is seeing "high-quality" transaction volume that keeps the NVT from spiking into "overvalued" territory despite the recent price surge. Supply Dynamics: Exchange reserves are declining to around 2.75 B XRP, down from Q4 2025's 3 billion XRP on exchanges, indicating coins are moving off exchanges into private wallets/custody. Finally, the NVT shows that XRP is reflecting current on-chain activity is healthy and fundamentally grounded rather than purely driven by retail hype. Also, the network usage is currently high enough to justify the $1.30–$1.40 price range, making this a period of valuation consolidation rather than overextension. Written by TopNotchYJ

Here Is the Analysis of What the XRP NVT Ratio Is Signaling

The NVT Ratio (Network Value to Transaction) acts like a "PE Ratio" for crypto.

High NVT: Suggests the market cap is outgrowing the actual volume being transferred on the ledger (potentially overvalued or a speculative bubble).

Low NVT: Suggests the network is being used heavily relative to its price (potentially undervalued or a strong organic base).

Analysis of the Chart Trends

The "De-leveraging" of Valuation: Looking at the transition from late 2025 into early 2026, the chart shows a significant "cooling off." The massive spikes in NVT seen in 2025 have leveled out.

Current Positioning (170.2):* The current NVT value of 170.2 sits in a "neutral-to-low" historical range compared to the 2025 peaks. This indicates that the current price of $1.37 is much better supported by actual on-chain transaction volume than it was during the speculative spikes of last year.

Price/NVT Convergence: In April 2026, the blue NVT line is showing tighter, more frequent oscillations. This "volatility compression" usually precedes a major move. It suggests that while the price has been range-bound, the underlying network utility is keeping pace.

Real-World Context (April 2026)

This technical data aligns with the current news cycle:

Institutional Adoption: With $1 billion now sitting in spot XRP ETFs (as of mid-April), the ledger is seeing "high-quality" transaction volume that keeps the NVT from spiking into "overvalued" territory despite the recent price surge.

Supply Dynamics: Exchange reserves are declining to around 2.75 B XRP, down from Q4 2025's 3 billion XRP on exchanges, indicating coins are moving off exchanges into private wallets/custody.

Finally, the NVT shows that XRP is reflecting current on-chain activity is healthy and fundamentally grounded rather than purely driven by retail hype. Also, the network usage is currently high enough to justify the $1.30–$1.40 price range, making this a period of valuation consolidation rather than overextension.

Written by TopNotchYJ
Artikel
Miners Reduce Selling Pressure on BitcoinBitcoin's Miners' Position Index (MPI) data indicates a period of relative equilibrium in miners' behavior recently, with a clear trend toward reduced selling pressure compared to previous periods. The index recorded a reading of approximately -0.83, a negative value reflecting a decrease in miners' transfers to exchanges. This suggests a reduced appetite for selling and a preference for holding Bitcoin rather than selling it into the market. Historically, when the MPI rises above the 2 level, it signals increased selling activity by miners and the potential for downward pressure on price. Conversely, the index remaining in negative territory, as is currently the case, reflects reduced selling activity by miners, which supports the market and reduces the likelihood of sudden selling pressure. The chart also shows that the index experienced sharp fluctuations in previous months, with several strong spikes above the 2 level, coinciding with periods of price correction for Bitcoin. However, the current phase appears different, as the index is moving within a relatively low and stable range, reflecting a shift in miners' behavior toward holding rather than selling. Meanwhile, Bitcoin's price is trading near $74,000, coinciding with this decline in the MPI, which reinforces the view that the market is not currently experiencing significant selling pressure from miners. This data points to a more stable environment, where miners appear to prefer waiting rather than selling at current levels. Overall, the current MPI reading reflects a decrease in selling pressure from miners and a more stable trend in their behavior, which could support more balanced price movements in the coming period, especially if the index continues to remain in negative or near-zero territory. Written by Arab Chain

Miners Reduce Selling Pressure on Bitcoin

Bitcoin's Miners' Position Index (MPI) data indicates a period of relative equilibrium in miners' behavior recently, with a clear trend toward reduced selling pressure compared to previous periods. The index recorded a reading of approximately -0.83, a negative value reflecting a decrease in miners' transfers to exchanges. This suggests a reduced appetite for selling and a preference for holding Bitcoin rather than selling it into the market.

Historically, when the MPI rises above the 2 level, it signals increased selling activity by miners and the potential for downward pressure on price. Conversely, the index remaining in negative territory, as is currently the case, reflects reduced selling activity by miners, which supports the market and reduces the likelihood of sudden selling pressure.

The chart also shows that the index experienced sharp fluctuations in previous months, with several strong spikes above the 2 level, coinciding with periods of price correction for Bitcoin. However, the current phase appears different, as the index is moving within a relatively low and stable range, reflecting a shift in miners' behavior toward holding rather than selling.

Meanwhile, Bitcoin's price is trading near $74,000, coinciding with this decline in the MPI, which reinforces the view that the market is not currently experiencing significant selling pressure from miners. This data points to a more stable environment, where miners appear to prefer waiting rather than selling at current levels.

Overall, the current MPI reading reflects a decrease in selling pressure from miners and a more stable trend in their behavior, which could support more balanced price movements in the coming period, especially if the index continues to remain in negative or near-zero territory.

Written by Arab Chain
Artikel
Binance BTC Derivatives Hit Their Second-Largest Capitulation Since 2023, While Recovery Stays Pa...Bitcoin derivatives on Binance may have already gone through one of their clearest capitulation phases of the current cycle, but the recovery in positioning still looks incomplete. On March 1, 2026, Binance’s 30-day change in Bitcoin open interest dropped to -14,960 BTC, making it one of the deepest capitulation readings recorded on the exchange in this cycle. The only comparable event in this period came on September 8, 2023, when the metric reached -14,791 BTC. That makes these two readings the biggest capitulation events for Binance derivatives traders recorded on Binance between H2 2023 and Q1 2026. Why this matters is simple: when the 30-day open interest change falls this deeply into negative territory, it usually reflects a major reset in speculative positioning. In practice, that means leveraged exposure has been aggressively flushed out of the market. As of April 14, the metric recovered to around 5,760 BTC, showing that some positioning has returned. But the rebuild still remains far from prior expansion highs. Earlier leverage rebuild phases pushed Binance’s 30-day open interest change to 11,200 BTC on July 25, 2025 and 11,540 BTC on November 21, 2025, well above the current reading. In other words, the current rebound is still roughly half the size of those earlier leverage expansion phases. That suggests Binance derivatives have recovered from the March washout, but speculative positioning has not yet returned to the same stretched levels seen during earlier market advances. Written by Amr Taha

Binance BTC Derivatives Hit Their Second-Largest Capitulation Since 2023, While Recovery Stays Pa...

Bitcoin derivatives on Binance may have already gone through one of their clearest capitulation phases of the current cycle, but the recovery in positioning still looks incomplete.

On March 1, 2026, Binance’s 30-day change in Bitcoin open interest dropped to -14,960 BTC, making it one of the deepest capitulation readings recorded on the exchange in this cycle.

The only comparable event in this period came on September 8, 2023, when the metric reached -14,791 BTC.

That makes these two readings the biggest capitulation events for Binance derivatives traders recorded on Binance between H2 2023 and Q1 2026.

Why this matters is simple: when the 30-day open interest change falls this deeply into negative territory, it usually reflects a major reset in speculative positioning.

In practice, that means leveraged exposure has been aggressively flushed out of the market.

As of April 14, the metric recovered to around 5,760 BTC, showing that some positioning has returned.

But the rebuild still remains far from prior expansion highs.

Earlier leverage rebuild phases pushed Binance’s 30-day open interest change to 11,200 BTC on July 25, 2025 and 11,540 BTC on November 21, 2025, well above the current reading.

In other words, the current rebound is still roughly half the size of those earlier leverage expansion phases. That suggests Binance derivatives have recovered from the March washout, but speculative positioning has not yet returned to the same stretched levels seen during earlier market advances.

Written by Amr Taha
Artikel
DeFi Yield Compression Is Real. but Capital Is Not Leaving in One Clean MoveIf lower yields were enough to break the whole space, TVL would be rolling over everywhere. That is not what the structure shows. From peak TVL, the damage is deep in some names. Aave v3 is still down about 43.8%. Sky Lending is down 23.7%. Ethena USDe remains the weakest, down roughly 60.7%. Morpho looks different. Its drawdown is closer to 12.3%. The right edge matters more. Over the last 7 days, Aave is up about 5.7% and Morpho about 4.6%. Sky is down 3.2%. Ethena is still slightly negative near 0.9%. The yield premium is fading. Capital is getting more selective 🧸 DYOR Written by TeddyVision

DeFi Yield Compression Is Real. but Capital Is Not Leaving in One Clean Move

If lower yields were enough to break the whole space, TVL would be rolling over everywhere. That is not what the structure shows.

From peak TVL, the damage is deep in some names. Aave v3 is still down about 43.8%. Sky Lending is down 23.7%. Ethena USDe remains the weakest, down roughly 60.7%. Morpho looks different. Its drawdown is closer to 12.3%.

The right edge matters more. Over the last 7 days, Aave is up about 5.7% and Morpho about 4.6%. Sky is down 3.2%. Ethena is still slightly negative near 0.9%.

The yield premium is fading. Capital is getting more selective 🧸 DYOR

Written by TeddyVision
Artikel
Ethereum Derivatives Signal Potential for Further Short SqueezesUncertainty continues to dominate, yet some investors are choosing to increase their exposure to Ethereum derivatives, particularly on Binance. Since February, around 350,000 ETH has been added to open interest on Binance, which now accounts for approximately 37% of total market share. At current prices, this represents over $1B that has flowed into Binance. What is paradoxical is that despite the recent price increase (+35% since the February low), the majority of investors appear to be positioning for a correction by shorting the market. This can be observed through ETH funding rates on Binance, which have reached levels not seen since the previous bear market. Since late January, funding rates on Binance have remained mostly negative, reflecting a clear market dynamic where investors do not believe in a potential bullish recovery. Observing such negative levels, with funding rates dropping below -0.01%, is relatively rare and indicates a significant buildup of short positions while investors remain in disbelief. When this level of consensus forms, it is not uncommon for the market to move against the majority, triggering liquidations of the most aggressive positions and leading to short squeeze events, like the one observed yesterday. Within just one hour, more than $3M in short positions were liquidated twice on Binance. This type of setup could repeat, given the accumulation of short positions on Ethereum in recent months and could further fuel this early phase of the uptrend. However, funding rates now appear to be turning positive again, currently around +0.01% (with today’s data not yet fully complete). If this shift persists, derivatives markets could begin to support a potential upward move, reinforcing it and making conditions increasingly difficult for late short sellers. Written by Darkfost

Ethereum Derivatives Signal Potential for Further Short Squeezes

Uncertainty continues to dominate, yet some investors are choosing to increase their exposure to Ethereum derivatives, particularly on Binance.

Since February, around 350,000 ETH has been added to open interest on Binance, which now accounts for approximately 37% of total market share. At current prices, this represents over $1B that has flowed into Binance.

What is paradoxical is that despite the recent price increase (+35% since the February low), the majority of investors appear to be positioning for a correction by shorting the market.

This can be observed through ETH funding rates on Binance, which have reached levels not seen since the previous bear market.

Since late January, funding rates on Binance have remained mostly negative, reflecting a clear market dynamic where investors do not believe in a potential bullish recovery.

Observing such negative levels, with funding rates dropping below -0.01%, is relatively rare and indicates a significant buildup of short positions while investors remain in disbelief.

When this level of consensus forms, it is not uncommon for the market to move against the majority, triggering liquidations of the most aggressive positions and leading to short squeeze events, like the one observed yesterday.

Within just one hour, more than $3M in short positions were liquidated twice on Binance.

This type of setup could repeat, given the accumulation of short positions on Ethereum in recent months and could further fuel this early phase of the uptrend.

However, funding rates now appear to be turning positive again, currently around +0.01% (with today’s data not yet fully complete).

If this shift persists, derivatives markets could begin to support a potential upward move, reinforcing it and making conditions increasingly difficult for late short sellers.

Written by Darkfost
Artikel
Growing Risk Appetite Among InvestorsSince March, the flow of Bitcoin into futures exchanges — rather than spot exchanges — has been intensifying. This pattern closely mirrors the behavior observed following the FTX collapse in December 2022 The emergence of leveraged positioning at this juncture suggests that the bear market may be drawing to a close, with the early stages of a new cycle potentially underway. Written by crypto sunmoon

Growing Risk Appetite Among Investors

Since March, the flow of Bitcoin into futures exchanges — rather than spot exchanges — has been intensifying. This pattern closely mirrors the behavior observed following the FTX collapse in December 2022

The emergence of leveraged positioning at this juncture suggests that the bear market may be drawing to a close, with the early stages of a new cycle potentially underway.

Written by crypto sunmoon
Artikel
Why I’m Watching Leverage and Funding Right HereI usually watch Estimated Leverage Ratio and Funding Rate together. Right now, Estimated Leverage Ratio is still around 0.22, which tells me leverage across the market is still pretty high. A lot of traders are still positioned pretty aggressively. At the same time, Funding Rate is pretty deeply negative, and the funding EMA is still moving further down in negative territory. That tells me shorts are still in control and still paying longs. When funding is this negative while market-wide leverage stays high, I lean toward the idea that the market is getting a bit over-shorted. And if we get a positive catalyst from here — for example, something constructive out of the US-Iran talks — there’s a decent chance of a short squeeze that snaps price back up. Written by Rei Researcher

Why I’m Watching Leverage and Funding Right Here

I usually watch Estimated Leverage Ratio and Funding Rate together.

Right now, Estimated Leverage Ratio is still around 0.22, which tells me leverage across the market is still pretty high. A lot of traders are still positioned pretty aggressively.

At the same time, Funding Rate is pretty deeply negative, and the funding EMA is still moving further down in negative territory. That tells me shorts are still in control and still paying longs.

When funding is this negative while market-wide leverage stays high, I lean toward the idea that the market is getting a bit over-shorted. And if we get a positive catalyst from here — for example, something constructive out of the US-Iran talks — there’s a decent chance of a short squeeze that snaps price back up.

Written by Rei Researcher
Artikel
XRP Withdrawals on Binance Rise to June 2025 Levels While Deposit Activity FallsPotential sell-side pressure for XRP on Binance may be softening as the exchange’s transaction mix shifts back to levels last seen in June 2025. The 7-day average shows withdrawal transactions rising to 53%, while deposit transactions fell to 46%. This is the first time since June 2025 that Binance’s XRP deposit/withdrawal transaction split has returned to these levels. This matters because falling deposit activity usually means fewer transactions are moving XRP onto the exchange, while rising withdrawals point to more coins leaving it. When that balance shifts this way, it can reduce immediate exchange-side selling intent, especially if the move continues over several days. In simple terms, Binance is seeing a less deposit-heavy XRP flow structure again. That does not guarantee an immediate price reaction, but it does signal a notable change in traders behavior that traders may want to watch closely. Written by Amr Taha

XRP Withdrawals on Binance Rise to June 2025 Levels While Deposit Activity Falls

Potential sell-side pressure for XRP on Binance may be softening as the exchange’s transaction mix shifts back to levels last seen in June 2025.

The 7-day average shows withdrawal transactions rising to 53%, while deposit transactions fell to 46%.

This is the first time since June 2025 that Binance’s XRP deposit/withdrawal transaction split has returned to these levels.

This matters because falling deposit activity usually means fewer transactions are moving XRP onto the exchange, while rising withdrawals point to more coins leaving it.

When that balance shifts this way, it can reduce immediate exchange-side selling intent, especially if the move continues over several days.

In simple terms, Binance is seeing a less deposit-heavy XRP flow structure again.

That does not guarantee an immediate price reaction, but it does signal a notable change in traders behavior that traders may want to watch closely.

Written by Amr Taha
Artikel
XRP Liquidity on Binance Falls to Lowest Level Since 2021XRP data on Binance indicates a significant decline in liquidity levels recently, with the index falling to its lowest point since 2021. This suggests a clear decrease in trading activity and a reduction in liquidity flows associated with XRP. According to the latest data, the liquidity index fell to approximately 0.053, coinciding with a 30-day trading volume of around 3.77 billion XRP, one of the lowest levels recorded in recent years. This decline reflects a clear contraction in liquidity flows on the Binance platform, indicating reduced trader activity compared to previous periods that saw significant increases in liquidity. Meanwhile, XRP is trading near $1.33, with relatively limited price movements, which aligns with the low liquidity environment. Periods of low liquidity are typically associated with reduced volatility and quieter price action, as fewer market participants and lower trading volumes prevail. The drop in liquidity to its lowest level since 2021 is a significant indicator of changing market dynamics, potentially reflecting a period of investor caution, reduced trading activity, and anticipation of new market catalysts. Periods of low liquidity often precede more pronounced price movements, particularly when liquidity returns to the market. this decline reflects a state of relative calm and investor anticipation at present, though conditions could shift if liquidity flows return to the market. Written by Arab Chain

XRP Liquidity on Binance Falls to Lowest Level Since 2021

XRP data on Binance indicates a significant decline in liquidity levels recently, with the index falling to its lowest point since 2021. This suggests a clear decrease in trading activity and a reduction in liquidity flows associated with XRP.

According to the latest data, the liquidity index fell to approximately 0.053, coinciding with a 30-day trading volume of around 3.77 billion XRP, one of the lowest levels recorded in recent years. This decline reflects a clear contraction in liquidity flows on the Binance platform, indicating reduced trader activity compared to previous periods that saw significant increases in liquidity.

Meanwhile, XRP is trading near $1.33, with relatively limited price movements, which aligns with the low liquidity environment. Periods of low liquidity are typically associated with reduced volatility and quieter price action, as fewer market participants and lower trading volumes prevail.

The drop in liquidity to its lowest level since 2021 is a significant indicator of changing market dynamics, potentially reflecting a period of investor caution, reduced trading activity, and anticipation of new market catalysts. Periods of low liquidity often precede more pronounced price movements, particularly when liquidity returns to the market.

this decline reflects a state of relative calm and investor anticipation at present, though conditions could shift if liquidity flows return to the market.

Written by Arab Chain
Artikel
Bitcoin Divergence: Price Rally Driven By Spot As Binance Open Interest PlungesRecent market data highlights a significant divergence between Bitcoin’s price action and its Open Interest on Binance. While Bitcoin has been riding a short-term bullish channel, with its price climbing from 63000 USD on February 5th to a peak near 73200 USD on February 14th, the derivatives market is painting a contrasting picture. During this exact same timeframe, the 30-day Simple Moving Average of Binance Open Interest for BTC-USD has experienced a sharp decline, dropping from 1.9B down to 1.19B. Analysis and Takeaway: This specific divergence (rising prices coupled with declining open interest) is a crucial indicator of the underlying market dynamics. It suggests that the recent upward price momentum is primarily driven by spot market accumulation rather than leveraged trading in the futures market. Furthermore, a dropping Open Interest during a price rally often points to a short covering scenario, where short sellers are forced to close their positions, inadvertently adding buying pressure and pushing the price higher. Overall, this can be viewed as a fundamentally healthy macro signal. A price rally built on low leverage significantly reduces the risk of sudden, severe liquidation cascades. However, for this bullish momentum to sustain itself aggressively over the longer term, we would eventually need to see fresh capital re-entering the derivatives market (a rising Open Interest) to confirm the trend’s enduring strength. Written by CryptoOnchain

Bitcoin Divergence: Price Rally Driven By Spot As Binance Open Interest Plunges

Recent market data highlights a significant divergence between Bitcoin’s price action and its Open Interest on Binance. While Bitcoin has been riding a short-term bullish channel, with its price climbing from 63000 USD on February 5th to a peak near 73200 USD on February 14th, the derivatives market is painting a contrasting picture. During this exact same timeframe, the 30-day Simple Moving Average of Binance Open Interest for BTC-USD has experienced a sharp decline, dropping from 1.9B down to 1.19B.

Analysis and Takeaway:

This specific divergence (rising prices coupled with declining open interest) is a crucial indicator of the underlying market dynamics. It suggests that the recent upward price momentum is primarily driven by spot market accumulation rather than leveraged trading in the futures market. Furthermore, a dropping Open Interest during a price rally often points to a short covering scenario, where short sellers are forced to close their positions, inadvertently adding buying pressure and pushing the price higher.

Overall, this can be viewed as a fundamentally healthy macro signal. A price rally built on low leverage significantly reduces the risk of sudden, severe liquidation cascades. However, for this bullish momentum to sustain itself aggressively over the longer term, we would eventually need to see fresh capital re-entering the derivatives market (a rising Open Interest) to confirm the trend’s enduring strength.

Written by CryptoOnchain
Artikel
Liquidations Reveal the Fragility of Bets Against Bitcoin in Low VolatilityWith BTC quoted at US$72,403.83 (24h%: +1.75%), the market finds itself facing a scenario of massive accumulation in the over-the-counter (OTC) market and an imminent risk of a supply shock. As a main strategy, the investor's focus at this moment is to completely step away from the short-term price noise and monitor the validation of scarcity and the breaking point of derivatives. DERIVATIVES The spot market is like the surface of an iceberg: its calm, especially in periods of low volatility, as observed at this moment, is merely apparent. Derivatives occupy the submerged and agitated part. It is there that the vital signs of momentum emerge. Tracking them is indispensable, acting as a radar for hidden pressures that anticipate liquidations and trend reversals. SHORT SQUEEZE Deluded by the lethargy of the spot market, retail bet on the fall. With the indicators Bitcoin: Funding Rates – All Exchanges (-0.009%) and Bitcoin: Funding Rates – Binance (-0.007%) being negative, what is exposed is the fear of the herd and the excess of leverage in short positions, amid the news about the war in the Middle East. However, our highlighted indicator, Bitcoin: Long & Short Liquidations (USD) – Binance, proves that reality is brutal and reveals who bled the most in the last 24 hours. There were US$5.25 million in annihilated shorts against US$2.01 million in longs — a significant result for a moment of low volatility, even more considering that it occurred in just one exchange. CONCLUSION With the spot supply scarce, any slight upward movement pulls the trigger on liquidations, feeding a Short Squeeze. Looking only at the surface at this moment is accepting the shipwreck. Written by GugaOnChain

Liquidations Reveal the Fragility of Bets Against Bitcoin in Low Volatility

With BTC quoted at US$72,403.83 (24h%: +1.75%), the market finds itself facing a scenario of massive accumulation in the over-the-counter (OTC) market and an imminent risk of a supply shock. As a main strategy, the investor's focus at this moment is to completely step away from the short-term price noise and monitor the validation of scarcity and the breaking point of derivatives.

DERIVATIVES

The spot market is like the surface of an iceberg: its calm, especially in periods of low volatility, as observed at this moment, is merely apparent. Derivatives occupy the submerged and agitated part. It is there that the vital signs of momentum emerge. Tracking them is indispensable, acting as a radar for hidden pressures that anticipate liquidations and trend reversals.

SHORT SQUEEZE

Deluded by the lethargy of the spot market, retail bet on the fall. With the indicators Bitcoin: Funding Rates – All Exchanges (-0.009%) and Bitcoin: Funding Rates – Binance (-0.007%) being negative, what is exposed is the fear of the herd and the excess of leverage in short positions, amid the news about the war in the Middle East.

However, our highlighted indicator, Bitcoin: Long & Short Liquidations (USD) – Binance, proves that reality is brutal and reveals who bled the most in the last 24 hours. There were US$5.25 million in annihilated shorts against US$2.01 million in longs — a significant result for a moment of low volatility, even more considering that it occurred in just one exchange.

CONCLUSION

With the spot supply scarce, any slight upward movement pulls the trigger on liquidations, feeding a Short Squeeze. Looking only at the surface at this moment is accepting the shipwreck.

Written by GugaOnChain
Artikel
Ethereum Coinbase Premium Index Hits Highest Level Since October 2025Over the past two days, Coinbase Premium Index data for Ethereum shows a significant increase in the premium on Coinbase compared to Binance. The index reached approximately 0.055, its highest level since October 2025, before subsequently retreating to around 0.006. This suggests a decline in the premium and a slowdown in buying momentum following a surge in strong institutional demand. The Coinbase Premium Index is a key indicator of institutional demand. When Ethereum trades at a higher premium on Coinbase compared to Binance, it typically signals increased demand from institutional investors, particularly in the U.S. market. Recently, the index’s rise to 0.055 reflected a significant influx of institutional liquidity. Ethereum traded at a higher price on Coinbase than on Binance, indicating increased institutional investor activity and stronger demand for Ethereum during this period. However, the index later retreated to around 0.006, indicating a relative slowdown in institutional demand during the current period. This decline reflects a narrowing price gap between Coinbase and Binance, suggesting reduced buying momentum from institutional investors following the previous surge. Written by Arab Chain

Ethereum Coinbase Premium Index Hits Highest Level Since October 2025

Over the past two days, Coinbase Premium Index data for Ethereum shows a significant increase in the premium on Coinbase compared to Binance. The index reached approximately 0.055, its highest level since October 2025, before subsequently retreating to around 0.006. This suggests a decline in the premium and a slowdown in buying momentum following a surge in strong institutional demand.

The Coinbase Premium Index is a key indicator of institutional demand. When Ethereum trades at a higher premium on Coinbase compared to Binance, it typically signals increased demand from institutional investors, particularly in the U.S. market.

Recently, the index’s rise to 0.055 reflected a significant influx of institutional liquidity. Ethereum traded at a higher price on Coinbase than on Binance, indicating increased institutional investor activity and stronger demand for Ethereum during this period.

However, the index later retreated to around 0.006, indicating a relative slowdown in institutional demand during the current period. This decline reflects a narrowing price gap between Coinbase and Binance, suggesting reduced buying momentum from institutional investors following the previous surge.

Written by Arab Chain
Artikel
Bitcoin: Profit Is Thin, and Mostly ReactiveBitcoin is still seeing selling. But not from a position of strength. aSOPR has spent 22 of the last 30 days below 1.0 and is back under break-even at 0.995. This is not a market distributing from a wide profit cushion. That cushion is already gone. LTH-SOPR/STH-SOPR says the same. Over the last 30 days, the ratio averaged 0.99, with 24 of those days below 1.0. Long-term holders are not realizing profit at a clear premium to short-term participants. Selling is there. But it looks reactive. There was a sharp spike in the ratio on Apr 5. It did not hold. In the next 7 sessions, the ratio moved back below 1.0 on 6 of them before rebounding to 1.27. What matters is what did not happen. The market did not move into clean long-term holder distribution. That keeps Bitcoin in a compressed structure. Stress is still there. Profit is not. Selling is real. But it still does not look like broad, confident distribution from the strongest cohort 🧸 DYOR Written by TeddyVision

Bitcoin: Profit Is Thin, and Mostly Reactive

Bitcoin is still seeing selling. But not from a position of strength. aSOPR has spent 22 of the last 30 days below 1.0 and is back under break-even at 0.995. This is not a market distributing from a wide profit cushion. That cushion is already gone.

LTH-SOPR/STH-SOPR says the same. Over the last 30 days, the ratio averaged 0.99, with 24 of those days below 1.0. Long-term holders are not realizing profit at a clear premium to short-term participants. Selling is there. But it looks reactive.

There was a sharp spike in the ratio on Apr 5. It did not hold. In the next 7 sessions, the ratio moved back below 1.0 on 6 of them before rebounding to 1.27. What matters is what did not happen. The market did not move into clean long-term holder distribution.

That keeps Bitcoin in a compressed structure. Stress is still there. Profit is not. Selling is real. But it still does not look like broad, confident distribution from the strongest cohort 🧸 DYOR

Written by TeddyVision
Artikel
Bitcoin: Profit Is Thin, and Mostly ReactiveBitcoin is still seeing selling. But not from a position of strength. aSOPR has spent 22 of the last 30 days below 1.0 and is back under break-even at 0.995. This is not a market distributing from a wide profit cushion. That cushion is already gone. LTH-SOPR/STH-SOPR says the same. Over the last 30 days, the ratio averaged 0.99, with 24 of those days below 1.0. Long-term holders are not realizing profit at a clear premium to short-term participants. Selling is there. But it looks reactive. There was a sharp spike in the ratio on Apr 5. It did not hold. In the next 7 sessions, the ratio moved back below 1.0 on 6 of them before rebounding to 1.27. What matters is what did not happen. The market did not move into clean long-term holder distribution. That keeps Bitcoin in a compressed structure. Stress is still there. Profit is not. Selling is real. But it still does not look like broad, confident distribution from the strongest cohort 🧸 DYOR Written by TeddyVision

Bitcoin: Profit Is Thin, and Mostly Reactive

Bitcoin is still seeing selling. But not from a position of strength. aSOPR has spent 22 of the last 30 days below 1.0 and is back under break-even at 0.995. This is not a market distributing from a wide profit cushion. That cushion is already gone.

LTH-SOPR/STH-SOPR says the same. Over the last 30 days, the ratio averaged 0.99, with 24 of those days below 1.0. Long-term holders are not realizing profit at a clear premium to short-term participants. Selling is there. But it looks reactive.

There was a sharp spike in the ratio on Apr 5. It did not hold. In the next 7 sessions, the ratio moved back below 1.0 on 6 of them before rebounding to 1.27. What matters is what did not happen. The market did not move into clean long-term holder distribution.

That keeps Bitcoin in a compressed structure. Stress is still there. Profit is not. Selling is real. But it still does not look like broad, confident distribution from the strongest cohort 🧸 DYOR

Written by TeddyVision
Artikel
BTC: Bull-Bear Indicator Remains Below Zero Without Entering Extreme BearThe CryptoQuant Bull-Bear Market Cycle Indicator remains below the neutral threshold (0), confirming that the market is still operating within a broader bear phase. The indicator is derived from a composite P&L Index combining MVRV, NUPL, and SOPR, measuring the deviation from its 365-day average and reflecting the underlying profitability-driven momentum of the market. Historically, the deepest accumulation phases emerged when the indicator entered the Extreme Bear zone, marking periods of maximum stress and forced selling. In contrast, the indicator currently remains below 0 but has not yet entered the Extreme Bear phase observed during prior cycle bottoms. This distinction is critical: while the market is in a bearish regime, the level of stress has not reached the extremes historically associated with major accumulation zones. As a result, the current structure reflects a bear phase without full capitulation, rather than a completed bottom formation. Source: CryptoQuant Written by Zizcrypto

BTC: Bull-Bear Indicator Remains Below Zero Without Entering Extreme Bear

The CryptoQuant Bull-Bear Market Cycle Indicator remains below the neutral threshold (0), confirming that the market is still operating within a broader bear phase.

The indicator is derived from a composite P&L Index combining MVRV, NUPL, and SOPR, measuring the deviation from its 365-day average and reflecting the underlying profitability-driven momentum of the market.

Historically, the deepest accumulation phases emerged when the indicator entered the Extreme Bear zone, marking periods of maximum stress and forced selling.

In contrast, the indicator currently remains below 0 but has not yet entered the Extreme Bear phase observed during prior cycle bottoms.

This distinction is critical: while the market is in a bearish regime, the level of stress has not reached the extremes historically associated with major accumulation zones.

As a result, the current structure reflects a bear phase without full capitulation, rather than a completed bottom formation.

Source: CryptoQuant

Written by Zizcrypto
Artikel
Leverage Washed Away: the Next Leap Pointed By On-Chain Data1. Trend: Supply-Demand Battle and Overheating Resolution In January, the exchange whale ratio was low but saw extreme selling in February and March (Jan 10: 0.345, Feb 21: 0.845, Mar 14: 0.835). April reverted to January levels, though some days remain higher (Apr 4: 0.734, Apr 8: 0.521). Exchange netflows show massive inflows and outflows crossing since January, proving a fierce supply-demand battle (Jan 14: -6889, Jan 31: 12991, Mar 16: -18933). This volatility continues in April (Apr 6: 4157, Apr 10: -5407). Massive long liquidations significantly resolved overheated leverage. Despite price drops, the short-term holder realized price never broke and remains a firm support line. 2. Micro Trend: Short-Term Anxiety and Sentiment Recovery The perpetual-spot price gap consistently recorded minus figures, showing lingering bearish anxiety (Apr 4: -29.42, Apr 10: -45.3). However, the short-term holder SOPR recovered to 1 or above in April, halting panic selling and stabilizing sentiment (Apr 8: 1.011, Apr 11: 1.011). The adjusted SOPR also re-entered the profit zone (Apr 8: 1.008). ERC20 reserve is defending its level, but TRC20 reserve is trending downward from its peaks, indicating partially reduced buying capacity. 3. Conclusion This is a healthy correction phase rather than a dead cat bounce. The market is consolidating its bottom after shaking off extreme leverage and whale selling pressure amid a massive supply-demand battle since January. The core support line is defended, and short-term investor sentiment is recovering. Lingering short betting in the derivatives market could act as fuel for a short squeeze if spot market dynamics stay positive. Written by Easy On Chain

Leverage Washed Away: the Next Leap Pointed By On-Chain Data

1. Trend: Supply-Demand Battle and Overheating Resolution

In January, the exchange whale ratio was low but saw extreme selling in February and March (Jan 10: 0.345, Feb 21: 0.845, Mar 14: 0.835). April reverted to January levels, though some days remain higher (Apr 4: 0.734, Apr 8: 0.521).

Exchange netflows show massive inflows and outflows crossing since January, proving a fierce supply-demand battle (Jan 14: -6889, Jan 31: 12991, Mar 16: -18933). This volatility continues in April (Apr 6: 4157, Apr 10: -5407).

Massive long liquidations significantly resolved overheated leverage. Despite price drops, the short-term holder realized price never broke and remains a firm support line.

2. Micro Trend: Short-Term Anxiety and Sentiment Recovery

The perpetual-spot price gap consistently recorded minus figures, showing lingering bearish anxiety (Apr 4: -29.42, Apr 10: -45.3).

However, the short-term holder SOPR recovered to 1 or above in April, halting panic selling and stabilizing sentiment (Apr 8: 1.011, Apr 11: 1.011). The adjusted SOPR also re-entered the profit zone (Apr 8: 1.008).

ERC20 reserve is defending its level, but TRC20 reserve is trending downward from its peaks, indicating partially reduced buying capacity.

3. Conclusion

This is a healthy correction phase rather than a dead cat bounce. The market is consolidating its bottom after shaking off extreme leverage and whale selling pressure amid a massive supply-demand battle since January.

The core support line is defended, and short-term investor sentiment is recovering. Lingering short betting in the derivatives market could act as fuel for a short squeeze if spot market dynamics stay positive.

Written by Easy On Chain
Artikel
Bitcoin Volatility on Binance Falls to Lowest Level Since Early 2026Data from the Bitcoin Realized Volatility Index on Binance indicates a significant decrease in market volatility recently, with the index falling to its lowest level since the beginning of 2026. This suggests that Bitcoin is entering a period of relative calm and price stability. According to the latest data, the 30-day VVI stands at approximately 0.38, a low level compared to previous periods that witnessed significant increases in volatility, particularly during strong upward trends. This decline reflects a clear reduction in sharp price movements, with the market shifting toward a more stable trading range. Meanwhile, Bitcoin is trading near $71,000, reinforcing the idea that the market is experiencing a period of relative consolidation following earlier strong movements. Low volatility levels typically indicate a decrease in short-term speculative activity, as investors tend to wait before taking new positions, resulting in less volatile price swings. The index falling to its lowest level since the beginning of 2026 reflects a state of relative stability in the Bitcoin market, alongside reduced speculative activity and fewer sharp price movements. This environment may pave the way for a new phase of price action in the coming period. Written by Arab Chain

Bitcoin Volatility on Binance Falls to Lowest Level Since Early 2026

Data from the Bitcoin Realized Volatility Index on Binance indicates a significant decrease in market volatility recently, with the index falling to its lowest level since the beginning of 2026. This suggests that Bitcoin is entering a period of relative calm and price stability.

According to the latest data, the 30-day VVI stands at approximately 0.38, a low level compared to previous periods that witnessed significant increases in volatility, particularly during strong upward trends. This decline reflects a clear reduction in sharp price movements, with the market shifting toward a more stable trading range.

Meanwhile, Bitcoin is trading near $71,000, reinforcing the idea that the market is experiencing a period of relative consolidation following earlier strong movements. Low volatility levels typically indicate a decrease in short-term speculative activity, as investors tend to wait before taking new positions, resulting in less volatile price swings.

The index falling to its lowest level since the beginning of 2026 reflects a state of relative stability in the Bitcoin market, alongside reduced speculative activity and fewer sharp price movements. This environment may pave the way for a new phase of price action in the coming period.

Written by Arab Chain
Artikel
Is ETH Quietly Tightening Supply?ETH Exchange Reserve (supply on exchanges) has declined from around 35M ETH to 14.9M ETH → a drop of nearly 57%. Traders are currently showing more of a holding tendency rather than sending ETH to exchanges to take profit or cut losses. The remaining ETH supply on exchanges is now significantly lower compared to the 2020–2021 period. ETH Inflow to exchanges has increased recently, but the scale is still clearly lower than the peaks seen in 2021–2022 (the previous cycle top). Past spikes approached the 10M–20M ETH range, while recent clusters are notably smaller compared to those previous cycle peaks. Based on the data: ETH Reserve dropping sharply = less ETH readily available for selling on exchanges Inflow not surging like previous cycles = no signs of extreme deposit pressure (panic selling) These two charts suggest that ETH’s supply structure on exchanges remains relatively tight: reserves have dropped significantly, while inflows have not returned to extreme levels seen during prior major distribution phases. Price is currently moving near the lows of previous correction ranges. This may be considered a constructive signal under current conditions. Written by Rei Researcher

Is ETH Quietly Tightening Supply?

ETH Exchange Reserve (supply on exchanges) has declined from around 35M ETH to 14.9M ETH → a drop of nearly 57%.

Traders are currently showing more of a holding tendency rather than sending ETH to exchanges to take profit or cut losses. The remaining ETH supply on exchanges is now significantly lower compared to the 2020–2021 period.

ETH Inflow to exchanges has increased recently, but the scale is still clearly lower than the peaks seen in 2021–2022 (the previous cycle top).

Past spikes approached the 10M–20M ETH range, while recent clusters are notably smaller compared to those previous cycle peaks.

Based on the data:

ETH Reserve dropping sharply = less ETH readily available for selling on exchanges

Inflow not surging like previous cycles = no signs of extreme deposit pressure (panic selling)

These two charts suggest that ETH’s supply structure on exchanges remains relatively tight:

reserves have dropped significantly, while inflows have not returned to extreme levels seen during prior major distribution phases. Price is currently moving near the lows of previous correction ranges. This may be considered a constructive signal under current conditions.

Written by Rei Researcher
Artikel
First-Mover Claim: Japanese Charting Methods Applied to Multiple Professional Indicators ↓• Japanese charting methods became the global standard for financial market visualization. The majority of professional traders on Wall Street use them. I recommend reading the following: • This dashboard demonstrates, through empirical examples, for the first time that Japanese charting methods, with more than 200 years of history and part of the CMT body of knowledge, a designation recognized by FINRA and the SEC, are applied directly to numerical data that do not represent raw price (many professional indicators), and can be used for trading. • For the first time as well, I used them to represent network data. • Includes the history of Candlesticks, Heikin-Ashi, Renko, Anchored VWAP, and Realized Cap/Price, their different forms of use, and reference links for further exploration (31 links included). • All the trading material shared here comes from authors whose work has been vetted and promoted by the CMT (Chartered Market Technician). • The CMT Association was founded in 1973 by Ralph Acampora, John Brooks, and John Greeley, growing from informal meetings of technical analysts that began in New York in 1967. Over the following decades, Acampora and the association worked to legitimize the discipline (it was finally recognized by FINRA and the SEC). Today, the CMT represents the highest professional standard in technical analysis. Acampora himself evolved to advocate for what he calls "fusion analysis", the integration of technical and fundamental approaches, as the most complete way to analyze markets. • The path of technical analysis toward institutional recognition is quite similar to Bitcoin’s. Both faced years of skepticism before regulators (SEC) acknowledged their legitimacy. • Check the link below ↓ Written by _OnChain

First-Mover Claim: Japanese Charting Methods Applied to Multiple Professional Indicators ↓

• Japanese charting methods became the global standard for financial market visualization. The majority of professional traders on Wall Street use them. I recommend reading the following:

• This dashboard demonstrates, through empirical examples, for the first time that Japanese charting methods, with more than 200 years of history and part of the CMT body of knowledge, a designation recognized by FINRA and the SEC, are applied directly to numerical data that do not represent raw price (many professional indicators), and can be used for trading.

• For the first time as well, I used them to represent network data.

• Includes the history of Candlesticks, Heikin-Ashi, Renko, Anchored VWAP, and Realized Cap/Price, their different forms of use, and reference links for further exploration (31 links included).

• All the trading material shared here comes from authors whose work has been vetted and promoted by the CMT (Chartered Market Technician).

• The CMT Association was founded in 1973 by Ralph Acampora, John Brooks, and John Greeley, growing from informal meetings of technical analysts that began in New York in 1967. Over the following decades, Acampora and the association worked to legitimize the discipline (it was finally recognized by FINRA and the SEC). Today, the CMT represents the highest professional standard in technical analysis. Acampora himself evolved to advocate for what he calls "fusion analysis", the integration of technical and fundamental approaches, as the most complete way to analyze markets.

• The path of technical analysis toward institutional recognition is quite similar to Bitcoin’s. Both faced years of skepticism before regulators (SEC) acknowledged their legitimacy.

• Check the link below ↓

Written by _OnChain
Artikel
First-Mover Claim: Japanese Charting Methods Applied to Multiple Professional Indicators ↓• Japanese charting methods became the global standard for financial market visualization. The majority of professional traders on Wall Street use them. I recommend reading the following: • This dashboard demonstrates, through empirical examples, for the first time that Japanese charting methods, with more than 200 years of history and part of the CMT body of knowledge, a designation recognized by FINRA and the SEC, are applied directly to numerical data that do not represent raw price (many professional indicators), and can be used for trading. • For the first time as well, I used them to represent network data. • Includes the history of Candlesticks, Heikin-Ashi, Renko, Anchored VWAP, and Realized Cap/Price, their different forms of use, and reference links for further exploration (31 links included). • All the trading material shared here comes from authors whose work has been vetted and promoted by the CMT (Chartered Market Technician). • The CMT Association was founded in 1973 by Ralph Acampora, John Brooks, and John Greeley, growing from informal meetings of technical analysts that began in New York in 1967. Over the following decades, Acampora and the association worked to legitimize the discipline (it was finally recognized by FINRA and the SEC). Today, the CMT represents the highest professional standard in technical analysis. Acampora himself evolved to advocate for what he calls "fusion analysis", the integration of technical and fundamental approaches, as the most complete way to analyze markets. • The path of technical analysis toward institutional recognition is quite similar to Bitcoin’s. Both faced years of skepticism before regulators (SEC) acknowledged their legitimacy. • Check the link below ↓ Written by _OnChain

First-Mover Claim: Japanese Charting Methods Applied to Multiple Professional Indicators ↓

• Japanese charting methods became the global standard for financial market visualization. The majority of professional traders on Wall Street use them. I recommend reading the following:

• This dashboard demonstrates, through empirical examples, for the first time that Japanese charting methods, with more than 200 years of history and part of the CMT body of knowledge, a designation recognized by FINRA and the SEC, are applied directly to numerical data that do not represent raw price (many professional indicators), and can be used for trading.

• For the first time as well, I used them to represent network data.

• Includes the history of Candlesticks, Heikin-Ashi, Renko, Anchored VWAP, and Realized Cap/Price, their different forms of use, and reference links for further exploration (31 links included).

• All the trading material shared here comes from authors whose work has been vetted and promoted by the CMT (Chartered Market Technician).

• The CMT Association was founded in 1973 by Ralph Acampora, John Brooks, and John Greeley, growing from informal meetings of technical analysts that began in New York in 1967. Over the following decades, Acampora and the association worked to legitimize the discipline (it was finally recognized by FINRA and the SEC). Today, the CMT represents the highest professional standard in technical analysis. Acampora himself evolved to advocate for what he calls "fusion analysis", the integration of technical and fundamental approaches, as the most complete way to analyze markets.

• The path of technical analysis toward institutional recognition is quite similar to Bitcoin’s. Both faced years of skepticism before regulators (SEC) acknowledged their legitimacy.

• Check the link below ↓

Written by _OnChain
Log ind for at udforske mere indhold
Slut dig til globale kryptobrugere på Binance Square
⚡️ Få de seneste og nyttige oplysninger om krypto.
💬 Betroet af verdens største kryptobørs.
👍 Opdag reelle indsigter fra verificerede skabere.
E-mail/telefonnummer
Sitemap
Cookie-præferencer
Vilkår og betingelser for platform