Sahar FRIDR
706 Следвани
23.1K+ Последователи
7.0K+ Харесано
755 Споделено
Публикации
Портфолио
Всички
Оферти
На живо
I’m watching @Vanarchain because it feels different from most small blockchains. They’re not just selling speed. They’re trying to turn brands into real digital worlds where people can play, explore, and come back again.
The big idea is simple. A digital item should not be the end. It should unlock something bigger. If users return daily, the project grows. If they visit once and leave, it fades.
Right now the price is small and risky. That means high upside, but also real danger.
I’m focused on one thing: real usage.
Follow for more and share with your friend my account.
#vanar $VANRY
The big idea is simple. A digital item should not be the end. It should unlock something bigger. If users return daily, the project grows. If they visit once and leave, it fades.
Right now the price is small and risky. That means high upside, but also real danger.
I’m focused on one thing: real usage.
Follow for more and share with your friend my account.
#vanar $VANRY
FROM TOKEN TO TERRITORY: CAN VANAR BUILD DIGITAL WORLDS PEOPLE ACTUALLY RETURN TO
I’m looking at Vanar Chain not as just another small blockchain, but as a focused attempt to solve a very specific problem. Most layer one networks try to be universal infrastructure. They talk about speed, decentralization, and low fees. Vanar is framing itself differently. They’re aiming to turn brands into interactive digital territories where users don’t just collect assets but step into environments, complete experiences, and come back again.
That distinction matters. We’ve already seen what happens when brands experiment with digital collectibles without a long term plan. They launch, create hype, sell out, and then activity drops off. There’s no second session. No habit. No reason to return. Vanar’s strategy is built around avoiding that outcome. The idea is simple in theory: make the collectible an entry point, not the final product. If someone owns an item, it should unlock access to something living and evolving, not just sit in a wallet.
Technically, Vanar operates as a high performance layer one blockchain designed for consumer scale. It emphasizes fast transactions, low costs, and tools that aim to abstract away blockchain complexity for end users. If users need to understand gas mechanics or complex wallet flows, most will simply disengage. The success of any brand driven digital world depends on frictionless onboarding. If it feels like a normal app, people stay. If it feels like a crypto experiment, they leave.
One of the most talked about parts of Vanar’s infrastructure is Neutron, its on-chain data compression system. Instead of relying heavily on external servers to host large media files, Neutron compresses data into significantly smaller, verifiable units that can live directly on the blockchain. That approach attempts to solve a deeper issue in Web3: permanence. When assets depend on third party storage, links can break and data can disappear. For brands building long term digital environments, that fragility is a serious risk. By pushing meaningful data onto the chain in compressed form, Vanar is positioning itself as infrastructure for persistent digital experiences rather than temporary campaigns.
From a market perspective, VANRY trades in the sub cent range, with a market capitalization in the mid teen millions and a circulating supply close to its maximum cap. Daily trading volume is relatively modest, and higher timeframe performance has been weak. On Binance, price action reflects a small cap asset without strong momentum behind it. That makes it volatile and highly sensitive to catalysts. A meaningful partnership, product release, or visible surge in user activity could move it quickly. At the same time, a lack of traction could see it drift lower in a risk off environment.
On-chain metrics show millions of transactions and addresses, but totals alone do not prove economic depth. What matters is the pattern beneath the surface. Are transactions tied to identifiable applications. Are wallets returning consistently. Are users spending time inside branded environments rather than interacting once and disappearing. High throughput is easy to generate. Retention is not.
The bull case for Vanar is straightforward. If brands use it to build interactive spaces that generate repeat engagement, and if users return because the experiences are genuinely enjoyable or rewarding, then the token becomes tied to real economic activity. In that scenario, today’s valuation looks small relative to potential growth. Even a move toward a few hundred million in market cap would represent a significant multiple from current levels.
The bear case is equally clear. If brand integrations remain mostly promotional and fail to create durable user loops, the narrative weakens. Without consistent retention and spending, the token has no strong foundation of demand. In that world, valuation compresses rather than expands.
For me, the core question is emotional as much as financial. When someone enters a Vanar powered world, do they feel enough connection to come back without being incentivized. If they do, this becomes infrastructure for the next phase of digital brand engagement. If they do not, it becomes another well intentioned blockchain experiment. The difference between those two outcomes will define everything.
@Vanarchain #Vanar $VANRY
That distinction matters. We’ve already seen what happens when brands experiment with digital collectibles without a long term plan. They launch, create hype, sell out, and then activity drops off. There’s no second session. No habit. No reason to return. Vanar’s strategy is built around avoiding that outcome. The idea is simple in theory: make the collectible an entry point, not the final product. If someone owns an item, it should unlock access to something living and evolving, not just sit in a wallet.
Technically, Vanar operates as a high performance layer one blockchain designed for consumer scale. It emphasizes fast transactions, low costs, and tools that aim to abstract away blockchain complexity for end users. If users need to understand gas mechanics or complex wallet flows, most will simply disengage. The success of any brand driven digital world depends on frictionless onboarding. If it feels like a normal app, people stay. If it feels like a crypto experiment, they leave.
One of the most talked about parts of Vanar’s infrastructure is Neutron, its on-chain data compression system. Instead of relying heavily on external servers to host large media files, Neutron compresses data into significantly smaller, verifiable units that can live directly on the blockchain. That approach attempts to solve a deeper issue in Web3: permanence. When assets depend on third party storage, links can break and data can disappear. For brands building long term digital environments, that fragility is a serious risk. By pushing meaningful data onto the chain in compressed form, Vanar is positioning itself as infrastructure for persistent digital experiences rather than temporary campaigns.
From a market perspective, VANRY trades in the sub cent range, with a market capitalization in the mid teen millions and a circulating supply close to its maximum cap. Daily trading volume is relatively modest, and higher timeframe performance has been weak. On Binance, price action reflects a small cap asset without strong momentum behind it. That makes it volatile and highly sensitive to catalysts. A meaningful partnership, product release, or visible surge in user activity could move it quickly. At the same time, a lack of traction could see it drift lower in a risk off environment.
On-chain metrics show millions of transactions and addresses, but totals alone do not prove economic depth. What matters is the pattern beneath the surface. Are transactions tied to identifiable applications. Are wallets returning consistently. Are users spending time inside branded environments rather than interacting once and disappearing. High throughput is easy to generate. Retention is not.
The bull case for Vanar is straightforward. If brands use it to build interactive spaces that generate repeat engagement, and if users return because the experiences are genuinely enjoyable or rewarding, then the token becomes tied to real economic activity. In that scenario, today’s valuation looks small relative to potential growth. Even a move toward a few hundred million in market cap would represent a significant multiple from current levels.
The bear case is equally clear. If brand integrations remain mostly promotional and fail to create durable user loops, the narrative weakens. Without consistent retention and spending, the token has no strong foundation of demand. In that world, valuation compresses rather than expands.
For me, the core question is emotional as much as financial. When someone enters a Vanar powered world, do they feel enough connection to come back without being incentivized. If they do, this becomes infrastructure for the next phase of digital brand engagement. If they do not, it becomes another well intentioned blockchain experiment. The difference between those two outcomes will define everything.
@Vanarchain #Vanar $VANRY
very very nice article
Bit Beacon
·
--
Plasma XPL: Innovation Meets Hidden Risk
Bold assumption to start: stablecoins on blockchains are basically solved. Everyone acts like you can drop a token on any EVM chain and suddenly payments “just work.” I wanted to see if that’s actually true, so I looked at one system that’s trying to do exactly that but in practice, things are never that simple.
Where it meets expectations
Fast payments need fast consensus nobody argues with that. Sub-second finality delivers what users expect: transfers that feel instant, checkout flows that don’t hiccup, and a UX that looks like traditional rails. That part works. But here’s the catch: fast finality doesn’t erase friction, it just moves it. Now the complexity lives in relayers, liquidity, and incentives. You can’t make payments frictionless, you just hide the friction somewhere else.
Where it quietly breaks the rules
This system puts stablecoins first. That sounds obvious, but most chains treat them as an afterthought. Making the stable token the center of fees and settlement rewires incentives in subtle ways. Validators, relayers, and liquidity providers are now all tied to the stablecoin’s health. If the coin stumbles, the chain stumbles. A tiny design decision cascades into a lot of hidden dependencies.
Where convenience hides fragility
Gasless transfers are great they remove a big adoption barrier. But someone has to pay for them. Usually it’s a relayer. If volume spikes or relayers run into cost issues, that “free” experience starts cracking. Convenience is nice, but here it’s really just a dependency dressed up as a feature.
Bitcoin anchoring: real security or a hidden bottleneck?
Anchoring state to Bitcoin looks strong on paper. It signals neutrality and censorship resistance. But it also creates an external dependency. High BTC fees or irregular block times don’t break the protocol, but they slow settlement confidence. Security isn’t eliminated it’s just passed off to Bitcoin’s network. That’s a trade-off most people don’t notice.
Scaling 10x: pressure-testing assumptions
What happens when ten times more people use the system? Liquidity, relayer throughput, and oracle reliability all get stretched. The stablecoin-first model looks tidy under normal load, but now contracts that assume instant settlement can break, MEV opportunities widen, and liquidity squeezes stress the network. Scale reveals fragilities that are invisible under calm conditions.
When incentives misalign
The market assumes incentives naturally align: validators want chain health, relayers want volume, issuers want adoption. Small misalignments a relayer fee cut, cost spike, or a delayed redemption cascade fast. Validators prioritize profitable transactions, relayers gate traffic, and market-makers widen spreads. Incentive misalignments that seem minor on paper can ripple into big operational problems.
Under pressure: attacks or legal stress
Try a flood of cheap transfers or a regulator pressuring the stablecoin issuer. Gasless transfers can amplify attacks relayer subsidies vanish, validators are overwhelmed, prioritization becomes human judgment. And if regulators hit the stablecoin issuer, freeze powers or redemptions suddenly control the entire chain. Speed and UX can’t save you from legal or social levers and that’s baked into the design.
Trade-offs and mitigation
You can try to fix these issues, but every solution comes with a cost. Broaden validators → slower finality. Move fees back to the native token → volatility returns. Strengthen anchoring cadence → higher costs or fewer anchors. Every lever trades one property for another. What matters is whether designers have been honest about those trade-offs or left them hidden.
What would break my skepticism
If stress tests show decentralized validators, solvent relayers without ongoing subsidies, and Bitcoin anchoring holding up during BTC spikes, I’d rethink my view. If stablecoin issuers can’t unilaterally freeze activity or we see that control isn’t necessary my concerns fade.
What would strengthen it
If relayer economics are resilient, validators are distributed globally, and deployments survive load spikes and regional outages, that’s credibility. Evidence showing no subsidy cliffs or cascading incentive failures would make the system far more convincing.
What I’m waiting for next
Specifically: (a) stress test results under heavy synthetic load, including finality, reorgs, and validator participation; (b) on chain data showing relayer behavior under high traffic and rising fees; (c) timestamped Bitcoin anchor reports proving consistency during congestion. Those numbers turn theory into evidence.
I’m not saying this system is doomed. I’m saying it compresses a lot of hidden trade offs into UX promises. And those trade-offs only become obvious under stress, scale, or legal pressure. That’s the moment you find out if it’s real plumbin or just a polished illusion.
#plasma @Plasma $XPL
Where it meets expectations
Fast payments need fast consensus nobody argues with that. Sub-second finality delivers what users expect: transfers that feel instant, checkout flows that don’t hiccup, and a UX that looks like traditional rails. That part works. But here’s the catch: fast finality doesn’t erase friction, it just moves it. Now the complexity lives in relayers, liquidity, and incentives. You can’t make payments frictionless, you just hide the friction somewhere else.
Where it quietly breaks the rules
This system puts stablecoins first. That sounds obvious, but most chains treat them as an afterthought. Making the stable token the center of fees and settlement rewires incentives in subtle ways. Validators, relayers, and liquidity providers are now all tied to the stablecoin’s health. If the coin stumbles, the chain stumbles. A tiny design decision cascades into a lot of hidden dependencies.
Where convenience hides fragility
Gasless transfers are great they remove a big adoption barrier. But someone has to pay for them. Usually it’s a relayer. If volume spikes or relayers run into cost issues, that “free” experience starts cracking. Convenience is nice, but here it’s really just a dependency dressed up as a feature.
Bitcoin anchoring: real security or a hidden bottleneck?
Anchoring state to Bitcoin looks strong on paper. It signals neutrality and censorship resistance. But it also creates an external dependency. High BTC fees or irregular block times don’t break the protocol, but they slow settlement confidence. Security isn’t eliminated it’s just passed off to Bitcoin’s network. That’s a trade-off most people don’t notice.
Scaling 10x: pressure-testing assumptions
What happens when ten times more people use the system? Liquidity, relayer throughput, and oracle reliability all get stretched. The stablecoin-first model looks tidy under normal load, but now contracts that assume instant settlement can break, MEV opportunities widen, and liquidity squeezes stress the network. Scale reveals fragilities that are invisible under calm conditions.
When incentives misalign
The market assumes incentives naturally align: validators want chain health, relayers want volume, issuers want adoption. Small misalignments a relayer fee cut, cost spike, or a delayed redemption cascade fast. Validators prioritize profitable transactions, relayers gate traffic, and market-makers widen spreads. Incentive misalignments that seem minor on paper can ripple into big operational problems.
Under pressure: attacks or legal stress
Try a flood of cheap transfers or a regulator pressuring the stablecoin issuer. Gasless transfers can amplify attacks relayer subsidies vanish, validators are overwhelmed, prioritization becomes human judgment. And if regulators hit the stablecoin issuer, freeze powers or redemptions suddenly control the entire chain. Speed and UX can’t save you from legal or social levers and that’s baked into the design.
Trade-offs and mitigation
You can try to fix these issues, but every solution comes with a cost. Broaden validators → slower finality. Move fees back to the native token → volatility returns. Strengthen anchoring cadence → higher costs or fewer anchors. Every lever trades one property for another. What matters is whether designers have been honest about those trade-offs or left them hidden.
What would break my skepticism
If stress tests show decentralized validators, solvent relayers without ongoing subsidies, and Bitcoin anchoring holding up during BTC spikes, I’d rethink my view. If stablecoin issuers can’t unilaterally freeze activity or we see that control isn’t necessary my concerns fade.
What would strengthen it
If relayer economics are resilient, validators are distributed globally, and deployments survive load spikes and regional outages, that’s credibility. Evidence showing no subsidy cliffs or cascading incentive failures would make the system far more convincing.
What I’m waiting for next
Specifically: (a) stress test results under heavy synthetic load, including finality, reorgs, and validator participation; (b) on chain data showing relayer behavior under high traffic and rising fees; (c) timestamped Bitcoin anchor reports proving consistency during congestion. Those numbers turn theory into evidence.
I’m not saying this system is doomed. I’m saying it compresses a lot of hidden trade offs into UX promises. And those trade-offs only become obvious under stress, scale, or legal pressure. That’s the moment you find out if it’s real plumbin or just a polished illusion.
#plasma @Plasma $XPL
so nice
Bit Beacon
·
--
Plasma XPL is a Layer 1 blockchain designed specifically for stablecoin settlement. Instead of treating stablecoins like just another token on a general-purpose chain, they’re building the system around how stablecoins are actually used in payments and finance.
#Plasma @Plasma $XPL
#Plasma @Plasma $XPL
nice
Bit Beacon
·
--
Бичи$SSV BB LIQUIDITY WIPEOUT ALERT
Longs just got flushed at $3.05 — weak hands cleared. Market ready for the next move: bounce or continuation. Watch support closely.
💎 Buy Zone: $2.92 – $3.02
🛑 Stop: $2.78
🎯 TP1: $3.18
🎯 TP2: $3.35
🎯 TP3: $3.60
Reclaim $3.10 with volume → momentum flips bullish. Break $2.92 → sellers accelerate. Liquidity sweeps = prime explosive entries.
{spot}(SSVUSDT)
#USRetailSalesMissForecast #USTechFundFlows #WhaleDeRiskETH #GoldSilverRally #BinanceBitcoinSAFUFund
Longs just got flushed at $3.05 — weak hands cleared. Market ready for the next move: bounce or continuation. Watch support closely.
💎 Buy Zone: $2.92 – $3.02
🛑 Stop: $2.78
🎯 TP1: $3.18
🎯 TP2: $3.35
🎯 TP3: $3.60
Reclaim $3.10 with volume → momentum flips bullish. Break $2.92 → sellers accelerate. Liquidity sweeps = prime explosive entries.
{spot}(SSVUSDT)
#USRetailSalesMissForecast #USTechFundFlows #WhaleDeRiskETH #GoldSilverRally #BinanceBitcoinSAFUFund
I’m excited about @Vanarchain . It’s an L1 blockchain built for real-world use, not just hype. The team has strong experience in games, entertainment, and working with big brands. I see their clear goal: bring the next 3 billion people into Web3 in a simple way.
Vanar supports gaming, metaverse, AI, eco projects, and brand solutions. Some known products are Virtua Metaverse and VGN Games Network. The whole ecosystem runs on the VANRY token.
I like how Vanar focuses on real adoption and easy access for users.
Follow me for more simple crypto updates, and share my account with your friends.
#vanar $VANRY
Vanar supports gaming, metaverse, AI, eco projects, and brand solutions. Some known products are Virtua Metaverse and VGN Games Network. The whole ecosystem runs on the VANRY token.
I like how Vanar focuses on real adoption and easy access for users.
Follow me for more simple crypto updates, and share my account with your friends.
#vanar $VANRY
🎙️ The $1 Illusion: What Traders Must Watch on USD1 Today
Край
05 ч 31 м 15 с
1.8k
13
🎙️ 广场大舞台之持有USD1空投WLFI
Край
01 ч 05 м 51 с
157
1
VANAR AND THE MISSION TO BRING WEB3 TO THE NEXT THREE BILLION PEOPLE Vanar is a Layer 1 blockchain
Vanar is a Layer 1 blockchain created with a clear and practical mission: to make Web3 ready for real world adoption. While many blockchain projects focus mainly on technical innovation or financial speculation, Vanar approaches the space differently. They are building infrastructure that connects directly with industries people already use and love, especially gaming, entertainment, digital experiences, artificial intelligence, and brand solutions. Instead of expecting billions of users to adjust to blockchain, Vanar is shaping blockchain to fit naturally into everyday digital life.
The team behind Vanar brings strong experience from gaming and entertainment industries. This background plays a major role in how the ecosystem is structured. Games already have digital economies, virtual items, and global communities. Vanar enhances these systems by adding blockchain-based ownership and security. This means players are not just renting digital items stored on centralized servers. They can truly own assets that are recorded on-chain. Ownership becomes transparent, verifiable, and transferable, which creates new possibilities for both players and developers.
One of the most recognized products connected to Vanar is the Virtua Metaverse. Virtua is designed as an immersive digital environment where users can explore virtual spaces, interact with others, and own digital collectibles. These assets are powered by blockchain technology, giving users greater control and permanence over what they acquire. The metaverse concept within Vanar is not just about virtual land or avatars. It is about creating a connected digital ecosystem where entertainment, social interaction, and commerce can exist together securely.
Another important component of the ecosystem is the VGN games network. This network focuses on blockchain-enabled gaming experiences. Through VGN, developers can integrate blockchain features without making the experience complicated for players. Transactions are designed to be fast and low cost, which is critical for gaming environments where users may perform frequent micro actions. By reducing friction and maintaining high performance, Vanar ensures that blockchain does not disrupt gameplay but instead enhances it.
At the core of the entire ecosystem is the VANRY token. VANRY functions as the utility token that powers transactions, supports applications, and incentivizes network participants. It is used for transaction fees, ecosystem services, and participation in various digital experiences built on Vanar. The token plays a central role in maintaining network activity and encouraging growth within the platform.
Technologically, Vanar focuses on scalability and efficiency. For Web3 to reach billions of users, the underlying blockchain must handle large transaction volumes without high fees or slow confirmation times. Vanar’s architecture is designed to deliver speed and cost effectiveness, which are essential for mainstream adoption. This makes it suitable not only for gaming but also for brand campaigns, AI-driven applications, and broader digital commerce solutions.
Vanar also extends into artificial intelligence and eco-conscious initiatives. By combining AI with blockchain, the platform aims to create smarter and more adaptive digital experiences. Additionally, sustainability considerations are increasingly important in blockchain development, and Vanar’s approach emphasizes operational efficiency to support long-term growth.
Overall, Vanar positions itself as more than just a blockchain network. It is a full ecosystem built to integrate seamlessly with existing digital industries. By focusing on usability, performance, and real world applications, Vanar seeks to make Web3 accessible to the next three billion users and bridge the gap between traditional digital platforms and decentralized technology.
#vanar @Vanarchain $VANRY
The team behind Vanar brings strong experience from gaming and entertainment industries. This background plays a major role in how the ecosystem is structured. Games already have digital economies, virtual items, and global communities. Vanar enhances these systems by adding blockchain-based ownership and security. This means players are not just renting digital items stored on centralized servers. They can truly own assets that are recorded on-chain. Ownership becomes transparent, verifiable, and transferable, which creates new possibilities for both players and developers.
One of the most recognized products connected to Vanar is the Virtua Metaverse. Virtua is designed as an immersive digital environment where users can explore virtual spaces, interact with others, and own digital collectibles. These assets are powered by blockchain technology, giving users greater control and permanence over what they acquire. The metaverse concept within Vanar is not just about virtual land or avatars. It is about creating a connected digital ecosystem where entertainment, social interaction, and commerce can exist together securely.
Another important component of the ecosystem is the VGN games network. This network focuses on blockchain-enabled gaming experiences. Through VGN, developers can integrate blockchain features without making the experience complicated for players. Transactions are designed to be fast and low cost, which is critical for gaming environments where users may perform frequent micro actions. By reducing friction and maintaining high performance, Vanar ensures that blockchain does not disrupt gameplay but instead enhances it.
At the core of the entire ecosystem is the VANRY token. VANRY functions as the utility token that powers transactions, supports applications, and incentivizes network participants. It is used for transaction fees, ecosystem services, and participation in various digital experiences built on Vanar. The token plays a central role in maintaining network activity and encouraging growth within the platform.
Technologically, Vanar focuses on scalability and efficiency. For Web3 to reach billions of users, the underlying blockchain must handle large transaction volumes without high fees or slow confirmation times. Vanar’s architecture is designed to deliver speed and cost effectiveness, which are essential for mainstream adoption. This makes it suitable not only for gaming but also for brand campaigns, AI-driven applications, and broader digital commerce solutions.
Vanar also extends into artificial intelligence and eco-conscious initiatives. By combining AI with blockchain, the platform aims to create smarter and more adaptive digital experiences. Additionally, sustainability considerations are increasingly important in blockchain development, and Vanar’s approach emphasizes operational efficiency to support long-term growth.
Overall, Vanar positions itself as more than just a blockchain network. It is a full ecosystem built to integrate seamlessly with existing digital industries. By focusing on usability, performance, and real world applications, Vanar seeks to make Web3 accessible to the next three billion users and bridge the gap between traditional digital platforms and decentralized technology.
#vanar @Vanarchain $VANRY
🎙️ LETS DISCUSS BENEFITS OF STABLECOIN $USD1 & WLFI
Край
04 ч 18 м 43 с
518
2
🎙️ 持USD1吃WLFI空投，享受最舒服的躺赢姿势！
Край
05 ч 59 м 49 с
14.5k
12
🎙️ Let's Know about crypto 🤗 $USD1 $WLFI
Край
03 ч 39 м 18 с
574
6
I’m watching $COMP for a support sweep recovery play.
I’m entering between 16.15 and 16.40.
My stop loss is 15.60.
My targets:
TP1: 17.10
TP2: 18.40
TP3: 20.00
I’m looking for a strong bounce from support and a clean move up. I will manage risk and follow my plan.
Follow me for more simple trade ideas.
Share with your friends and support my account
#BinanceBitcoinSAFUFund #GoldSilverRally #BTCMiningDifficultyDrop
.
I’m entering between 16.15 and 16.40.
My stop loss is 15.60.
My targets:
TP1: 17.10
TP2: 18.40
TP3: 20.00
I’m looking for a strong bounce from support and a clean move up. I will manage risk and follow my plan.
Follow me for more simple trade ideas.
Share with your friends and support my account
#BinanceBitcoinSAFUFund #GoldSilverRally #BTCMiningDifficultyDrop
.
🎙️ Lets Discuss $USD1 and $WLFI holding benefits
Край
03 ч 53 м 32 с
2.2k
4
"A South Korean cryptocurrency exchange accidentally gave away more than $40bn (£32bn) worth of bitc
It had planned to give customers a small cash reward of 2,000 won - $1.37 - but instead gave them 2,000 bitcoins on Friday.
The platform, Bithumb, apologised for the error, adding that it quickly had realised its mistake and recovered almost all the missing tokens.
It said it had restricted trading and withdrawals for the 695 affected customers within 35 minutes of the glitch.
The platform, Bithumb, apologised for the error, adding that it quickly had realised its mistake and recovered almost all the missing tokens.
It said it had restricted trading and withdrawals for the 695 affected customers within 35 minutes of the glitch.
$QNT
EP $61.50
TP1 $72.00
TP2 $78.50
TP3 $89.00
SL $57.00
I’m watching $QNT with real price structure in mind. The market has been bearish overall with price under key moving averages, but the recent bounce from support shows sellers may be exhausted and buyers are stepping in if price holds above the $61 area. Trend strength is weak but oversold conditions suggest relief is likely first before continuation. Momentum is improving as short‑term RSI moves upwards from deeply oversold levels. Liquidity sits above current price near the $72‑$78 zone, so movement toward our targets is likely if buyers keep control. Break below $57 would invalidate this setup and show bears still dominate. Follow for more and share with your friend my account
$QNT
#WhaleDeRiskETH #BTCMiningDifficultyDrop
EP $61.50
TP1 $72.00
TP2 $78.50
TP3 $89.00
SL $57.00
I’m watching $QNT with real price structure in mind. The market has been bearish overall with price under key moving averages, but the recent bounce from support shows sellers may be exhausted and buyers are stepping in if price holds above the $61 area. Trend strength is weak but oversold conditions suggest relief is likely first before continuation. Momentum is improving as short‑term RSI moves upwards from deeply oversold levels. Liquidity sits above current price near the $72‑$78 zone, so movement toward our targets is likely if buyers keep control. Break below $57 would invalidate this setup and show bears still dominate. Follow for more and share with your friend my account
$QNT
#WhaleDeRiskETH #BTCMiningDifficultyDrop
$BTCUSD
EP $63,000
TP1 $68,500
TP2 $72,000
TP3 $78,000
SL $59,500
I’m watching $BTC carefully. The market structure shows sellers in control recently with heavy selling pressure and ETF outflows. Price has bounced off the $63,000 zone and liquidity sits below, making it a clear level for entry. Trend is still bearish on short time frames, but momentum shows a counter‑trend bounce taking shape off that support. If buyers reclaim and hold above $68,500, price should push toward our targets as sellers lose grip. A break under $59,500 invalidates this setup and signals deeper weakness. Follow for more and share with your friend my account
$BTCUSD
#BinanceBitcoinSAFUFund #BinanceBitcoinSAFUFund
EP $63,000
TP1 $68,500
TP2 $72,000
TP3 $78,000
SL $59,500
I’m watching $BTC carefully. The market structure shows sellers in control recently with heavy selling pressure and ETF outflows. Price has bounced off the $63,000 zone and liquidity sits below, making it a clear level for entry. Trend is still bearish on short time frames, but momentum shows a counter‑trend bounce taking shape off that support. If buyers reclaim and hold above $68,500, price should push toward our targets as sellers lose grip. A break under $59,500 invalidates this setup and signals deeper weakness. Follow for more and share with your friend my account
$BTCUSD
#BinanceBitcoinSAFUFund #BinanceBitcoinSAFUFund
I’m learning about $SOL and how it powers the Solana blockchain. I’m interested in its fast and low-cost transactions. I’m studying its real use and not following hype. I’m taking small steps and learning every day. I believe smart choices bring long-term growth. I’m focused on understanding before investing. I’m building my knowledge and staying patient in crypto.
Follow me for more.
Share with your friends and support my account.
#WhaleDeRiskETH #BitcoinGoogleSearchesSurge
Follow me for more.
Share with your friends and support my account.
#WhaleDeRiskETH #BitcoinGoogleSearchesSurge
I’m learning about $TAO and how it connects AI with blockchain. I’m interested in how it rewards smart work on the network. I’m studying the project and its real use. I’m not following hype. I’m doing my own research first. I believe strong ideas win over time. I’m focused on learning before investing. I’m building knowledge step by step and staying patient in this market.
Follow me for more.
Share with your friends and support my account.
#USRetailSalesMissForecast #WhenWillBTCRebound
Follow me for more.
Share with your friends and support my account.
#USRetailSalesMissForecast #WhenWillBTCRebound
I’m learning about $ZEC and how it protects privacy in crypto. I’m interested because it keeps transactions secure and private. I’m studying how it works and why people use it. I’m not investing without research. I’m taking small steps and learning daily. I believe privacy matters in digital money. I’m focused on smart choices and long term growth. I’m building my knowledge before making big moves.
Follow me for more.
Share with your friends and support my account.
#BTCMiningDifficultyDrop #BitcoinGoogleSearchesSurge
Follow me for more.
Share with your friends and support my account.
#BTCMiningDifficultyDrop #BitcoinGoogleSearchesSurge
Влезте, за да разгледате още съдържание