Trytech39

Why $1.74 Feels Like More Than Just a Number
Toncoin recently rose 0.77% in 24 hours, extending a 20.69% monthly gain.
On the surface, it looks modest, but the on-chain data and ecosystem activity reveal a story of real adoption, revenue, and growing confidence. Here’s a breakdown.
On-Chain Reality
$TON is not your typical DeFi-heavy blockchain.
Its on-chain metrics show a consumer app-first economy rather than a capital-heavy
DeFi playground:
TVL: $86.08M = low
meaning users are active but not locking large sums Ton
Chain revenue: $7,435
almost negligible, shows base layer isn’t capturing much value
App revenue: $287K +
app fees: $1,000,000 = massive monetization at the app layer
DEX volume: $2.74M
perp volume: $7.58M = price driven more by speculation and leverage than accumulation
In short: TON users pay for apps, but the chain itself earns very little. The money flows through, not into the base layer. Yet, this micro-economy drives adoption and keeps the network buzzing.
How On-Chain Data Boosted TON’s Price
Despite low TVL and chain fees, TON’s price saw positive movement thanks to:
Strong app monetization
$1M in app fees and $287K in revenue show real users paying real money.
This signals to investors that TON has a sustainable ecosystem, even if the base layer isn’t fully capturing value.
Technical stabilization
Price holding above $1.74 Fibonacci support calmed traders and reduced short-term risk.
Leveraged perps amplified the upward movement, translating usage and revenue into price action.
Speculative trading volume
Perpetuals volume ($7.58M) exceeded spot DEX volume ($2.74M), showing leveraged bets driving short-term price spikes.
Fundamental Catalysts
Beyond the on-chain numbers, TON’s fundamentals reinforce confidence:
Telegram Integration: U.S. wallet launches and exclusive Mini Apps bring new users directly to TON, boosting app revenue and adoption.
AlphaTON AI Investment ($46M): Signals long-term infrastructure commitment, institutional interest, and potential future revenue streams.
Active Ecosystem: Games, Mini Apps, and social features maintain high engagement, proving TON isn’t just hype.
These fundamentals support long-term optimism even if the chain itself is not yet generating huge fees.
My final take:
Toncoin’s recent rise is driven by a combination of real usage, app monetization, and technical positioning rather than base-layer DeFi activity or large locked capital.
#MarketRebound #TON

A Clean Valuation Analysis After the X API Shock
Crypto valuation is messy, but moments like this strip projects down to their core.
KAITO recently took a hit after X (Twitter) shut down API access for InfoFi and reward for promoting apps and web3 projects, directly affecting how Kaito sourced data and rewarded users. The price reaction was sharp, but the more important question is not price.
It’s value.
What KAITO Actually Is.
KAITO is not DeFi.
It is not a yield protocol.
It does not custody funds.

✅ It is a utility / app token tied to an AI-powered information platform that aggregates crypto data, narratives, and attention.
Its value depends on usage, relevance, and token necessity, not TVL.
That’s why TVL = $0 (source from defilLama) is correct, even though users stake tokens.
About Staking (12.78M Staked)
Yes, users have staked about 12.78M $KAITO ,
but in context:
Circulating supply ≈ 241M
That’s roughly 5% staked
This is utility staking, not economic staking.
The capital is locked for access, rewards, or alignment, not deployed to generate yield or secure a financial system.
So staking slightly reduces circulating supply, but it does not create a valuation floor.
The X API Decision: Why It Hurt So Much
Kaito’s earlier InfoFi model relied heavily on X data to:
✅track engagement
✅rank contributors
✅distribute rewards
When X closed its API to these apps, that broke the core demand loop.
Before: Usage 👉 engagement data 👉 rewards 👉 token demand
After: No data 👉 no verified rewards 👉 no forced token demand
This wasn’t just bad news.
It exposed a structural risk:
Kaito’s token utility depended on a centralized Web2 platform it did not control.
Markets repriced that risk immediately.
The Core Valuation Problem
Using your own framework, the decisive question is simple:
If usage doubles, does the token benefit?
Right now, the answer is not mechanically.
Revenue exists off-chain. The product may still be useful. But token demand is optional, not enforced through fees, burns, or mandatory staking.
That places $KAITO in the category of:
Growth optionality tokens, not cash-flow or capital-backed assets.
What Still Works in Kaito’s Favor
Real product solving real information problems
AI + data narrative remains strong
Paying users and enterprise interest exist
Team is pivoting away from X dependency
What Weakens the Valuation
No TVL or capital moat
Weak value capture for token holders
Low staking ratio
Heavy reliance on future execution
Narrative damage from the API shutdown

Bottom Line
$KAITO is not dead, but it is repriced correctly as a higher-risk asset.
Its future valuation depends almost entirely on whether the team can:
Prove strong, growing product usage
Redesign token utility to capture value directly
Remove dependency on centralized data gates
Until then, $KAITO remains a speculative bet on execution, not a fundamentals anchor.
Price moves fast in crypto. Value moves only when incentives are redesigned.
What's your thought on this?
#MarketRebound

$HYPE On-Chain Analiz: Hype Həqiqətən Varmı?
Hyperliquid ($HYPE) yüksək performanslı on-chain perp DEX kimi dikkat cəlb edir. İştirakçılar ona axır, amma əsas sual qalır: qiymətləndirmə məşhur olub, yoxsa hamısı hypesizdir? Mən real on-chain nömrələri ilə təhlil edəcəm.
1) Bazar Kapitalizasiyası və TVL:
Hyperliquid Nə Qədər Böyükdür?
Bazar Kapitalizasiyası: $7.85B
Yerli TVL: $1.36B
Köçürülən TVL: $6.62B
Ümumi Likvidlik: ≈ $7.98B
Bu, bazar kapitalizasiyasının ümumi likvidliyə təxminən bərabər olduğunu, Ehtiyat, USDC, USDT və digər zincirlərdən köçürülən aktivləri də əhatə etdiyini göstərir.