CryptonewsCom

The UK Parliament’s Crypto and Digital Assets All-Party Parliamentary Group has launched a formal inquiry into why banks refuse to open accounts and block payments for crypto businesses. Written evidence will be accepted until August 31, while the group aims to publish recommendations before the FCA’s mandatory crypto regime begins in October 2027. The move tests whether the UK’s ambition to become a global digital asset hub can survive banking restrictions.
The inquiry was announced on Tuesday by co-chairs Lord Vaizey of Didcot and Labor MP Gurinder Singh Josan CBE. It covers difficulties opening and maintaining business accounts, transfer limits, payment blocks, and whether banks apply restrictions proportionately. It will also compare the UK’s approach with the US, Hong Kong, Australia, and the European Union.
The APPG outlined its concern clearly. It said crypto and digital asset firms have consistently reported difficulty accessing UK banking services. The group added that banking access is essential for legitimate businesses, while unnecessary barriers risk slowing investment, innovation, and long-term growth.
The scale of the issue remains significant. Research from the UK Cryptoasset Business Council, published in January 2026, found roughly 40% of payments to crypto exchanges were blocked or delayed by UK banks. One platform reported almost £1 billion in rejected transactions during 2025. Meanwhile, 80% of exchanges saw customer friction increase, while 70% described banking conditions as more hostile than a year earlier.
UK LAWMAKERS LAUNCH INQUIRY INTO CRYPTO BANKING ACCESS!
UK parliamentarians have launched an inquiry into the challenges crypto firms face in obtaining traditional banking services.
The probe aims to address barriers that have hindered the sector’s growth and integration with… pic.twitter.com/aSqFNBRRPx
— Crypto Banter (@crypto_banter) July 21, 2026
Those findings contrast with the government’s stated position. HM Treasury Economic Secretary Lucy Rigby told Parliament in March 2026 that licensed crypto firms should not face restrictions simply because they operate in the sector. As a result, the inquiry will examine why FCA-registered businesses continue facing banking hurdles despite regulatory progress.
Discover: The Best Crypto to Diversify Your Portfolio
UK Crypto and FCA Framework Sharpen the Debanking Question
The inquiry also follows the UK’s finalized FCA crypto framework. The authorization window opens in September 2026, while full compliance becomes mandatory on October 25, 2027. If licensed firms still struggle to secure banking services, confidence in the new regulatory framework could suffer.
Meanwhile, comparisons with overseas markets continue to grow. In the United States, crypto companies have compared banking restrictions to Operation Chokepoint 2.0. Kraken recently secured a $22 million settlement from an auditor it claimed abandoned the exchange during that period. In Australia, Coinbase has also criticized banks over restrictions on crypto-related services. The APPG will assess how competing jurisdictions have handled similar challenges.
The inquiry arrives during a political transition. Andy Burnham became Prime Minister on Monday, while John Healey was appointed Chancellor of the Exchequer. Legal experts say global financial firms will closely watch whether the new government delivers a stable regulatory environment for digital assets and financial services.
Written submissions will be accepted from July 21 through August 31 across banking, payments, fintech, and crypto sectors. The APPG will then publish recommendations before the October 2027 deadline. Industry participants are expected to advocate for case-by-case risk assessments instead of blanket restrictions on FCA-registered crypto firms.
Trade on Bybit and Get a Chance to Win Our $1,000 USDT Airdrop
The post APPG Targets UK Bank Debanking of Crypto Firms Before 2027 FCA Deadline appeared first on Cryptonews.

The hardware wallet market has seen a quiet revolution over the past few years. Even though traditional USB-style devices like Ledger and Trezor still dominate the conversation, a new category of card-shaped cold wallets has emerged. These devices look like credit cards, fit in your wallet, and use NFC to sign transactions. No cables, no batteries, no Bluetooth pairing. Just tap and go.
Two names stand out here; DCENT S and Tangem. Both use EAL6+ certified secure elements, and both promise to make self-custody easier than ever. But they take fundamentally different approaches to one critical area – backup and recovery. This single difference shapes everything else about how these wallets work and who they are for.
DCENT S launched in July 2026 as the latest offering from IOTRUST, a South Korean company with years of hardware wallet engineering experience. Tangem has been around longer and comes from Switzerland, with a strong focus on simplicity and beginner accessibility. Both have loyal followings, but they serve slightly different users.
This comparison breaks down every important aspect of these two wallets so you can decide which one fits your needs. We will look at design, security, backup systems, supported assets, daily usability, mobile apps, and overall value.
DCENT S vs Tangem: Quick Comparison
Design & Build Quality
Both wallets use a credit-card-sized form factor. The DCENT S measures 85.6 by 54 millimeters and comes in at just 0.9 millimeters thick. That is thinner than most standard payment cards. Tangem is similarly sized and feels just as slim and lightweight. Both devices fit easily into any wallet slot alongside your other cards.
Tangem offers an additional form factor that D’CENT does not; a wearable ring. If you prefer something even more convenient than a card, the Tangem ring lets you carry your wallet on your finger. It is a nice option for people who do not want to carry another card or who simply like the novelty of a crypto ring.
The build quality on both is excellent. DCENT S carries an IP69 dust and water resistance rating, while Tangem goes slightly higher with IP69K. In practical terms, both can survive being dropped in water, exposed to dust, and subjected to everyday wear and tear. Tangem also advertises resistance to X-rays, electrostatic discharge, and electromagnetic pulses, which adds another layer of durability for people who travel frequently or work in environments where such exposure is possible.
Temperature tolerances are similar. DCENT S operates from minus 30 to plus 50 degrees Celsius, while Tangem works from roughly minus 25 to plus 50 degrees Celsius. Either wallet will function in hot cars, freezing winters, or tropical climates.
The one difference that stands out is that Tangem offers a 25-year warranty on their hardware, while DCENT S provides a limited lifetime warranty. Both are generous, and neither company expects you to replace your wallet anytime soon.
Security & Private Key Protection
This is where both wallets are remarkably similar – and that is a good thing. Both use EAL6+ certified secure elements. This is the same level of security certification used for government IDs, passports, and EMV payment cards. It protects against both invasive physical attacks and non-invasive side-channel attacks.
The private key generation process is identical in concept. When you set up either wallet, the secure element generates your private key on-device. The key never leaves the chip under any circumstances. It never touches your smartphone, never goes to the cloud, and never gets stored on company servers.
Both wallets are battery-free and get powered entirely by your phone’s NFC field during signing sessions. This means there is no always-on power source that could be exploited. The card is inert until you tap it against your phone, which significantly reduces the attack surface compared to Bluetooth-enabled wallets that remain discoverable.
Tangem adds anti-counterfeit verification through their app, which lets you confirm that your card is genuine before you use it. DCENT S does not emphasize this feature in their marketing, though the secure element itself provides strong protection against cloning attempts.
Firmware security is another point where Tangem has an edge in transparency. They have had their firmware independently audited by Kudelski Security in 2018 and Riscure in 2023. DCENT S is newer to the market, and while their secure element is certified, they have not published equivalent third-party audit results at this stage.
Both wallets lock themselves automatically after repeated incorrect PIN entries, and both include tamper protection that locks the card if someone attempts to physically extract the chip.
Backup & Recovery
This is where the two wallets diverge completely, and it is the single most important difference between them.
DCENT S uses what they call the R3covery Card. Every box contains two cards – the main DCENT S for everyday transactions and a dedicated recovery card. The recovery card cannot sign transactions. Its only purpose is to restore your wallet if you lose your primary card. The backup is stored inside another EAL6+ secure chip, so your recovery data is never displayed as words, never written on paper, and never typed anywhere.
If you lose your DCENT S, you tap the R3covery Card against your phone, restore the wallet, and then move everything to a new DCENT S card. The recovery card itself remains a high-value target because whoever holds it can restore your wallet. The company recommends storing the two cards in different physical locations.
Tangem takes a different approach. Instead of a dedicated recovery card, they sell wallet sets that include two or three identical cards (or combinations of cards and a ring). During setup, the private key is securely copied to all devices in the set. Any of these duplicate cards can function as the primary wallet. If you lose one card, you simply use another from your set.
The Tangem approach means you do not need to order a replacement card just to restore access. You already have a backup ready to go. The downside is that every card in your set can sign transactions. If someone gets hold of one of your backup cards and knows your PIN, they have full access to your funds. With DCENT S, the recovery card cannot sign anything, so even if stolen, it is useless without the main card and PIN.
There is a trade-off here. Tangem offers immediate redundancy – you have multiple working cards from day one. DCENT S offers a recovery-only backup that cannot be misused for transactions but requires you to obtain a new primary card after loss.
Supported Coins & Networks
DCENT S supports over 100 blockchain networks and more than 4,900 tokens. Tangem supports more than 90 blockchain networks and over 14,000 tokens.
In practice, both wallets cover all the major assets you are likely to hold. Bitcoin, Ethereum, XRP, Solana, Stellar, Polygon, and BNB Chain are supported on both. New chains are added through app updates on both platforms, so you do not need to update the physical card firmware.
Where DCENT S distinguishes itself is in XRP support. The company has been working with the XRP Ledger since 2018, and they make a point of emphasizing full XRPL functionality. Trust Lines, decentralized applications, swaps, sending, receiving, and holding XRP are all fully supported. If you are active on the XRP Ledger, DCENT S feels like it was built specifically for you.
Tangem supports XRP as well, but they do not make it a central part of their marketing. For most users, both wallets cover everything they need. The difference in token count is more about counting methodology than actual compatibility.
Ease of Setup & Daily Use
Both wallets are exceptionally easy to set up. Tangem claims a two-minute setup time, while DCENT S estimates three minutes. In reality, both are fast enough that the difference is negligible. You download the app, tap the card, create a PIN, and you are ready to send and receive crypto.
Daily use is where the similarity continues. Both wallets require an NFC-enabled Android or iPhone. You open the app, create a transaction, tap the card against your phone, wait about one second for the signing to complete, and the transaction is broadcast. No cables, no pairing, no charging.
Neither wallet has a display, which means you cannot verify transaction details directly on the device. You rely on the app to show you the transaction details before you sign. This is a trade-off for the card form factor – traditional hardware wallets with screens offer an extra layer of verification that these card wallets cannot provide.
For people who frequently use their crypto on mobile devices, both wallets feel natural. The tap-to-sign workflow is almost identical to using a contactless payment card. It takes the friction out of self-custody and makes it feel like a normal part of your daily routine.
Mobile App Experience
The DCENT app and Tangem app both serve as the primary interface for managing your assets. They let you send and receive crypto, view your portfolio, and track transaction history. Both apps are available for Android and iOS.
Tangem’s app has been around longer and benefits from more mature feature development. It offers built-in swapping through integrated providers, staking support for certain assets, and the ability to connect to decentralized applications. The portfolio tracking and market price features are polished and regularly updated.
DCENT’s app is part of a broader ecosystem that includes their other hardware wallet products. It is clean, functional, and gets the job done. The app supports swapping, portfolio tracking, and all the basic functions you need. It may not have quite as many built-in services as Tangem, but it covers the essentials well.
Both apps are beginner-friendly and do not assume prior experience with cryptocurrency. If you can use a basic banking app, you can use either of these.
Price & Value
Pricing for both wallets depends on the configuration you choose. Tangem offers two-card and three-card sets, with higher prices for larger sets. The ring version is also priced higher than the card version. DCENT S comes as a single primary card plus the R3covery Card in every box.
DCENT S launched with free U.S. shipping, delivered duty paid, a 30-day money-back guarantee, and a limited lifetime warranty. Tangem typically offers similar shipping options and warranty coverage, though their standard warranty is 25 years rather than lifetime.
When comparing value, the backup method matters. With Tangem, you are paying for multiple working cards upfront. With DCENT S, you get one working card and one recovery-only card. If you lose your primary DCENT S, you need to buy a replacement. If you lose a Tangem card, you already have another one in your set.
Tangem and DCENT S take different approaches to backup. Tangem focuses on immediate multi-card redundancy, while DCENT S separates daily use from recovery by pairing the main card with a dedicated R3covery card.
DCENT S vs Tangem: Pros & Cons
DCENT S Pros:
Dedicated recovery card that cannot sign transactions
Seedless setup available
Full XRPL support with Trust Lines, dApps, and swaps
Thinner card design at 0.76mm
Limited lifetime warranty
Korean hardware engineering with design and assembly in South Korea
DCENT S Cons:
Fewer built-in app features compared to Tangem
No third-party security audit published yet
Tangem Pros:
Multiple identical cards included, immediate backup ready
25-year warranty
Wider token support (14,000+)
More mature app with built-in staking, swapping, and dApp connectivity
Available in ring form factor
Independent firmware audits by Kudelski and Riscure
Tangem Cons:
Every backup card can sign transactions (higher risk if stolen)
No dedicated recovery-only card option
Slightly thicker than DCENT S
Less emphasis on XRP-specific features
Which Wallet Should You Choose?
After spending time with both wallets and looking closely at what each one offers, I lean toward the DCENT S for most users. The deciding factor is the backup system.
Tangem gives you multiple identical cards that all work as primary wallets. This is convenient, no question about it. If you lose one card, you grab another from your set and keep going. But here is the catch – every single one of those cards can sign transactions. If someone steals one of your backup cards and figures out your PIN, they have full access to your funds. The redundancy is nice, but the security model is less segmented.
DCENT S takes a different approach that I find more thoughtful. The R3covery Card cannot sign transactions. Its only purpose is to restore your wallet. This means even if someone gets hold of your backup card, they cannot move a single coin without also having your primary card and PIN. That separation between daily use and emergency recovery is a smarter security design. You store the two cards in different places, and you have built-in protection against a single point of failure.
The XRP support on DCENT S is another strong reason to choose it. Full XRPL functionality with Trust Lines, decentralized applications, and swaps makes it the obvious choice if you hold XRP or interact with the XRP Ledger. Tangem also supports XRP, but DCENT S places more emphasis on XRP-oriented workflows and recovery-focused positioning.
There is also something to be said for a company that has been building hardware wallets since 2017 and serves users across 220 countries. IOTRUST has engineering experience that predates many of their competitors. The DCENT S is designed and assembled in South Korea, which speaks to the quality control and manufacturing standards you get with the product.
At the end of the day, both wallets represent a major step forward in making self-custody accessible. But the DCENT S offers a more secure backup architecture, better XRP support, and the peace of mind that comes from knowing your recovery card cannot be used against you. That is why I would choose it over Tangem.
The post DCENT S Wallet vs Tangem: Full Comparison of Design, Security, Supported Coins, and Mobile App appeared first on Cryptonews.

In Solana news today, the network’s total stablecoin market cap crossed $15Bn for the first time, according to Token Terminal data. The question the number forces onto the table is whether this supply base holds structural depth or remains tethered to cyclical retail flows.
USDC accounts for a large share of Solana’s stablecoin supply, with DeFiLlama reporting USDC at $7.09Bn and total Solana stablecoins at $15.16Bn. Circle’s $250M USDC minting on Solana has been reported as part of a pattern of supply growth contributing to the $15Bn milestone.
This Stablecoin surge across the Solana network comes as SOL USD spiked +3% over the past 24-hours, reaching over $78, with a daily trading volume of $1.94Bn.
SOURCE: DefiLlama
Solana News: Beyond USDC/USDT and the New Stablecoins on the Block
The more structurally significant development sits outside the USDC/USDT duopoly. The non-USDC/USDT stablecoin segment on Solana hit an all-time high of $4.81Bn, driven by USD1 and USDG, according to SolanaFloor data. That segment now accounts for nearly one-third of Solana’s total stablecoin market cap.
USD1, a dollar-pegged stablecoin associated with World Liberty Financial, and USDG (Global Dollar) are the primary drivers of that growth.
USDT sits at $2.91Bn on Solana per DeFiLlama, leaving the remaining $4.81Bn distributed across these newer entrants. The diversification of the issuer base matters: it signals that dollar liquidity on Solana is no longer a two-party dependency.
Anchorage Digital’s USDGO reached a $1Bn market cap on Solana, up approximately 20x since January 2026. USDGO is a regulated, USD-pegged stablecoin launched on Solana in February 2026.
Two Demand Drivers, One Supply Stack
JUST IN: Total stablecoin market cap on @solana surpasses $15B, marking an all-time high.
Leading currencies: USD, EUR, & more
Leading assets: USDC, USDT, USD1, USDGO, & more
Leading issuers: Circle, Tether, Paxos, & more
~5% of all stablecoins are currently issued on Solana. pic.twitter.com/pGrojYxwfP
— Token Terminal (@tokenterminal) July 20, 2026
Solana’s stablecoin boom is being driven by two overlapping forces that reinforce each other but do not depend on each other. The first is renewed retail activity: DEX trading volume on Solana rose 13.1% week over week, daily transactions climbed 17.3%, and TVL expanded 12.5%, per DeFiLlama metrics.
Memecoin cycle activity is generating real on-chain dollar demand, with Jupiter and Raydium as notable liquidity venues. More than $900M in new stablecoins were minted in a single 24-hour window per Token Terminal.
The second driver is settlement-layer adoption. BlockEden reports Solana processed $650Bn in adjusted stablecoin volume in February 2026, surpassing Ethereum and Tron combined. That figure predates the current $15Bn supply milestone by several months, implying settlement throughput has likely expanded further since then.
DeFi protocols on Solana benefit directly from deeper stablecoin liquidity, tighter spreads, higher utilization rates, and more capital-efficient collateral pools, all of which follow from a larger on-chain dollar base. The growing dominance of Solana in tokenized assets, which hit a record $6Bn in Q2, compounds this dynamic: real-world asset settlement and stablecoin liquidity are co-locating on the same chain.
The regulatory context is not peripheral here. Stablecoin legislation moving through Congress, including a Crypto Clarity Act framework discussed toward a Senate vote, could create clearer rules of the road for stablecoin issuers. A clear federal standard accelerates institutional issuance and removes regulatory ambiguity that has kept some treasury desks from deploying at scale on public chains.
Discover: The Best Token Presales
What the $15Bn Figure Does and Does Not Confirm
$SOL
> Up only from $75 to $140 last cycle
> Down only from $140 to $75 this cycle
Both times this range offered no resistance/support leaving a really large imbalance area
There is no resistance until $125 which even at this current price is a 64% gain
Flip $125 and imagine… pic.twitter.com/Ewpxe5g0HR
— gum (@gumsays) July 19, 2026
In other Solana news, the $15Bn supply level confirms that Solana has accumulated a dollar base large enough to sustain serious DeFi and settlement activity independent of any single issuer.
It does not confirm that this base is cycle-resistant. A meaningful portion of current stablecoin demand on Solana is memecoin-adjacent, speculative liquidity that migrates when retail attention rotates.
The non-USDC/USDT segment’s 15x growth since January 2025 is impressive, but some of that reflects specific product launches (USDGO’s February debut, USD1’s expansion) rather than purely organic demand accumulation.
The credible bear case is a memecoin cycle cooling combined with stalled stablecoin legislation, which would simultaneously slow both retail-driven USDC minting and institutional USDGO deployment.
The bull case is that institutional settlement demand, evidenced by USDGO’s trajectory and Solana’s stablecoin volume market share, provides a structural floor that persists through retail drawdowns.
Circle’s aggressive minting cadence and Anchorage Digital’s institutional positioning suggest at least one major issuer is betting on the latter.
Discover: The Best Crypto to Diversify Your Portfolio
The post Solana News: Stablecoin Supply Hits $15Bn With New Issuers Reshaping the Mix appeared first on Cryptonews.

On Tuesday, July 21, 2026, institutional capital showed sustained momentum as Bitcoin (BTC) climbed back above $66,000. This recovery, fueled by five consecutive days of net inflows into US spot ETFs, has stabilized the market after a period of volatility near the $60,000 support level. As capital flows back into the primary digital asset, market attention is shifting toward infrastructure projects capable of bridging Bitcoin’s liquidity with other major ecosystems. Among these, the LiquidChain (LIQUID) presale has secured over $914,000, approaching its $1 million target ahead of the month’s end.
On Monday, US spot Bitcoin ETFs registered a net inflow of approximately $227 million, reversing the net outflows recorded during May and June. BlackRock’s IBIT led the session with $116 million in net inflows, bringing total net assets across all US spot Bitcoin products to nearly $79 billion. This sustained buying pressure pushed Bitcoin past $66,000, with 24-hour trading volume exceeding $31 billion.
According to analyst Ted Pillows, clearing the $65,000 resistance opens the door for a near-term target of $68,000, with potential for further upward momentum.
$BTC has reclaimed the $65,000 level.
The next key resistance is $67,500-$68,000, which means Bitcoin has some room to pump.
If BTC manages to reclaim the $68,000 resistance too, it could rally another 5%-6% very quickly. pic.twitter.com/XPMb3aSU69
— Ted (@TedPillows) July 21, 2026
While spot exposure remains the primary vehicle for institutional entry, Bitcoin’s price stabilization is driving interest in decentralized applications and infrastructure that expand the utility of idle BTC.
LiquidChain Targets Cross-Chain Fragmentation with Layer 3 Network
To address capital fragmentation across major networks, LiquidChain (LIQUID) is building a Layer 3 execution environment. The network aims to connect Bitcoin’s liquidity with Ethereum’s decentralized finance (DeFi) ecosystem and Solana’s execution speed. By leveraging a Solana-class virtual machine, trust-minimized state verification, and cross-chain proofs, the protocol enables atomic settlements without relying on traditional wrapped assets.
The Order builds.
Brick by brick. Layer by layer. ⟁https://t.co/vqvBcdSQYC pic.twitter.com/tcfMNP4lNq
— LiquidChain (@getliquidchain) July 15, 2026
The native LIQUID token serves as the network’s utility asset, powering transaction fees, staking, and governance. The total supply of LIQUID is capped at 11.8 billion tokens, structured as follows:
Development: 35%
Marketing and Growth: 32.5%
Business Partnerships: 15%
Staking and Rewards: 10%
Exchange Listings: 7.5%
The ongoing presale has raised more than $914,000, with the current token price set at $0.01482. The next incremental price increase is scheduled to take effect in two days.
Presale Access and Staking Integration
Participants can access the presale via the official LiquidChain website by connecting a compatible Web3 wallet. Alternatively, the presale is integrated into the Best Wallet mobile application under its “Upcoming Tokens” section, available for download on the Apple App Store and Google Play.
The presale supports multiple payment methods, including BTC, ETH, SOL, BNB, USDT, USDC, and direct credit/debit card purchases. Upon acquiring LIQUID, participants can opt to stake their tokens immediately to access a dynamic staking yield of 1,231% APY, which will adjust as the staking pool grows.
For real-time development updates and presale milestones, interested parties can follow LiquidChain on X and join the Telegram community.
Visit LiquidChain.
The post Institutional ETF Inflows Push Bitcoin Past $66K as LiquidChain Presale Nears $1M appeared first on Cryptonews.

The White House has reached an agreement on the Clarity Act ethics provision, the main sticking point blocking a Senate floor vote, and has begun circulating deal language with Republican senators, according to Eleanor Terrett.
The agreement removes what had been the single biggest procedural overhang on the legislation, but the bill still faces a compressed timeline and a 60-vote cloture threshold.
This latest CLARITY Act development comes as the crypto market is bouncing hard, with Bitcoin leading the charge after reclaiming $66,000 on the back of a +3.5% daily move and $31.5Bn in trading volume.
NEWS: I’m hearing from multiple industry sources that the White House has agreed on an ethics package for the Clarity Act and sent the language to certain Senate Republicans this afternoon.
It’s still unclear what the details of the agreement are (I’ve reached out for…
— Eleanor Terrett (@EleanorTerrett) July 20, 2026
Why the Ethics Provision Stalled the CLARITY Act Bill
The ethics provision at the center of the dispute is designed to prevent senior officials from holding or profiting from digital assets they are responsible for regulating – a structural conflict-of-interest bar that Democrats made a hard condition of their support. The political charge intensified after an Office of Government Ethics disclosure.
The White House’s negotiating position, previously articulated by crypto adviser Patrick Witt, held that any ethics language must apply uniformly rather than targeting the president or his family specifically.
A prior compromise involving state attorneys general as enforcers collapsed after Democrats rejected it as inadequate, and a Senate committee amendment from Sen. Chris Van Hollen failed 13–11 along party lines. The July 20 agreement suggests the two sides found language that threads that needle, though the specific text has not been publicly released.
The Clarity Act is built around establishing a comprehensive federal market-structure framework for digital assets, codifying key elements of US crypto market regulation. It passed the House in July 2025 and cleared the Senate Banking Committee in May 2026.
The bill still needs additional steps before a floor vote can occur. That ethics provision deadlock had driven Senate passage odds into the 40–45% range by late June.
Discover: The Best Crypto to Diversify Your Portfolio
The Legislative Window Is Now Measured in Days
The Senate heads into its August recess after the first week of August, leaving only a matter of weeks for the chamber to process and vote on the legislation this year.
That August deadline has been the defining constraint on the bill’s timeline since spring, and if no vote occurs before the recess, momentum likely slips into 2027. The agreement on the ethics provision is necessary to unlock floor scheduling, but it is not sufficient.
The bill still needs additional steps before a floor vote can occur. The 60-vote threshold means Democratic senators must cross, and the deal language now being shared with Republican senators will need to satisfy Democratic holdouts.
What Passage Would Mean for Markets
SOURCE: TradingView
For active traders, the main implication of the passage is regulatory clarity for US exchanges, issuers, and investors. A defined federal framework can reduce legal uncertainty and encourage broader institutional adoption.
Failure carries the inverse risk: if the bill stalls again, regulatory uncertainty extends well into next year, and the political window for a comprehensive market structure bill narrows further.
The ethics agreement meaningfully shifts the probability distribution toward passage, but traders should treat the outcome as unresolved until the revised text clears and Democratic floor commitments are on record.
Discover: The Best Token Presales
The post Ethics Provision Deal Could Unlock Senate Vote on the Clarity Act appeared first on Cryptonews.

Arthur Hayes is buying Ethereum again, trading above $1,900, as its price prediction centers around the psychological $2,000 level, which will finally give way. That latest move has reignited a familiar question: Is smart money quietly soaking up supply while everyone else hesitates?
On-chain trackers flagged another purchase of 1,332.5 ETH, worth $2.53 million at the time of execution. It followed an earlier July accumulation of about 1,939 ETH through two OTC-style transactions. Together, those recent buys exceed $5 million, showing Hayes is not exactly nibbling around the edges.
Arthur Hayes(@CryptoHayes) bought another 1,332.5 $ETH($2.53M) 3 hours ago.https://t.co/gau6egd7Vmhttps://t.co/iKDlaSftbq pic.twitter.com/YKgXPCVe2Z
— Lookonchain (@lookonchain) July 20, 2026
The turnaround stands out because Hayes sold 6,000 ETH in June, locking in an estimated $606,000 loss. Instead of staying sidelined, he reversed course as Ethereum pulled back and started accumulating again. Sometimes the market hands you lemons. Hayes apparently buys Ether instead.
Meanwhile, institutional demand continues to shape the narrative. Fresh inflows into BlackRock’s iShares Staked Ethereum ETF and Robinhood Chain’s use of ETH as its gas token have strengthened the investment case. Fundstrat’s Tom Lee summed up the shift neatly, saying Wall Street is now building on Ethereum rather than simply trading it.
Whether that institutional bid can keep supporting Ethereum near current levels remains the key question by the end of the month. If large buyers keep stepping in, the path toward $2,000 becomes far less intimidating. If not, traders may need a little more patience before the next curtain call.
Discover: The Best Crypto to Diversify Your Portfolio
Ethereum Price Prediction: Reclaim $2,000 Before August?
ETH is trading in a contested range around $1,920 after recovering from last week’s pullback. Its market cap sits near $232 billion, while the daily move remains modest. That calm follows a sharp correction, so the market is still deciding whether it found a floor or is simply catching its breath.
Technically, $1,500 is the major bounce zone and a structural support level, and $2,000 remains the level bulls need to reclaim convincingly. Until that happens, sellers still have a say. The 100-day EMA also remains an important hurdle, refusing to roll out the welcome mat.
Ethereum (ETH)
24h7d30d1yAll time
The bullish scenario for Ethereum price prediction stays straightforward. If ETH holds above $1,900 and buying volume improves, a retest of $2,000 becomes increasingly likely. A decisive close above that level could then clear the path toward the mid $2,000s. Markets rarely move in straight lines, though. They prefer making everyone doubt first.
The base case still points to range-bound trading between roughly $1,900 and $2,000 as macro developments and Bitcoin continue driving sentiment. On the downside, losing $1,800 with strong selling pressure would shift focus back toward the $1,500 support zone and weaken the near-term structure.
Meanwhile, staking continues to tighten Ethereum’s available supply. More than one-third of the circulating ETH supply remains locked in staking, reducing liquid tokens on exchanges. That does not always move the market overnight, but it can quietly strengthen the setup for investors looking several weeks ahead.
Trade Ethereum on Bybit and Get a Chance to Win Our $1,000 USDT Airdrop
LiquidChain Targets Early-Mover Upside as Ethereum Tests Key Levels
ETH at $1,800–$1,950 is a psychologically awkward position. It’s not cheap enough to be an obvious value buy for new entrants, not strong enough to confirm a trend reversal. That compression pushes risk-tolerant capital toward earlier-stage infrastructure plays where the asymmetry is structurally different.
LiquidChain is a Layer 3 infrastructure project building what it calls a unified cross-chain execution environment, fusing Bitcoin, Ethereum, and Solana liquidity into a single settlement layer.
The next generation of infrastructure won't stand alone.
It'll connect everything around it. ⟁https://t.co/vqvBcdSQYC pic.twitter.com/mWc9fGndPd
— LiquidChain (@getliquidchain) July 21, 2026
The architecture is built around four pillars: a Unified Liquidity Layer, Single-Step Execution, Verifiable Settlement, and a Deploy-Once framework. Liquid lets developers push to all three ecosystems simultaneously rather than maintaining separate deployments.
The presale is currently priced at $0.01482 per $LIQUID token, with $915K raised to date. With the cross-chain thesis playing out as ETH’s institutional layer matures, the entry point is materially different from buying ETH at the current market cap.
Research LiquidChain here before the presale advances to its next pricing tier.
Discover: The Best Token Presales
The post Ethereum Price Prediction: Arthur Hayes Makes $25M Move as ETH Tests $2K appeared first on Cryptonews.

Ripple CTO Emeritus David Schwartz just reminded the market why conviction is the hardest edge to hold. XRP price is trading around $1.12, up about 1% over the past 24 hours after reclaiming the $1.10 level. That move has shifted momentum back toward the bulls, making the timing of Schwartz’s admission hit a little closer to home.
In yesterday’s post on X, Schwartz confirmed he sold XRP at $0.10 and unloaded 40,000 ETH at roughly $1.05 each. Those decisions came from a risk reduction agreement with his wife, not from losing faith in either asset. As every trader eventually learns, your portfolio rarely argues with your spouse and wins.
Obviously, I wish I hadn't done those things. But I agreed with my wife to sell at every new ATH and I really, really hate risk. I wish I was more comfortable with risk, but I'm just not that person.
— David 'JoelKatz' Schwartz (@JoelKatz) July 20, 2026
“Obviously, I wish I hadn’t done those things,” Schwartz wrote. He added that he genuinely dislikes financial risk and followed a rule to sell whenever an asset reached a new all-time high. Later, he admitted that assigning even a 1% chance to Ethereum reaching $2,368 would have kept him from selling at $1.05. The same lesson applies to XRP, which has long left that $0.10 exit behind.
The irony has not gone unnoticed. XRP is climbing after reclaiming a key technical level just as Schwartz reflects on selling too early. It is a familiar reminder that timing the market sounds easy until the market starts proving you wrong. Sometimes the hardest trade is simply doing nothing.
Discover: The Best Token Presales
Can XRP Price Push Toward $1.50 After Breaking $1.10 Resistance?
The current $1.12 level is now the line in the sand. Buyers pushed XRP from around $1.08 to roughly $1.12, locking in a modest daily gain. The next job is keeping that level as support, which is never automatic after weeks of heavy selling. Momentum has improved, but the market still wants proof.
Meanwhile, the daily RSI remains near oversold territory, while a TD Sequential buy signal on the three-day chart hints that bearish momentum may be fading. That points to possible trend exhaustion instead of a confirmed breakout. Sometimes the first bounce grabs attention, but the second one earns respect.
Institutional demand also remains part of the story. XRP ETPs recently attracted nearly $40 million in fresh inflows, lifting assets under management to about $2.6 billion. At the same time, spot trading volume jumped sharply during the move above $1.10, suggesting larger players were not sitting on the sidelines.
Xrp (XRP)
24h7d30d1yAll time
Three scenarios remain in play. The bullish case sees $1.12 holding as support before XRP clears price resistance around $1.18. If buyers keep pressing, a sustained move above $1.20 could expose the $1.30 to $1.35 region next. One green candle is nice. A few more are what pay the bills.
The base case is a period of consolidation between $1.10 and $1.18 while the market confirms that selling pressure has eased. However, a daily close below $1.10 would shift attention back to the $1.04 to $1.08 support zone. The late session volume surge showed buyers arrived with conviction, but one good session alone does not make a lasting trend.
Trade XRP on Bybit and Get a Chance to Win Our $1,000 USDT Airdrop
Bitcoin Hyper Targets Early-Stage Entry as XRP Tests Critical Levels
XRP at $1.13 is a better position than Schwartz’s $0.10 exit, but at a $70 billion+ market cap, the asymmetry available at genuine early stages simply isn’t there anymore. That’s the structural trade-off every trader running rotational strategies weighs when an asset reclaims resistance rather than breaks into discovery.
The question isn’t whether XRP can go higher; it’s whether the risk-reward at current prices matches what early participants captured.
Bitcoin Hyper is positioning itself in a different part of the risk spectrum entirely. The project is building the first Bitcoin Layer 2 with full SVM integration, meaning Solana Virtual Machine-grade smart contract execution anchored to Bitcoin’s security model, targeting performance that competes with Solana’s throughput while preserving BTC’s trust layer.
The presale has raised $32.9 million at a current token price of $0.0136834, with a staking program live for participants. That combination of infrastructure utility and early pricing is the setup Schwartz described missing, except it’s available now, not in retrospect.
Research Bitcoin Hyper before committing capital.
Discover: The Best Crypto to Diversify Your Portfolio
The post David Schwartz Regrets Selling XRP at 10 Cents as Price Broke $1.10 Resistance appeared first on Cryptonews.

In Ethereum news today, spot ETFs recorded $105M in net inflows during the week of July 13–17, 2026, the strongest weekly figure since April and a measurable acceleration from the prior week’s $84M.
The two consecutive positive weeks end an eight-week outflow streak, raising the direct question of whether this is a durable institutional re-engagement or a short-term technical bounce that will stall at the first sign of ETH price weakness.
SOURCE: CoinGlass
Flow-tracking platforms CoinGlass and Farside Investors both confirm the reversal, with data showing renewed net creations across the Ethereum ETF complex after two months of persistent redemptions.
The prior week’s $84M was itself notable as the streak-breaker; the follow-through to $105M adds weight to the argument that the reversal has legs rather than being a single-week anomaly.
Ethereum News: BlackRock’s ETHA Is Carrying the Category
According to SoSoValue data, U.S. spot Bitcoin ETFs recorded total net inflows of USD 108 million on July 15, with BlackRock’s IBIT posting the largest single-day inflow at USD 80.82 million. Spot Ethereum ETFs drew USD 53.83 million, led by BlackRock’s ETHA with USD 45.29… pic.twitter.com/4YrMd19EDs
— Wu Blockchain (@WuBlockchain) July 16, 2026
BlackRock’s iShares Ethereum Trust, trading under the ticker ETHA, has consistently accounted for the majority of daily net positive flows across the entire Ethereum ETF landscape. On July 15 alone, in a single session during the reported week, ETHA captured a substantial share of the day’s $53.83M in complex-wide inflows, according to data from BingX.
The concentration dynamic cuts both ways. ETHA’s brand, distribution reach, and institutional trust give it a structural pull that smaller issuers cannot easily replicate, which explains why BlackRock’s ETF inflows have driven ETH price action more than any other single product in the category.
But it also means the health of the entire spot ETF complex is effectively contingent on one fund; if ETHA flows stall or reverse, the broader category tips back into net outflow territory almost immediately.
As of mid-July, cumulative complex-wide net inflows across nine issuers since the category launched in July 2024 totaled approximately $11.07Bn, with total net asset value near $10.4Bn, per BingX data. ETHA’s own cumulative net inflow reached $11.28Bn.
ETH Price at $1,845: The $1,800 Level Is the Key Variable
$ETH $1750 remains the key area to hold for the bulls.
This marked the February low but also marked the higher low & market structure shift back in 2025 before the large rally.
Above, $2.1K is the main resistance to watch. https://t.co/PAHmyFsitT pic.twitter.com/RVgmf5tMEh
— Daan Crypto Trades (@DaanCrypto) July 20, 2026
ETH price traded at approximately $1,845 during the inflow week, with the $1,800–$1,900 range serving as a critical demand zone. Buyers have consistently stepped in near the lower end of that band, and the structural logic is straightforward.
Sustained spot ETF inflows create a mechanical bid, because each new creation requires the fund to purchase actual ETH to back its shares. At $80–105M in weekly inflows, this represents consistent buy pressure absent during the eight-week redemption period.
The $1,800 level is therefore not just a technical support reading; it is partially a function of ETF flow dynamics. A breakdown below that zone would likely signal either a sharp deceleration in institutional demand or net outflow resumption, both of which would remove the mechanical bid that has been supporting prices.
The inverse is also true: sustained weekly inflows in the $80–105M range provide a floor that did not exist during the prior two-month drawdown.
Institutional Crypto Momentum and What the Data Confirms and What It Doesn’t
In other Ethereum news, the $105M weekly figure is the best since April, but it remains modest compared with the peaks the category reached during more euphoric periods in 2024 and early 2025. Calling this an institutional comeback is accurate as a directional statement; framing it as a full-scale rotation back into institutional crypto ETF allocation requires more evidence. Two consecutive positive weeks after a prolonged outflow streak is a reversal, not yet a trend.
What the data does confirm is that institutional interest in Ethereum as a strategic portfolio asset has not evaporated, despite two months of redemptions suggesting otherwise. The speed of the reversal, from outflow-heavy weeks to back-to-back inflow weeks accelerating from $84M to $105M, indicates that allocators were watching specific price and macro conditions before re-engaging, rather than abandoning the category entirely.
For context on how Ethereum’s ETF recovery compares to the broader spot ETF landscape, XRP ETF flows have shown a different pattern, which underlines that the current Ethereum inflow momentum is asset-specific rather than a broad crypto ETF tide lifting all products.
The forward scenario is binary and relatively clean. If ETHA sustains its pace of flow through late July and ETH holds the $1,800 support zone, the two-week reversal will validate the start of a genuine institutional re-accumulation phase.
If flows decelerate sharply or ETHA specifically turns negative, the outflow streak resumes and the $1,800 floor loses its structural underpinning. The next two weeks of weekly flow data from CoinGlass and Farside Investors will settle that question more definitively than any price chart reading alone.
Discover: The Best Crypto to Diversify Your Portfolio
The post Ethereum News: BlackRock’s ETHA Drives ETH ETF Reversal With Back-to-Back Inflow Weeks appeared first on Cryptonews.

Polymarket traders have cut the odds of the CLARITY Act becoming law in 2026 to 37% today. The prediction market has turned more cautious as Senate negotiations remain deadlocked over ethics provisions tied to President Donald Trump’s crypto business interests. Although the House has passed the bill and the Senate Banking Committee approved it, the legislation has yet to receive a Senate floor vote.
The delay has fueled concerns that the bill could miss its best opportunity before lawmakers leave Washington for the August recess. Every week without progress leaves fewer legislative days on the calendar. As a result, traders have become increasingly skeptical that the legislation can clear the Senate this year.
Polymarket
The biggest obstacle is no longer the bill’s market structure framework. Instead, negotiations have centered on an ethics amendment. Senate Democrats, led by Elizabeth Warren, want enforceable restrictions preventing senior government officials, including the president, from financially benefiting from the digital asset industry they oversee.
Discover: The Best Crypto to Diversify Your Portfolio
CLARITY Act Stalls as Ethics Dispute Deepens
Republicans have resisted language aimed specifically at the president’s crypto interests. They argue such provisions could undermine bipartisan support for the broader legislation. Without a compromise, Democrats have shown little willingness to provide the votes Republicans need to advance the bill.
The debate intensified after Trump’s latest annual financial disclosure revealed roughly $1.4 billion in crypto-related income. The filing included about $594 million connected to World Liberty Financial. It also reported approximately $635 million tied to the TRUMP meme coin venture.
Democrats argue that those financial interests create an obvious conflict if the president signs legislation affecting the same industry. They contend that ethics protections should accompany any market structure reforms. The disclosure has therefore become the central issue in Senate negotiations rather than a secondary political dispute.
The Senate math leaves little room for error. Most legislation requires 60 votes to overcome a filibuster, meaning Republicans cannot pass the CLARITY Act on their own. They must secure support from several Democrats to move the bill forward.
Several Democrats who previously appeared open to supporting the legislation now insist on enforceable ethics safeguards before committing their votes. Until bipartisan negotiators bridge that gap, the bill is expected to remain in procedural limbo despite continued backing from much of the crypto industry.
Discover: The Best Token Presales
Senate Calendar Leaves Little Room for Delay
Time has also become a growing concern. Senate leaders have only a limited number of legislative days before the August recess. Appropriations bills, nominations, and other priorities continue competing for valuable floor time.
If the CLARITY Act misses that window, its path could become even more difficult later this year. Congress will soon shift its focus toward government funding deadlines and other legislative priorities. Supporters acknowledge that every delay increases the political challenge.
For now, Polymarket traders appear to be pricing in uncertainty rather than outright failure. The odds could improve if lawmakers reach a bipartisan agreement on ethics language or if Senate leaders schedule a floor vote. Until then, the CLARITY Act remains stalled, and its path to becoming law remains uncertain.
Trade Ethereum on Bybit and Get a Chance to Win Our $1,000 USDT Airdrop
The post Senate Ethics Deadlock Drags CLARITY Act Odds Under 40% on Polymarket appeared first on Cryptonews.

In Bitcoin news today, Michael Saylor, co-founder of Strategy and the largest publicly listed corporate BTC holder, has gone on record opposing BIP-110, the proposed one-year soft fork that would restrict non-financial data storage on the Bitcoin blockchain, arguing that the proposed cure carries more systemic risk than the condition it targets.
His critique, posted to X and covered by the Bitcoin Foundation on July 11, frames the entire debate not as a spam-management question but as a Bitcoin governance question: who decides what constitutes a valid transaction, and what happens once that line is drawn within the protocol.
Many Bitcoiners I respect support BIP 110. I understand and share their desire to protect Bitcoin, but believe the proposed cure is more dangerous than the condition. Here are 110 reasons why Bitcoin needs guardians of neutrality. https://t.co/hOAqfAgC58
— Michael Saylor (@saylor) July 19, 2026
That framing cuts directly to the precedent problem. As Saylor stated in his X post, “He wrote: “BIP 110 turns a spam dispute into a consensus change that would invalidate some currently valid, fee-paying transactions.
That precedent is the danger.” The concern is not specifically about Ordinals or blockchain spam today; it is about what the protocol becomes the moment it starts filtering transactions by perceived intent rather than fee payment and cryptographic validity.
Bitcoin News: The Miner Threshold is the Flashpoint
Saylor Pushes Back Against Bitcoin Soft Fork Plan
Michael Saylor (@saylor) has urged the Bitcoin $BTC community to reject BIP 110, a proposed software update that would temporarily limit certain data stored on the blockchain.
He argued Bitcoin should remain neutral and only… pic.twitter.com/xmdNsSdZPC
— BSCN (@BSCNews) July 20, 2026
BIP-110’s activation mechanics have drawn as much fire as its content. The proposal would lock in if miners signal support in at least 55% of blocks during a 2,016-block period – well below the 95% threshold that has historically governed permanent consensus changes in Bitcoin.
Saylor has flagged this reduction as a structural risk, warning it could produce a network split and sustained market uncertainty at a moment when no such disruption is justified by the underlying threat.
The current miner signaling picture gives that warning context: as of July 13, support stood at approximately 1.3%, per the public BIP-110 signaling monitor at bip110.org. The voluntary signaling deadline falls around block 961,542 in August.
A 55% threshold is aggressive by any historical standard in Bitcoin governance; at 1.3% support, it is also currently unreachable, but the threshold itself remains a live governance concern regardless of the present signal count.
The technical scope of the proposal is sweeping for a supposedly temporary measure. BIP-110 would restore a tighter limit on OP_RETURN outputs, restrict larger data uploads, and reject blocks containing transactions that are valid under Bitcoin’s current rules.
Nodes adopting BIP-110 would, in effect, enforce a narrower definition of which transactions are acceptable than non-adopting nodes, a split scenario Saylor is flagging.
Discover: The Best Token Presales
Bitcoin Neutrality vs. Protocol Gatekeeping
Saylor’s deeper argument is that Bitcoin neutrality is not a soft preference; it is a structural property the network cannot afford to compromise.
With this Bitcoin news drop, the proposal reframes the change to consensus rules to fight spam as a decision about which valid, fee-paying transactions the network should accept, raising concerns about embedding judgment in the protocol.
The chilling-effect logic follows directly. If consensus rules can be modified to exclude data storage when a segment of the community labels it as spam, the same mechanism is available for other categories that would raise similar concerns.
The institutional investors who have followed Strategy’s lead and the broader wave of corporate treasury adoption across the Bitcoin corporate treasury space are implicitly betting on protocol stability. A governance mechanism that can exclude valid use cases introduces a risk category unrelated to price or macro.
There is also a direct fee-revenue argument. Suppressing on-chain use cases, whatever their aesthetic merit, can affect the demand for transaction fees.
Saylor’s position is that market-based fees and individual relay policies are the correct instruments for managing unwanted data traffic, because they operate without altering consensus and can be reversed or adjusted without a network-wide coordination event.
SOURCE: TradingView
Broader Opposition and What Comes Next
In other Bitcoin news, Saylor is not the only prominent voice pushing back. Other long-standing Bitcoin contributors have also publicly opposed BIP-110. The debate has surfaced a wider tension in Bitcoin governance over who holds effective veto power: miners, developers, node operators, or major holders, and whether a 55% miner threshold is a legitimate activation path for changes of this scope.
With miner support effectively at zero six weeks before the August deadline and no clear institutional momentum building behind the proposal, BIP-110 may be difficult to push through under the required 55% signaling threshold. But the governance argument Saylor is making does not expire with this particular proposal.
The question of whether Bitcoin’s consensus layer should ever be used to discriminate between transaction types, and who gets to make that call, is now squarely on the table. Institutional players have a direct stake in how that question gets answered.
Strategy holds approximately 843,775 BTC. His argument is not philosophical posturing. It is a position from the largest corporate Bitcoin balance sheet in existence, and it lands squarely on the side of preserving the protocol’s neutrality.
Discover: The Best Crypto to Diversify Your Portfolio
The post Bitcoin News: Saylor Warns BIP-110 Trades Bitcoin Neutrality for a Dangerous Precedent appeared first on Cryptonews.

Ethereum is trading around $1,850, and bulls remain focused on one technical price trigger to initiate a big rally. Bulls are waiting for a sustained close above the 100-day EMA near $1,938. That is the line in the sand. Crack it with convincing volume, and the medium-term picture finally starts looking brighter. Miss it, and late longs could end up holding the bag.
The data behind this setup still looks tidy. Exchange outflows continue to reduce available sell-side supply, while staking keeps locking away circulating ETH. Meanwhile, futures volume has jumped sharply, and funding rates remain positive. That tells us buyers are still willing to pay for exposure, although the market has not reached full euphoria just yet.
Ethereum (ETH)
24h7d30d1yAll time
The long-to-short ratio sits close to 0.96, keeping positioning near balance instead of leaning too heavily in one direction. At the same time, Ethereum has tightened into an intraday range between $1,845 and $1,865. Markets love making traders wait, but tight ranges rarely stay quiet for long. Institutional interest has also continued to build, adding another layer of support beneath the chart.
With the MACD crossing into positive territory and ETH holding above the 50-day EMA near $1,818, the technical structure still leans bullish. Even so, this remains a level-by-level trade rather than a victory lap. As always, the chart gets the final vote, not our opinions.
Discover: The Best Crypto to Diversify Your Portfolio
Can Ethereum Price Break and Hold Above $1,940 This Week?
Ethereum price has gained about 4% over the past seven days, making it one of the stronger performers among the top ten cryptocurrencies by market cap. Trading activity has also picked up, with 24-hour volume hovering around $7.0 billion. Fresh money appears to be joining the move instead of traders simply passing the same chips around.
The technical picture remains straightforward. Support sits near the 50-day EMA around $1,818, and losing that level would weaken the recovery story. Resistance now stretches between $1,875 and $1,900, while the 100-day EMA near $1,938 remains the real gatekeeper. A convincing daily close above it puts $2,000 firmly back on the radar.
If buyers keep volume elevated, exchange outflows continue, and ETH closes above $1,938, the next stops become $2,000 and then the 200-day EMA near $2,180. That would finally give bulls something more exciting than another day of staring at candles.
The base case is less dramatic. Ethereum could spend another week chopping between $1,818 and $1,938 while traders wait for fresh macro catalysts. However, if ETH loses $1,818 on a daily close and exchange outflows reverse, this rally could fizzle out, exposing the $1,700 area once again.
The positive MACD crossover and improving momentum still favor buyers. Even so, charts reward patience more than enthusiasm. Watch the daily close, not every five-minute candle, trying to steal the spotlight.
Trade Ethereum on Bybit and Get a Chance to Win Our $1,000 USDT Airdrop
Bitcoin Hyper Targets Early-Mover Upside as Ethereum Tests Key Levels
ETH at $1,860 is a recovery trade with defined upside targets. The math to $2,180 is roughly 16% from current levels. It’s a respectable target, but that’s a move back to levels ETH already occupied months ago.
For traders who want asymmetric upside tied to the same crypto risk cycle, the early-stage presale market is where the leverage lives.
Bitcoin Hyper ($HYPER) is positioning itself at what could be a genuinely underexplored infrastructure niche: it’s the first Bitcoin Layer 2 to integrate the Solana Virtual Machine, targeting sub-second finality and low-cost smart contract execution while inheriting Bitcoin’s security model.
The project has raised $32.9 millio0n at a current presale price of $0.0136834, with staking rewards available to early participants. The $33 million milestone is already within reach, which tends to accelerate visibility and the next price step-up.
The core pitch of bringing Solana-speed programmability to Bitcoin’s trust layer via a Decentralized Canonical Bridge addresses limitations that have kept Bitcoin-native DeFi marginal.
Research Bitcoin Hyper before the next price tier closes.
Discover: The Best Token Presales
The post Ethereum Bulls are Preparing for a Major Price Breakout Above the 100-day EMA appeared first on Cryptonews.

Bitcoin price is holding the low to mid $64,000s on Monday after geopolitical fears, which rattled its prediction last week. As of now, BTC trades around $64,200 after slipping modestly over the past 24 hours, while still staying comfortably above last week’s lows. The real question is whether this is genuine relief buying or simply a classic dead cat bounce.
Secretary of State Marco Rubio confirmed Monday that the US remains open to a diplomatic resolution with Iran, even as US Central Command acknowledged another wave of strikes in the region. That mix of military action and diplomatic messaging is the sort of “bad, but not worse” outcome markets often welcome. Unsurprisingly, Bitcoin bounced from its weekend lows soon after Rubio’s remarks made the rounds.
.@SecRubio: "Iran is a rich country. One of the reason why Iran is in shambles is because every penny that this regime ever gets — be it through sanctions relief or through the oil they're able to get out — they invest it in Hezbollah. They invest it in Hamas… They should be… pic.twitter.com/E3OrpuBAHa
— Rapid Response 47 (@RapidResponse47) July 20, 2026
Meanwhile, the macro backdrop still deserves respect. Global risk assets remain jumpy as traders react to every headline tied to the Iran conflict. Even so, Bitcoin’s ability to defend the $64,000 level through the worst of the recent news gives bulls something tangible to lean on. Sometimes, not falling is its own victory.
Of course, one calm headline does not erase weeks of uncertainty. If diplomatic progress continues, Bitcoin could build on its recovery and challenge higher resistance. However, another escalation would likely send volatility racing back, reminding traders that headlines, not charts, are still calling the tune.
Discover: The Best Token Presales
Bitcoin Price Prediction: Break $70,000 While Iran Tensions Simmer?
Price action across major trackers tells a clean consolidation story. Bitcoin is range trading at around $64,200, with its daily volume sitting at $16.3 billion, enough to support the range but hardly the fireworks that usually spark a breakout.
Support in the low $64,000s has survived repeated tests over the past week. Meanwhile, resistance remains stacked between $67,000 and $70,000. That area has turned back rallies before and could do it again unless a strong macro catalyst forces short sellers to blink. The weekly performance remains modest, showing buyers have not abandoned Bitcoin despite the Iran headlines.
Xrp (XRP)
24h7d30d1yAll time
Three scenarios are worth watching. In the bullish case, diplomatic progress lifts risk appetite, allowing Bitcoin to reclaim $67,000 and challenge the $70,000 ceiling. The base case keeps military action contained while talks drag on, leaving Bitcoin stuck between roughly $64,000 and $67,000. Not exciting, but markets rarely ask for permission to be boring.
The bearish price prediction arrives if tensions escalate without meaningful diplomatic progress, and crack support near $64,000, and send Bitcoin toward the low $60,000s. Watch exchange inflows and realized price closely. Those metrics often whisper before price starts shouting. The macro picture still matters, but right now the headlines are driving the bus, while the long-term structure waits for its turn.
Trade Butcoin on Bybit and Get a Chance to Win Our $1,000 USDT Airdrop
Bitcoin Hyper Targets Early-Mover Upside as BTC Tests Key Levels
Bitcoin holding $64,000 is constructive, but the upside math at a $1.28 trillion market cap is compressing. A move to $70,000 is just a 9% gain. That’s real money, but it’s not the asymmetry that moves portfolio needles for traders with a higher risk tolerance.
Bitcoin Hyper ($HYPER) is positioned directly at the intersection of Bitcoin’s two biggest structural gaps: slow throughput and near-zero programmability.
The project is building the first Bitcoin Layer 2 with Solana Virtual Machine (SVM) integration, meaning smart contract execution that claims to outperform Solana’s own speeds, while settlement anchors to Bitcoin’s security model.
What the data shows: the presale has raised $32.9 million at a current token price of $0.0136834, with staking available for early participants. The project is approaching a $33 million milestone, a level of presale traction that reflects genuine demand, not just launch-day noise.
Features include a Decentralized Canonical Bridge for BTC transfers and high-speed, low-cost transaction execution layered over Bitcoin’s base security. If the SVM-on-Bitcoin thesis plays out, early presale entry at sub-$0.02 pricing is the window that closes first.
Research Bitcoin Hyper before the next pricing tier locks in.
Discover: The Best Crypto to Diversify Your Portfolio
The post Bitcoin Price Prediction: BTC Rises as Marco Rubio Says Iran Deal Remains Open appeared first on Cryptonews.

Perpetual futures trading does not care about conviction. They care about your margin. The Trump administration’s move to open American markets to highly leveraged perpetual futures marks a structural shift that could pull more capital and retail participation into an instrument known for making and breaking fortunes in days. Crypto derivatives desks are already recalibrating. The real question is whether traders understand what they are actually holding.
The regulatory green light is significant. Previously, many U.S. traders turned to offshore venues such as Binance, Bybit, and OKX, accepting extra counterparty and jurisdictional risk for access. Bringing perpetual futures onshore introduces clearer compliance standards and deeper institutional participation. It also makes high leverage feel more familiar, even when the risks remain the same. A 10% move that spot traders absorb over time can wipe out a 50x position before lunch.
Korea’s Leverage Rout Wipes Out $1.45 Billion, With Young Traders Hit Hardest
South Korean retail investors lost an estimated KRW 2.15 trillion, or about USD 1.45 billion, from leveraged trading over the past month, with investors in their 20s and 30s accounting for 62% of… pic.twitter.com/PCVRrSLhHD
— Wu Blockchain (@WuBlockchain) July 16, 2026
Meanwhile, open interest across major perpetual futures markets remains elevated, although it now shifts with changing market sentiment rather than climbing in a straight line. Funding rates continue to swing between neutral and positive, showing leveraged longs still step in aggressively during rallies. That usually works well until everyone crowds through the same exit. Then the elevator suddenly becomes a trapdoor.
That is why perpetual futures reward discipline more than confidence. Leverage shortens both profits and mistakes, leaving little room for hesitation. Used carefully, it can amplify returns. Used carelessly, it has a habit of turning heroes into cautionary tales before the weekend is over.
Discover: The Best Token Presales
How High Can Perpetual Trading Volumes Push Crypto Prices — and How Fast Can Leverage Reverse the Move?
Bitcoin has been the clearest case study. Perp-driven rallies often overshoot spot-driven moves because leverage compounds momentum. Every short liquidation adds fuel to the rally, until the script flips and overleveraged longs get flushed instead. The same pattern appears in mid-cap and meme coins, where thinner liquidity makes every squeeze feel louder.
Greater U.S. retail and institutional access could bring fresh capital, lift open interest, and improve price discovery. Assets with active communities and strong narratives may benefit the most. Still, leverage has a habit of throwing a party before sending everyone the bill.
Bitcoin (BTC)
24h7d30d1yAll time
However, volatility will likely remain tied to major macro data and Federal Reserve decisions instead of following a clean trend. The worst case is a macro shock triggering a synchronized long squeeze, where leverage accelerates losses and liquidation cascades overwhelm the order book.
Three metrics define today’s risk environment: funding rates, open interest relative to spot volume, and liquidation clusters around key price levels. Watch those before chasing chart patterns. Traders who ignore funding while staring only at candles are like drivers checking the rearview mirror on a sharp corner.
Try Bybit Perpetual Trading and Get a Chance to Win Our $1,000 USDT Airdrop
Maxi Doge Targets Early Mover Upside as Leveraged Markets Amplify Speculative Appetite
This is precisely the environment where early-stage, high-narrative assets attract disproportionate attention. When leverage is cheap and accessible, speculative capital doesn’t sit in blue-chips; it hunts for multipliers. Presale-stage projects with strong community mechanics have historically captured that energy before it prices in.
Maxi Doge ($MAXI) is built around exactly that thesis, a meme token on Ethereum that leans into the 1000x leverage-trading mentality without apology. The project has raised $4.8 million at a current presale price of $0.000283, with a staking model offering dynamic APY for holders.
POV: The government trying to work out how to tax capital gains on assets that price fluctuate pic.twitter.com/MXJPJDRzzJ
— MaxiDoge (@MaxiDoge_) July 7, 2026
The core mechanics include holder-only trading competitions with leaderboard rewards, a Maxi Fund treasury earmarked for liquidity provision and partnerships, and meme-first marketing anchored in gym-bro culture.
The community angle is the actual product here; the token is the access mechanism.
For traders already thinking in terms of leverage and asymmetric payoff structures, the logic of an early-stage presale entry is familiar. Research Maxi Doge before the presale window closes.
Discover: The Best Crypto to Diversify Your Portfolio
The post The Double-Edged Sword of Perpetual Trading: Hero to Zero, or Vice Versa appeared first on Cryptonews.

Zcash’s Orchard implementation has increased interest in how users move between different privacy-focused assets, including swaps between Zcash and Monero. For those not familiar with Orchard, this is Zcash’s third-generation shielded pool, which is built to replace older privacy systems with stronger efficiency and more modern cryptography.
It uses the Halo 2 proving system, Pallas-based keys, and unified addresses. All of these make private transactions and address handling simpler and more flexible than Sapling.
Orchard is created to hide sender, recipient, and amount for shielded ZEC transfers while keeping the protocol auditable at the network level.
Privacy coins are facing increased regulatory scrutiny and exchange delistings, so many crypto traders are rotating between assets like BTC to XMR, ETH to XMR, ZEC to XMR, or XMR to ZEC depending on exchange listings, wallet support, regulatory developments, privacy preferences, and ecosystem changes.
The ZEC to XMR pair is at the intersection of two very different privacy philosophies. And it can be done in just one step using GhostSwap.
Zcash vs. Monero: What’s the Difference?
Both Zcash and Monero are privacy-focused cryptos, yet they use fundamentally different approaches to protecting user privacy.
Zcash: Optional Privacy
Zcash offers privacy through zk-SNARKs, shielded addresses, and zero-knowledge proofs. The key characteristic is that privacy is optional; Zcash supports both transparent transactions and shielded transactions, and users choose which they use.
This flexibility has trade-offs. Researchers have repeatedly noted that anonymity depends partly on adoption of shielded transactions. Users can accidentally transact transparently, and privacy depends on usage patterns. Historical research has found shielded adoption lower than ideal for maximum anonymity.
However, Zcash also offers advantages: very advanced cryptography, relatively small transaction sizes, selective disclosure capabilities, and regulatory flexibility due to the transparent option.
Monero: Privacy by Default
Monero takes the opposite strategy. Privacy is not optional. Every transaction uses ring signatures, stealth addresses, and RingCT by default. There’s no “transparent mode”; every transaction is private automatically.
This mandatory privacy provides benefits: strong fungibility, no need to think about address types, shielding funds, or privacy settings. Monero supporters often argue that every XMR is effectively identical, whereas coins on transparent chains may carry transaction history.
However, Monero’s mandatory privacy comes with trade-offs: larger transaction sizes, more limited exchange support, and more regulatory scrutiny globally.
How to Swap ZEC to XMR Using GhostSwap
GhostSwap makes sure you can swap Zcash to Monero extremely easily. The platform supports both Zcash (ZEC) and Monero (XMR) as primary assets, and the ZEC to XMR page follows the same workflow as GhostSwap’s other pair pages.
Core user flow:
Select ZEC as the asset being sent
Select XMR as the asset being received
Enter a Monero wallet address (the destination for your XMR)
Optionally enter a refund address (recommended)
Send ZEC to a temporary deposit address
Receive XMR after confirmations
The platform markets this as:
No account creation
No email
No KYC for standard swaps
Non-custodial swap process
Cross-chain conversion
Typically completed in minutes depending on network conditions
The swap requires only an XMR destination address and a recommended refund address. No name, email, phone number, or identity documents are requested during the normal flow.
GhostSwap states most privacy-coin swaps finish within roughly 5–30 minutes overall as this depends on source-chain confirmations and congestion.
The user sends funds from their wallet, funds go to a temporary swap address, conversion occurs, and the output asset is sent to the user’s destination wallet.
GhostSwap’s Fees, Timing, and What to Expect
GhostSwap charges a flat 2% fee built into the quoted exchange rate. Users see this fee upfront as part of the exchange rate and the final receive amount. Standard blockchain network fees (Zcash and Monero transaction fees) are extra and come from the user’s wallet.
It’s important to understand that a ZEC to XMR swap is not instant. Completion depends on:
Zcash confirmations (network conditions)
Swap processing by GhostSwap’s engine
Monero confirmations (the XMR network)
Once the Zcash network confirms the deposit, GhostSwap’s backend automatically executes the swap across its liquidity sources and sends the Monero directly to the provided destination address.
Is GhostSwap Legit
GhostSwap is a non-custodial swap platform that has processed over $750 million in swaps for approximately 1.5 million users. The company is registered as a Delaware LLC and operates as an anonymous crypto exchange prioritizing user privacy and simplicity.
Signs of legitimacy:
Public website and extensive documentation
Transparent swap process with upfront fees
Published API with clear documentation
Functional Telegram bot
Operational history spanning years
User-facing support channels
GhostSwap never takes long-term custody of user funds. Each swap uses a temporary deposit address, and funds are routed directly to the user’s destination wallet. No pooled account is ever held on GhostSwap, avoiding many hacking risks associated with centralized exchanges.
Even though GhostSwap advertises no account and no KYC for standard swaps, users should still read the terms because compliance screening may occur through underlying partners. The platform explicitly works with licensed crypto processing partners to handle AML/sanctions screening. If a swap is flagged (e.g., for high value or hitting a blacklist), GhostSwap reserves the right to block, reject, or refund it.
Important points:
No-KYC ≠ No Compliance: GhostSwap advertises no account and no KYC for standard swaps. However, users should still read the terms because compliance screening may occur through underlying partners.
Monero Doesn’t Erase History: A common misconception: swapping ZEC into XMR does not magically erase the history of the ZEC transaction. The ZEC side still exists on the Zcash blockchain. The Monero side simply enters a different privacy model after conversion.
Network Confirmation Times Matter: A ZEC to XMR swap is not instant. Completion depends on Zcash confirmations, swap processing, and Monero confirmations.
The final conclusion
Swapping Zcash to Monero has become pretty relevant as the privacy-coin landscape evolves. Whether you prefer Zcash’s optional privacy model with its advanced cryptography and regulatory flexibility, or Monero’s mandatory privacy with strong fungibility and simplicity, GhostSwap provides a non-custodial, no-KYC bridge between the two ecosystems.
The platform’s support for both ZEC and XMR, combined with its public API, Telegram bot, and transparent 2% fee structure, makes it a practical option for users looking to rotate between privacy assets without creating exchange accounts or submitting to KYC processes.
Frequently Asked Question
Does GhostSwap require KYC to swap ZEC to XMR?
No. GhostSwap does not require identity documents, name, address, or phone number for standard swaps. Compliance checks are handled behind the scenes by partners and may occasionally flag transactions.
How long does a ZEC to XMR swap take on GhostSwap?
Most privacy-coin swaps complete within 5–30 minutes, depending on Zcash confirmation times, network congestion, and Monero confirmations.
What is the fee for swapping ZEC to XMR?
GhostSwap charges a flat 2% fee built into the quoted exchange rate. Users also pay standard blockchain network fees (Zcash and Monero transaction fees).
Is GhostSwap custodial or non-custodial?
Non-custodial. GhostSwap never takes long-term custody of user funds. Each swap uses a temporary deposit address, and funds are routed directly to the user’s destination wallet.
Does GhostSwap support Zcash and Monero?
Yes. GhostSwap supports both Zcash (ZEC) and Monero (XMR) as primary assets, with pairs like ZEC to XMR and XMR to ZEC available.
The post How to Swap Zcash to Monero With No KYC, in One Step appeared first on Cryptonews.

Thirty days is a short window to ask for anything, which makes Grok AI predicts that XRP is almost restrained by comparison to the usual end-of-year moonshots. From $1.08, it wants $1.25 to $1.35 by mid August.
The setup leans on five things happening together rather than one big catalyst. Spot ETF inflows keep showing up. Ripple’s full MiCA license opens the door to regulated European expansion.
XRPL network activity is surging in the background. Whales are accumulating instead of distributing. Exchange balances are dropping as coins move into cold storage.
Source: Grok AI XRP Price Prediction
Grok also points to something almost calendar-based. July has historically been a strong month for XRP, and that seasonal pattern is landing right on top of a market that just deleveraged hard.
The $1.00 to $1.05 zone has held firm through that deleveraging, which Grok reads as buyers defending a line rather than just drifting sideways. Clear resistance at $1.18 to $1.22, and Grok sees a confident push toward $1.25 to $1.40, with $1.30 to $1.35 as the realistic high if momentum and any regulatory tailwind cooperate.
The bear case stays narrow here, too. Broader market weakness or delays to the CLARITY Act could cap gains and force consolidation, with a retest of $0.95 to $1.00 support if the round number breaks.
Grok’s own base scenario without fresh catalysts is a flat $0.95 to $1.10, basically where XRP sits right now. The whole prediction hinges on new news arriving, not on existing momentum carrying itself.
Xrp (XRP)
24h7d30d1yAll time
Discover: The Best Token Presales
XRP Price Prediction: Has Traded In A Shrinking Box For Six Months And Grok Wants The Top Broken
The chart tells a quieter story than the prediction does. XRP closed at $1.08468, down 0.14%, in a session ranging between $1.07840 and $1.09495.
Zoom out from February, and this is not a downtrend anymore; it is a fading range. The February crash from above $2.30 down toward $1.20 was the violent part, and everything since has been a series of lower highs inside a slowly compressing box.
April topped near $1.55. May topped near $1.55 again. July’s bounce topped near $1.20 and already rolled over.
That is three failed attempts at reclaiming higher ground, each one weaker than the last. Support sits at $1.00, the level Grok specifically flagged as defended, then $0.95 below that.
Resistance stacks at $1.12, then $1.18, then the stubborn $1.20 ceiling that keeps rejecting every bounce. The RSI panel shows momentum at 44.55 with the signal line at 47.03, a small negative gap that has been narrowing over the past week.
That narrowing gap is the one mildly encouraging detail on this chart. It suggests selling pressure is easing rather than building, even if it has not flipped positive yet.
For Grok’s $1.25 target to happen in 30 days, XRP needs to do something it has failed to do three times since February, actually clear $1.20 and hold above it. Until that happens, this range keeps compressing rather than breaking.
Discover: The best crypto to diversify your portfolio with
Here is what Grok AI Predicts For LiquidChain’s Near Future
Every cycle has a moment where waiting becomes the most expensive decision you can make. That moment is now.
Bitcoin, Ethereum, and XRP are all pinned under the same resistance they have been testing for weeks. The macro unlock is perpetually one data point away. The institutional money keeps arriving next quarter. Large-cap traders waiting for a breakout are queuing for a decision that belongs to someone else entirely.
Grok AI has identified what experienced cycle traders already act on. Capital that registers as statistical background noise at Bitcoin’s market cap can completely reprice a small, undiscovered project.
The asymmetry is not complicated. It lives in the distance between what something is genuinely worth and what the market has currently assigned it. The moment that distance gets noticed, it collapses. Before that moment, it is fully open.
Cross-chain fragmentation has been quietly taxing every DeFi participant since the first bridge went live. Bitcoin, Ethereum, and Solana were engineered independently with zero shared infrastructure and no design intent to communicate. Every transaction crossing those ecosystem boundaries absorbs the cost of that decision in fees, failed execution, and slippage that hits before settlement even begins. The bridge industry did not fix this problem. It built a business model on top of it.
LiquidChain removes the business model entirely. Three networks unified inside a single execution layer. One deployment reaches all of them simultaneously. No cross-chain tax is extracted from any interaction anywhere.
Grok AI predicts it as a worth watching coin. The presale sits at $0.01454 with just over $860,000 raised.
Execution is unproven. Adoption is an open question. Established assets offer a smoother path toward a ceiling that the entire market can already see. LiquidChain is the entry point that stops existing once the market finds it.
LiquidChain Here.
Don’t Miss Out on Our $1,000 USDT Airdrop on ByBit
The post Elon Musk Grok AI Predicts XRP Will Do This by Next 30 Days, and Nobody Is Ready appeared first on Cryptonews.

XRP price prediction remains in focus as it trades between $1.08 and $1.10. The chart still gives bulls little to celebrate. Price remains below the 50, 100, and 200-day EMAs between $1.15 and $1.16, $1.24 and $1.25, and $1.45 and $1.46. That leaves the $1.00 to $1.02 zone as the key support that traders keep watching.
The latest inflation data briefly lifted risk appetite across financial markets. However, XRP barely flinched. While stocks welcomed the softer backdrop, XRP continued to drift as traders stayed on the sidelines. Sometimes the market hears good news and simply shrugs.
Open interest in perpetual futures has continued to fade, reflecting weaker speculative demand. ETF inflows have also slowed, while assets under management remain below $900 million to $1 billion. Retail participation has yet to return in meaningful numbers, leaving momentum without much fuel.
XRP Open Interest, Coinglass
Even so, momentum remains neutral rather than outright bearish. The daily RSI sits between 44 and 46, suggesting neither buyers nor sellers have full control. That shifts the focus away from breakout dreams. Instead, traders are asking whether XRP can defend the psychologically important $1.00 to $1.02 area before sellers push for another leg lower.
Now, can XRP push higher next week?
Trade ADA on Bybit and Get a Chance to Win Our $1,000 USDT Airdrop
XRP Price Prediction: Hold $1.00 Support This Week?
XRP is trading between $1.08 and $1.10, while 24-hour volume sits between $1.0 billion and $1.1 billion. Activity remains healthy, but volume still lacks the punch that usually confirms a trend. Meanwhile, the failed defense of the $1.10 to $1.11 zone remains the technical headline. That area briefly acted as support, but losing it puts buyers back on the spot.
The EMA stack still leans against a quick recovery. The 20, 50, and 200-day EMAs continue capping upside attempts. As a result, every bounce runs into overhead supply almost immediately. Sellers are not running away with the market, but they are still calling the tune.
Xrp (XRP)
24h7d30d1yAll time
The bullish path remains straightforward. Buyers need to defend the $1.08 to $1.10 range and reclaim $1.15 to $1.17 with convincing volume. Fresh optimism around regulation could also help, although the price still needs to prove it. Hope is cheap, but breakouts usually demand cash.
The base case is still a sideways grind between $1.08 and $1.16. However, if $1.10 to $1.11 turns into firm resistance again, attention shifts toward $1.02 to $1.04. A break there would put the $0.99 to $1.00 area back in focus, where traders often become far more emotional than technical.
The RSI around 51 to 53 reflects neutral momentum rather than a decisive edge for either side. In that environment, patience often beats prediction. Longer-term models still lean constructive, yet short-term traders are likely watching whether the $1.00 mark survives before dreaming about the next rally.
Discover: The Best Token Presales
Bitcoin Hyper Targets Early Mover Upside as XRP Tests Key Levels
When a large-cap asset like XRP is grinding below every meaningful moving average with weakening institutional flows, the risk-adjusted case for holding it starts to compete with the opportunity cost of sitting in something earlier in its curve. That’s the rotation trade some active traders are running right now. They are not abandoning crypto, but moving capital where asymmetry is higher.
Bitcoin Hyper ($HYPER) is currently in presale at $0.0136832, having raised $32.9 million to date. The project’s core pitch is infrastructure, not hype: it’s positioning as the first Bitcoin Layer 2 with Solana Virtual Machine (SVM) integration, with sub-Solana latency on a chain secured by Bitcoin’s trust model.
The presale includes staking with a high APY, and the feature set covers a decentralized canonical bridge for BTC transfers alongside low-cost smart contract execution.
Research Bitcoin Hyper at the presale page before the current pricing stage closes.
Discover: The Best Crypto to Diversify Your Portfolio
The post XRP Price Prediction: Can XRP Hold $1 Next Week? appeared first on Cryptonews.

From a $63,000 Bitcoin price, Sam Altman’s ChatGPT AI is not thinking in percentages anymore, it predicts $180,000 to $250,000 BTC by the end of 2026. It’s a price prediction that treats the current price as little more than a starting line.
The case leans hard on politics and plumbing rather than hype. A pro-crypto White House under President Trump has openly embraced digital assets as policy rather than tolerating them.
The GENIUS Act already delivered the first federal stablecoin framework. The CLARITY Act, if it passes, would finally define SEC and CFTC jurisdiction and remove years of regulatory fog in one move.
Source: ChatGPT AI Bitcoin Price Prediction
That kind of clarity does not just calm nerves; it unlocks capital that was sitting out specifically because the rules were unclear. Institutional adoption is already moving without waiting for the bill, through spot ETFs, growing corporate treasury allocations, expanding bank custody, and early sovereign interest.
Layer the post-halving supply shock on top of all of that. Less new Bitcoin entering the market against rising institutional demand is the exact setup that has preceded every major leg up in past cycles.
ChatGPT frames 2026 as the start of Bitcoin’s institutional era rather than the tail end of another speculative cycle. That reframing is the whole bull case in one sentence.
The bear case is not dismissed, just narrower. If inflation reaccelerates, the Fed holds rates higher for longer, ETF inflows slow, or CLARITY gets delayed or watered down, Bitcoin could stall out trading between $90,000 and $140,000 instead.
Notice that even the bear scenario sits above where the price trades today. ChatGPT is essentially arguing that the floor has already moved, only the ceiling is in question.
Bitcoin (BTC)
24h7d30d1yAll time
Discover: The Best Token Presales
Bitcoin Price Prediction: BTC Is Sitting Exactly On The Fence, RSI Just Confirmed
Price closed at $63,032, down 1.18%, in a session that ranged between $62,613 and $64,008. Nothing dramatic happened today, which is itself worth noting after the year this chart has had.
Zoom out, and the story is a slow bleed followed by a stubborn floor. Bitcoin topped near $128,000 in October 2025, then broke down hard in February, gapping through $84,000 in one violent leg.
Since that break, price carved a rounded recovery attempt, rallying to $97,000 in April before fading, then pushing again to $82,000 in May before rolling over into a June flush near $60,000. That June low held, and the price has spent the last six weeks grinding sideways just above it.
Support sits at $60,000, the level defended in June, then $52,000 if that floor finally gives. Resistance stacks at $68,000, then $73,000, then the heavier ceiling near $84,000 that has rejected two rally attempts already.
The RSI panel here gives an unusually clean read. RSI sits at 48.35 with its signal line at 51.19, meaning momentum is currently running just under its own average, a small negative gap rather than a dramatic one.
That is a market caught exactly at the midpoint, not oversold, not overbought, just undecided. It is the kind of reading you get right before a real decision gets made, not after one.
For ChatGPT’s six-figure targets to matter, Bitcoin needs that RSI gap to flip positive and stay there, then take back $84,000 with volume behind it. Until then, $63,000 is a market thinking it over, not a market that has chosen a direction.
Don’t Miss Out on Our $1,000 USDT Airdrop on ByBit
Here is What ChatGPT AI Predicts About LiquidChain
The rotation has already happened. Most people will realize it too late.
Large caps are boxed in. Bitcoin, Ethereum, and XRP keep testing the same ceilings with nothing giving way. Every macro catalyst has a new date. Every institutional wave arrives next quarter. Waiting on someone else’s timeline is not a trade.
A capital that has navigated enough cycles moves before the destination has a name.
Small market cap infrastructure plays on different physics entirely. A modest rotation that vanishes as noise at Bitcoin’s scale can reprice an undiscovered project by multiples. The returns live in the gap between what something is genuinely worth and what the market has assigned it. That gap closes permanently the moment discovery happens.
Multi-chain fragmentation bleeds DeFi every single day. Bitcoin, Ethereum, and Solana run as completely isolated systems. Every user crossing those boundaries pays in fees, slippage, and failed transactions. Every single time.
ChatGPT AI predicts LiquidChain fixes that entirely. All 3 networks inside one execution layer. One deployment. Zero cross-chain tax anywhere.
The presale is at $0.01454 with just over $900,000 raised. The market has not found this yet. That is exactly the point.
Execution is unproven. Adoption is unknown. LiquidChain is an entry point that disappears the moment the market looks up.
Visit LiquidChain.
Discover: The Best Crypto to Diversify Your Portfolio
The post ChatGPT AI Predicts This Exact Bitcoin Price by the End of 2026, and It’s Insane appeared first on Cryptonews.

In the latest Solana news, the SOL real-world asset ecosystem just crossed 300,000 unique holders, a milestone no competing chain has matched at this scale or speed.
SOL is trading at $74.30, down 2.30% over the last 24 hours, yet the on-chain fundamentals paint a picture that the spot price alone doesn’t fully capture. The gap between short-term price weakness and long-term network traction is where the real story sits.
The catalyst driving this week’s narrative: Circle injected $250 million of fresh liquidity into Solana on July 15, directly reinforcing its position as the dominant stablecoin and DeFi settlement layer. That capital doesn’t just sit idle; it deepens order books, tightens spreads on RWA protocols, and makes Solana more attractive to institutional allocators scanning for tokenization infrastructure.
BREAKING: Circle minted 250,000,000 $USDC on Solana today. pic.twitter.com/gHZmTSkw85
— MSB Intel (@MSBIntel) July 13, 2026
The broader setup is a classic tension between strong fundamentals and compressed technicals. Whether that tension resolves to the upside depends on one specific price level, and the window may be narrower than it looks.
Discover: The Best Token Presales
Solana News: Can Solana Price Break $85 Before Macro Resistance Resets the Chart?
SOL is trading at $74.30, up 1.46% on the day. Price is chopping around the $74 to $78 band with genuine intraday indecision on both sides.
The technical structure is tight. Support at $77 was reclaimed on strong DEX volume but the $79 to $85 supply wall remains unbroken, a zone where sellers have historically overwhelmed buyers.
A potential triple-top formation is being flagged by technical analysts. If trendline support fails, a flush toward $50 becomes a credible scenario, not a tail risk.
SOL clearing $78 cleanly on volume triggers a short squeeze toward roughly $90, with Circle’s liquidity injection and continued DEX activity providing the fuel.
Source: SOLUSD / Tradingview
Consolidation between $74 and $79, persisting for another week while traders wait for macro clarity and the supply wall gets tested, but not broken, is the base case.
A close below $74 on meaningful volume reopens the path to $65 and potentially $50, with bot-inflated transaction counts masking softer organic demand, accelerating the move.
News and sentiment are cautiously optimistic, which in practice means nobody is fully committed to Solana either way. The next 72 hours around the $74 level will carry outsized signal value for trend direction.
Discover: The Best Crypto to Diversify Your Portfolio
LiquidChain Targets Early-Mover Upside as Solana Tests Key Levels
SOL’s RWA dominance and Circle’s $250M liquidity injection confirm the multi-chain institutional thesis is real. The complication: at a $43 billion market cap, SOL’s upside in a base-case scenario is measured in percentages, not multiples.
Traders chasing leverage-adjusted returns are increasingly looking at infrastructure plays positioned across the chains generating that growth, not just one of them.
LiquidChain ($LIQUID) is building exactly that layer. The project operates as a Layer 3 infrastructure protocol that fuses Bitcoin, Ethereum, and Solana liquidity into a single execution environment, enabling developers to deploy once and access all three ecosystems simultaneously (a meaningful reduction in fragmentation costs for any protocol building cross-chain RWA products).
Key architecture features include a Unified Liquidity Layer, Single-Step Execution, Verifiable Settlement, and a Deploy-Once Architecture that removes the need to maintain separate codebases per chain.
The presale has raised $907,706.46 at a current token price of $0.0148. As with any early-stage presale, liquidity risk and execution risk are real. This is pre-launch infrastructure, not a finished product.
For those tracking the cross-chain RWA race that Solana is currently winning, researching LiquidChain’s presale mechanics is worth the time.
Don’t Miss Out on Our $1,000 USDT Airdrop on ByBit
The post Solana News: SOL Hits 300,000 RWA Holders, Leaving Other Chains in the Dust appeared first on Cryptonews.

Google Gemini AI predicts a Solana price target that skips the usual talking points and goes straight to a number that made us pause.
Over 96% of global on-chain equity volume runs through Solana right now. That is not a growing market share story; that is a market that has already been won.
From $74, Gemini puts the December 2026 target at $180 to $220. Stablecoin liquidity is doing real work here too, with Circle adding $500M in USDC to the network in a single move.
Source: Gemini AI Solana Price Prediction
The forward-looking piece is the Alpenglow upgrade, aimed at pushing throughput into territory that makes high-frequency use cases viable on chain for the first time. Pair that with deep institutional integration into real-world assets, and Gemini’s thesis is less about speculation and more about infrastructure quietly becoming unavoidable.
A sustained macro expansion is the condition attached to all of it. Without a broader risk appetite returning, even dominant infrastructure sits underpriced.
The bear case Gemini offers is almost an afterthought by comparison. Regulatory roadblocks around ecosystem ETFs or a sudden bout of network congestion could dampen retail momentum and push SOL into a defensive range of $45 to $55.
That is a specific, bounded downside rather than a collapse scenario. It reads more like a pause than a reversal.
Solana (SOL)
24h7d30d1yAll time
Discover: The Best Token Presales
Solana Price Prediction: SOL RSI Just Crossed A Line It Has Not Held Since October
Price closed at $74.67, down 0.78%, with the session ranging between $74.12 and $75.69. On its own, that is an unremarkable day, but the chart underneath it tells a longer and more interesting story.
SOL peaked near $257 in September 2025, and the decline from there was almost uninterrupted through the February crash below $80. Since that crash, price has spent five months carving a wide range between roughly $60 and $100, with three separate rally attempts, March, May, and now July, each stalling near the same $95 to $100 ceiling.
That repetition matters. A level that rejects price three times stops being a coincidence and starts being the market’s actual opinion on fair value.
Support sits at $70, then the June low near $60 that has held twice now. Resistance stacks at $80, then $85, then that stubborn $95 to $100 zone.
The RSI panel shows something worth pausing on. RSI reads 46.03 with the signal line at 54.63, and that signal line has been climbing steadily since the June bottom, tracking the price recovery closely.
The current gap is negative, meaning short-term momentum has cooled slightly after the recent bounce, but the broader trend in the signal line itself is the more telling detail. It has not been this elevated since October, back when SOL was still trading above $200.
For Gemini AI, as it predicts, a $180 prediction becomes plausible. Solana needs to finally close above $100 with conviction, something it has failed to do three separate times since February. The infrastructure case may already be true. The chart has not been asked to agree with it yet.
Discover: The best crypto to diversify your portfolio with
Don’t Miss Out on Our $1,000 USDT Airdrop on ByBit
You Might Like What Gemini AI Predicts About This New Layer 3 Called LiquidChain
The money that wins cycles never waits at resistance.
Large caps are stuck. Bitcoin, Ethereum, and XRP keep testing the same ceilings with nothing breaking through. Every macro catalyst has a new arrival date. Every institutional wave has a new quarter attached. Waiting on someone else’s decision is not a trade.
Small market cap infrastructure plays operate on completely different physics. A rotation that vanishes as noise at Bitcoin’s scale reprices an undiscovered project by multiples. The opportunity lies in the gap between what something is genuinely worth and what the market has assigned it. That gap closes permanently the moment discovery happens.
Multi-chain fragmentation is one of the most expensive unsolved problems in DeFi. Bitcoin, Ethereum, and Solana run as completely isolated systems. No shared architecture. No native interoperability. Every time value crosses those boundaries it pays in fees, slippage, and failed transactions.
LiquidChain makes the crossing free. Gemini AI predicts and agrees. All 3 networks inside one execution environment. Single deployment. Complete ecosystem access. No tax on any interaction.
The presale is at $0.01454 with just over $900,000 raised. Early and undiscovered. That combination does not last long.
Explore the LiquidChain Presale
The post Google Gemini AI Reveals Shocking Solana Price Target for 2026 appeared first on Cryptonews.

The CLARITY Act, the bill that would define whether digital assets fall under SEC or CFTC jurisdiction, has two remaining floor windows before the August recess: the weeks of July 20 and July 27.
Miss both, and Senator Lummis has warned that market structure legislation could slip to 2030 or die entirely at the end of the 119th Congress in January 2027, forcing a full restart.
That is not a political projection, it is the structural consequence of a Senate calendar that leaves roughly three weeks of productive session after September before lawmakers enter full midterm campaign mode.
One year after Washington’s Crypto Week, the scorecard is uneven. The GENIUS Act became law on July 18, 2025, establishing the first federal framework for payment stablecoins.
BREAKING:
SEN. LUMMIS SAYS THE CLARITY ACT WILL BE INTRODUCED WITHIN DAYS AFTER 10 MONTHS OF WORK
SENATE VOTE IS NOW TARGETED FOR THE WEEK OF JULY 20
BULLISH FOR CRYPTO pic.twitter.com/1BuG9FWUEs
— Midas (@DeFiMidas) July 14, 2026
An anti-CBDC provision eventually passed inside the 21st Century ROAD to Housing Act, becoming law automatically on July 10, the House voted 358–32, the Senate 85–5, margins that made Trump’s refusal to sign irrelevant.
The CLARITY Act, which passed the House 294–134 on July 17, 2025, cleared the Senate Banking Committee 15–9 on May 14, 2026, and has sat on the Senate Legislative Calendar since June 1 with no floor vote scheduled.
The distinction between GENIUS and CLARITY matters here. GENIUS governed one product. CLARITY governs the entire market. It answers the classification question that determines everything downstream: whether a given digital asset falls under SEC jurisdiction as a security or CFTC jurisdiction as a commodity.
Registration, custody, listing decisions, and disclosure posture all flow from that single determination. Without a statutory answer, the question gets resolved by whichever agency sues first, or whichever party holds the White House.
Bitcoin (BTC)
24h7d30d1yAll time
Discover: The Best Token Presales
The Vote Math Is Getting Harder
Senate leadership needs 60 votes. The Republican coalition is already fractured. Senators Josh Hawley (R-Mo.) and Rand Paul (R-Ky.) were the only two Republicans to vote against the GENIUS Act; per Galaxy Digital analyst Alex Thorn, both are expected to oppose CLARITY as well.
Senator McConnell has missed votes due to an ongoing medical issue, and the death of Senator Lindsey Graham at 71 further narrows an already thin Republican majority. By Thorn’s calculation, leadership may need as many as nine Democratic crossovers to reach the threshold.
Photo: Senator McConnell
Those crossovers are not secured. Senators Ruben Gallego (D-Ariz.) and Angela Alsobrooks (D-Md.) voted yes in committee but explicitly characterized those votes as conditional, not floor commitments.
Polymarket’s current passage odds in 2026 are approximately 34% and falling.
Discover: The Best Crypto to Diversify Your Portfolio
Clarity Act: Four Disputes, Zero Resolutions
The first and most visible obstacle is ethics. Senator Elizabeth Warren (D-Mass.) wrote to Majority Leader John Thune and Minority Leader Chuck Schumer on July 13, demanding guardrails preventing senior officials and members of Congress from profiting off the crypto industry.
The letter cited approximately $1.4 billion in crypto-related income disclosed in the president’s 2025 financial filing. Senator Kirsten Gillibrand (D-N.Y.) has made enforceable ethics language covering officials’ crypto holdings a prerequisite for her support. The merged draft from the Banking and Agriculture committees omits ethics provisions entirely.
A compromise floated by Senator Lummis would allow state attorneys general to sue exchanges that list tokens issued by public officials in violation of the act – but Senate Republicans are unlikely to advance any ethics language the White House actively opposes. For a detailed breakdown of this standoff, see the ethics dispute driving the CLARITY Act delay.
The CLARITY Act is in trouble.
And it all comes to ethics provisions.
The newest text of the bill that was released has ZERO dem support – and they need 60 votes.
Apparently, the plan presented to Trump was different to what dems had agreed.
Unlikely to pass before midterms.
— Nic (@puckrin) July 17, 2026
The second dispute centers on law enforcement. The National District Attorneys Association argued to Senate leadership that Section 604, the Blockchain Regulatory Certainty Act provision, would materially impair criminal investigations by shielding non-custodial software developers from money transmitter obligations.
Senator Ron Wyden (D-Ore.) countered that developers who never control customer funds should not be classified as money transmitters for publishing code. Senators Mark Warner (D-Va.) and Catherine Cortez Masto (D-Nev.) have tied their votes directly to law enforcement’s sign-off.
Third: banking trade groups, including the ABA and ICBA, argue the bill creates a stablecoin yield loophole allowing digital asset platforms to offer interest-equivalent rewards that circumvent the GENIUS Act’s prohibition on issuer-paid interest.
The Independent Community Bankers of America has questioned the bill’s pace entirely. Fourth, and structurally acute: the CFTC has operated with a single commissioner, and the SEC has two vacancies. Rules issued by a lone CFTC commissioner could invite legal challenge and keep jurisdictional uncertainty alive. Senator Amy Klobuchar has proposed blocking the framework from taking effect until at least four CFTC commissioners are confirmed.
Don’t Miss Out on Our $1,000 USDT Airdrop on ByBit
The post Two July Windows Left: The CLARITY Act’s Senate Fight and What Failure Means appeared first on Cryptonews.