#dusk $DUSK @Dusk
went back to the Phoenix section this morning and read it properly instead of skimming.
funds live as encrypted notes,not balances sitting in a table with your name next to them.
what a transaction proves is narrow. no double spend, enough funds. what it never reveals is the amount, the sender except to the receiver, or which notes were involved
so the verifier confirms the settlement is valid without learning a single figure in it
thats a strange sentence and its the whole point of confidential settlement. the verifier cant be tricked by data it never receives
Moonlight sits next to it for flows that should be observable. two models one chain, you pick per transaction
whats your take
@Dusk #dusk $DUSK
went back to the Phoenix section this morning and read it properly instead of skimming.
funds live as encrypted notes,not balances sitting in a table with your name next to them.
what a transaction proves is narrow. no double spend, enough funds. what it never reveals is the amount, the sender except to the receiver, or which notes were involved
so the verifier confirms the settlement is valid without learning a single figure in it
thats a strange sentence and its the whole point of confidential settlement. the verifier cant be tricked by data it never receives
Moonlight sits next to it for flows that should be observable. two models one chain, you pick per transaction
whats your take
@Dusk #dusk $DUSK
its amazing
0%
settlement is valid
0%
0 الأصوات • تمّ إغلاق التصويت