0xMohamed 1

Bitcoin surpasses Tesla in market cap $BTC has overtaken Tesla in market capitalization, moving up to the 14th-largest asset by market value worldwide. The milestone highlights Bitcoin’s growing position among the world’s largest financial assets. #BTC continues to climb the global market-cap rankings.

No real name ≠ anonymous payments. That distinction matters. With @Liberdus , you can create an account without a phone number or email, and your username can be mapped to a wallet address. But LIB transactions are not anonymous. The project’s own documentation says transaction metadata can include the sending account, receiving account and amount. So there are two different concepts, identity privacy ≠ transaction privacy. And honestly, this is the kind of distinction more Web3 conversations should make. Because privacy isn't about throwing the word anonymous everywhere. It's about understanding exactly what is protected and what isn't. Where do you draw the line between identity privacy and transaction privacy? #Liberdus #XRP $XRP

Ethereum transaction fees have plunged 87% from April’s $0.72 peak to just $0.095 today, even as $ETH trades higher. #ETH

Bitcoin reclaims $78,000. Will it hit $80,000 before the week ends? #BTC $BTC

Aave to launch an RWA lending market on Avalanche, letting institutions borrow stablecoins against tokenized assets. $AVAX $AAVE #AVAX #aave

Zcash holders vote to cut block times from 75 to 25 seconds and retain the network’s Bitcoin-style halving schedule. #ZEC $ZEC

Understand Liberdus Most messaging apps separate conversation from payments. One app for chatting. Another for sending money. Another wallet to manage crypto. Liberdus takes a different approach. What happens when messaging and payments exist in the same ecosystem? Liberdus has a built-in wallet that lets users send and receive LIB directly inside the app. So payments aren't treated as a completely separate experience. They can happen alongside communication. For example, when you're already chatting with someone, you can open the payment option, enter the amount, optionally add a memo, review the transaction and confirm it. The transaction then appears in the conversation. You can also send LIB directly from the wallet. The recipient can be specified using: → their username → a QR code → or a wallet address The transaction can also include an optional memo. Why does this matter? Because a username can serve as more than a way to find someone. Liberdus documents that usernames can be used for both messaging and payments, and are mapped to wallet addresses. That creates an interesting model, Identity → Communication → Payment instead of treating each as a completely separate layer. Your conversation can become the starting point for an interaction that also includes value transfer. But there's an important privacy detail. LIB transactions are not anonymous. Liberdus says transaction metadata can include the sending account, receiving account and amount. So no phone number ≠ anonymous transactions. That's an important distinction. And that's what makes this architecture interesting to me. It's not simply about adding a wallet to a messaging app. It's about asking what should communication + identity + payments look like when they're designed together? The bigger Web3 question, if messaging and payments can share the same identity layer does the wallet become part of how we communicate online? That's a conversation worth having. #Liberdus #AVAX $AVAX

The more I learn about digital identity, the less I think it should be about identification. We’ve built the internet around usernames, emails, phone numbers and accounts. But we rarely stop to ask who actually controls the identity behind all of this? That question is becoming more important as Web3 evolves. Maybe digital ownership isn't only about owning assets. Maybe it starts with owning how you exist online. #Liberdus @Liberdus #BTC $BTC

Standard Chartered sees 70x upside for Arbitrum’s $ARB by 2030. The bank initiated coverage with a $10 target, citing tokenized assets and Robinhood Chain growth as key catalysts, with Arbitrum’s monthly revenue projected to reach about $5 million in September. #ARB

Crypto exchange CoinEx to shut down after 9 years, citing low liquidity and rising compliance costs. Its native token, $CET , is down 91.3% over the past year. #CET

Would you trust a digital identity you control yourself? No phone number, no email required, no central account recovery. Instead, your account is tied to cryptographic credentials you control. More ownership sounds great. But it also means more responsibility. Would you choose that model over the traditional email + password system? Why or why not? #Liberdus @Liberdus #XRP $XRP

BitMine Immersion purchases another 27,180 Ethereum, now holds over 5.96M $ETH . #ETH

Chainlink is rallying hard:
$LINK closed at $11.74, up 35.4% over 30 days.
Meanwhile, $ETH is up 36.9% over the same period and sits at its highest since January 2026.

@Chainlink #LINK #ETH @Ethereum

Multicoin Capital says Hyperliquid is one of its largest positions after reassessing $HYPE
. Multicoin’s Spencer Applebaum said Hyperliquid’s perpetual markets reaching centralized-exchange-level liquidity, alongside builder codes and HIP-3, showed the protocol had found genuine product-market fit. #HYPE

$250,000,000
$USDC
just minted at USDC Treasury. #USDC

Arthur Hayes: nations will stick with gold Arthur Hayes told Bitcoin Magazine that sovereign nations are unlikely to use Bitcoin as a reserve asset, arguing they will continue to rely on gold instead. They don't know how to use computers. Hayes’ view highlights a key hurdle for Bitcoin’s adoption at the sovereign level: infrastructure, familiarity, and operational complexity. Gold remains the asset governments understand best, while Bitcoin requires a very different technological framework. $BTC #BTC

Solana recorded more than 263,000 new token launches on Sept. 9 its highest-ever daily total, according to Solscan data. #SOL $SOL

How to open a Liberdus account on the app. 1/ What if creating a messaging account didn't require your phone number or email? Let's actually look at how Liberdus handles it. No theory, just the process. 2/ Open Liberdus, from the home screen, select: create Account that's where the process begins. 3/ Choose your username, you don't need to provide a phone number or email during account creation. Your username becomes the identifier you use within the platform. 4/ Then comes the interesting part. Liberdus generates your account keys. The account is cryptographically secured, with quantum-resistant cryptography used by the platform. 5/ Once the keys are generated, your account appears on the dashboard. No traditional signup flow built around: enter your phone number or verify your email. Instead, the account is built around cryptographic credentials. 6/ And there's another useful detail: You can create multiple Liberdus accounts on the same device. Each account is independent and has its own private key and wallet address. 7/ So the interesting part isn't simply: Liberdus doesn't ask for your phone number. It's the architecture behind that choice. Your account doesn't have to start with a real-world identifier. It can start with a cryptographic identity. 8/ That's a very different way of thinking about digital accounts. And it raises a bigger question, #liberdus #Privacy $ONDO

Chainlink added 91,100 $LINK worth $1.06 million, to its strategic reserve, bringing the total to 5.86 million $LINK valued at $67.24 million. #LINK

Understand that your phone number isn't your identity. Your phone number isn't your identity. Yet most digital services treat it like one. You give them a number, they give you an account. But there's a deeper question: Who actually controls that identity? Think about what happens when you create a typical online account. Email Phone number Password Sometimes even government-issued ID Your identity becomes tied to identifiers controlled outside the platform. That's convenient, but convenience and ownership aren't the same thing. If your account depends on an identifier you don't control, losing access to that identifier can become a problem. Web3 approaches identity differently. Instead of making an email address or phone number the foundation of your account, you can use cryptographic keys and wallet-based identities. The important shift is identity → something you can control cryptographically. Liberdus takes this approach for its accounts. According to its current documentation, you can create an account by choosing a username without providing a phone number or email. The username is mapped to your Liberdus wallet address. That doesn't magically solve digital identity. It simply changes the architecture. Instead of asking: Which phone number belongs to this user? the system can ask: Which cryptographic account controls this identity? That's a very different model. And that's where things get interesting. Because digital identity isn't just about logging in. It's about control, portability, privacy and ownership. The real question isn't can I create an account? It's xhat actually belongs to me when I create one? #Liberdus @Liberdus #PI $PI