Blockonomi
Ověřený tvůrce
A guide to Cryptocurrencies, Technology and the Blockchain Economy #cryptocurrency #blockchain #fintech
0 Sledujících
14.9K+ Sledujících
9.6K+ Označeno To se mi líbí
1.1K+ Sdílené
DeFi Didn’t Fail. Manual Participation Did.
Early DeFi rewarded people who moved fast and experimented freely.
That phase is over.
Today, manually jumping between pools and incentives often creates more problems than profits.
Fees, timing errors, fatigue — they add up.
Experienced users are adjusting.
Instead of stacking tools, they’re choosing frameworks.
IODeFi feels like part of that shift.
It doesn’t position itself as another yield opportunity.
It positions itself as a structure you participate in.
That difference matters.
Returns aren’t sold as “high.”
They’re designed to be repeatable.
Most DeFi veterans I’ve spoken to treat IODeFi the same way:
They don’t rush.
They read.
They start small.
Registration: https://iodefi.com/xml/index.html#/register
Structures overview: https://iodefi.com/xml/index.html#/contracts
DeFi is growing up.
Participation is becoming less emotional and more deliberate.
Platforms that reflect that mindset tend to last longer.
The post DeFi Didn’t Fail. Manual Participation Did. appeared first on Blockonomi.
That phase is over.
Today, manually jumping between pools and incentives often creates more problems than profits.
Fees, timing errors, fatigue — they add up.
Experienced users are adjusting.
Instead of stacking tools, they’re choosing frameworks.
IODeFi feels like part of that shift.
It doesn’t position itself as another yield opportunity.
It positions itself as a structure you participate in.
That difference matters.
Returns aren’t sold as “high.”
They’re designed to be repeatable.
Most DeFi veterans I’ve spoken to treat IODeFi the same way:
They don’t rush.
They read.
They start small.
Registration: https://iodefi.com/xml/index.html#/register
Structures overview: https://iodefi.com/xml/index.html#/contracts
DeFi is growing up.
Participation is becoming less emotional and more deliberate.
Platforms that reflect that mindset tend to last longer.
The post DeFi Didn’t Fail. Manual Participation Did. appeared first on Blockonomi.
They Came for the Lambos, They Stayed for the Vibes: How a ” mysterious” Project Became Crypto’s ...
In an industry notorious for “rug pulls” and communities that evaporate the moment the chart turns red, an anomaly has emerged on the Solana blockchain. Slothana ($SLOTH), a project that by all traditional metrics should have struggled in the current market, is currently staging one of the most confusing—and inspiring—grassroots movements in crypto history.
The narrative is supposed to be simple: The price dips, and the community dissolves. But for the 23,000+ holders of $SLOTH, the script has been flipped.
The “Anti-Panic” Phenomenon Over 600 days after its launch, the Slothana community has done the unthinkable: they stayed.
Instead of panic selling, the core community—forged in the fires of a grueling market—has hardened into a diamond-handed collective. What started as a standard speculative play for thousands of presale buyers has evolved into a fascinating social experiment in digital resilience.
“We all came here chasing a quick win,” admits one long-time community member. “But when the hype settled and the official channels went quiet, the people who were left realized we actually shared a vision. We stopped looking at the chart and started looking at the chat. That’s when the real project started.”
From Bagholders to Builders With the original developers remaining silent, the community has effectively seized the destiny of the project. This is not a formal DAO, neither is it a CTO, it is something pretty unique that has yet to get its own three letters title, NAP?
Grassroots Marketing: The community successfully crowdfunded its own PR campaign to reignite momentum—a rarity for a project operating without official dev backing.
Self-Made Ecosystem: Community developers and creatives have built their own onboarding tools, including a dedicated LinkTree (https://linktr.ee/slothana.SLOTH) and the “Slothonomics” educational hub (https://slothonomics.wordpress.com), designed to guide newcomers through the ecosystem.
The “Slow” Philosophy: In a market obsessed with speed, $SLOTH holders have embraced their mascot’s nature. The “Slow and Steady” mantra has transformed from a meme into a legitimate investment thesis, creating a psychological safe harbor for investors tired of the high-stress, 24/7 anxiety of the crypto market.
The Verdict Slothana represents a paradox in the current market landscape. It is a memecoin with no promised tech roadmap, yet it possesses the one asset every billion-dollar project is desperate to buy but cannot manufacture: unshakeable loyalty.
For investors, $SLOTH is no longer just a bet on a token; it is a bet on a community that has proven it cannot be shaken by market volatility. In a world of fleeting trends, the Slothana community is proving that the strongest utility in crypto isn’t code—it’s culture.
For more information about Slothana, visit the Website: www.slothana.com
The post They Came for the Lambos, They Stayed for the Vibes: How a ” mysterious” Project Became Crypto’s Most Unbreakable Community appeared first on Blockonomi.
The narrative is supposed to be simple: The price dips, and the community dissolves. But for the 23,000+ holders of $SLOTH, the script has been flipped.
The “Anti-Panic” Phenomenon Over 600 days after its launch, the Slothana community has done the unthinkable: they stayed.
Instead of panic selling, the core community—forged in the fires of a grueling market—has hardened into a diamond-handed collective. What started as a standard speculative play for thousands of presale buyers has evolved into a fascinating social experiment in digital resilience.
“We all came here chasing a quick win,” admits one long-time community member. “But when the hype settled and the official channels went quiet, the people who were left realized we actually shared a vision. We stopped looking at the chart and started looking at the chat. That’s when the real project started.”
From Bagholders to Builders With the original developers remaining silent, the community has effectively seized the destiny of the project. This is not a formal DAO, neither is it a CTO, it is something pretty unique that has yet to get its own three letters title, NAP?
Grassroots Marketing: The community successfully crowdfunded its own PR campaign to reignite momentum—a rarity for a project operating without official dev backing.
Self-Made Ecosystem: Community developers and creatives have built their own onboarding tools, including a dedicated LinkTree (https://linktr.ee/slothana.SLOTH) and the “Slothonomics” educational hub (https://slothonomics.wordpress.com), designed to guide newcomers through the ecosystem.
The “Slow” Philosophy: In a market obsessed with speed, $SLOTH holders have embraced their mascot’s nature. The “Slow and Steady” mantra has transformed from a meme into a legitimate investment thesis, creating a psychological safe harbor for investors tired of the high-stress, 24/7 anxiety of the crypto market.
The Verdict Slothana represents a paradox in the current market landscape. It is a memecoin with no promised tech roadmap, yet it possesses the one asset every billion-dollar project is desperate to buy but cannot manufacture: unshakeable loyalty.
For investors, $SLOTH is no longer just a bet on a token; it is a bet on a community that has proven it cannot be shaken by market volatility. In a world of fleeting trends, the Slothana community is proving that the strongest utility in crypto isn’t code—it’s culture.
For more information about Slothana, visit the Website: www.slothana.com
The post They Came for the Lambos, They Stayed for the Vibes: How a ” mysterious” Project Became Crypto’s Most Unbreakable Community appeared first on Blockonomi.
SFC Confirms Transition Timeline for New Suspicious Transaction Reporting Platform STREAMS 2
TLDR
The SFC confirmed STREAMS 2 will fully replace the existing STREAMS reporting system on February 2, 2026.
From that date, licensed entities must submit suspicious transaction reports only through STREAMS 2.
The new platform supports XML submissions, PDF uploads, and direct online reporting forms.
The legacy STREAMS system will shut down from January 28 to February 2, 2026, before permanent closure.
Alongside STREAMS 2, the SFC has introduced stricter crypto custody rules under its ASPIRe regulatory roadmap.
Hong Kong’s Securities and Futures Commission (SFC) has announced the official transition timeline to a new suspicious transaction reporting platform called STREAMS 2, developed by the Joint Wealth Intelligence Unit, with the change set to take full effect by February 2, 2026. STREAMS 2 will replace the legacy STREAMS platform, aiming to improve automation and analysis of suspicious transaction reports submitted by regulated entities.
Licensed Entities Must Shift to STREAMS 2 by February 2, 2026
From February 2, 2026, STREAMS 2 will serve as the exclusive platform for submitting suspicious transaction reports to the Joint Financial Intelligence Unit. Submissions can be completed through three channels: XML format, PDF upload, or by filling out the online report form. The SFC has instructed all licensed institutions to begin registering for user access to STREAMS 2 immediately.
To register, users must complete the registration form available on the Joint Financial Intelligence Unit website and email it to the designated address. The transition process includes a planned system shutdown period from 12:00 a.m. January 28 to 9:00 a.m. February 2, during which the old STREAMS system will not accept reports. Urgent reports during this downtime should be directed to the JFIU via email, phone, or fax.
Once STREAMS 2 goes live, historical reports submitted via STREAMS will be migrated to the new platform. Licensed corporations and virtual asset service providers will be able to review past reports and access consent statuses directly in STREAMS 2. Entities opting to use XML submissions must coordinate with the Joint Financial Intelligence Unit in advance to carry out technical testing.
SFC Expands Oversight with New Crypto Custody Rules
As reported by Blockonomi earlier, SFC has been experiencing a wave of developments, including new custody rules targeting crypto platforms operating in the city. Towards the end of last year, the regulator issued updated guidelines that set tighter operational standards for safeguarding client assets.
The rules fall under the broader ASPIRe roadmap, which aims to enhance Hong Kong’s digital asset infrastructure. All licensed virtual asset trading platforms must strengthen their cold wallet architecture, tighten device-level access controls, and enable real-time threat detection.
Operators must also ensure that senior management maintains direct accountability for asset protection practices. The SFC released these rules following a sector-wide review that uncovered weaknesses in some platforms’ cybersecurity protocols, often tied to third-party wallet systems with weak transaction validation safeguards.
The post SFC Confirms Transition Timeline for New Suspicious Transaction Reporting Platform STREAMS 2 appeared first on Blockonomi.
The SFC confirmed STREAMS 2 will fully replace the existing STREAMS reporting system on February 2, 2026.
From that date, licensed entities must submit suspicious transaction reports only through STREAMS 2.
The new platform supports XML submissions, PDF uploads, and direct online reporting forms.
The legacy STREAMS system will shut down from January 28 to February 2, 2026, before permanent closure.
Alongside STREAMS 2, the SFC has introduced stricter crypto custody rules under its ASPIRe regulatory roadmap.
Hong Kong’s Securities and Futures Commission (SFC) has announced the official transition timeline to a new suspicious transaction reporting platform called STREAMS 2, developed by the Joint Wealth Intelligence Unit, with the change set to take full effect by February 2, 2026. STREAMS 2 will replace the legacy STREAMS platform, aiming to improve automation and analysis of suspicious transaction reports submitted by regulated entities.
Licensed Entities Must Shift to STREAMS 2 by February 2, 2026
From February 2, 2026, STREAMS 2 will serve as the exclusive platform for submitting suspicious transaction reports to the Joint Financial Intelligence Unit. Submissions can be completed through three channels: XML format, PDF upload, or by filling out the online report form. The SFC has instructed all licensed institutions to begin registering for user access to STREAMS 2 immediately.
To register, users must complete the registration form available on the Joint Financial Intelligence Unit website and email it to the designated address. The transition process includes a planned system shutdown period from 12:00 a.m. January 28 to 9:00 a.m. February 2, during which the old STREAMS system will not accept reports. Urgent reports during this downtime should be directed to the JFIU via email, phone, or fax.
Once STREAMS 2 goes live, historical reports submitted via STREAMS will be migrated to the new platform. Licensed corporations and virtual asset service providers will be able to review past reports and access consent statuses directly in STREAMS 2. Entities opting to use XML submissions must coordinate with the Joint Financial Intelligence Unit in advance to carry out technical testing.
SFC Expands Oversight with New Crypto Custody Rules
As reported by Blockonomi earlier, SFC has been experiencing a wave of developments, including new custody rules targeting crypto platforms operating in the city. Towards the end of last year, the regulator issued updated guidelines that set tighter operational standards for safeguarding client assets.
The rules fall under the broader ASPIRe roadmap, which aims to enhance Hong Kong’s digital asset infrastructure. All licensed virtual asset trading platforms must strengthen their cold wallet architecture, tighten device-level access controls, and enable real-time threat detection.
Operators must also ensure that senior management maintains direct accountability for asset protection practices. The SFC released these rules following a sector-wide review that uncovered weaknesses in some platforms’ cybersecurity protocols, often tied to third-party wallet systems with weak transaction validation safeguards.
The post SFC Confirms Transition Timeline for New Suspicious Transaction Reporting Platform STREAMS 2 appeared first on Blockonomi.
Fed Signals Dollar Intervention to Support Japanese Yen Amid Currency Crisis
TLDR:
New York Fed prepares first currency intervention in ten years to address yen weakness and market dysfunction.
The proposed dollar sales strategy could intentionally devalue USD while making US exports more competitive globally.
The US government and asset holders stand to benefit as inflation reduces debt burden and metals prices rise.
Stocks and gold are already at record highs, raising concerns about timing risks for investors entering positions.
The New York Federal Reserve is reportedly preparing to intervene in currency markets for the first time in a decade. This move aims to support the struggling Japanese yen through coordinated dollar sales.
Market analysts suggest this strategy could trigger intentional US dollar devaluation while reshaping global currency dynamics. The intervention comes as Japan faces mounting economic pressures despite rising bond yields.
Breaking Currency Market Dynamics
Japan’s financial markets are displaying unusual patterns that have caught the attention of US monetary authorities. Bond yields continue to climb, yet the yen remains weak against major currencies.
This disconnect signals potential structural problems within the foreign exchange system. Currency traders view this development as evidence of market dysfunction requiring central bank action.
The proposed intervention mechanism involves the Federal Reserve selling dollars to purchase yen in open markets. This operation would directly weaken the dollar while providing support to Japan’s currency.
Such coordinated efforts typically involve multiple central banks working together to stabilize exchange rates. The strategy marks a departure from recent hands-off approaches to currency management.
A post from @NoLimitGains outlined the potential intervention strategy and its broader market implications. The account noted that Japan’s yields are soaring while the yen tanks simultaneously.
This unusual combination has prompted speculation about imminent Fed action in currency markets.
Economic Winners and Market Implications
The intentional dollar devaluation creates several beneficiaries across different economic sectors. The US government stands to gain as inflation reduces the real value of outstanding debt obligations.
Lower dollar values make American exports more competitive in international markets. Domestic manufacturers could see increased demand as their products become cheaper for foreign buyers.
Asset holders may experience significant gains if the dollar weakens substantially. Stocks and precious metals historically perform well during periods of currency devaluation.
However, both equities and gold are already trading at record highs. This timing raises questions about potential risks for investors entering positions now.
The currency intervention strategy carries multiple economic ramifications beyond immediate exchange rate movements. Trade balances could shift as American goods become more affordable globally.
Import costs would rise for US consumers as foreign products become more expensive. International investors holding dollar-denominated assets might reassess their portfolio allocations based on these developments.
Market observers are monitoring the situation closely as the Fed considers its options. The last major currency intervention occurred over ten years ago under different economic conditions.
Whether this strategy succeeds depends on coordination between central banks and market responses. The coming weeks will reveal how seriously authorities pursue this controversial approach.
THE U.S. WILL SAVE JAPAN BY CRASHING THE DOLLAR
Forget the tariffs.
Forget Gold hitting ATHs.
For the first time in a decade, the NY Fed is signaling intervention.
They’re about to save the Japanese Yen.
Why this is a massive deal:
– Japan's yields are soaring, yet the… pic.twitter.com/GmnMKyubBW
— NoLimit (@NoLimitGains) January 25, 2026
The post Fed Signals Dollar Intervention to Support Japanese Yen Amid Currency Crisis appeared first on Blockonomi.
New York Fed prepares first currency intervention in ten years to address yen weakness and market dysfunction.
The proposed dollar sales strategy could intentionally devalue USD while making US exports more competitive globally.
The US government and asset holders stand to benefit as inflation reduces debt burden and metals prices rise.
Stocks and gold are already at record highs, raising concerns about timing risks for investors entering positions.
The New York Federal Reserve is reportedly preparing to intervene in currency markets for the first time in a decade. This move aims to support the struggling Japanese yen through coordinated dollar sales.
Market analysts suggest this strategy could trigger intentional US dollar devaluation while reshaping global currency dynamics. The intervention comes as Japan faces mounting economic pressures despite rising bond yields.
Breaking Currency Market Dynamics
Japan’s financial markets are displaying unusual patterns that have caught the attention of US monetary authorities. Bond yields continue to climb, yet the yen remains weak against major currencies.
This disconnect signals potential structural problems within the foreign exchange system. Currency traders view this development as evidence of market dysfunction requiring central bank action.
The proposed intervention mechanism involves the Federal Reserve selling dollars to purchase yen in open markets. This operation would directly weaken the dollar while providing support to Japan’s currency.
Such coordinated efforts typically involve multiple central banks working together to stabilize exchange rates. The strategy marks a departure from recent hands-off approaches to currency management.
A post from @NoLimitGains outlined the potential intervention strategy and its broader market implications. The account noted that Japan’s yields are soaring while the yen tanks simultaneously.
This unusual combination has prompted speculation about imminent Fed action in currency markets.
Economic Winners and Market Implications
The intentional dollar devaluation creates several beneficiaries across different economic sectors. The US government stands to gain as inflation reduces the real value of outstanding debt obligations.
Lower dollar values make American exports more competitive in international markets. Domestic manufacturers could see increased demand as their products become cheaper for foreign buyers.
Asset holders may experience significant gains if the dollar weakens substantially. Stocks and precious metals historically perform well during periods of currency devaluation.
However, both equities and gold are already trading at record highs. This timing raises questions about potential risks for investors entering positions now.
The currency intervention strategy carries multiple economic ramifications beyond immediate exchange rate movements. Trade balances could shift as American goods become more affordable globally.
Import costs would rise for US consumers as foreign products become more expensive. International investors holding dollar-denominated assets might reassess their portfolio allocations based on these developments.
Market observers are monitoring the situation closely as the Fed considers its options. The last major currency intervention occurred over ten years ago under different economic conditions.
Whether this strategy succeeds depends on coordination between central banks and market responses. The coming weeks will reveal how seriously authorities pursue this controversial approach.
THE U.S. WILL SAVE JAPAN BY CRASHING THE DOLLAR
Forget the tariffs.
Forget Gold hitting ATHs.
For the first time in a decade, the NY Fed is signaling intervention.
They’re about to save the Japanese Yen.
Why this is a massive deal:
– Japan's yields are soaring, yet the… pic.twitter.com/GmnMKyubBW
— NoLimit (@NoLimitGains) January 25, 2026
The post Fed Signals Dollar Intervention to Support Japanese Yen Amid Currency Crisis appeared first on Blockonomi.
Zlato dosahuje 5 097 $ a stříbro vzrůstá na 109,81 $, jak důvěra v dolar klesá
TLDR:
Stříbro vzrostlo o více než 7 % během jednoho sezení, zatímco zlato dosáhlo 5 097 $ uprostřed bezprecedentních obav o dolar.
Fyzické prémie za stříbro dosáhly rekordních výšin, přičemž Čína dosáhla 134 $ a Japonsko 139 $ za unci oproti papírovým hodnotám.
Federální rezerva čelí nemožné volbě mezi snižováním sazeb, které vyvolává inflaci, nebo rizikem kolapsu trhu.
Očekávají se nucené likvidace, protože fondy pokrývají ztráty na akciích, ale očekává se, že rally drahých kovů bude pokračovat výše.
Trhy s drahými kovy zažily bezprecedentní volatilitu, kdy cena zlata dosáhla 5 097 $ a stříbro vzrostlo na 109,81 $ v nedávných obchodních sezeních.
Stříbro vzrostlo o více než 7 % během jednoho sezení, zatímco zlato dosáhlo 5 097 $ uprostřed bezprecedentních obav o dolar.
Fyzické prémie za stříbro dosáhly rekordních výšin, přičemž Čína dosáhla 134 $ a Japonsko 139 $ za unci oproti papírovým hodnotám.
Federální rezerva čelí nemožné volbě mezi snižováním sazeb, které vyvolává inflaci, nebo rizikem kolapsu trhu.
Očekávají se nucené likvidace, protože fondy pokrývají ztráty na akciích, ale očekává se, že rally drahých kovů bude pokračovat výše.
Trhy s drahými kovy zažily bezprecedentní volatilitu, kdy cena zlata dosáhla 5 097 $ a stříbro vzrostlo na 109,81 $ v nedávných obchodních sezeních.
$1.72B Withdrawn from Bitcoin ETFs in 5-Day Outflow Streak: What’s Next?
TLDR:
Bitcoin ETFs saw $1.72B in outflows as market sentiment remains fragile and cautious.
Fear & Greed Index signals “Extreme Fear” while Bitcoin hovers around $89K.
Lack of catalysts and volatile sentiment leave the Bitcoin price movement uncertain.
ETF outflows and subdued price action reflect shifting risk appetites among investors.
Bitcoin ETFs have been facing a sustained withdrawal streak. $1.72 billion has been pulled in just five days, signaling caution among investors.
This is despite Bitcoin struggling to break above $100,000 since November; sentiment indicators show an “Extreme Fear” environment. With risk-averse behavior dominating, market participants are closely watching for any signs of a trend reversal or further price decline.
Bitcoin ETF Outflows Signal Growing Caution Among Investors
Bitcoin ETFs have experienced significant outflows over the past week. Approximately $1.72 billion was withdrawn across five consecutive trading days.
This trend highlights the fragile investor sentiment prevailing in the market, particularly as Bitcoin has been unable to break above the key psychological level of $100,000 since mid-November.
The continued pullback underscores the broader risk-off behavior among retail investors, signaling a cautious stance amid persistent uncertainty.
US Bitcoin ETFs have experienced a significant outflow, totaling $1.72B over a five-day streak.
— Bitcoin Dino (@bitcoindinos) January 25, 2026
On Friday, Bitcoin ETFs saw a net outflow of $103.5 million, extending a trend that began the previous week. The lack of bullish momentum for Bitcoin is currently hovering around $89,160.
This has led investors to seek safer assets, with many turning to traditional markets like gold and silver. ETF flows are often seen as a barometer for retail appetite in crypto markets.
The current outflow streak reflects the cautious mood dominating the space.
What Does This Mean for Bitcoin’s Near-Term Outlook?
The outflows from Bitcoin ETFs are an indication of broader market sentiment. Investors are retreating from riskier assets as the crypto market faces a phase of uncertainty.
The Crypto Fear & Greed Index recently dropped to “Extreme Fear,” reflecting how fear is weighing heavily on retail participants. Santiment, an analytics firm, suggests that despite the caution, there are signs of a potential market bottom forming.
On-chain signals, reduced social media chatter, and changes in supply distribution could be early hints that a reversal may be coming. This is even though the timing remains uncertain.
Some analysts remain cautiously optimistic, predicting that a corrective rally could be imminent; others believe that Bitcoin may need more time to consolidate before a definitive trend reversal takes shape.
With liquidity conditions tightening and no immediate catalysts on the horizon, Bitcoin’s price is likely to remain range-bound for now.
In this uncertain environment, Bitcoin’s immediate price trajectory is highly dependent on sentiment indicators, ETF flows, and any macro developments.
This could restore confidence among investors. However, the current outflows represent a short-term correction before a new bullish phase can emerge.
The post $1.72B Withdrawn from Bitcoin ETFs in 5-Day Outflow Streak: What’s Next? appeared first on Blockonomi.
Bitcoin ETFs saw $1.72B in outflows as market sentiment remains fragile and cautious.
Fear & Greed Index signals “Extreme Fear” while Bitcoin hovers around $89K.
Lack of catalysts and volatile sentiment leave the Bitcoin price movement uncertain.
ETF outflows and subdued price action reflect shifting risk appetites among investors.
Bitcoin ETFs have been facing a sustained withdrawal streak. $1.72 billion has been pulled in just five days, signaling caution among investors.
This is despite Bitcoin struggling to break above $100,000 since November; sentiment indicators show an “Extreme Fear” environment. With risk-averse behavior dominating, market participants are closely watching for any signs of a trend reversal or further price decline.
Bitcoin ETF Outflows Signal Growing Caution Among Investors
Bitcoin ETFs have experienced significant outflows over the past week. Approximately $1.72 billion was withdrawn across five consecutive trading days.
This trend highlights the fragile investor sentiment prevailing in the market, particularly as Bitcoin has been unable to break above the key psychological level of $100,000 since mid-November.
The continued pullback underscores the broader risk-off behavior among retail investors, signaling a cautious stance amid persistent uncertainty.
US Bitcoin ETFs have experienced a significant outflow, totaling $1.72B over a five-day streak.
— Bitcoin Dino (@bitcoindinos) January 25, 2026
On Friday, Bitcoin ETFs saw a net outflow of $103.5 million, extending a trend that began the previous week. The lack of bullish momentum for Bitcoin is currently hovering around $89,160.
This has led investors to seek safer assets, with many turning to traditional markets like gold and silver. ETF flows are often seen as a barometer for retail appetite in crypto markets.
The current outflow streak reflects the cautious mood dominating the space.
What Does This Mean for Bitcoin’s Near-Term Outlook?
The outflows from Bitcoin ETFs are an indication of broader market sentiment. Investors are retreating from riskier assets as the crypto market faces a phase of uncertainty.
The Crypto Fear & Greed Index recently dropped to “Extreme Fear,” reflecting how fear is weighing heavily on retail participants. Santiment, an analytics firm, suggests that despite the caution, there are signs of a potential market bottom forming.
On-chain signals, reduced social media chatter, and changes in supply distribution could be early hints that a reversal may be coming. This is even though the timing remains uncertain.
Some analysts remain cautiously optimistic, predicting that a corrective rally could be imminent; others believe that Bitcoin may need more time to consolidate before a definitive trend reversal takes shape.
With liquidity conditions tightening and no immediate catalysts on the horizon, Bitcoin’s price is likely to remain range-bound for now.
In this uncertain environment, Bitcoin’s immediate price trajectory is highly dependent on sentiment indicators, ETF flows, and any macro developments.
This could restore confidence among investors. However, the current outflows represent a short-term correction before a new bullish phase can emerge.
The post $1.72B Withdrawn from Bitcoin ETFs in 5-Day Outflow Streak: What’s Next? appeared first on Blockonomi.
Binance Sees $6 Billion Weekly Outflow as Bitcoin, Ethereum and Stablecoins Leave Exchange
TLDR:
Bitcoin and Ethereum combined outflows exceeded $3.3 billion, marking the highest weekly exodus since November 10.
Tether on Ethereum saw $3.11 billion withdrawn while Tron network gained $905 million in USDT inflows concurrently.
Simultaneous withdrawal of risk assets and stablecoins typically precedes heightened volatility rather than clear trends.
Large-scale exchange outflows suggest traders moving to self-custody or responding to market uncertainty concerns.
Binance experienced its largest weekly asset withdrawal since November 10, with over $6 billion leaving the exchange across multiple blockchain networks.
On-chain tracking data shows Bitcoin, Ethereum and Tether dominated the outflows during the week beginning January 19, 2026.
The exodus represents a notable shift in trader behavior on the world’s largest cryptocurrency platform.
Multi-Billion Dollar Withdrawal Marks Exchange Exodus
Bitcoin withdrawals reached approximately $1.97 billion during the seven-day period, while Ethereum saw roughly $1.34 billion move off the platform.
Tether on the Ethereum network recorded the largest single-asset outflow at $3.11 billion. The combined movement of risk assets and stablecoins suggests traders are repositioning holdings rather than exiting crypto markets entirely.
Multichain weekly netflow data confirms the withdrawal pattern affected major digital assets simultaneously. However, the Tron network presented a contrasting trend with USDT-TRC20 recording positive inflows around $905 million.
Source: Cryptoquant
This pattern indicates capital rotation between blockchain networks instead of wholesale flight from centralized exchanges.
The timing and scale of withdrawals draw parallels to previous periods of market uncertainty. Large institutional holders often move assets into cold storage ahead of anticipated price movements. Self-custody solutions have gained traction among traders seeking direct control over their digital holdings.
Market Dynamics Point to Potential Volatility Ahead
Exchange outflows of this magnitude typically precede periods of increased price swings across cryptocurrency markets.
The simultaneous withdrawal of both trading assets and stablecoins creates conditions for supply constraints. Reduced liquidity on centralized platforms can amplify price movements in either direction.
Two competing narratives have emerged around the data. Some analysts view the outflows as preparation for future price appreciation through reduced available supply.
Others interpret the movement as risk mitigation amid broader market concerns or platform-specific factors affecting trader confidence.
The withdrawal pattern differs from typical market cycles where stablecoins flow into exchanges before major purchases.
Instead, USDT exited alongside Bitcoin and Ethereum, complicating immediate directional forecasts. Historical precedent suggests this configuration often leads to heightened volatility rather than clear trends.
Network-specific data reveals traders are selectively choosing blockchain platforms for asset storage. The positive Tron network inflow contrasts sharply with Ethereum’s stablecoin exodus.
This selective migration points to cost considerations and transaction efficiency driving allocation decisions beyond simple exchange exit strategies.
The post Binance Sees $6 Billion Weekly Outflow as Bitcoin, Ethereum and Stablecoins Leave Exchange appeared first on Blockonomi.
Bitcoin and Ethereum combined outflows exceeded $3.3 billion, marking the highest weekly exodus since November 10.
Tether on Ethereum saw $3.11 billion withdrawn while Tron network gained $905 million in USDT inflows concurrently.
Simultaneous withdrawal of risk assets and stablecoins typically precedes heightened volatility rather than clear trends.
Large-scale exchange outflows suggest traders moving to self-custody or responding to market uncertainty concerns.
Binance experienced its largest weekly asset withdrawal since November 10, with over $6 billion leaving the exchange across multiple blockchain networks.
On-chain tracking data shows Bitcoin, Ethereum and Tether dominated the outflows during the week beginning January 19, 2026.
The exodus represents a notable shift in trader behavior on the world’s largest cryptocurrency platform.
Multi-Billion Dollar Withdrawal Marks Exchange Exodus
Bitcoin withdrawals reached approximately $1.97 billion during the seven-day period, while Ethereum saw roughly $1.34 billion move off the platform.
Tether on the Ethereum network recorded the largest single-asset outflow at $3.11 billion. The combined movement of risk assets and stablecoins suggests traders are repositioning holdings rather than exiting crypto markets entirely.
Multichain weekly netflow data confirms the withdrawal pattern affected major digital assets simultaneously. However, the Tron network presented a contrasting trend with USDT-TRC20 recording positive inflows around $905 million.
Source: Cryptoquant
This pattern indicates capital rotation between blockchain networks instead of wholesale flight from centralized exchanges.
The timing and scale of withdrawals draw parallels to previous periods of market uncertainty. Large institutional holders often move assets into cold storage ahead of anticipated price movements. Self-custody solutions have gained traction among traders seeking direct control over their digital holdings.
Market Dynamics Point to Potential Volatility Ahead
Exchange outflows of this magnitude typically precede periods of increased price swings across cryptocurrency markets.
The simultaneous withdrawal of both trading assets and stablecoins creates conditions for supply constraints. Reduced liquidity on centralized platforms can amplify price movements in either direction.
Two competing narratives have emerged around the data. Some analysts view the outflows as preparation for future price appreciation through reduced available supply.
Others interpret the movement as risk mitigation amid broader market concerns or platform-specific factors affecting trader confidence.
The withdrawal pattern differs from typical market cycles where stablecoins flow into exchanges before major purchases.
Instead, USDT exited alongside Bitcoin and Ethereum, complicating immediate directional forecasts. Historical precedent suggests this configuration often leads to heightened volatility rather than clear trends.
Network-specific data reveals traders are selectively choosing blockchain platforms for asset storage. The positive Tron network inflow contrasts sharply with Ethereum’s stablecoin exodus.
This selective migration points to cost considerations and transaction efficiency driving allocation decisions beyond simple exchange exit strategies.
The post Binance Sees $6 Billion Weekly Outflow as Bitcoin, Ethereum and Stablecoins Leave Exchange appeared first on Blockonomi.
Polymarket předpovídá 77% šanci na uzavření vlády USA tento leden
TLDR:
Sazby Polymarketu nyní ukazují 77 % šanci na uzavření vlády USA do konce ledna, což je nárůst o 67 % během 24 hodin.
Odmítnutí senátora Schumera hlasovat o financování DHS vyvolává obavy z prodlouženého uzavření a regulačních zpoždění.
Předpověď Trumpa o ‚Demokratickém uzavření‘ zvyšuje rostoucí nejistotu ohledně časového harmonogramu pro zákon CLARITY.
Generální ředitel Coinbase Brian Armstrong se staví proti aktuální verzi zákona CLARITY a uvádí obavy z tokenizovaných akcií a rizik souvisejících s ochranou soukromí.
Polymarket ocenil šanci na 77 % na uzavření vlády USA před koncem ledna, což znamená výrazný nárůst pravděpodobnosti uzavření.
Sazby Polymarketu nyní ukazují 77 % šanci na uzavření vlády USA do konce ledna, což je nárůst o 67 % během 24 hodin.
Odmítnutí senátora Schumera hlasovat o financování DHS vyvolává obavy z prodlouženého uzavření a regulačních zpoždění.
Předpověď Trumpa o ‚Demokratickém uzavření‘ zvyšuje rostoucí nejistotu ohledně časového harmonogramu pro zákon CLARITY.
Generální ředitel Coinbase Brian Armstrong se staví proti aktuální verzi zákona CLARITY a uvádí obavy z tokenizovaných akcií a rizik souvisejících s ochranou soukromí.
Polymarket ocenil šanci na 77 % na uzavření vlády USA před koncem ledna, což znamená výrazný nárůst pravděpodobnosti uzavření.
SUI Group Shifts to Operating Business Model with $450M Raise and Protocol Privacy Launch
TLDR:
Sui Group raised $450M in PIPE funding to increase holdings from 3% to 5% of SUI’s circulating supply.
SuiUSDE stablecoin directs 90% of fees to buy SUI tokens or fund Sui-native DeFi ecosystem projects.
Protocol-level privacy using ZK-proofs hides transaction details while maintaining regulatory compliance.
Institutional inflows reached $5.7M weekly as Sui positions itself as bank-friendly blockchain infrastructure.
Nasdaq-listed Sui Group Holdings has announced a fundamental shift from a foundation-backed digital asset treasury to an operating business model focused on accumulating SUI and generating recurring yield.
The company currently holds approximately 108 million SUI tokens, valued at roughly $160 million and representing about 3% of the circulating supply.
Sui Group aims to increase its holdings to 5% of the float through strategic acquisitions and partnerships.
Sui Group Raises Capital and Launches Yield-Bearing Stablecoin
The company secured approximately $450 million through a private investment in public equity (PIPE) transaction. Galaxy Digital serves as the custodian for these digital assets.
According to @martypartymusic, Sui Group is launching SuiUSDE, a yield-bearing stablecoin developed in collaboration with the Sui Foundation and Ethena. The stablecoin structure directs 90% of generated fees back to Sui Group and the foundation.
SUI News: Nasdaq-listed Sui Group Holdings is shifting from a foundation-backed digital asset treasury to an operating business that accumulates $SUI and generates recurring yield. The company holds ~108 million SUI (~$160M, ~3% of circulating supply) and aims to increase to 5%…
— MartyParty (@martypartymusic) January 25, 2026
These funds will be used to purchase SUI tokens or support Sui-native decentralized finance protocols. Additionally, Sui Group has established a revenue-sharing agreement with Bluefin DEX.
The firm targets an effective yield of approximately 6% from its operations. Management has already repurchased 8.8% of outstanding shares while maintaining roughly $22 million in cash reserves.
The strategic positioning aims to establish Sui Group as the central economic actor within the Sui ecosystem. This approach combines treasury management with active participation in ecosystem development.
The company intends to generate sustainable returns through multiple revenue streams rather than passive token holding.
Protocol-Level Privacy Features Attract Institutional Capital
Sui blockchain is implementing protocol-level privacy features that differentiate it from competing networks. Unlike traditional blockchains, where complete wallet histories remain publicly visible, Sui’s new zero-knowledge proof architecture enables “Confidential DeFi” functionality.
Transaction details become hidden from public view while remaining verifiable for regulatory purposes. @Altcoinbuzzio reported that this architecture positions Sui as a “bank-friendly” high-performance ledger.
SUI: THE PROTOCOL-LEVEL PRIVACY SHIFT$SUI is moving beyond the "Solana Killer" narrative by launching Protocol-Level Privacy.
Unlike other chains where your entire wallet history is public, $SUI's new ZK-proof architecture allows for "Confidential DeFi," where transaction… pic.twitter.com/asqfI4EBdd
— Altcoin Buzz (@Altcoinbuzzio) January 24, 2026
Institutional capital has responded positively to these developments. Weekly inflows reached $5.7 million during the current month.
The “S2” StackStack framework simplifies development operations for builders constructing applications on the network. This combination of privacy features and developer tools attracts both institutional investors and technical teams.
The privacy implementation moves beyond typical marketing narratives focused on competitor comparisons. Instead, the technical infrastructure addresses specific regulatory and institutional requirements.
Financial institutions require transaction privacy while maintaining compliance with reporting obligations. Sui’s zero-knowledge proof system provides this balance through cryptographic verification methods.
The convergence of Sui Group’s operating business model and the protocol’s privacy features creates a unique positioning.
Enterprise adoption often requires privacy guarantees that public blockchains traditionally cannot provide. However, regulatory frameworks demand transparency for compliance purposes.
These developments address both requirements simultaneously through technical innovation and strategic business structure.
The post SUI Group Shifts to Operating Business Model with $450M Raise and Protocol Privacy Launch appeared first on Blockonomi.
Sui Group raised $450M in PIPE funding to increase holdings from 3% to 5% of SUI’s circulating supply.
SuiUSDE stablecoin directs 90% of fees to buy SUI tokens or fund Sui-native DeFi ecosystem projects.
Protocol-level privacy using ZK-proofs hides transaction details while maintaining regulatory compliance.
Institutional inflows reached $5.7M weekly as Sui positions itself as bank-friendly blockchain infrastructure.
Nasdaq-listed Sui Group Holdings has announced a fundamental shift from a foundation-backed digital asset treasury to an operating business model focused on accumulating SUI and generating recurring yield.
The company currently holds approximately 108 million SUI tokens, valued at roughly $160 million and representing about 3% of the circulating supply.
Sui Group aims to increase its holdings to 5% of the float through strategic acquisitions and partnerships.
Sui Group Raises Capital and Launches Yield-Bearing Stablecoin
The company secured approximately $450 million through a private investment in public equity (PIPE) transaction. Galaxy Digital serves as the custodian for these digital assets.
According to @martypartymusic, Sui Group is launching SuiUSDE, a yield-bearing stablecoin developed in collaboration with the Sui Foundation and Ethena. The stablecoin structure directs 90% of generated fees back to Sui Group and the foundation.
SUI News: Nasdaq-listed Sui Group Holdings is shifting from a foundation-backed digital asset treasury to an operating business that accumulates $SUI and generates recurring yield. The company holds ~108 million SUI (~$160M, ~3% of circulating supply) and aims to increase to 5%…
— MartyParty (@martypartymusic) January 25, 2026
These funds will be used to purchase SUI tokens or support Sui-native decentralized finance protocols. Additionally, Sui Group has established a revenue-sharing agreement with Bluefin DEX.
The firm targets an effective yield of approximately 6% from its operations. Management has already repurchased 8.8% of outstanding shares while maintaining roughly $22 million in cash reserves.
The strategic positioning aims to establish Sui Group as the central economic actor within the Sui ecosystem. This approach combines treasury management with active participation in ecosystem development.
The company intends to generate sustainable returns through multiple revenue streams rather than passive token holding.
Protocol-Level Privacy Features Attract Institutional Capital
Sui blockchain is implementing protocol-level privacy features that differentiate it from competing networks. Unlike traditional blockchains, where complete wallet histories remain publicly visible, Sui’s new zero-knowledge proof architecture enables “Confidential DeFi” functionality.
Transaction details become hidden from public view while remaining verifiable for regulatory purposes. @Altcoinbuzzio reported that this architecture positions Sui as a “bank-friendly” high-performance ledger.
SUI: THE PROTOCOL-LEVEL PRIVACY SHIFT$SUI is moving beyond the "Solana Killer" narrative by launching Protocol-Level Privacy.
Unlike other chains where your entire wallet history is public, $SUI's new ZK-proof architecture allows for "Confidential DeFi," where transaction… pic.twitter.com/asqfI4EBdd
— Altcoin Buzz (@Altcoinbuzzio) January 24, 2026
Institutional capital has responded positively to these developments. Weekly inflows reached $5.7 million during the current month.
The “S2” StackStack framework simplifies development operations for builders constructing applications on the network. This combination of privacy features and developer tools attracts both institutional investors and technical teams.
The privacy implementation moves beyond typical marketing narratives focused on competitor comparisons. Instead, the technical infrastructure addresses specific regulatory and institutional requirements.
Financial institutions require transaction privacy while maintaining compliance with reporting obligations. Sui’s zero-knowledge proof system provides this balance through cryptographic verification methods.
The convergence of Sui Group’s operating business model and the protocol’s privacy features creates a unique positioning.
Enterprise adoption often requires privacy guarantees that public blockchains traditionally cannot provide. However, regulatory frameworks demand transparency for compliance purposes.
These developments address both requirements simultaneously through technical innovation and strategic business structure.
The post SUI Group Shifts to Operating Business Model with $450M Raise and Protocol Privacy Launch appeared first on Blockonomi.
Investoři do Bitcoinu zaznamenali první čisté ztráty od října 2023, když se rozsvítily indikátory medvědího trhu.
TLDR:
Investoři do Bitcoinu realizovali ztráty ve výši 6,1 miliardy dolarů od prosince, což je první negativní období za 15 měsíců.
Čisté realizované zisky klesly na 2,5M BTC, což odpovídá úrovním z března 2022, kdy byl trh medvědí.
Dvě třetiny nabídky Bitcoinu zůstávají ziskové, zatímco jedna třetina je pod vodou na současných cenových úrovních.
MVRV poměr klesl na 1,5x, což naznačuje rané medvědí podmínky spíše než fázi hluboké medvědí tržní kapitulace.
Držitelé Bitcoinu zaznamenávají čisté ztráty poprvé za více než rok, podle nedávných on-chain dat od CryptoQuant.
Investoři do Bitcoinu realizovali ztráty ve výši 6,1 miliardy dolarů od prosince, což je první negativní období za 15 měsíců.
Čisté realizované zisky klesly na 2,5M BTC, což odpovídá úrovním z března 2022, kdy byl trh medvědí.
Dvě třetiny nabídky Bitcoinu zůstávají ziskové, zatímco jedna třetina je pod vodou na současných cenových úrovních.
MVRV poměr klesl na 1,5x, což naznačuje rané medvědí podmínky spíše než fázi hluboké medvědí tržní kapitulace.
Držitelé Bitcoinu zaznamenávají čisté ztráty poprvé za více než rok, podle nedávných on-chain dat od CryptoQuant.
Korea University Joins Injective as Validator in Strategic Blockchain Partnership
TLDR:
Korea University ranked first in the 2026 K Universities Global Excellence Rankings for education quality
Partnership makes Korea University both a validator and research partner in Injective’s global network
Joint research will focus on real-world asset tokenization structures for the Korean financial market
The institute leads government-funded research on smart contract security across the complete development cycle
Korea University’s Blockchain Research Institute has formed a strategic partnership with Injective, marking a notable development in the country’s blockchain sector.
The collaboration positions the institution as both a validator and research partner within the Injective ecosystem.
This move strengthens Injective’s presence in the Asia-Pacific region while connecting academic research with blockchain infrastructure.
The partnership focuses on production-grade systems and institutional readiness for decentralized finance applications.
Academic Institution Enters Blockchain Validation
Korea University secured first place in The Korea Times K Universities Global Excellence Rankings for 2026.
The institution maintains a strong record in education quality, research output, and graduate outcomes. As Korea’s oldest university, it has shaped the nation’s academic and technological development for decades.
The Blockchain Research Institute operates within the College of Informatics. Since 2020, the institute has conducted research on blockchain and digital asset technologies. The work spans multiple sectors including finance, public systems, and enterprise infrastructure.
The institute currently leads a government-funded research initiative. The project receives support from the Institute of Information and Communications Technology Planning and Evaluation.
The research focuses on smart contract security across the entire lifecycle from design through execution.
This expertise matches well with Injective’s technical framework. The platform launched its native EVM layer in November 2025.
The system includes MEV-resistant infrastructure and atomic transaction processing designed for institutional requirements.
Research Focus on Real-World Asset Tokenization
Korea University will operate as a validator within the Injective network. The role extends beyond technical contributions to ecosystem development and global expansion.
Both parties plan joint research on real-world asset tokenization and onchain financial structures in Korea.
According to Andrew Kang, Head of Korea at Injective, academic partnerships build long-term trust and sustainable growth.
He stated that the collaboration aims to advance research and discussion around onchain finance and RWA adoption in Korea and Asia.
The research will examine structural feasibility and regulatory compatibility from the start. Analysis will cover disclosure obligations, compliance constraints, and operational requirements within the Korean financial systems.
Injective’s RWA module provides institutions with compliance-focused solutions for permissioned asset-backed tokens.
In a statement, Professor Inho Lee, Director of the Blockchain Research Institute, explained that the partnership enables practical studies applicable to industry and regulatory environments.
He emphasized that the focus remains on digital assets and RWA structures suitable for the Korean market. The collaboration represents a shift toward active academic participation in blockchain ecosystems rather than external observation.
The post Korea University Joins Injective as Validator in Strategic Blockchain Partnership appeared first on Blockonomi.
Korea University ranked first in the 2026 K Universities Global Excellence Rankings for education quality
Partnership makes Korea University both a validator and research partner in Injective’s global network
Joint research will focus on real-world asset tokenization structures for the Korean financial market
The institute leads government-funded research on smart contract security across the complete development cycle
Korea University’s Blockchain Research Institute has formed a strategic partnership with Injective, marking a notable development in the country’s blockchain sector.
The collaboration positions the institution as both a validator and research partner within the Injective ecosystem.
This move strengthens Injective’s presence in the Asia-Pacific region while connecting academic research with blockchain infrastructure.
The partnership focuses on production-grade systems and institutional readiness for decentralized finance applications.
Academic Institution Enters Blockchain Validation
Korea University secured first place in The Korea Times K Universities Global Excellence Rankings for 2026.
The institution maintains a strong record in education quality, research output, and graduate outcomes. As Korea’s oldest university, it has shaped the nation’s academic and technological development for decades.
The Blockchain Research Institute operates within the College of Informatics. Since 2020, the institute has conducted research on blockchain and digital asset technologies. The work spans multiple sectors including finance, public systems, and enterprise infrastructure.
The institute currently leads a government-funded research initiative. The project receives support from the Institute of Information and Communications Technology Planning and Evaluation.
The research focuses on smart contract security across the entire lifecycle from design through execution.
This expertise matches well with Injective’s technical framework. The platform launched its native EVM layer in November 2025.
The system includes MEV-resistant infrastructure and atomic transaction processing designed for institutional requirements.
Research Focus on Real-World Asset Tokenization
Korea University will operate as a validator within the Injective network. The role extends beyond technical contributions to ecosystem development and global expansion.
Both parties plan joint research on real-world asset tokenization and onchain financial structures in Korea.
According to Andrew Kang, Head of Korea at Injective, academic partnerships build long-term trust and sustainable growth.
He stated that the collaboration aims to advance research and discussion around onchain finance and RWA adoption in Korea and Asia.
The research will examine structural feasibility and regulatory compatibility from the start. Analysis will cover disclosure obligations, compliance constraints, and operational requirements within the Korean financial systems.
Injective’s RWA module provides institutions with compliance-focused solutions for permissioned asset-backed tokens.
In a statement, Professor Inho Lee, Director of the Blockchain Research Institute, explained that the partnership enables practical studies applicable to industry and regulatory environments.
He emphasized that the focus remains on digital assets and RWA structures suitable for the Korean market. The collaboration represents a shift toward active academic participation in blockchain ecosystems rather than external observation.
The post Korea University Joins Injective as Validator in Strategic Blockchain Partnership appeared first on Blockonomi.
Ethereum Redefines Digital Art: When the Network Becomes the Medium
TLDR:
Ethereum enables art that exists fully on the blockchain, requiring network participation to function.
CryptoPunks and Autoglyphs showcase protocol-first design, making the network itself the medium.
Ownership and value are determined by consensus, not museums or centralized institutions.
The ∞ETH NODE sculpture visualizes Ethereum’s real-time activity as both art and data experience.
Ethereum is reshaping the way digital art is created and preserved by using the network itself as the medium. Unlike traditional digital art, networked art requires the blockchain for its function, storage, and execution.
As Natalie Stone, Executive Producer & Arts Strategist, explains, “What does it mean to make art with a network? Not on it. Not about it. With it.”
Projects like CryptoPunks and Autoglyphs show that Ethereum allows art to persist indefinitely, maintained by global participation rather than institutional control.
Networked Art as a Living System
Networked art differs from art about or hosted on a network. Stone notes, “Art about a network is thematic; art on a network is hosted; art with a network cannot function without it.”
While net.art of the 1990s relied on centralized servers, Ethereum allows works to exist fully within a decentralized ecosystem.
JODI’s browser-based art depended on manual archiving, whereas Ethereum-based projects embed the art in smart contracts, creating permanence and interactivity.
Artists like Matt Hall and John Watkinson of Larva Labs illustrate this through Autoglyphs, where the algorithm “ran inside the transaction itself, performance happening on Ethereum, not a server.”
Each piece becomes a self-contained execution on the blockchain, consuming network resources while remaining immutable.
Their 2025 project Quine further explores onchain replication, producing works where the computation itself is the artistic output.
The Ethereum network transforms each transaction into part of the artwork, reinforcing a collective experience.
CryptoPunks exemplify networked art as both technical and social protocols. As Stone writes, “Every bid, offer, sale is executed and reaffirmed on the smart contract within the Ethereum blockchain, validating ownership and signifying status.”
https://t.co/SdX5l1KYQz
— Ethereum (@ethereum) January 25, 2026
The project’s smart contract enforces scarcity and transfer automatically, creating a decentralized marketplace.
Value is determined by thousands of participants worldwide, not by the artists or institutions, illustrating the network’s power in defining cultural significance.
Participation drives the art’s meaning and value. Without collectors and active transactions, the artwork cannot exist. Larva Labs ensured that control over pricing and ownership rests with the network, reinforcing Stone’s observation:
“If participation is the medium, decentralization is not just an ideology; it is a material constraint.” This approach allows Ethereum-based projects to maintain authenticity and function independent of central authority.
Ethereum as Medium and Marketplace
Ethereum enables artworks inseparable from the network itself, integrating technology and cultural expression.
The ∞ETH NODE sculpture demonstrates this by visualizing every block, transaction, and heartbeat in real time.
Stone remarks, “The world’s computer, presented unapologetically, as the art itself.” Larva Labs’ installation converts the network’s invisible processes into light and audio, showing Ethereum’s properties as material that artists must shape.
Ownership and value are confirmed by network consensus rather than museums or curators. Stone observes that institutional acquisitions, including MoMA’s purchase of CryptoPunks, “acknowledge cultural significance but do not control the artwork.”
Smart contracts preserve creation, transfer, and ownership on Ethereum, ensuring longevity. Larva Labs’ methodology emphasizes “logic before image, system before object, protocol first,” storing image data and hashes directly onchain.
Ethereum’s network consensus determines value and meaning. Transactions, interactions, and replication collectively reinforce the artwork, confirming Stone’s point:
“Without participants – there is no consensus, there is no art.” Ethereum transforms cultural production into a decentralized system, where global participation sustains art’s existence and guarantees permanence.
The post Ethereum Redefines Digital Art: When the Network Becomes the Medium appeared first on Blockonomi.
Ethereum enables art that exists fully on the blockchain, requiring network participation to function.
CryptoPunks and Autoglyphs showcase protocol-first design, making the network itself the medium.
Ownership and value are determined by consensus, not museums or centralized institutions.
The ∞ETH NODE sculpture visualizes Ethereum’s real-time activity as both art and data experience.
Ethereum is reshaping the way digital art is created and preserved by using the network itself as the medium. Unlike traditional digital art, networked art requires the blockchain for its function, storage, and execution.
As Natalie Stone, Executive Producer & Arts Strategist, explains, “What does it mean to make art with a network? Not on it. Not about it. With it.”
Projects like CryptoPunks and Autoglyphs show that Ethereum allows art to persist indefinitely, maintained by global participation rather than institutional control.
Networked Art as a Living System
Networked art differs from art about or hosted on a network. Stone notes, “Art about a network is thematic; art on a network is hosted; art with a network cannot function without it.”
While net.art of the 1990s relied on centralized servers, Ethereum allows works to exist fully within a decentralized ecosystem.
JODI’s browser-based art depended on manual archiving, whereas Ethereum-based projects embed the art in smart contracts, creating permanence and interactivity.
Artists like Matt Hall and John Watkinson of Larva Labs illustrate this through Autoglyphs, where the algorithm “ran inside the transaction itself, performance happening on Ethereum, not a server.”
Each piece becomes a self-contained execution on the blockchain, consuming network resources while remaining immutable.
Their 2025 project Quine further explores onchain replication, producing works where the computation itself is the artistic output.
The Ethereum network transforms each transaction into part of the artwork, reinforcing a collective experience.
CryptoPunks exemplify networked art as both technical and social protocols. As Stone writes, “Every bid, offer, sale is executed and reaffirmed on the smart contract within the Ethereum blockchain, validating ownership and signifying status.”
https://t.co/SdX5l1KYQz
— Ethereum (@ethereum) January 25, 2026
The project’s smart contract enforces scarcity and transfer automatically, creating a decentralized marketplace.
Value is determined by thousands of participants worldwide, not by the artists or institutions, illustrating the network’s power in defining cultural significance.
Participation drives the art’s meaning and value. Without collectors and active transactions, the artwork cannot exist. Larva Labs ensured that control over pricing and ownership rests with the network, reinforcing Stone’s observation:
“If participation is the medium, decentralization is not just an ideology; it is a material constraint.” This approach allows Ethereum-based projects to maintain authenticity and function independent of central authority.
Ethereum as Medium and Marketplace
Ethereum enables artworks inseparable from the network itself, integrating technology and cultural expression.
The ∞ETH NODE sculpture demonstrates this by visualizing every block, transaction, and heartbeat in real time.
Stone remarks, “The world’s computer, presented unapologetically, as the art itself.” Larva Labs’ installation converts the network’s invisible processes into light and audio, showing Ethereum’s properties as material that artists must shape.
Ownership and value are confirmed by network consensus rather than museums or curators. Stone observes that institutional acquisitions, including MoMA’s purchase of CryptoPunks, “acknowledge cultural significance but do not control the artwork.”
Smart contracts preserve creation, transfer, and ownership on Ethereum, ensuring longevity. Larva Labs’ methodology emphasizes “logic before image, system before object, protocol first,” storing image data and hashes directly onchain.
Ethereum’s network consensus determines value and meaning. Transactions, interactions, and replication collectively reinforce the artwork, confirming Stone’s point:
“Without participants – there is no consensus, there is no art.” Ethereum transforms cultural production into a decentralized system, where global participation sustains art’s existence and guarantees permanence.
The post Ethereum Redefines Digital Art: When the Network Becomes the Medium appeared first on Blockonomi.
MicroStrategy Controls 3% of Bitcoin as Corporate Accumulation Hits New Highs
TLDR:
MicroStrategy now owns over 700,000 BTC, equaling more than 3% of total supply.
Average cost basis of $71,000 per BTC, current value shows $13B unrealized gain.
US custody wallets added 577,000 BTC in the past year, worth $53B.
Corporate and institutional accumulation intensifies competition for available Bitcoin supply.
Bitcoin corporate accumulation continues to reshape the market as major companies secure significant positions. MicroStrategy (MSTR) has emerged as a leading corporate holder, now owning over 3% of the total Bitcoin supply.
Since late 2020, MicroStrategy CEO Michael Saylor has executed 95 separate purchases, bringing the company’s holdings to 709,715 BTC.
With an average cost basis around $71,000 per coin, the current market price of $89,000 reflects a $13 billion unrealized gain.
MicroStrategy’s Growing Bitcoin Position
MicroStrategy’s persistent accumulation strategy demonstrates the challenge for new corporate entrants seeking meaningful Bitcoin exposure.
In January alone, the company added 22,305 BTC, though there have been no confirmed purchases since January 20.
Observers note Saylor’s recent chart postings may signal renewed activity, following a consistent historical pattern.
Corporate adoption of Bitcoin is no longer in its early stages, as one company now holds a substantial portion of the fixed supply.
Everyone thinks corporate $BTC adoption is "just getting started."
One company already owns 3% of all Bitcoin that will ever exist.
That's not early adoption. That's market dominance.$MSTR now holds 709,715 Bitcoin.
Worth roughly $63B at current prices.
Let that sit &… pic.twitter.com/vmic2lxcvl
— Milk Road (@MilkRoad) January 25, 2026
The scale of MicroStrategy’s holdings emphasizes the competitive environment for other companies considering a Bitcoin treasury.
Every major organization now evaluating Bitcoin must contend with the market presence of an entity that has been actively purchasing for four years.
The concentration of Bitcoin in corporate balance sheets has altered market dynamics, making accumulation increasingly difficult for latecomers.
Such accumulation also highlights the effects of fixed supply on market access. With 21 million total Bitcoins, controlling more than 700,000 represents a significant share that could influence liquidity and market behavior.
This situation draws attention to the strategic planning required for companies entering Bitcoin, especially given high volatility and demand.
MicroStrategy’s position also illustrates the long-term commitment some corporations are making toward digital assets. Holding a substantial portion without selling reflects a strategy focused on preservation and gradual exposure to market trends. This approach has set a benchmark for other institutional actors in the crypto space.
Institutional Demand for Bitcoin Custody
Institutional demand for Bitcoin continues beyond corporate purchases. According to CryptoQuant CEO, U.S. custody wallets added 577,000 BTC over the past year, valued at roughly $53 billion. This reflects a growing interest from financial institutions seeking secure storage solutions and direct market exposure.
HUGE: Institutional demand for $BTC remains strong.
US custody wallets added 577K $BTC over the past year, worth ~$53B, per CryptoQuant CEO. pic.twitter.com/aYQ3sDYiBg
— DeFi Planet (@PlanetDefi) January 25, 2026
The increase in custody wallet holdings signals a broader acceptance of Bitcoin as an asset class. Institutions are now engaging with digital assets at scales previously reserved for major corporations. Custody solutions provide transparency and regulatory compliance, fostering confidence in large-scale holdings.
Market observers note that institutional accumulation often coincides with corporate strategies, as firms manage treasury allocations alongside investment funds.
The synergy between custody wallets and corporate portfolios suggests a maturing ecosystem, where significant Bitcoin reserves are held responsibly.
Demand from both corporations and institutions is reshaping Bitcoin market dynamics. As more entities secure positions, competition for available supply intensifies, influencing pricing and trading patterns.
The trend demonstrates the increasing integration of Bitcoin into traditional financial structures.
The post MicroStrategy Controls 3% of Bitcoin as Corporate Accumulation Hits New Highs appeared first on Blockonomi.
MicroStrategy now owns over 700,000 BTC, equaling more than 3% of total supply.
Average cost basis of $71,000 per BTC, current value shows $13B unrealized gain.
US custody wallets added 577,000 BTC in the past year, worth $53B.
Corporate and institutional accumulation intensifies competition for available Bitcoin supply.
Bitcoin corporate accumulation continues to reshape the market as major companies secure significant positions. MicroStrategy (MSTR) has emerged as a leading corporate holder, now owning over 3% of the total Bitcoin supply.
Since late 2020, MicroStrategy CEO Michael Saylor has executed 95 separate purchases, bringing the company’s holdings to 709,715 BTC.
With an average cost basis around $71,000 per coin, the current market price of $89,000 reflects a $13 billion unrealized gain.
MicroStrategy’s Growing Bitcoin Position
MicroStrategy’s persistent accumulation strategy demonstrates the challenge for new corporate entrants seeking meaningful Bitcoin exposure.
In January alone, the company added 22,305 BTC, though there have been no confirmed purchases since January 20.
Observers note Saylor’s recent chart postings may signal renewed activity, following a consistent historical pattern.
Corporate adoption of Bitcoin is no longer in its early stages, as one company now holds a substantial portion of the fixed supply.
Everyone thinks corporate $BTC adoption is "just getting started."
One company already owns 3% of all Bitcoin that will ever exist.
That's not early adoption. That's market dominance.$MSTR now holds 709,715 Bitcoin.
Worth roughly $63B at current prices.
Let that sit &… pic.twitter.com/vmic2lxcvl
— Milk Road (@MilkRoad) January 25, 2026
The scale of MicroStrategy’s holdings emphasizes the competitive environment for other companies considering a Bitcoin treasury.
Every major organization now evaluating Bitcoin must contend with the market presence of an entity that has been actively purchasing for four years.
The concentration of Bitcoin in corporate balance sheets has altered market dynamics, making accumulation increasingly difficult for latecomers.
Such accumulation also highlights the effects of fixed supply on market access. With 21 million total Bitcoins, controlling more than 700,000 represents a significant share that could influence liquidity and market behavior.
This situation draws attention to the strategic planning required for companies entering Bitcoin, especially given high volatility and demand.
MicroStrategy’s position also illustrates the long-term commitment some corporations are making toward digital assets. Holding a substantial portion without selling reflects a strategy focused on preservation and gradual exposure to market trends. This approach has set a benchmark for other institutional actors in the crypto space.
Institutional Demand for Bitcoin Custody
Institutional demand for Bitcoin continues beyond corporate purchases. According to CryptoQuant CEO, U.S. custody wallets added 577,000 BTC over the past year, valued at roughly $53 billion. This reflects a growing interest from financial institutions seeking secure storage solutions and direct market exposure.
HUGE: Institutional demand for $BTC remains strong.
US custody wallets added 577K $BTC over the past year, worth ~$53B, per CryptoQuant CEO. pic.twitter.com/aYQ3sDYiBg
— DeFi Planet (@PlanetDefi) January 25, 2026
The increase in custody wallet holdings signals a broader acceptance of Bitcoin as an asset class. Institutions are now engaging with digital assets at scales previously reserved for major corporations. Custody solutions provide transparency and regulatory compliance, fostering confidence in large-scale holdings.
Market observers note that institutional accumulation often coincides with corporate strategies, as firms manage treasury allocations alongside investment funds.
The synergy between custody wallets and corporate portfolios suggests a maturing ecosystem, where significant Bitcoin reserves are held responsibly.
Demand from both corporations and institutions is reshaping Bitcoin market dynamics. As more entities secure positions, competition for available supply intensifies, influencing pricing and trading patterns.
The trend demonstrates the increasing integration of Bitcoin into traditional financial structures.
The post MicroStrategy Controls 3% of Bitcoin as Corporate Accumulation Hits New Highs appeared first on Blockonomi.
Nigeria Crypto Sandbox Hits First Wall: Quidax Shuts Down Peer-to-Peer Service
TLDR:
Quidax ends P2P trading, citing user preferences and regulatory caution within sandbox.
SEC flags opaque P2P flows, off-platform settlements, and foreign platform dominance.
Licensing delays and higher capital requirements raise compliance challenges for exchanges.
Quidax delists 35 tokens to align platform with Nigerian regulatory expectations.
Nigeria crypto sandbox has faced its first notable challenge as Quidax, a provisionally licensed digital asset exchange, announced the closure of its peer-to-peer (P2P) trading platform.
The shutdown comes just five months after the feature launched under the Securities and Exchange Commission’s (SEC) Accelerated Regulatory Incubation Programme (ARIP).
Quidax will continue instant swaps and order-book trading, but the P2P exit illustrates limits in the sandbox’s ability to oversee informal trading activity.
P2P Trading Faces Regulatory and Operational Limits
Quidax stated in an email to users, “We are retiring our P2P marketplace to focus on services that provide a more secure and efficient trading experience.”
The platform added that ads, merchant chats, and escrow services will be disabled, while other trading products will continue.
The P2P feature was initially designed to provide a controlled environment for users to trade directly. Merchants required full registration, Level-3 know-your-customer verification, two-factor authentication, and a minimum participation history. Approved traders were issued badges signaling verification and trust.
Despite these safeguards, the SEC has expressed long-standing concerns over P2P markets. In 2024, the regulator noted that “opaque transaction flows, off-platform settlements, and foreign dominance make supervision challenging and increase risk for investors.”
Quidax’s attempt to internalize trades within its platform responded to these issues, but operational limits have now become apparent.
The P2P exit marks the first visible boundary of the sandbox, showing that activities not closely aligned with traditional capital-market structures, such as order-book trading or custodial swaps, remain easier to supervise. Quidax’s decision highlights the balance between innovation and regulatory visibility.
Licensing Delays and Strategic Platform Adjustments
Quidax’s timing coincides with delays in ARIP licensing. Startups, including Quidax and Busha, were expected to transition to full licenses by August 2025.
A SEC spokesperson said, “We are reassessing supervisory readiness to ensure platforms meet capital-market standards before granting full licensure.”
New rules under the Investment and Securities Act (2025) classify digital assets as securities, bringing exchanges firmly under capital-market regulation.
Digital Asset Intermediaries (DAIs) and Digital Asset Platform Operators (DAPOs) now require a minimum capital of N500 million ($352,000). Combined services, including P2P trading, custody, or escrow, further increase regulatory obligations.
Quidax has also announced plans to delist 35 tokens, including meme coins, gaming assets, and tokens such as Worldcoin and World Liberty Financial. The company stated, “This adjustment aligns our platform with regulatory expectations and ensures safer trading for all users.”
The P2P shutdown represents the first clear wall for Nigeria’s crypto sandbox. Exchanges are now focusing on products that regulators can effectively monitor while maintaining liquidity and active trading for users in Nigeria’s developing crypto ecosystem.
The post Nigeria Crypto Sandbox Hits First Wall: Quidax Shuts Down Peer-to-Peer Service appeared first on Blockonomi.
Quidax ends P2P trading, citing user preferences and regulatory caution within sandbox.
SEC flags opaque P2P flows, off-platform settlements, and foreign platform dominance.
Licensing delays and higher capital requirements raise compliance challenges for exchanges.
Quidax delists 35 tokens to align platform with Nigerian regulatory expectations.
Nigeria crypto sandbox has faced its first notable challenge as Quidax, a provisionally licensed digital asset exchange, announced the closure of its peer-to-peer (P2P) trading platform.
The shutdown comes just five months after the feature launched under the Securities and Exchange Commission’s (SEC) Accelerated Regulatory Incubation Programme (ARIP).
Quidax will continue instant swaps and order-book trading, but the P2P exit illustrates limits in the sandbox’s ability to oversee informal trading activity.
P2P Trading Faces Regulatory and Operational Limits
Quidax stated in an email to users, “We are retiring our P2P marketplace to focus on services that provide a more secure and efficient trading experience.”
The platform added that ads, merchant chats, and escrow services will be disabled, while other trading products will continue.
The P2P feature was initially designed to provide a controlled environment for users to trade directly. Merchants required full registration, Level-3 know-your-customer verification, two-factor authentication, and a minimum participation history. Approved traders were issued badges signaling verification and trust.
Despite these safeguards, the SEC has expressed long-standing concerns over P2P markets. In 2024, the regulator noted that “opaque transaction flows, off-platform settlements, and foreign dominance make supervision challenging and increase risk for investors.”
Quidax’s attempt to internalize trades within its platform responded to these issues, but operational limits have now become apparent.
The P2P exit marks the first visible boundary of the sandbox, showing that activities not closely aligned with traditional capital-market structures, such as order-book trading or custodial swaps, remain easier to supervise. Quidax’s decision highlights the balance between innovation and regulatory visibility.
Licensing Delays and Strategic Platform Adjustments
Quidax’s timing coincides with delays in ARIP licensing. Startups, including Quidax and Busha, were expected to transition to full licenses by August 2025.
A SEC spokesperson said, “We are reassessing supervisory readiness to ensure platforms meet capital-market standards before granting full licensure.”
New rules under the Investment and Securities Act (2025) classify digital assets as securities, bringing exchanges firmly under capital-market regulation.
Digital Asset Intermediaries (DAIs) and Digital Asset Platform Operators (DAPOs) now require a minimum capital of N500 million ($352,000). Combined services, including P2P trading, custody, or escrow, further increase regulatory obligations.
Quidax has also announced plans to delist 35 tokens, including meme coins, gaming assets, and tokens such as Worldcoin and World Liberty Financial. The company stated, “This adjustment aligns our platform with regulatory expectations and ensures safer trading for all users.”
The P2P shutdown represents the first clear wall for Nigeria’s crypto sandbox. Exchanges are now focusing on products that regulators can effectively monitor while maintaining liquidity and active trading for users in Nigeria’s developing crypto ecosystem.
The post Nigeria Crypto Sandbox Hits First Wall: Quidax Shuts Down Peer-to-Peer Service appeared first on Blockonomi.
Pi App Studio 2026: Build Custom Apps and Integrate Pi Payments Easily
TLDR:
Pioneers can now build custom apps directly in Pi Browser without technical skills.
In-app Pi payments allow premium features and one-time purchases during single sessions.
Ad-supported deployment enables low-cost experimentation for creators with small balances.
Community feedback through surveys rewards users with Pi credits for app creation.
Pi App Studio is introducing new tools that enable users to build and run custom apps directly inside the Pi Browser. These updates focus on expanding access for creators, even without technical skills, and increasing Pi’s real-world utility.
The platform now supports interactive Pi payment integration, ad-supported deployment, and a community-wide creator event. Pioneers can provide feedback through a survey, earning Pi credits for app creation and experimentation.
Community Engagement and Creator Event
Pi Network is launching a creator event that encourages pioneers to explore the App Studio and provide feedback.
The Pi Core Team tweeted, “Build Your Own Custom App in Pi Browser! You can create and run custom apps directly inside the Pi Browser — start building powerful Pi Apps today and become part of the Pi ecosystem.” This reinforces the platform’s accessibility for new and non-technical creators.
Build Your Own Custom App in Pi Browser!
You can create and run custom apps directly inside the Pi Browser — but not in the Pi Desktop App
Start building powerful Pi Apps today and become part of the Pi ecosystem
Watch the full step-by-step tutorial on… pic.twitter.com/lQ0wxLKXY2
— Pi Core Team ᵖⁱ ⁿᵉᵗʷᵒʳᵏ (@PiCoreGroup) January 25, 2026
Users who complete the survey can share insights on useful apps and App Studio experiences. The first 10,000 qualified responses will receive five Pi credits, which can be used exclusively for app creation and customization. This initiative encourages experimentation while lowering the barriers to entry for new creators.
The survey also allows pioneers to highlight innovative app use cases or suggest improvements. Gathering structured feedback helps the Pi Core Team prioritize updates and optimize the platform for non-technical users. This iterative approach ensures that app development remains community-driven.
Pioneers are encouraged to showcase their creations within the Pi Browser, as full deployment and experimentation are supported there.
The event provides a clear pathway for creators to test ideas, refine apps, and explore monetization opportunities using Pi credits, while contributing to the growing Pi ecosystem.
Payment Integration and Ad-Supported Deployment
Pi App Studio now allows in-app Pi payments through a simple interactive setup, without requiring coding skills. According to the team, creators can integrate payments to enable premium features or one-time purchases, although payments currently apply only during a single session.
This lays the groundwork for future mainnet-enabled transactions. Pioneers must create a new custom app and include “Pi payment” in their prompt to activate the feature.
Another update introduces ad-supported deployment, designed to reduce costs for non-mainnet users or those with low Pi balances.
When an App Studio balance drops below 0.25 Pi, creators can deploy apps by watching ads. This encourages continuous testing and lowers financial barriers for experimentation.
The combination of in-app payments and ad-supported deployment allows creators to explore monetization models while maintaining low financial risk.
Pioneers can unlock premium functions, test interactive features, and gain practical experience in app management within the Pi ecosystem.
The Pi Core Team also emphasized community participation, noting that the updates are designed to empower creators, encourage experimentation, and foster real utility within Pi.
These enhancements mark a clear step toward making Pi App Studio a central hub for innovation and app development.
The post Pi App Studio 2026: Build Custom Apps and Integrate Pi Payments Easily appeared first on Blockonomi.
Pioneers can now build custom apps directly in Pi Browser without technical skills.
In-app Pi payments allow premium features and one-time purchases during single sessions.
Ad-supported deployment enables low-cost experimentation for creators with small balances.
Community feedback through surveys rewards users with Pi credits for app creation.
Pi App Studio is introducing new tools that enable users to build and run custom apps directly inside the Pi Browser. These updates focus on expanding access for creators, even without technical skills, and increasing Pi’s real-world utility.
The platform now supports interactive Pi payment integration, ad-supported deployment, and a community-wide creator event. Pioneers can provide feedback through a survey, earning Pi credits for app creation and experimentation.
Community Engagement and Creator Event
Pi Network is launching a creator event that encourages pioneers to explore the App Studio and provide feedback.
The Pi Core Team tweeted, “Build Your Own Custom App in Pi Browser! You can create and run custom apps directly inside the Pi Browser — start building powerful Pi Apps today and become part of the Pi ecosystem.” This reinforces the platform’s accessibility for new and non-technical creators.
Build Your Own Custom App in Pi Browser!
You can create and run custom apps directly inside the Pi Browser — but not in the Pi Desktop App
Start building powerful Pi Apps today and become part of the Pi ecosystem
Watch the full step-by-step tutorial on… pic.twitter.com/lQ0wxLKXY2
— Pi Core Team ᵖⁱ ⁿᵉᵗʷᵒʳᵏ (@PiCoreGroup) January 25, 2026
Users who complete the survey can share insights on useful apps and App Studio experiences. The first 10,000 qualified responses will receive five Pi credits, which can be used exclusively for app creation and customization. This initiative encourages experimentation while lowering the barriers to entry for new creators.
The survey also allows pioneers to highlight innovative app use cases or suggest improvements. Gathering structured feedback helps the Pi Core Team prioritize updates and optimize the platform for non-technical users. This iterative approach ensures that app development remains community-driven.
Pioneers are encouraged to showcase their creations within the Pi Browser, as full deployment and experimentation are supported there.
The event provides a clear pathway for creators to test ideas, refine apps, and explore monetization opportunities using Pi credits, while contributing to the growing Pi ecosystem.
Payment Integration and Ad-Supported Deployment
Pi App Studio now allows in-app Pi payments through a simple interactive setup, without requiring coding skills. According to the team, creators can integrate payments to enable premium features or one-time purchases, although payments currently apply only during a single session.
This lays the groundwork for future mainnet-enabled transactions. Pioneers must create a new custom app and include “Pi payment” in their prompt to activate the feature.
Another update introduces ad-supported deployment, designed to reduce costs for non-mainnet users or those with low Pi balances.
When an App Studio balance drops below 0.25 Pi, creators can deploy apps by watching ads. This encourages continuous testing and lowers financial barriers for experimentation.
The combination of in-app payments and ad-supported deployment allows creators to explore monetization models while maintaining low financial risk.
Pioneers can unlock premium functions, test interactive features, and gain practical experience in app management within the Pi ecosystem.
The Pi Core Team also emphasized community participation, noting that the updates are designed to empower creators, encourage experimentation, and foster real utility within Pi.
These enhancements mark a clear step toward making Pi App Studio a central hub for innovation and app development.
The post Pi App Studio 2026: Build Custom Apps and Integrate Pi Payments Easily appeared first on Blockonomi.
Eric Trump: Crypto More Needed in Developing World Than US
TLDR:
Eric Trump says developing nations need crypto more than the U.S. for financial access.
American Bitcoin mines efficiently using low-cost energy in West Texas for global growth.
Sovereign wealth funds adopt Bitcoin to hedge against inflation and unstable currencies.
Crypto adoption is rising in Asia, making financial systems faster, cheaper, and transparent.
Eric Trump said sovereign wealth funds are rapidly entering crypto due to concerns over unstable currencies and outdated banking systems.
In a recent interview with Yahoo Finance, he emphasized that developing countries require cryptocurrency even more than the U.S., as it provides access to modern financial tools.
Trump explained, “Many government-backed funds are using surplus winter energy to mine Bitcoin, and some countries have even included Bitcoin in national reserves.” He also addressed the growing adoption of cryptocurrency in Asia.
American Bitcoin and Crypto Mining Leadership
Eric Trump co-founded American Bitcoin with Asher Gnut, aiming to establish the U.S. as a leader in cryptocurrency mining.
Trump said, “Bitcoin is a hedge against hard assets, inflation, and corrupt monetary systems,” highlighting its liquidity and global accessibility. The company focuses on acquiring Bitcoin and providing low-cost mining solutions using surplus energy in West Texas.
He added, “Blockchain is a solution to the weaponization of the banking industry,” reflecting his family’s past challenges with financial institutions.
Asher Gnut explained, “We are building data centers to power AI applications, and energy is a key driver for both AI and Bitcoin mining.” He acknowledged discussions of an AI bubble but noted that AI is still in its early stages and requires substantial infrastructure.
American Bitcoin has quickly become one of the top Bitcoin accumulators in the U.S., reflecting growing interest from both corporate and government sectors.
The company is scaling operations efficiently, combining mining and AI services to maximize energy use. Trump said, “Fortune 500 companies and sovereign wealth funds, especially in Asia and the Middle East, are increasingly adopting Bitcoin.” He stated that crypto can modernize financial systems by making them faster, cheaper, and more transparent.
Trump also indicated that the U.S. could lead in cryptocurrency adoption under his administration. He remarked, “America can provide a framework for other countries to follow,” while criticizing political obstacles that affect economic growth and limit opportunities for widespread crypto adoption.
Global Crypto Adoption and Financial Access
Eric Trump stressed that crypto adoption is critical in developing countries, which often face corrupt governments and weak financial systems. He said, “Developing countries need crypto even more than the U.S., as it helps solve the lack of modern financial infrastructure.”
Digital currencies can bypass traditional banking limitations, providing more accessible and secure financial tools for individuals and governments alike.
Trump noted, “Several countries have already integrated Bitcoin into their national reserves,” and highlighted that Asia continues to lead in crypto adoption, with governments and private entities actively participating in both mining and investment.
He added that crypto is increasingly recognized worldwide as a legitimate financial tool, with sovereign wealth funds seeing Bitcoin as a hedge against inflation and currency instability.
Trump stated, “Crypto represents the future of finance—making systems cheaper, more transparent, and reducing the dominance of big banks over users.”
Gnut emphasized American Bitcoin’s dual focus, saying, “Our infrastructure supports both mining and AI development, linking financial technology with broader technological growth.”
The company plans to expand operations to further support AI and crypto adoption, aligning with global trends where technology, energy, and finance intersect.
The post Eric Trump: Crypto More Needed in Developing World Than US appeared first on Blockonomi.
Eric Trump says developing nations need crypto more than the U.S. for financial access.
American Bitcoin mines efficiently using low-cost energy in West Texas for global growth.
Sovereign wealth funds adopt Bitcoin to hedge against inflation and unstable currencies.
Crypto adoption is rising in Asia, making financial systems faster, cheaper, and transparent.
Eric Trump said sovereign wealth funds are rapidly entering crypto due to concerns over unstable currencies and outdated banking systems.
In a recent interview with Yahoo Finance, he emphasized that developing countries require cryptocurrency even more than the U.S., as it provides access to modern financial tools.
Trump explained, “Many government-backed funds are using surplus winter energy to mine Bitcoin, and some countries have even included Bitcoin in national reserves.” He also addressed the growing adoption of cryptocurrency in Asia.
American Bitcoin and Crypto Mining Leadership
Eric Trump co-founded American Bitcoin with Asher Gnut, aiming to establish the U.S. as a leader in cryptocurrency mining.
Trump said, “Bitcoin is a hedge against hard assets, inflation, and corrupt monetary systems,” highlighting its liquidity and global accessibility. The company focuses on acquiring Bitcoin and providing low-cost mining solutions using surplus energy in West Texas.
He added, “Blockchain is a solution to the weaponization of the banking industry,” reflecting his family’s past challenges with financial institutions.
Asher Gnut explained, “We are building data centers to power AI applications, and energy is a key driver for both AI and Bitcoin mining.” He acknowledged discussions of an AI bubble but noted that AI is still in its early stages and requires substantial infrastructure.
American Bitcoin has quickly become one of the top Bitcoin accumulators in the U.S., reflecting growing interest from both corporate and government sectors.
The company is scaling operations efficiently, combining mining and AI services to maximize energy use. Trump said, “Fortune 500 companies and sovereign wealth funds, especially in Asia and the Middle East, are increasingly adopting Bitcoin.” He stated that crypto can modernize financial systems by making them faster, cheaper, and more transparent.
Trump also indicated that the U.S. could lead in cryptocurrency adoption under his administration. He remarked, “America can provide a framework for other countries to follow,” while criticizing political obstacles that affect economic growth and limit opportunities for widespread crypto adoption.
Global Crypto Adoption and Financial Access
Eric Trump stressed that crypto adoption is critical in developing countries, which often face corrupt governments and weak financial systems. He said, “Developing countries need crypto even more than the U.S., as it helps solve the lack of modern financial infrastructure.”
Digital currencies can bypass traditional banking limitations, providing more accessible and secure financial tools for individuals and governments alike.
Trump noted, “Several countries have already integrated Bitcoin into their national reserves,” and highlighted that Asia continues to lead in crypto adoption, with governments and private entities actively participating in both mining and investment.
He added that crypto is increasingly recognized worldwide as a legitimate financial tool, with sovereign wealth funds seeing Bitcoin as a hedge against inflation and currency instability.
Trump stated, “Crypto represents the future of finance—making systems cheaper, more transparent, and reducing the dominance of big banks over users.”
Gnut emphasized American Bitcoin’s dual focus, saying, “Our infrastructure supports both mining and AI development, linking financial technology with broader technological growth.”
The company plans to expand operations to further support AI and crypto adoption, aligning with global trends where technology, energy, and finance intersect.
The post Eric Trump: Crypto More Needed in Developing World Than US appeared first on Blockonomi.
Plány Fedu na pohyby dolaru a jenu: Co to znamená pro kryptoměny
TLDR:
Fed může prodávat dolary a kupovat jeny, což je vzácný krok, který nebyl v tomto století viděn.
Koordinované zásahy USA a Japonska historicky zvyšují globální likviditu a aktiva.
Bitcoin má silnou inverzní korelaci s dolarem a může mít dlouhodobě prospěch.
Síla jenu představuje krátkodobé riziko, ale slabost dolaru podporuje růst kryptoměn.
Americká centrální banka (Fed) se údajně připravuje na prodej dolarů a nákup japonských jenů, což je vzácný krok, který nebyl v tomto století viděn. Newyorský Fed provedl kontrolu sazeb, což je klíčový krok, který obvykle předchází zásahu do měny.
Fed může prodávat dolary a kupovat jeny, což je vzácný krok, který nebyl v tomto století viděn.
Koordinované zásahy USA a Japonska historicky zvyšují globální likviditu a aktiva.
Bitcoin má silnou inverzní korelaci s dolarem a může mít dlouhodobě prospěch.
Síla jenu představuje krátkodobé riziko, ale slabost dolaru podporuje růst kryptoměn.
Americká centrální banka (Fed) se údajně připravuje na prodej dolarů a nákup japonských jenů, což je vzácný krok, který nebyl v tomto století viděn. Newyorský Fed provedl kontrolu sazeb, což je klíčový krok, který obvykle předchází zásahu do měny.
Ripple and Ondo Partnership Speculation Fuels Institutional Yield Narrative on XRP Ledger
TLDR:
Commentary suggests RLUSD and Ondo’s USDY could integrate to provide yield utility on the XRP Ledger.
Ripple Custody via Metaco is viewed as a potential trust layer for Ondo’s tokenized treasury assets.
Native deployment of Ondo products on XRPL could enable continuous minting and redemption cycles.
Technical market analysis links XRP price structure narratives with expanding ecosystem expectations.
Ripple and Ondo partnership discussions are gaining attention as market participants assess potential developments tied to the upcoming Ondo Summit.
Recent commentary suggests that Ripple and Ondo Finance may be aligning strategies around institutional yield, tokenized treasuries, and stablecoin infrastructure.
While no formal announcement has been made, the scenario reflects broader trends in digital asset markets.
These trends include regulated yield products, on-chain settlement efficiency, and institutional-grade custody frameworks.
Observers are closely monitoring signals from both ecosystems as expectations build.
Institutional Yield Pathways on the XRP Ledger
Ripple and Ondo partnership speculation intensified following commentary shared by market analyst Paul Barron on X.
His assessment outlined a potential integration between Ripple’s RLUSD stablecoin and Ondo’s yield-bearing USDY product.
Such a structure would position RLUSD as a transactional asset, with USDY providing yield access when capital is idle.
https://t.co/mwjcjD31ir
— PaulBarron (@paulbarron) January 24, 2026
This configuration aligns with Ripple’s stated objective of expanding utility for RLUSD beyond payments alone.
Yield functionality remains a key adoption driver among institutional users seeking capital efficiency.
Ondo, in parallel, continues to prioritize distribution for its regulated yield products across established blockchain networks.
Within this framework, the XRP Ledger would function as the settlement layer supporting instant swaps between RLUSD and USDY.
The structure relies on existing XRPL liquidity mechanics rather than experimental tooling. As a result, the proposal fits within current infrastructure constraints while targeting institutional use cases.
Custody and Native Asset Deployment Signals
Ripple and Ondo partnership narratives also reference Ripple Custody, formerly known as Metaco, as a possible integration layer.
Barron suggested that Ondo could custody a portion of its tokenized treasury reserves through Ripple’s institutional custody platform. This approach would mirror custody models already familiar to global banking participants.
The use of a shared custody provider would address operational risk considerations for institutions evaluating tokenized treasuries.
Banks currently using Metaco infrastructure may view such alignment as operationally consistent. This creates continuity rather than introducing new custodial dependencies.
Further speculation centers on a native deployment of Ondo’s OUSG and USDY on the XRP Ledger. Such a deployment would enable continuous minting and redemption using XRP or RLUSD.
The structure would also demonstrate real-time settlement advantages compared with legacy treasury settlement cycles.
Market Structure Narratives and Price Expectations
Separate commentary from EGRAG CRYPTO introduced a technical perspective focused on XRP price structure.
The analyst referenced recurring macro formations that historically resolved through measured moves. According to the post, a fourth structural pattern is currently forming within similar parameters.
#XRP – $42 Target Isn’t Hopium. It’s Structure:
Everyone in the #XRPFamily needs to see this setup.
Why 42?
Because in some philosophy and culture, 42 represents the answer to life, truth, and meaning.
In markets? It becomes a symbol of convergence between math, structure,… pic.twitter.com/wbTWHCSrGU
— EGRAG CRYPTO (@egragcrypto) January 24, 2026
The analysis framed a long-term price pathway toward a $42 level based on symmetry and duration patterns.
The commentary emphasized that the projection was structural rather than guaranteed. This distinction positioned the analysis within technical modeling rather than price promotion.
While speculative, such narratives often gain traction alongside ecosystem expansion themes. Ripple and Ondo partnership discussions contribute to broader attention on XRP Ledger utility.
Market participants continue to weigh structural analysis alongside fundamental developments as expectations evolve.
The post Ripple and Ondo Partnership Speculation Fuels Institutional Yield Narrative on XRP Ledger appeared first on Blockonomi.
Commentary suggests RLUSD and Ondo’s USDY could integrate to provide yield utility on the XRP Ledger.
Ripple Custody via Metaco is viewed as a potential trust layer for Ondo’s tokenized treasury assets.
Native deployment of Ondo products on XRPL could enable continuous minting and redemption cycles.
Technical market analysis links XRP price structure narratives with expanding ecosystem expectations.
Ripple and Ondo partnership discussions are gaining attention as market participants assess potential developments tied to the upcoming Ondo Summit.
Recent commentary suggests that Ripple and Ondo Finance may be aligning strategies around institutional yield, tokenized treasuries, and stablecoin infrastructure.
While no formal announcement has been made, the scenario reflects broader trends in digital asset markets.
These trends include regulated yield products, on-chain settlement efficiency, and institutional-grade custody frameworks.
Observers are closely monitoring signals from both ecosystems as expectations build.
Institutional Yield Pathways on the XRP Ledger
Ripple and Ondo partnership speculation intensified following commentary shared by market analyst Paul Barron on X.
His assessment outlined a potential integration between Ripple’s RLUSD stablecoin and Ondo’s yield-bearing USDY product.
Such a structure would position RLUSD as a transactional asset, with USDY providing yield access when capital is idle.
https://t.co/mwjcjD31ir
— PaulBarron (@paulbarron) January 24, 2026
This configuration aligns with Ripple’s stated objective of expanding utility for RLUSD beyond payments alone.
Yield functionality remains a key adoption driver among institutional users seeking capital efficiency.
Ondo, in parallel, continues to prioritize distribution for its regulated yield products across established blockchain networks.
Within this framework, the XRP Ledger would function as the settlement layer supporting instant swaps between RLUSD and USDY.
The structure relies on existing XRPL liquidity mechanics rather than experimental tooling. As a result, the proposal fits within current infrastructure constraints while targeting institutional use cases.
Custody and Native Asset Deployment Signals
Ripple and Ondo partnership narratives also reference Ripple Custody, formerly known as Metaco, as a possible integration layer.
Barron suggested that Ondo could custody a portion of its tokenized treasury reserves through Ripple’s institutional custody platform. This approach would mirror custody models already familiar to global banking participants.
The use of a shared custody provider would address operational risk considerations for institutions evaluating tokenized treasuries.
Banks currently using Metaco infrastructure may view such alignment as operationally consistent. This creates continuity rather than introducing new custodial dependencies.
Further speculation centers on a native deployment of Ondo’s OUSG and USDY on the XRP Ledger. Such a deployment would enable continuous minting and redemption using XRP or RLUSD.
The structure would also demonstrate real-time settlement advantages compared with legacy treasury settlement cycles.
Market Structure Narratives and Price Expectations
Separate commentary from EGRAG CRYPTO introduced a technical perspective focused on XRP price structure.
The analyst referenced recurring macro formations that historically resolved through measured moves. According to the post, a fourth structural pattern is currently forming within similar parameters.
#XRP – $42 Target Isn’t Hopium. It’s Structure:
Everyone in the #XRPFamily needs to see this setup.
Why 42?
Because in some philosophy and culture, 42 represents the answer to life, truth, and meaning.
In markets? It becomes a symbol of convergence between math, structure,… pic.twitter.com/wbTWHCSrGU
— EGRAG CRYPTO (@egragcrypto) January 24, 2026
The analysis framed a long-term price pathway toward a $42 level based on symmetry and duration patterns.
The commentary emphasized that the projection was structural rather than guaranteed. This distinction positioned the analysis within technical modeling rather than price promotion.
While speculative, such narratives often gain traction alongside ecosystem expansion themes. Ripple and Ondo partnership discussions contribute to broader attention on XRP Ledger utility.
Market participants continue to weigh structural analysis alongside fundamental developments as expectations evolve.
The post Ripple and Ondo Partnership Speculation Fuels Institutional Yield Narrative on XRP Ledger appeared first on Blockonomi.
Ethereum Holds $3,000 as Derivatives Liquidity Concentrates on Binance, Signaling Strategic Accum...
TLDR:
Ethereum’s stability near $3,000 shows the market absorbed deleveraging without forced liquidations.
Total ETH derivatives open interest fell to $16.9B, reflecting reduced leverage across exchanges.
Binance open interest remains elevated, indicating liquidity concentration on the deepest venue.
Analysts view the consolidation phase as long-term accumulation ahead of a major expansion move.
Ethereum has maintained stability around the $3,000 level while open interest across derivatives platforms undergoes a significant redistribution, revealing shifting trader behavior in the current market environment.
Market Positioning Reflects Strategic Accumulation Phase
Veteran analyst Scient from Crypto_Scient has identified Ethereum as presenting one of the strongest technical setups in the cryptocurrency sector.
The analyst outlined a long-term accumulation strategy targeting price levels between $1,900 and $2,000.
This approach centers on building positions during the current consolidation phase rather than pursuing short-term leveraged trades.
According to Scient’s assessment, the market appears to be experiencing a period of reduced liquidity and sideways movement.
$ETH
Arguably the best chart in the crypto market.
This year, my focus is on accumulating ETH on dips, ideally all the way down into the $1900–$2000 zone if the market gives the opportunity.
Markets might feel boring and illiquid right now, but once this phase ends, the next… pic.twitter.com/BTkgqUOego
— Scient (@Crypto_Scient) January 24, 2026
However, this phase typically precedes stronger expansionary moves. The timeframe for this thesis extends 12 to 18 months into the future.
Market participants should prepare for substantial upward momentum once the consolidation period concludes.
The analyst emphasized that current market conditions may feel uneventful to traders accustomed to high volatility. Yet the foundation being built during this time could support a rally surpassing previous cycles.
The comparison to traditional assets like metals suggests the anticipated move could exceed conventional market expectations.
Whether the current choppy trading environment persists for another month or extends six months remains uncertain.
Nonetheless, the technical structure supports an eventual bullish phase of considerable magnitude.
Derivatives Data Reveals Concentrated Liquidity on Binance
Recent analysis from Arab Chain highlights a notable divergence in Ethereum derivatives markets across different trading platforms.
Total open interest has declined to approximately $16.9 billion, marking the lowest reading since mid-December.
This reduction indicates traders have been unwinding leveraged positions across the broader derivatives ecosystem.
Binance data presents a contrasting picture with current open interest hovering around $7.5 billion. This figure exceeds the December average range of $6.8 to $7.4 billion.
The discrepancy between overall market trends and Binance-specific metrics points to a consolidation of trading activity.
Liquidity has not exited the derivatives market entirely but has migrated toward the exchange offering deeper order books.
Large traders appear to have reduced aggregate exposure while maintaining concentrated positions on the platform with superior pricing efficiency.
This behavior indicates sophisticated risk management rather than wholesale market abandonment.
Ethereum’s price stability near $3,000 throughout this deleveraging process demonstrates the market absorbed position closures without triggering cascading liquidations.
The absence of forced selling pressure suggests underlying demand remains robust. With Binance maintaining elevated open interest relative to December levels, an active derivatives base continues supporting potential directional moves.
The current market structure combines reduced overall leverage with concentrated liquidity on the primary exchange.
This configuration typically precedes periods of increased volatility once directional conviction returns to market participants.
The post Ethereum Holds $3,000 as Derivatives Liquidity Concentrates on Binance, Signaling Strategic Accumulation appeared first on Blockonomi.
Ethereum’s stability near $3,000 shows the market absorbed deleveraging without forced liquidations.
Total ETH derivatives open interest fell to $16.9B, reflecting reduced leverage across exchanges.
Binance open interest remains elevated, indicating liquidity concentration on the deepest venue.
Analysts view the consolidation phase as long-term accumulation ahead of a major expansion move.
Ethereum has maintained stability around the $3,000 level while open interest across derivatives platforms undergoes a significant redistribution, revealing shifting trader behavior in the current market environment.
Market Positioning Reflects Strategic Accumulation Phase
Veteran analyst Scient from Crypto_Scient has identified Ethereum as presenting one of the strongest technical setups in the cryptocurrency sector.
The analyst outlined a long-term accumulation strategy targeting price levels between $1,900 and $2,000.
This approach centers on building positions during the current consolidation phase rather than pursuing short-term leveraged trades.
According to Scient’s assessment, the market appears to be experiencing a period of reduced liquidity and sideways movement.
$ETH
Arguably the best chart in the crypto market.
This year, my focus is on accumulating ETH on dips, ideally all the way down into the $1900–$2000 zone if the market gives the opportunity.
Markets might feel boring and illiquid right now, but once this phase ends, the next… pic.twitter.com/BTkgqUOego
— Scient (@Crypto_Scient) January 24, 2026
However, this phase typically precedes stronger expansionary moves. The timeframe for this thesis extends 12 to 18 months into the future.
Market participants should prepare for substantial upward momentum once the consolidation period concludes.
The analyst emphasized that current market conditions may feel uneventful to traders accustomed to high volatility. Yet the foundation being built during this time could support a rally surpassing previous cycles.
The comparison to traditional assets like metals suggests the anticipated move could exceed conventional market expectations.
Whether the current choppy trading environment persists for another month or extends six months remains uncertain.
Nonetheless, the technical structure supports an eventual bullish phase of considerable magnitude.
Derivatives Data Reveals Concentrated Liquidity on Binance
Recent analysis from Arab Chain highlights a notable divergence in Ethereum derivatives markets across different trading platforms.
Total open interest has declined to approximately $16.9 billion, marking the lowest reading since mid-December.
This reduction indicates traders have been unwinding leveraged positions across the broader derivatives ecosystem.
Binance data presents a contrasting picture with current open interest hovering around $7.5 billion. This figure exceeds the December average range of $6.8 to $7.4 billion.
The discrepancy between overall market trends and Binance-specific metrics points to a consolidation of trading activity.
Liquidity has not exited the derivatives market entirely but has migrated toward the exchange offering deeper order books.
Large traders appear to have reduced aggregate exposure while maintaining concentrated positions on the platform with superior pricing efficiency.
This behavior indicates sophisticated risk management rather than wholesale market abandonment.
Ethereum’s price stability near $3,000 throughout this deleveraging process demonstrates the market absorbed position closures without triggering cascading liquidations.
The absence of forced selling pressure suggests underlying demand remains robust. With Binance maintaining elevated open interest relative to December levels, an active derivatives base continues supporting potential directional moves.
The current market structure combines reduced overall leverage with concentrated liquidity on the primary exchange.
This configuration typically precedes periods of increased volatility once directional conviction returns to market participants.
The post Ethereum Holds $3,000 as Derivatives Liquidity Concentrates on Binance, Signaling Strategic Accumulation appeared first on Blockonomi.
Analyst Debunks Gold-Bitcoin Correlation Myth, Explains Why Rotation Theory Fails
TLDR:
Gold and Bitcoin show no stable correlation across market cycles, often moving independently.
Gold functions as risk-off asset while Bitcoin operates as risk-on, driven by different factors.
Capital doesn’t rotate mechanically from gold to Bitcoin when precious metals peak, data shows.
Bitcoin rallies require liquidity expansion, not just rotation away from gold or other assets.
The relationship between gold and Bitcoin continues to spark debate among investors seeking clarity on how these assets interact.
Market analyst Washigorira recently challenged common assumptions about their correlation, arguing that many widely held beliefs about capital rotation between the two assets lack empirical foundation.
The analysis examines how gold and Bitcoin respond to different market conditions despite sharing a role as alternatives to traditional fiat currencies.
Understanding these dynamics becomes crucial as investors navigate increasingly complex macroeconomic environments where both assets coexist.
Different Risk Profiles Drive Asset Performance
Gold and Bitcoin operate on opposite ends of the risk spectrum, according to the analysis shared by Washigorira on social media.
“Gold is primarily a risk-off asset” that “reacts to uncertainty and loss of confidence,” while “Bitcoin is primarily a risk-on asset” that remains “highly sensitive to liquidity conditions,” the analyst noted.
https://t.co/37p2caJaxz
— Titan of Crypto (@Washigorira) January 24, 2026
The precious metal benefits from falling real interest rates and attracts capital seeking preservation during turbulent periods. Bitcoin, conversely, exhibits characteristics that thrive when financial conditions ease and liquidity expands.
The correlation between these assets varies significantly across different market regimes. Washigorira observed that “sometimes they move together, sometimes they diverge, and sometimes they even move in opposite directions.”
Historical data confirms that no stable relationship consistently holds across various market conditions. This variability undermines simplistic comparisons that treat gold and Bitcoin as interchangeable hedges against fiat currency devaluation.
Investors often assume that shared macro characteristics automatically create correlated price movements. “The usual shortcut goes like this: Gold is a hedge against fiat, Bitcoin is a hedge against fiat.
Therefore, capital should rotate from one to the other,” Washigorira explained. This reasoning ignores fundamental differences in how capital actually flows through markets. While both assets may coexist in the same economic environment, they respond to distinct incentives and catalysts.
The distinction between these drivers explains why rotation theories fail to materialize consistently. Markets do not operate through mechanical transfers of capital from one asset class to another.
Instead, investor behavior reflects complex decision-making processes influenced by multiple factors beyond simple hedging considerations. The analyst emphasized that “sharing a broad macro backdrop does not mean reacting to the same incentives.”
Liquidity Conditions Matter More Than Rotation Theories
The popular narrative suggesting that Bitcoin rallies automatically follow gold peaks oversimplifies actual market dynamics. Washigorira points out that after gold reaches a top, “capital often moves first into cash, bonds, or equities” rather than directly into Bitcoin.
The cryptocurrency requires liquidity expansion to generate sustained rallies, not merely rotation away from precious metals. “Bitcoin does not benefit mechanically from a gold top,” the analyst stated, adding that a gold peak alone does not provide sufficient conditions for Bitcoin price appreciation.
Understanding the indirect relationship between these assets offers a more reliable analytical framework. “Gold strength usually reflects stress and uncertainty,” while “Bitcoin strength usually reflects easing conditions and rising risk appetite,” according to the analysis. While they occasionally move together, timing differences frequently emerge between the two assets.
“Gold leads during stress phases when investors seek safety and capital preservation,” Washigorira explained. Bitcoin responds later when liquidity returns to financial markets and speculative appetite increases.
These different timelines result from fundamentally different macro engines driving each asset’s performance. The relationship proves indirect rather than rotational in nature.
The analysis emphasizes that lack of correlation does not equal inverse correlation. “A common misconception is that if two assets are not correlated, they must be inversely correlated. That is not how correlations work,” Washigorira clarified.
Periods where gold outperforms while Bitcoin underperforms occur regularly, but these episodes reflect conditional rather than structural relationships.
Investors who expect mechanical inverse movements misunderstand how asset correlations function in practice. Both assets deserve monitoring, but only when analysts correctly identify what economic forces each one actually responds to in real market conditions.
The post Analyst Debunks Gold-Bitcoin Correlation Myth, Explains Why Rotation Theory Fails appeared first on Blockonomi.
Gold and Bitcoin show no stable correlation across market cycles, often moving independently.
Gold functions as risk-off asset while Bitcoin operates as risk-on, driven by different factors.
Capital doesn’t rotate mechanically from gold to Bitcoin when precious metals peak, data shows.
Bitcoin rallies require liquidity expansion, not just rotation away from gold or other assets.
The relationship between gold and Bitcoin continues to spark debate among investors seeking clarity on how these assets interact.
Market analyst Washigorira recently challenged common assumptions about their correlation, arguing that many widely held beliefs about capital rotation between the two assets lack empirical foundation.
The analysis examines how gold and Bitcoin respond to different market conditions despite sharing a role as alternatives to traditional fiat currencies.
Understanding these dynamics becomes crucial as investors navigate increasingly complex macroeconomic environments where both assets coexist.
Different Risk Profiles Drive Asset Performance
Gold and Bitcoin operate on opposite ends of the risk spectrum, according to the analysis shared by Washigorira on social media.
“Gold is primarily a risk-off asset” that “reacts to uncertainty and loss of confidence,” while “Bitcoin is primarily a risk-on asset” that remains “highly sensitive to liquidity conditions,” the analyst noted.
https://t.co/37p2caJaxz
— Titan of Crypto (@Washigorira) January 24, 2026
The precious metal benefits from falling real interest rates and attracts capital seeking preservation during turbulent periods. Bitcoin, conversely, exhibits characteristics that thrive when financial conditions ease and liquidity expands.
The correlation between these assets varies significantly across different market regimes. Washigorira observed that “sometimes they move together, sometimes they diverge, and sometimes they even move in opposite directions.”
Historical data confirms that no stable relationship consistently holds across various market conditions. This variability undermines simplistic comparisons that treat gold and Bitcoin as interchangeable hedges against fiat currency devaluation.
Investors often assume that shared macro characteristics automatically create correlated price movements. “The usual shortcut goes like this: Gold is a hedge against fiat, Bitcoin is a hedge against fiat.
Therefore, capital should rotate from one to the other,” Washigorira explained. This reasoning ignores fundamental differences in how capital actually flows through markets. While both assets may coexist in the same economic environment, they respond to distinct incentives and catalysts.
The distinction between these drivers explains why rotation theories fail to materialize consistently. Markets do not operate through mechanical transfers of capital from one asset class to another.
Instead, investor behavior reflects complex decision-making processes influenced by multiple factors beyond simple hedging considerations. The analyst emphasized that “sharing a broad macro backdrop does not mean reacting to the same incentives.”
Liquidity Conditions Matter More Than Rotation Theories
The popular narrative suggesting that Bitcoin rallies automatically follow gold peaks oversimplifies actual market dynamics. Washigorira points out that after gold reaches a top, “capital often moves first into cash, bonds, or equities” rather than directly into Bitcoin.
The cryptocurrency requires liquidity expansion to generate sustained rallies, not merely rotation away from precious metals. “Bitcoin does not benefit mechanically from a gold top,” the analyst stated, adding that a gold peak alone does not provide sufficient conditions for Bitcoin price appreciation.
Understanding the indirect relationship between these assets offers a more reliable analytical framework. “Gold strength usually reflects stress and uncertainty,” while “Bitcoin strength usually reflects easing conditions and rising risk appetite,” according to the analysis. While they occasionally move together, timing differences frequently emerge between the two assets.
“Gold leads during stress phases when investors seek safety and capital preservation,” Washigorira explained. Bitcoin responds later when liquidity returns to financial markets and speculative appetite increases.
These different timelines result from fundamentally different macro engines driving each asset’s performance. The relationship proves indirect rather than rotational in nature.
The analysis emphasizes that lack of correlation does not equal inverse correlation. “A common misconception is that if two assets are not correlated, they must be inversely correlated. That is not how correlations work,” Washigorira clarified.
Periods where gold outperforms while Bitcoin underperforms occur regularly, but these episodes reflect conditional rather than structural relationships.
Investors who expect mechanical inverse movements misunderstand how asset correlations function in practice. Both assets deserve monitoring, but only when analysts correctly identify what economic forces each one actually responds to in real market conditions.
The post Analyst Debunks Gold-Bitcoin Correlation Myth, Explains Why Rotation Theory Fails appeared first on Blockonomi.
Přihlaste se a prozkoumejte další obsah