ROYCE_ARLO

Look, let’s be honest for a second. Most new blockchains don’t actually feel new. You read the announcement, you skim the docs, and halfway through you realize it’s the same story again. Slightly faster. Slightly cheaper. Same problems, just with better marketing.

That’s why Fogo caught my attention.

Not because it promised to “change everything” (every chain says that), but because it made a very specific, very opinionated choice: build a high-performance Layer-1 using the Solana Virtual Machine. No hedging. No half measures. Just straight up, “this is the execution model we believe in.”

And yeah, that matters more than people think.

If you’ve been around crypto long enough, you’ve seen how we got here. Bitcoin proved money could exist without permission. Cool. Ethereum took that idea and said, “What if money could run code?” Even cooler. But then reality hit. Hard. Gas fees went insane. Transactions slowed to a crawl whenever things got busy. Normal users bounced. Builders got frustrated. I’ve seen teams scrap entire product ideas just because fees made them impossible.

That pain is what pushed the industry toward two paths. One group doubled down on Layer-2s. Rollups, bridges, more complexity. The other group said, “Forget this. Let’s redesign the base layer.” Solana came out of that second camp, and whether you love it or hate it, it changed the conversation around performance.

The Solana Virtual Machine is the real heart of that change. And honestly, people still don’t talk about it enough.

Here’s the simple version. Most blockchains process transactions one at a time. Doesn’t matter if they touch totally different data. They still wait in line. It’s like forcing everyone at a grocery store to use one checkout lane even though there are ten open. Makes no sense, but that’s how legacy execution models work.

The SVM flips that on its head. Transactions say upfront what accounts they’ll touch. The runtime looks at that and goes, “Okay, these don’t conflict. Run them at the same time.” That’s it. That’s the magic. Parallel execution. Modern CPU thinking applied to blockchains. No gimmicks.

Fogo doesn’t just borrow that idea. It commits to it fully.

That’s a big deal.

Because when you build natively on the SVM, you don’t deal with translation layers or awkward compatibility hacks. You get raw performance. You get predictable execution. You get a system that scales with actual hardware instead of pretending every validator lives on a 2013 laptop.

And the results show up where users actually care. Fees stay low. Like, actually low. Not “low until the next NFT mint” low. Latency feels instant. Apps don’t fall apart the moment people start using them.

This is where my bias kicks in. I think most blockchains fail because they optimize for ideology instead of usability. Fogo clearly picks usability. That doesn’t mean decentralization doesn’t matter. It does. A lot. But decentralization that no one can afford to use isn’t winning anything.

Now, from a builder’s perspective, Fogo is interesting in a different way. The SVM programming model isn’t hand-holdy. It forces you to think. You have to be explicit about state access. You have to design with concurrency in mind. That scares some developers, especially if they’re used to the EVM world where everything just… kind of works until it doesn’t.

But here’s the thing. That explicitness is a feature, not a bug.

I’ve watched too many Ethereum apps hit invisible bottlenecks because nobody realized how much shared state they were touching. With SVM-style development, those mistakes show up early. Painful at first? Yeah. Worth it? Absolutely.

And the kinds of apps this unlocks are the ones people keep saying they want but can’t actually build on slower chains. Fully on-chain order books. Games that don’t rely on off-chain servers for basic logic. Payment systems that don’t charge more in fees than the payment itself. Even machine-to-machine transactions, which sound boring until you realize that’s where real scale lives.

Of course, it’s not all sunshine.

High-performance chains come with real trade-offs. Validators need serious hardware. That’s not nothing. Critics will say this leads to centralization, and they’re not wrong to worry. But decentralization isn’t a checkbox. It’s a balancing act. And pretending that low hardware requirements magically equal strong decentralization is one of crypto’s favorite lies.

Another challenge is ecosystem gravity. Tech alone doesn’t win. Liquidity matters. Tooling matters. Community matters. I’ve seen technically brilliant chains fade into irrelevance because nobody showed up to build. Fogo still has to prove it can attract and keep real developers, not just early hype.

There’s also this weird misconception floating around that SVM-based chains “can’t do composability.” That’s just false. They can. You just have to design for it. Parallel execution doesn’t break composability. Bad assumptions do.

Zooming out, Fogo fits neatly into where the industry’s already headed, whether people admit it or not. We’re moving away from one chain doing everything poorly. We’re moving toward specialized, high-performance base layers that can actually support real usage. Not demos. Not stress tests. Actual humans clicking buttons.

And if you think institutions, games, or serious consumer apps are going to settle for slow, expensive infrastructure long-term… I don’t know what to tell you. They won’t.

So here’s my takeaway. Fogo isn’t just another Layer-1. It’s a statement. It says blockchains don’t have to be slow to be decentralized, and they don’t have to be expensive to be secure. It won’t be easy. It won’t be perfect. But it’s aiming in the right direction.

And honestly? That alone puts it ahead of most of the field.

#fogo @Fogo Official $FOGO

Look, I’ve been around this space long enough to see the same cycle repeat itself over and over again. New blockchain launches. Big promises. Faster this. Cheaper that. Everyone swears this one is different. And then… regular people still don’t show up. That’s the part people don’t talk about enough.

That’s why Vanar actually caught my attention.

Not because it’s another Layer 1. We’ve got plenty of those already. Honestly, it’s because Vanar seems obsessed with something most chains quietly ignore. Normal users. Gamers. Brands. People who don’t want to learn what gas fees are at 2 a.m. just to click a button.

The thing is, blockchain was never supposed to feel this hard. Bitcoin was about trust. Ethereum was about programmability. Somewhere along the way, we turned Web3 into this weird maze of wallets, bridges, warnings, and pop-ups that basically scream “are you sure you know what you’re doing?” Most people don’t. And they shouldn’t have to.

Vanar starts from a different place. Instead of saying “users will figure it out,” the team seems to be saying “no, let’s just build this so people don’t need to figure anything out.” That sounds obvious. It isn’t. I’ve seen projects ignore that lesson for years.

A big reason Vanar even thinks this way is because of where the team comes from. Games. Entertainment. Brand work. Those worlds don’t care about your fancy architecture if the experience feels bad. Gamers quit instantly. Fans bounce. Brands walk away. There’s zero patience. Vanar’s tech choices feel shaped by that reality.

As a Layer 1, Vanar controls its own stack. That matters more than people realize. It means the network can focus on speed, low latency, and stable fees without duct-taping solutions on top of someone else’s system. If you’ve ever watched a game lag because a network got congested, you know how brutal that is. Immersion dies fast. Vanar seems built to avoid that mess from day one.

Where this really shows up is in the products. Take Virtua Metaverse. This isn’t some empty virtual land sale with a vague roadmap and a Discord full of hopium. Virtua feels like an actual digital world. Licensed content. Recognizable brands. Interfaces that don’t feel like homework. You’re owning assets, sure, but it doesn’t slap you in the face with “BLOCKCHAIN” every five seconds. And honestly, that’s the right move.

Then there’s VGN Games Network, which I think is underrated. Instead of every game being its own little island, VGN connects multiple games into a shared ecosystem. Same identity. Shared assets. Progress that carries over. If you’ve ever invested time or money into a game only to abandon it later, you know how painful that feels. This setup actually respects players’ time. That alone puts it ahead of most Web3 gaming experiments I’ve seen.

And it’s not just games. Vanar stretches into AI, brand tools, and even eco-focused initiatives. The AI angle makes sense. Personalized content, smarter environments, dynamic assets. Blockchain keeps ownership and transparency intact while AI does the heavy lifting. It’s a clean pairing when done right.

On the sustainability side, Vanar leans into efficiency. That matters, because let’s be real, energy use has been a real headache for blockchain’s public image. Efficient consensus, measurable impact, and practical use cases help push that conversation forward instead of pretending it doesn’t exist.

For brands, Vanar’s approach is refreshingly realistic. Companies don’t want their customers dealing with seed phrases or signing scary transactions. They want smooth experiences that feel familiar. Vanar’s infrastructure lets brands step into Web3 without dragging users through crypto culture shock. That’s how you get adoption. Quietly.

The VANRY token powers the whole thing. Fees. Security. Incentives. Nothing wild or flashy here, and honestly, that’s a good sign. When the token isn’t the entire story, it usually means the team cares more about building something that lasts than chasing short-term hype.

Now, let’s not pretend it’s all sunshine. The Layer 1 space is crowded. Brutally crowded. Attention is expensive. Adoption takes time. Markets swing. Regulations loom. I’ve seen solid projects struggle simply because timing wasn’t kind. Vanar isn’t immune to any of that.

But here’s where my bias shows. I trust teams that focus on real products more than teams that focus on narratives. I trust projects that think about users before traders. And I trust builders who understand that technology wins when people forget it’s even there.

People love to say “this is just another L1.” I don’t buy that. Another L1 doesn’t usually come with actual games, actual virtual worlds, and actual brand integrations already in motion. Another L1 doesn’t usually care this much about whether your cousin who plays games all night could use it without asking for help.

Web3 feels like it’s growing up right now. Less noise. More questions about revenue, users, and sustainability. The hype-only era is cracking. And in that shift, projects like Vanar suddenly make a lot more sense.

If blockchain ever becomes truly mainstream, it won’t be because people learned how blockchains work. It’ll be because they didn’t have to. They’ll just play, explore, collect, and interact. Vanar seems to get that. And honestly, that’s why I’m paying attention.

#Vanar @Vanarchain $VANRY

Look, blockchains were never supposed to feel this painful to use.

That’s the thing people don’t talk about enough. Somewhere along the way, we convinced ourselves that waiting, paying crazy fees, and watching transactions fail was just part of the deal. Like it was some noble sacrifice for decentralization. Honestly? Most users don’t care. They just want stuff to work.

That’s why projects like Fogo even exist in the first place.

I’ve seen this cycle before. New tech launches. Early adopters put up with the rough edges. Then normal people show up and say, “Why is this slow?” or “Why did this cost me $40?” And suddenly the old excuses don’t work anymore.

Blockchain’s at that point right now.

Back in the early days, Bitcoin didn’t care about speed. It cared about not breaking. And fair enough. Ethereum came along and said, “Cool, now let’s build apps.” That worked too. For a while. Then DeFi exploded. NFTs went wild. Everyone piled in at the same time. Fees went nuts. Networks choked. You’ve seen it. We all have.

That pain created demand. Real demand. Not marketing demand.

People wanted blockchains that didn’t feel like dial-up internet.

That’s where high-performance Layer 1s stepped in, and this is where the Solana Virtual Machine starts to matter. A lot.

Most blockchains process transactions one after another. Slow and safe. The Solana Virtual Machine said, “Why are we doing that if most transactions don’t even touch the same data?” So instead of forcing everything into a single line, it runs things in parallel when it can. Simple idea. Massive impact.

This isn’t just some nerd optimization. It changes what’s possible.

Fogo builds directly on that model. It doesn’t try to reinvent execution or pretend performance is something you bolt on later. Performance is the point. From day one.

And yeah, that’s a strong opinion. But I stand by it.

Because the thing is, users don’t experience consensus mechanisms. They experience clicks. Swaps. Transfers. Game actions. If those feel slow or expensive, you lose them. Period.

I’ve watched teams bend over backward trying to make apps usable on slow chains. Off-chain logic here. Batching tricks there. Weird UX compromises everywhere. It’s a real headache. High-performance Layer 1s like Fogo remove a lot of that nonsense. You can actually keep logic on-chain without punishing users.

That’s huge.

Take DeFi. Early DeFi was cool but clunky. Order books were a mess. High-frequency trading basically belonged to bots willing to pay insane fees. On a fast chain, suddenly things look different. Trades settle quickly. Fees stay predictable. Apps behave more like what users expect from modern finance. Not perfect. But way closer.

Payments are another one. Everyone loves to talk about crypto payments. Almost no one actually uses them daily. Why? Because waiting minutes and paying unpredictable fees feels ridiculous in 2026. On a network like Fogo, transactions are fast and cheap enough that payments stop feeling like a demo and start feeling… normal. And yeah, that’s kind of the whole goal.

Gaming is where this really clicks for me though. Games need responsiveness. You press a button, something should happen. Immediately. Slow blockchains ruin that. Developers end up pushing everything off-chain, which defeats the point. High throughput changes the math. More logic on-chain. Fewer hacks. Better gameplay. Still early. But promising.

Now, let’s be real. There are tradeoffs.

High-performance chains usually need beefier hardware. That scares people, and honestly, I get it. Validator centralization is a real concern. Anyone pretending otherwise is lying or coping. Decentralization isn’t binary though. It’s a spectrum. The industry’s still figuring out where the right balance is.

Parallel execution also isn’t trivial. Developers need to understand how state works or things break. I’ve seen teams mess this up. The learning curve is steeper. No way around that. But once devs get it, they don’t want to go back. I hear that over and over.

Another myth that won’t die is that speed means weak security. That’s lazy thinking. Security depends on incentives, consensus, and participation, not just how fast blocks move. Fast doesn’t mean reckless. It just means optimized.

Right now, the market’s shifting. Hype matters less. Users are impatient. Developers are tired of excuses. If your chain feels bad to use, people leave. No amount of ideology fixes that.

That’s why Fogo’s approach makes sense to me. It’s not trying to win philosophical debates. It’s trying to run well. To scale. To not fall apart when people actually show up.

Long term, this is where blockchain’s headed. Fewer chains. Better performance. UX that doesn’t scream “experimental tech.” If users don’t even notice they’re on a blockchain, that’s a win.

So yeah, Fogo isn’t just another Layer 1. It’s part of a bigger shift. Away from theory. Toward reality. Away from “someday it’ll scale” and toward “it works right now.”

And honestly? It’s about time.

#fogo @Fogo Official $FOGO

Look, I’ve been around crypto long enough to know when something feels real and when it’s just noise dressed up with fancy words. And honestly, most blockchains talk a big game about “mass adoption” while quietly building stuff only other crypto people will ever touch. That’s the thing no one likes to admit. Web3 keeps saying it’s for everyone, but it rarely acts like it.

That’s why Vanar caught my attention.

Not because it promised the moon. Not because of some wild TPS number plastered on a landing page. But because the whole idea behind it feels grounded. Almost boring in a good way. Built for real people. Real products. Real use. And yeah, I’ve seen this approach before in Web2. It’s usually the stuff that actually lasts.

The thing is, blockchain didn’t start out trying to be confusing. It just kind of became that way. Bitcoin was about sending value without asking permission. Ethereum opened the door for apps that didn’t need a middleman. Simple ideas. Powerful ideas. Then things got messy. Fees went crazy. Wallets multiplied. One wrong click and boom, funds gone. That’s a real headache, especially if you’re not living on Crypto Twitter all day.

Most normal people checked out at that point. Can you blame them?

Vanar seems to be built with that exact frustration in mind. The team didn’t wake up and say, “Let’s build the most technically elegant chain ever.” They asked a better question. How do we make this stuff actually usable for gamers, brands, entertainment companies, and people who don’t care what a Layer-1 even is?

That mindset changes everything.

Vanar runs as its own Layer-1, which matters more than people realize. It means the network controls its own performance, its own rules, and its own priorities. And those priorities lean heavily toward speed, low fees, and stability. Not “sometimes cheap if the network’s quiet.” Cheap when it matters. Especially when you’re dealing with games or consumer apps where users click buttons fast and often and expect nothing to break.

And yeah, gaming is a huge part of this. People love to argue about whether gaming is the gateway to Web3. From what I’ve seen, it already is. Gamers understand digital items better than most crypto folks. Skins. Items. Currencies. Trading. That’s not new to them. What’s new is actually owning that stuff.

That’s where things like VGN games network come in. The goal isn’t to shove crypto down players’ throats. It’s to let games be games first. Fun first. Ownership second. Blockchain stays in the background doing its job quietly, which is exactly where it should be.

And then there’s Virtua Metaverse. I’ll be honest. I usually roll my eyes when I hear “metaverse.” Most of them feel empty or forced or built around flipping assets instead of actually doing anything interesting. Virtua feels different. It leans into entertainment, licensed content, and experiences people already understand. You explore. You interact. You collect. You don’t need a lecture on decentralization to enjoy it.

That’s kind of the point.

Vanar also doesn’t pretend everything is about gaming. Brands matter here. A lot. Big brands already know how to reach billions of people. They just need infrastructure that doesn’t scare users away. Vanar positions itself as that quiet backend layer that brands can build on without turning their customers into accidental crypto experts. People don’t talk about this enough, but that’s where real scale comes from.

Then there’s AI. And yeah, AI gets overhyped too. But the overlap with blockchain is real. Data ownership. Verification. Transparency. Those problems don’t magically disappear just because an AI model is smart. Vanar’s architecture makes sense here, especially for apps that need trust without friction.

The VANRY token sits at the center of all this. And thankfully, it actually has a job. Fees. Network usage. Ecosystem participation. None of that vague “future utility” stuff. Tokens only survive long term when they’re useful. Everything else fades once the excitement wears off. I’ve watched that cycle play out more times than I can count.

Now, let’s be real for a second. This isn’t guaranteed success. The Layer-1 space is brutal. Everyone’s competing for developers, users, and attention. Adoption is hard even when the tech is solid. Regulation changes fast. Markets flip moods overnight. That’s just reality.

And token economics? Always tricky. One wrong incentive and things spiral fast. Vanar still has to prove it can grow without losing focus. Execution matters more than vision at this stage.

But here’s why I think Vanar’s approach deserves attention.

The industry’s tired. Hype doesn’t hit like it used to. People want things that work. Products with users. Apps that don’t feel like experiments. Vanar leans into that shift instead of fighting it. It treats blockchain as infrastructure, not the star of the show.

If Web3 ever reaches the next 3 billion users, it won’t be because everyone suddenly fell in love with wallets and gas fees. It’ll be because they didn’t have to think about them at all.

That’s the bet Vanar’s making.

And honestly? It’s one of the few bets in this space that actually makes sense.

#Vanar @Vanarchain $VANRY

Podívej se, pokud jsi kolem kryptoměn dost dlouho, slyšel jsi stejné sliby znovu a znovu. Rychlé. Levné. Škálovatelné. Tentokrát je to jiné. Většinu času? Není. Už jsem tento film viděl a upřímně, začíná být nudný.

Ale občas se něco objeví, co ti alespoň donutí na chvíli pozastavit se během rolování očí. A právě tam přichází Fogo.

Ve své podstatě je Fogo vysoce výkonná blockchainová technologie Layer-1, která běží na Solana Virtual Machine nebo SVM. A ano, tato věta sama o sobě už zní jako marketing. Zůstaň se mnou. Problémy, které se Fogo snaží vyřešit, jsou velmi reálné a lidé o nich nemluví dostatečně.

Look, I’ve been around crypto long enough to see the same movie play again and again. Big promises. Fancy tech words. Everyone saying “mass adoption” like it’s just one feature away. And then… nothing. Users bounce. Fees spike. UX breaks. Same story.

That’s why Vanar actually caught my attention. Not because it claims to be the fastest or the cheapest or whatever buzzword is trending this week, but because it starts from a question most blockchains weirdly ignore.

Why would normal people even want to use this?

Seriously. Ask a gamer. Or a brand manager. Or someone who just wants to own a digital item without reading a 20-step wallet guide. Most blockchains don’t fit into real life. They expect people to adapt. And people just don’t.

Vanar flips that around.

The thing is, blockchain didn’t start out broken. Bitcoin did what it needed to do. Ethereum pushed things forward with smart contracts and opened the door to NFTs, DeFi, all of it. I was excited back then. A lot of us were. But somewhere along the line, usability got lost. Gas fees turned into a meme. Wallets became a nightmare. And suddenly Web3 felt like a club instead of an open door.

I’ve seen this before in tech. When builders obsess over infrastructure and forget the human on the other side of the screen, adoption stalls. Period.

What Vanar does differently is honestly pretty refreshing. The team comes from gaming, entertainment, and brand work. That matters more than people admit. In those industries, if something feels clunky, users leave. Instantly. No loyalty. No patience. You mess up the experience, you’re done.

So Vanar builds like that’s the rule.

It’s a Layer-1 blockchain, yes, but it’s designed for stuff people already care about. Games. Virtual worlds. Digital collectibles that actually do something. Not just sit in a wallet forever. The network focuses on fast finality, low fees, and scalability because, let’s be real, gaming doesn’t work any other way. You can’t have players waiting on confirmations. You can’t charge dollars for tiny actions. That’s a real headache.

And this isn’t theoretical.

One of the biggest examples is Virtua Metaverse. I’ve looked at a lot of metaverse projects, and most of them feel empty. Cool visuals. No soul. Virtua actually tries to give digital assets context. You’re not just buying an NFT because number go up. You’re using it inside an environment. Showing it. Interacting with it. That difference matters.

Then there’s the VGN Games Network. And honestly, people don’t talk about this enough, but blockchain gaming failed early because teams forgot to make games fun. They chased tokenomics instead of gameplay. VGN seems to get that. Blockchain stays in the background. Ownership and economies come in quietly. Players play. That’s it.

Vanar also stretches beyond gaming, which I think is smart. AI integrations. Brand tools. Eco-focused ideas. Brands want into Web3, but they don’t want to hire a blockchain team just to run a campaign. Vanar gives them rails that make sense. That’s how adoption actually happens. Not through whitepapers. Through use.

At the center of all this is the VANRY token. And yeah, every project has a token, but this one actually does things. Fees. Network usage. Incentives. It’s tied to activity, not just vibes. I prefer that. Tokens without utility always end the same way.

Now, let’s not pretend everything’s perfect.

Layer-1 competition is brutal. There are a lot of chains screaming for attention. Adoption isn’t guaranteed. And blockchain still has an image problem, especially in gaming. Some players hear “NFT” and immediately think scam or cash grab. Vanar can’t fix that overnight. It has to earn trust the hard way. By shipping good stuff. Again and again.

But here’s why I’m cautiously optimistic.

The industry is changing. The hype cycles are cooling. Builders are focusing more on things that actually work. Games people want to play. Digital spaces people want to spend time in. Tools brands can use without friction. Vanar fits into that shift almost naturally.

I think the long-term win here isn’t about being the loudest chain. It’s about being the one users don’t even realize they’re using. When blockchain fades into the background and the experience just works, that’s when Web3 finally grows up.

That’s what Vanar is aiming for.

And honestly? I’ve seen enough projects chase the wrong things. This one’s chasing the right problem. That alone makes it worth paying attention to.

#Vanar @Vanarchain $VANRY

Dobře, pojďme mluvit o Plasma. A ano, myslím tím skutečně o tom mluvit, ne o obvyklém ztuhlém kryptopitchi, který zní, jako by byl napsán komisí ve 3 ráno.

Podívejte, stablecoiny jsou už všude. Lidé o tom nemluví dostatečně. Zatímco každý na Twitteru diskutuje o memecoinech a jakémkoli novém narativu, který se objevil tento týden, stablecoiny tiše pohybují šílenými částkami peněz. Skutečné peníze. Peníze na nájem. Mzdy. Remitence. Ty nudné věci, které ve skutečnosti záleží.

A tady je věc. Většina blockchainů nebyla nikdy postavena pro to.

Podívej, už jsem kolem krypta dost dlouho, abych viděl stejný cyklus opakovat se znovu a znovu. Nové řetězce se spouštějí. Velké sliby. Elegantní slova. Všichni říkají, že tento změní všechno. A pak se skuteční lidé snaží to používat, poplatky explodují, transakce se zpomalují a najednou o tom nikdo nemluví.

Stablecoiny jsou jedna věc, která nezmizela.

Zůstali. Tiše. Neúnavně.

O tom se příliš nemluví, ale stablecoiny už vyhrály. Ne v teorii. V praxi. Jsou to, co obchodníci používají. V čem podniky účtují. V čem lidé v zemích s vysokou inflací skutečně šetří. A přesto jsme je nějak nutili žít na blockchainech, které nikdy nebyly postaveny pro to, jak peníze skutečně plynou.

Podívej, jsem na kryptu dost dlouho na to, abych rozpoznal vzory. A upřímně, už jsem tento film viděl. Velké sliby. Fancy technické výrazy. Nula skutečných uživatelů. Většina blockchainů nepadá, protože technologie je špatná. Padnou, protože obyčejní lidé se nezajímají. A o tom se nemluví dostatečně.

To je důvod, proč mě Vanar zaujal.

Ne proto, že tvrdí, že je „nejrychlejší“ nebo „nejlevnější.“ Každý to říká. Úhel pohledu Vanar je jiný. Je postaven pro skutečné lidi. Hráče. Značky. Zábavní společnosti. Druhy uživatelů, kteří se ráno nebudí s myšlenkami na peněženky nebo poplatky za plyn. Chtějí jen, aby věci fungovaly.

Podívejte se, peníze jsou nudné, dokud se nerozbrou. Pak se najednou stanou problémem pro všechny.

Tento cyklus jsem viděl víc než dokážu spočítat. Platby se zdají být v pořádku. Převody většinou fungují. Lidé si trochu stěžují, pokrčí rameny a jdou dál. A pak objem roste. Používání exploduje. Najednou praskliny už nejsou malé. Jsou všude. Poplatky stoupají. Převody se zastavují. Věci, které by měly být jednoduché, se stávají skutečnou bolestí hlavy.

To je v podstatě to, kde se stablecoiny nacházejí právě teď.

Stablecoiny se do globálního finančního systému nenásilně dostaly. Vtrhly do něj. Každý den jimi procházejí miliardy. Obchodníci se na ně spoléhají. Firmy se na ně spoléhají. Lidé v zemích s vysokou inflací se na ně spoléhají jen proto, aby ochránili své úspory. A přesto, podivně, stále žijí na blockchainech, které pro ně vůbec nebyly postaveny.