Mr_Ishaq818275

Chlapi, důležitá aktualizace!
Prezident Trump dnes oznámí nového předsedu Federálního rezervního systému a zároveň potvrdí čerstvé snížení úrokových sazeb.

Čas je 18:10 ET, takže sledujte trhy.
Právě teď trh již reaguje před oznámením.

Obchodníci očekávají vysokou volatilitu a mnoho z nich věří, že Bitcoin by mohl zaznamenat silný krátký squeeze, pokud se zpráva o snížení sazeb stane agresivní.
Toto oznámení může rozhodnout o dalším významném pohybu na trhu.
Pokud Fed signalizuje silnější snížení sazeb, kryptoměny by mohly dostat velký impuls.

Ethereum (ETH) was introduced in 2015 by Vitalik Buterin along with a group of co-founders, marking the birth of the world’s first fully programmable blockchain. Unlike earlier blockchains focused mainly on peer-to-peer transfers, Ethereum enabled smart contracts and decentralized applications (dApps), opening the door to a new digital economy.

In 2022, Ethereum completed its historic transition from Proof of Work (PoW) (Proof of Work) to Proof of Stake (PoS) (Proof of Stake) through an upgrade known as The Merge. This shift significantly improved energy efficiency while strengthening Ethereum’s role as the backbone of decentralized finance (DeFi) and Web3 innovation.

Today, the Ethereum ecosystem hosts thousands of decentralized applications, including DeFi platforms like Uniswap and Aave, NFT marketplaces, blockchain games, and layer-2 scaling solutions such as Arbitrum and Polygon. Within this ecosystem, ETH functions both as a digital asset and as “gas,” the fuel required to execute smart contracts on the network.

CoinDesk provides comprehensive coverage of Ethereum, including protocol upgrades, scalability progress, staking developments, DeFi growth, and regulatory trends. Our reporting follows Ethereum’s evolving roadmap and explores how programmable money and decentralized autonomous organizations (DAOs) are reshaping the global financial landscape.

Disclosure: This content was created with the assistance of artificial intelligence (AI) (Artificial Intelligence) and reviewed by a human editor.

Solana (SOL) is one of the most dynamic assets in the cryptocurrency market. By looking at actual year-end closing prices, rather than averages or ranges, we can clearly see how Solana has moved through rapid growth, deep corrections, and strong recoveries over time.

Year-End Closing Prices of Solana (SOL)

2020 – ~$1.51
2021 – ~$170.30
2022 – ~$9.96
2023 – ~$101.51
2024 – ~$189.26
2026 – ????

---

2020: Early Foundation

Solana closed 2020 at approximately $1.51. During this period, the project was still in its early stages, focusing on building a high-speed and scalable blockchain infrastructure. Market awareness was limited, but the technical foundation was being established.

2021: Breakout Year

In 2021, Solana experienced explosive growth, closing the year near $170.30. The rise of decentralized finance (DeFi) and non-fungible tokens (NFTs), combined with Solana’s fast transaction speeds and low fees, pushed SOL into the spotlight as a major blockchain platform.

2022: Market Collapse

The crypto market downturn in 2022 had a severe impact on Solana. Network concerns, ecosystem stress, and broader market failures led SOL to close the year at around $9.96. This marked one of the most challenging periods in the project’s history.

2023: Recovery Phase

Solana showed strong resilience in 2023, ending the year at approximately $101.51. Improved network stability, increased developer activity, and renewed investor confidence helped the ecosystem regain momentum after the previous year’s decline.

2024: Strength and Expansion

By the end of 2024, Solana closed at about $189.26. Growth in on-chain activity, expanding use cases, and rising adoption across the crypto space positioned Solana as one of the strongest performers of the year.

2026: Looking Ahead

The year-end closing price for 2026 remains unknown. However, Solana’s historical price action highlights a clear pattern of extreme cycles followed by recovery. Future performance will depend on adoption, technological progress, and overall market conditions.

---

Conclusion

From $1.51 in 2020 to $189.26 in 2024, Solana’s journey reflects both the risks and opportunities present in the cryptocurrency market. While volatility remains a defining feature, Solana has repeatedly demonstrated the abili
ty to recover and grow after major downturns
#USNonFarmPayrollReport #BinanceBlockchainWeek #BTCVSGOLD #USNonFarmPayrollReport $SOL .

$XRP U.S. lawmakers are advancing the Clarity Act (Regulatory Clarity Act) — and one rule is shaking the crypto market:
👉 No entity connected to a crypto project can control more than 20% of total supply if the asset wants commodity status.
⚠️ The issue?
Ripple still controls 30%+ of XRP, including 34 billion XRP locked in escrow.
👀 So what happens next?
🧠 Some believe Ripple may need to reduce its XRP holdings.
Others are pointing to something far more surprising…
💥 WHAT IF RIPPLE BECOMES A BANK?
According to Brad Kimes (Digital Perspectives),
a national bank charter could place Ripple under a different regulatory framework — potentially bypassing the 20% supply cap entirely.
That would mean: ✅ No forced selling
✅ No distribution pressure
✅ No supply shock
⚠️ Still speculative — regulators have not confirmed this.
But the narrative shift alone is powerful.
🏦 RIPPLE’S BIG MOVE (MOST PEOPLE MISSED THIS): • Applied to form Ripple National Trust Bank
• Requested a Federal Reserve master account
• Direct access to Fedwire & FedNow
• 24/7 issuance & redemption of RLUSD (Ripple USD stablecoin)
• No reliance on third-party custodians
📌 This is institutional-grade positioning, not retail hype.
🤖 PRICE IMPACT? HERE’S THE WILD PART…
According to Google Gemini Artificial Intelligence (AI): If Ripple secures a banking charter + Federal Reserve access,
it could become one of the strongest institutional validations in crypto history.
🚀 In an extreme bullish scenario: 💥 XRP → $50
Driven by: • Regulatory clarity
• Bank & institutional adoption
• Removal of long-standing legal uncertainty
👀 Most traders are chasing noise.
💡 Smart money watches regulation + market structure.
⚠️ Not financial advice.
Narratives usually move before price does.
🔥 If Ripple gets the license, XRP won’t wait for late buyers.
XRPUSDT (XRP–Tether United States Dollar)
Perpetual Futures
📉 1.9963 | −1.84%
#XRP #Ripple #BinanceSquare #SmartMoney #Altcoins 🚀👑

Expert Report: Q4 2025 Strategic Assessment

​1. Overview and Executive Summary

​This strategic assessment analyzes the digital asset market trends observed on December 13, 2025, synthesizing the disclosed financial data with concurrent regulatory, geopolitical, and scientific developments. The analysis is targeted toward institutional investors and corporate strategy executives seeking to position capital amid accelerated technological centralization and burgeoning global systemic risks.

​Executive Summary: Key Findings

​The current market environment is defined by a dynamic tension between increasing domestic regulatory certainty in high-growth technology sectors and heightened international geopolitical and environmental fragility.

​Regulatory Centralization and Sector De-Risking: The Trump Administration is aggressively pursuing regulatory preemption in both Artificial Intelligence (AI) and Digital Assets, centralizing authority to foster a uniform, minimally-burdensome federal operational environment. This strategy, highlighted by the December 11, 2025, AI Executive Order and simultaneous targeting of bank restrictions on digital asset firms, substantially reduces legal fragmentation and operational friction for institutional adoption.
​Digital Asset Maturation and Resilience: With a global cryptocurrency market capitalization of $3.07 Trillion and Bitcoin trading above $90,000, the asset class is fully established. Despite a minor overall downturn on this date, fundamental utility growth—evidenced by national blockchain integrations in Kazakhstan and Pakistan—is decoupled from short-term macro price fluctuations, demonstrating structural resilience.
​Geopolitical Instability: The violent breakdown of the US-brokered Cambodia–Thailand ceasefire, marked by airstrikes in early December 2025, signals elevated regional conflict risk and diplomatic fragility in Southeast Asia. This volatility requires maintenance of significant liquidity and application of higher risk premiums to regional supply chain exposure.
​Systemic Environmental Constraints: The 2025 Planetary Health Check confirms that seven of nine planetary boundaries have been breached, including the Ocean Acidification boundary for the first time. This scientific confirmation transitions environmental stress into an immediate, mandatory financial input, necessitating urgent capital redirection toward deep-tech resilience solutions, particularly Quantum Computing and advanced regenerative sciences, which witnessed landmark breakthroughs this year.

​1.1 The $90,000 Bitcoin Baseline: Financial Context and Institutional Saturation

​The snapshot of the global cryptocurrency market on December 13, 2025, provides a definitive illustration of the asset class’s maturation. The reported global cryptocurrency market capitalization stands at $3.07 Trillion, with Bitcoin (BTC) trading at $90,355, reflecting a 24-hour decline of -1.79% [Image]. This valuation level is far removed from the speculative periods of previous cycles; it represents a fundamental entrenchment of digital assets within the global financial system. The high price point is maintained by a market deep enough to absorb regulatory scrutiny and geopolitical shock, reinforcing the established position of BTC as a primary component of portfolio diversification.

​The normalization of this high-value ecosystem is directly supported by the headline referencing that public and private companies have maintained "Bitcain Holdings Since January 2023" [Image]. This suggests a sustained, institutional-driven accumulation strategy over a period of almost two years, confirming that digital assets are no longer viewed as peripheral but rather as core treasury management and inflation-hedging instruments.

​1.2 Analysis of Market Movers: Decoupling Price from Fundamental Adoption

​The short-term price movements observed on December 13 are mixed, suggesting sensitivity to macro sentiment or regulatory concerns, despite positive fundamental developments. Key Layer 1/Layer 2 assets, including Ethereum (ETH), BNB, and Solana (SOL), showed steeper 24-hour losses than Bitcoin, recording drops of -3.71%, -2.79%, and -2.21%, respectively [Image]. This pattern of deeper losses in the Decentralized Finance (DeFi) ecosystem often indicates capital moving out of complex, high-risk platforms and into the relative stability of Bitcoin during periods of uncertainty.

​The most compelling observation regarding market dynamics is the clear decoupling between asset price action and fundamental utility growth. The market update features the major development that "Kazakhstan Integrates Solana into National Blockchain Strategy" [Image]. Such a high-profile sovereign integration, which establishes tangible, long-term utility for the Solana network, is fundamentally bullish. Yet, the price of SOL dropped by 2.21% on the same day. This demonstrates that while government and institutional integration represent long-term structural validity, immediate market sentiment and liquid macro factors—such as general risk-off sentiment or potential regulatory anticipation—can temporarily dictate price over fundamental utility.

​This global trend of acceptance extends beyond Kazakhstan. Reports confirm that "Pakistan Integrates Bitcoin into Economic Infrastructure" and mention "Bratil's Plans to Tokenize Bank Recommends Bitcoin Investmorck" (interpreted as Brazil’s tokenization strategy) [Image]. These concurrent developments demonstrate a global movement toward recognizing Bitcoin and blockchain technology as decentralized infrastructural layers essential for national economies and traditional banking sector advancements.

​1.3 Interpreting SEC and OCC Regulatory Signals

​The market narrative is heavily influenced by rapid shifts in US federal regulatory posture concerning financial technology.

​The headline "President Trump Targets Bank Restrictions on Digital Asset Firms as OCC Issites New OvererrCut Warning" [Image] signals a direct, aggressive administrative intervention aimed at dismantling barriers imposed by legacy financial regulators, specifically the Office of the Comptroller of the Currency (OCC). This action explicitly supports the integration of digital asset firms into the traditional banking system. The decision to target these restrictions is consistent with a broader administrative policy objective: to foster US leadership in high-growth technology by forcibly reducing the operational and compliance burden on firms.

​Furthermore, the announced "SEC Chairman Intounces Shift to On-Chain Financial Markets" [Image] confirms that the US securities regulator has accepted the permanence of the technology. This signifies a monumental pivot away from existential challenges to the digital asset sector and toward defining the required rules of engagement for on-chain finance. If this shift prioritizes regulatory clarity and standardized safety measures, it represents a dramatic reduction in systemic regulatory risk for institutional investors contemplating large-scale entry.

​2. The Friction of Federal Regulatory Supremacy

​The administrative agenda on digital assets is mirrored by an equally decisive and potentially controversial strategy concerning Artificial Intelligence (AI). This policy centralization seeks to ensure federal supremacy, thereby imposing a uniform regulatory framework designed to accelerate technological progress and prevent state-level legislative fragmentation.

​2.1 The December 11, 2025, AI Executive Order: Precedent for Federal Supremacy

​Two days prior to the market update, on December 11, 2025, President Trump signed the Executive Order (EO) titled "Ensuring A National Policy Framework For Artificial Intelligence". This EO represents an aggressive step toward preempting and invalidating state and local regulation of AI.

​The administration's central objective is to eliminate the severe barrier posed by requiring companies to navigate "50 different approvals from 50 different states," arguing this would destroy AI in its infancy. The underlying motive is explicitly framed around national technological competition and avoiding ideological fragmentation, with the President stating that allowing "one woke state" to impose rules would force the entire industry to comply with that ideology. This establishes a clear economic and political driver: the priority is protecting US technological dominance via a unified, minimally burdensome federal framework.

​The EO employs significant enforcement mechanisms, which demonstrate the gravity of the federal commitment to preemption:

​DOJ AI Litigation Task Force: The EO mandates the U.S. Attorney General, Pam Bondi, to establish an "AI Litigation Task Force" within the Department of Justice (DOJ) within thirty days. This task force is given the "sole responsibility" to challenge state AI laws in court, using grounds such as unconstitutional regulation of interstate commerce or preemption by existing federal regulations.

​Financial Leverage: The administration threatens to restrict federal funding, particularly from broadband deployment programs and other grant initiatives, to states that implement AI regulations deemed burdensome.

​2.2 Case Studies in Regulatory Challenge: Colorado and California

​The federal pushback is not theoretical; it targets existing state laws designed to mitigate specific societal risks.

​Colorado's "Consumer Protections for Artificial Intelligence Act," although delayed until June 2026, is explicitly identified in the federal order as an example of "harmful excessive State regulation". Colorado’s law was implemented to prevent algorithmic discrimination in critical decisions related to employment, housing, and healthcare. The administration’s critique centers on the claim that such laws risk requiring AI systems to "produce false results in order to avoid differential treatment or impact". This exposes a profound policy conflict: whether to prioritize unconstrained innovation and speed to market, as demanded by industry, or to mandate algorithmic fairness and mitigation of human bias in high-stakes societal systems. For businesses, the federal intervention creates significant uncertainty regarding the eventual implementation of state compliance costs.

​Similarly, California's "frontier" AI laws are likely targets. These laws require developers to publish their safety plans, disclose how they incorporate national and international safety standards, and report critical safety incidents. Large frontier developers are also required to summarize catastrophic risk assessments and review and update their frameworks annually. These disclosure and safety mandates, while supported by civil liberties groups and researchers concerned about risk, are framed by the Trump administration as unnecessary bureaucratic hurdles that impede American innovation.

​2.3 Integration: AI Regulatory Preemption and Digital Asset Strategy

​The regulatory preemption efforts in AI and digital assets are managed under a singular, unified administrative vision. This is confirmed by the influential role assigned to the Special Advisor for AI and Crypto, David Sacks, who is instructed to consult directly with the newly established DOJ AI Litigation Task Force. The fact that the same Special Advisor oversees both AI policy and cryptocurrency policy confirms that the administration views these as inseparable vectors for US technological and economic dominance.

​This unified approach, favoring centralized federal rules over fragmented state laws (as seen in the challenge to Colorado's laws and the pushback against the OCC's "OvererrCut" restrictions [Image]), establishes a crucial de-risking factor for institutional investors. By consolidating regulatory decision-making and prioritizing national uniformity, the administration effectively promises a simpler, more predictable operating environment, directly benefitting firms involved in both AI development and digital asset infrastructure.

​The strategic conflicts surrounding this centralization are summarized below:

​Table 2.2: US Regulatory Preemption Strategy: Conflicts and Implications
3. Geopolitical Risk Assessment: Conflict and Instability
The minor downturn in digital asset prices on December 13, 2025, must be contextualized by immediate and acute geopolitical volatility, especially the violent collapse of a critical, recent diplomatic agreement in Southeast Asia.
3.1 The Failure of the Kuala Lumpur Peace Accords (Cambodia–Thailand)
The conflict along the Cambodia–Thailand border, rooted in long-standing disputes over ancient temples and cultural ownership, escalated sharply in July 2025, causing dozens of deaths and displacing hundreds of thousands of people. A ceasefire, known as the Kuala Lumpur Peace Accords, was brokered by US President Donald Trump and Malaysian Prime Minister Anwar Ibrahim (as ASEAN Chair) in late July.
By early December 2025, this truce had failed. Thailand suspended the implementation of the deal in November, citing renewed hostilities. The conflict violently re-escalated, culminating in Thailand launching airstrikes against Cambodian military positions on or around December 8, 2025, in response to artillery and mortar fire. The exchanges resulted in civilian and military casualties on both sides.
As of the date of the market update, the situation remains highly volatile. The US Embassy in Thailand issued a security alert on December 8, 2025, urging US citizens to avoid all travel within 50 kilometers of the border due to active hostilities and unpredictable security conditions. International reaction, including statements from the Australian Government and ASEAN, has focused on calling both nations to abide by the collapsed July ceasefire and de-escalate.
The collapse of a high-profile, US-brokered diplomatic agreement just weeks after its signing fundamentally elevates the perceived instability not just of the immediate border region, but also of ASEAN’s collective security architecture. This failure necessitates a higher geopolitical risk premium across supply chains and investments linked to Southeast Asia, contributing to generalized risk aversion that affects high-liquidity assets like cryptocurrencies.
3.2 Global Instability Context
The Cambodia-Thailand conflict is not an isolated event. Global reports from the same period confirm a persistent state of armed conflict and volatility: the ongoing Sudanese Civil War , attacks on joint Syrian and American convoys in Palmyra , and continuing Russian military actions against Ukraine. This constant stream of high-intensity conflict globally validates the inherent volatility of the 2025 security environment. For asset allocation, this reinforces the rationale for favoring digital assets—specifically Bitcoin—as a highly liquid, non-sovereign hedge against sovereign and regional political risk.
4. Systemic Long-Term Risk and Next-Generation Technology Vectors
While short-term policy and conflict dominate news headlines, the structural assessment of the late 2025 environment must incorporate the accelerating acceleration of planetary-scale systemic failure and the technological breakthroughs required to mitigate it.
4.1 The 2025 Planetary Health Check: Crossing Critical Thresholds
The Potsdam Institute for Climate Impact Research (PIK) published the 2025 Planetary Health Check, a landmark scientific review that confirms a significant escalation of risk to Earth’s life-support systems. The report reveals that seven of the nine critical planetary boundaries have now been breached, with all seven showing worsening trends. Only Ozone Depletion and Aerosol Loading remain within the safe operating space.
Most critically, the boundary for Ocean Acidification was assessed as transgressed for the first time in 2025. The control variable for this boundary is the global mean aragonite saturation state of the surface ocean. This chemical change, driven by the absorption of increasing amounts of anthropogenic carbon dioxide, represents a 30-40% increase in acidity since the industrial era. This shift pushes ocean chemistry beyond safe levels, placing cold-water corals, tropical coral reefs, and Arctic marine life at severe risk and degrading the ocean's function as a global climate stabilizer.
The breaching of seven planetary boundaries places the Earth in the "upper end of the danger zone" and closer to the "high risk zone" for triggering catastrophic tipping points, such as the irreversible collapse of major ice sheets or the dieback of the Amazon rainforest. This development mandates a fundamental shift in capital modeling: environmental degradation is no longer an externality but an immediate, quantifiable constraint on future economic activity. Investment strategies must incorporate climate risk as a core determinant of long-term solvency, especially for sectors dependent on intact ecosystem services.
4.2 Required Investment Vector: Climate Resilience and Technology
The confirmation of accelerating systemic planetary risk necessitates immediate investment in deep resilience technology. The market must pivot capital toward solutions that address the consequences of these breaches. Research highlights that solutions are rapidly emerging, such as the effectiveness of regular prescribed burns in promoting carbon sequestration in forests , and new technologies like green ammonia production and geothermal energy.
Furthermore, localized environmental risks linked to policy changes are evident. For example, studies by UC Merced indicate that the Central Valley of California now accounts for approximately 77% of fallowed agricultural land in the state, directly correlating with about 88% of serious dust storms. This link between water regulation, land use change (one of the breached boundaries), and local environmental catastrophe illustrates the rapid transition of environmental stress into tangible physical and economic costs.
4.3 The Quantum Computing Watershed Moment (2025)
The severity and complexity of the planetary health challenge require computing power far beyond classical systems. Analysis confirms that 2025 marks a "watershed moment" for Quantum Computing (QC), moving the technology decisively from specialized research toward commercial viability.
A major structural impediment, quantum error correction, saw dramatic progress in 2025. Recent breakthroughs have pushed error rates to record lows—reported at 0.000015% per operation—with new algorithmic techniques reducing error correction overhead by up to 100 times. This technical advancement substantially accelerates the timeline for achieving practical, fault-tolerant quantum computing.
Simultaneously, the commercialization phase has begun, with systems like Quantinuum’s Helios launching and achieving high accuracy. The focus on hybrid quantum-classical systems is intensifying, accelerating applications across optimization, drug discovery, and, critically, complex climate modeling. Bain reports that QC could unlock up to $250 billion in market value for the pharmaceutical, finance, logistics, and materials science industries. Given the systemic complexity outlined by the Planetary Health Check, only technologies capable of solving exponentially complex problems (Quantum AI and QC) offer a mechanism to address climate change and materials science requirements at the necessary scale. Investment in QC is thus both a major profit opportunity and an essential defensive strategy against planetary destabilization.
4.4 Advances in Regenerative Medicine and Deep Science
In parallel with computing and climate breakthroughs, significant advancements in medical research highlight the accelerated pace of scientific progress in 2025. Researchers successfully developed the first implantable patch to strengthen the heart walls in monkeys, utilizing lab-grown stem cells coaxed into becoming heart muscle and connective tissue. Additionally, scientists successfully created functioning ureter tissue from programmable stem cells, addressing a previously missing component in renal system regeneration.
These successes in regenerative medicine and molecular biology are coupled with major advances in women’s health, such as the approval of new non-hormonal treatments for hot flashes (e.g., Lynkuet), which target temperature-regulating neurons in the hypothalamus. This successful translation of complex cell biology into clinically relevant products demonstrates that focused, aggressive R&D investment across deep science sectors continues to yield transformative and high-value returns.
5. Strategic Synthesis and Recommendations for Institutional Capital
The operational environment of late 2025 presents a dual imperative: tactical navigation of domestic policy shifts and strategic deployment of capital against global existential risks.
5.1 Tactical Positioning: Capitalizing on Regulatory Certainty
The US government has established a clear policy preference for technological acceleration through regulatory centralization. The unified approach to AI and Digital Asset policy, overseen by a single advisory function, serves to remove uncertainty regarding federal versus state regulatory jurisdiction. The active policy efforts to preempt restrictive state laws (like those in Colorado and California) and remove obstacles to digital asset integration into the traditional banking system (via the OCC challenge) are major de-risking factors for US-based digital asset infrastructure and large technology companies.
Recommendation: Institutional portfolios should overweight US-domiciled digital asset and AI infrastructure investments. The administrative drive for a unified national operating framework substantially reduces litigation risk and compliance fragmentation, offering a distinct competitive advantage for firms established in this environment.
5.2 Strategic Long-Term Allocation: Systemic Risk Hedging
Geopolitical volatility, underlined by the failed Cambodia–Thailand ceasefire and ongoing global conflicts, remains a persistent threat that influences short-term market sentiment and liquidity. More profoundly, the scientific confirmation that seven of nine planetary boundaries have been breached, including the critical Ocean Acidification threshold, mandates a reassessment of long-term risk.
Recommendation 1 (Hedge): Maintain high, strategic exposure to Bitcoin. The asset’s $90,000+ baseline and regulatory streamlining (Section 2) position it as a globally liquid, non-sovereign safe harbor capable of hedging against immediate geopolitical and political shock, which remains endemic to the 2025 global security environment.
Recommendation 2 (Opportunity and Mitigation): Dedicate a mandatory portion of strategic capital to Deep Technology (DeepTech) focused explicitly on resilience and systemic solutions. Investment should prioritize sectors demonstrating 2025 breakthroughs necessary to combat planetary degradation:
Quantum Computing: Target firms rapidly advancing quantum error correction and hybrid QC-AI systems, positioning capital to unlock the substantial future market value projected for this sector, and viewing QC as an essential tool for solving complex climate and materials science challenges.
Climate Resilience Technology: Allocate capital to solutions addressing the economic risks associated with breached boundaries, including technologies focused on sustainable food security (in response to Land System Change) and those directly mitigating the impacts of ocean acidification and warming.
In conclusion, the market's minor volatility on December 13, 2025, masks a fundamental bifurcation in global strategic planning. While regulatory policy is creating domestic financial certainty, the systemic risks associated with geopolitical instability and planetary failure are accelerating. The optimal strategy requires institutional capital to exploit the certainty offered by the new US federal technology policy framework while simultaneously investing defensively and aggressively into the foundational sciences required for long-term planetary, and thus economic, resilience.
#CryptoResearch #USJobsData #BTCVSGOLD $BTC $ETH $SOL