DoggoAnalyst

The chart shown in the image is a textbook example of how volatility operates in the cryptocurrency market and how capital concentration influences price behavior. The sharp spikes, deep wicks, and sudden reversals are not simply the result of random trading activity. They are the visible outcome of liquidity dynamics, leverage, and the interaction between large and small market participants.
Volatility in crypto refers to the market’s ability to move aggressively in very short time frames. Because crypto markets operate continuously and often lack deep, stable liquidity, price can travel significant distances before balance is restored. The extreme candle wicks in the image highlight moments where price briefly explored levels far from equilibrium, only to be rapidly rejected.
Large market participants do not chase price; they engineer movement through liquidity access. Retail traders tend to place stop-losses, breakout orders, and liquidation thresholds around predictable technical zones — prior highs, moving averages, or psychological price levels. When price approaches these areas, it attracts clustered orders. This concentration becomes fuel.
In the image, price accelerates upward, breaking structure and triggering breakout buys while forcing short positions to close. This surge is not sustained because it is driven by reactive flow rather than genuine accumulation. Once sufficient liquidity is collected, larger players distribute into that buying pressure. The result is a sharp reversal, visible as a long upper wick.
The same logic applies to the aggressive downward movement that follows. Liquidations below key levels create forced selling, allowing larger participants to absorb positions at discounted prices. That appears to be chaos is actually order flow efficiency.
Moving averages, often viewed as dynamic support or resistance, fail to provide stability during these phases. Instead, they trail price and become zones of mean reversion. Traders who rely on them mechanically are frequently caught in whipsaws, reinforcing the perception that the market is “manipulated.”
In reality, crypto markets are not manipulated in the traditional sense; they are optimized for liquidity extraction. High leverage, transparent liquidation data, and emotional participation amplify these effects. Price moves toward areas where traders are most vulnerable, not to deceive, but to facilitate large-scale position management.
This chart reflects a familiar truth of the crypto ecosystem: volatility is the mechanism through which risk is transferred. Capital flows from reactive participants to those who understand patience, structure, and liquidity. Price does not move to reward belief — it moves to resolve imbalance.

Short answer:
Directly – no.
Indirectly – yes, sometimes quite strongly.
What perpetual futures do not do
Perpetual contracts:
do not trade the actual asset (no real coins are bought or sold),
do not automatically change the spot price,
are derivatives → their price is anchored to the spot market, not the other way around.
In other words, there is no direct mechanism where “futures set the spot price”.
What actually happens (the important part)
1️⃣ Funding rate – the link between futures and spot
Perpetual futures use a funding rate to stay close to the spot price:
If the futures price is higher than spot, longs pay shorts
If the futures price is lower than spot, shorts pay longs
👉 This encourages arbitrage:
traders buy spot and short futures, or
sell spot and go long futures.
This is where the indirect influence on the spot market begins.
2️⃣ Liquidations → real market orders
During mass liquidations:
exchanges execute market orders,
these hit the order book,
algorithms and market makers react.
📌 If at that moment:
liquidity is thin, or
market makers pull back,
→ the spot price often moves in the same direction.
3️⃣ Psychology and signaling effect
The futures market:
usually has higher volume,
uses leverage,
reacts faster to news.
Many participants:
monitor OI, funding rates, long/short ratios,
and make spot trading decisions based on futures data.
👉 This is behavioral influence, not a mechanical one.
4️⃣ Manipulation ≠ control
Large players:
can move the futures market more easily due to leverage,
but cannot directly control the spot price without real capital.
That’s why we often see:
a move starting in futures,
followed by confirmation (or rejection) in spot.
The statement:
“Futures do not affect the real price”
🔹 Technically – correct
🔹 From a market perspective – incomplete
A more accurate formulation would be:
Futures do not set the spot price, but they can accelerate it, distort it, or temporarily push it through liquidations, arbitrage, and market psychology.

#Futures #EDU #educational_post #MarketImpact #Derivative
$BTC $ETH $BNB

💡Co to je:
ChainOpera AI ($COAI) je kryptoměnový projekt, který míchá umělou inteligenci a blockchain. Umožňuje uživatelům a vývojářům vytvářet a používat AI nástroje prostřednictvím speciální aplikace nazvané AI Terminal.

💰Fakta o tokenech

✔️Celkové tokeny: 1 miliarda COAI
✔️Při spuštění: Přibližně 20 % bylo odemčeno
Zamčené tokeny: Zbytek je pomalu uvolňován každý měsíc po několik let
❗Každý měsíc: Přibližně 8,3 milionu tokenů se odemyká (≈ 0,8 % z celkového počtu)
👀Za jeden rok: Téměř 10 % více tokenů vstoupí na trh

Recent Updates:

1. v3.5.0 Upgrade — Market Module Reactivation🔧
In mid-August 2025, the Terra Classic network completed upgrade v3.5.0, which reactivated the Market Module. This component helps stabilize the exchange rate between LUNC and USTC by enabling controlled on-chain minting and burning — a limited return to the original mechanism used by the old Terra system.

2. Cosmos SDK Modernization🔧
Developers are currently working on migrating the chain to Cosmos SDK 0.50.x, aiming to improve IBC interoperability, performance, and compatibility across the wider Cosmos ecosystem. Progress has been gradual, as some validators have expressed concerns or delays in adopting the upgrade.

3. Ongoing Token Burns💥
The community continues to implement LUNC burn programs to reduce the circulating supply and create deflationary pressure. Exchanges like Binance still support voluntary burns of trading fees, helping to lower the total token count.

4. Exchange Delistings and Liquidity Challenges🤔
One major setback came when OKX announced the delisting of all LUNC/USTC trading pairs, limiting liquidity and access for users. This move raised concerns that other exchanges might follow, reducing LUNC’s market presence further.

5. Restricting USTC Minting👀
Several governance proposals aim to cap or fully disable new USTC minting to prevent inflation and price instability. The focus is now on maintaining scarcity rather than expanding supply.

6. Validator Power Concentration🙄
Recent data shows that voting power is increasingly concentrated among a small number of validators, raising decentralization concerns. This could impact governance decisions and slow down key technical or economic reforms.

What’s Next:
Full SDK 0.50.x Integration🔧
Completing the Cosmos SDK migration remains a top technical priority. Once finished, it should unlock smoother IBC communication and new cross-chain functionality.
Gradual USTC Re-Peg Plan👀
The community is considering a long-term re-peg strategy for USTC, possibly through staking and controlled burns, though no official roadmap or deadlines have been confirmed.
New DAO Governance Proposals🌟
Future proposals will likely target improvements in the oracle system, smart contract support, and even potential EVM-compatibility for easier dApp development.
Automatic Burn Mechanisms💥
Developers are exploring new ways to automate LUNC burns, such as deducting a small percentage from transaction fees or staking rewards to keep supply shrinking consistently.

Exchange and Regulatory Outlook🏦
Maintaining listings on major exchanges will be critical for liquidity and trust. At the same time, LUNC will need to adapt to any new regulatory frameworks around algorithmic stablecoins and decentralized finance.

⚠️Risks and Outlook
Reduced liquidity and centralized validator control remain significant challenges.
Development resources are limited compared to larger Cosmos-based chains.
The project’s long-term survival depends on community coordination, technical upgrades, and attracting real developers and users back to the ecosystem.
Despite its complex past, the LUNC community remains active and determined to restore utility and stability through consistent burning, modernization, and transparent governance.

Thank you for reading. More articles coming soon!
$LUNC