Alther

Rychlý růst digitálních aktiv vedl mnoho muslimů k tomu, aby se ptali na zásadní otázku: mohou být kryptoměny v souladu s islámským právem? Odpověď není jednoduché „halal“ nebo „haram.“ Závisí na tom, jak je aktivum strukturováno, jaká je jeho funkce a jak je používáno. Tři základní principy islámských financí řídí toto hodnocení: vyhýbání se riba (úrokům), vyhýbání se nadměrnému ghararu (nejistotě) a vyhýbání se maysiru (hazardním hrám).
V praxi lze kryptoměny považovat za digitální komodity plně vlastněné jejich držiteli. Když se obchoduje na spotovém základě — bez pákového efektu, marže, futures nebo jakékoli formy derivátového kontraktu — riziko riba je podstatně sníženo. Mnohé současné fatwa orgány považují kryptoměny s jasnou užitečností, jako je sloužení jako prostředek směny, za potenciálně přípustné (mubah), pokud jsou zacházeno jako s jakýmkoli jiným obchodovatelným aktivem.

When Crypto Becomes a Language, Not Just an Asset
In many K-dramas, the greatest conflicts rarely come from grand betrayals or spectacular villains. They emerge from something smaller: words left unsaid, meanings misunderstood, silence mistaken for indifference. The same pattern quietly governs the world of crypto.
Can This Crypto Be Translated? is another way of reading this phenomenon—not as a story about prices, charts, or profit, but as a story about humans trying to understand a new system using an old language.
Crypto is often treated like love: everyone talks about it, yet few agree on what it actually means. For some, crypto is technology—an instrument of efficiency, data, and financial solutions. For others, it is ideology—a belief in freedom, sovereignty, and trust without intermediaries. Trouble begins when these two languages meet but fail to translate one another.
That is where the drama starts.
The same whitepaper can be read as innovation by one person and as danger by another. The same chart can spark hope on one side and anxiety on the other. Arguments rarely end because of a lack of data, but because each side operates within a different framework of meaning.
Like human relationships, crypto is often misunderstood not because it lacks substance, but because everyone brings their own dictionary.
Crypto also exposes a classic paradox: a system designed to remove dependency ends up demanding an extraordinary level of trust. Not trust in banks, but in code. Not in institutions, but in communities. Many stumble here, because trust is an emotional language, while crypto is usually presented in technical terms.
The drama deepens when crypto enters daily life. Price notifications arrive in moments of emotional fatigue. Financial decisions become entangled with personal beliefs. Rational analysis and hope sit at the same table, frequently clashing.
The real question is no longer, “Will crypto go up or down?”
but, “Can crypto be translated into something humans can understand together?”
Like a good K-drama, Can This Crypto Be Translated? offers no definitive answers. Instead, it invites acceptance of a quieter truth: some things can never be fully translated. All we can do is keep trying—to listen longer, explain more honestly, and admit that differences in meaning are not always threats, sometimes just distances yet to be bridged.
In the end, crypto is not about coins or chains.
It is a mirror.
And what we often see reflected is not the future of technology, but our own relationship with trust, risk, and hope.
That is where the drama truly lives.
Not in the market—but in people.
#Crypto #BTC #BCH #XMR

In the crypto world, time is usually neutral. Blocks are produced, prices move, markets make noise. But for Monero (XMR), 2026 turns time into something political. The Monero clock—the XMR clock—does not simply tick along with market cycles; it negotiates with a world increasingly hostile to privacy.
XMR was born as a quiet refusal of radical transparency. It does not shout. It does not perform. It works in silence. And precisely because of that, in 2026 its hands move differently.
The first half of 2026 feels like a period of adjustment. Regulatory pressure has not vanished, delistings still cast long shadows, and liquidity migrates into quieter channels: DEXs, atomic swaps, peer-to-peer routes. The Monero clock slows—not from weakness, but from choosing paths that avoid the crowd. What remains is not speculative noise, but a community shaped by conviction rather than momentum.
By mid-year, the XMR clock begins to find its rhythm. While mainstream crypto leans hard into compliance narratives, Monero becomes an uncomfortable mirror—reminding us that money was once built for freedom, not reporting. Adoption does not arrive through marketing campaigns, but through necessity: private payments, protection from excessive surveillance, and transactions that still feel human.
The closing months of 2026 are not about euphoria, but resilience. If global markets wobble—through monetary tightening, financial censorship, or institutional distrust—Monero’s hands tend to steady. Not because of promised returns, but because of function. At this stage, the XMR clock resembles an old mechanical watch: not the flashiest, not the fastest, but still accurate when the power goes out.
Monero in 2026 teaches a simple lesson: time does not always favor the loudest projects. Sometimes it favors the most consistent. XMR is not for everyone—and perhaps it never intended to be. It is a clock for those who believe that privacy is not a feature, but a fundamental right.
And as the world grows brighter under constant scrutiny, the Monero clock keeps ticking in the shade—protecting secrecy, preserving function, and guarding the deeper meaning of money itself.
#XMR #Monero

Komunity kolem Bitcoinu Cash (BCH) a Monero (XMR) nevznikly pouze z tržního nadšení. Vznikly z tichého zdroje: morální nespokojenosti. Jak se finanční systémy stávaly stále sofistikovanějšími, stávaly se také stále invazivnějšími, dražšími a centralizovanějšími. BCH a XMR existují proto, že někteří lidé odmítli přijmout tuto cestu jako nevyhnutelnou.
Toto není příběh o zisku. Je to příběh o tom, kde peníze patří do lidského života.
----------
BCH: Tichý odmítnutí finanční elitismu

Když se poprvé objevila řešení Layer 2, byla považována za zachránce. Rychlejší transakce, nižší poplatky a slib, že blockchainy konečně mohou škálovat pro masy. V roce 2025 tento narativ zastaral. Co zůstává, není hype, ale obtížnější otázka: zaslouží si všechny sítě Layer 2 stále existovat?
Pravda je nepříjemná, ale jasná: Layer 2 nezhynul – ale již není automaticky relevantní. Přesunul se z revoluční infrastruktury na obyčejné potrubí, a obyčejná infrastruktura musí každý den ospravedlňovat svou přítomnost.