#dusk $DUSK @Dusk
I’ve been thinking about Dusk’s native issuance model from a slightly different angle: settlement speed may matter less than balance-sheet efficiency.
When a security is issued natively onchain, ownership and settlement can happen within the same system.That potentially removes a layer of reconciliation between the trade and the final transfer of ownership.
For an investor, the interesting consequence is what happens to capital that would otherwise sit against unsettled positions. Faster finality could reduce the duration of counterparty exposure and the amount of collateral tied up waiting for multiple parties to complete their processes.
“Settlement time is also capital allocation time.”
That is why T+0 is more interesting to me than simply being faster than T+1 or T+2. If native issuance genuinely compresses the gap between execution and final ownership, it could change how efficiently regulated markets use liquidity.
Still, I think there is an important uncertainty here. Traditional settlement delays often contain operational safeguards, exception handling and compliance checks. Moving the asset onchain does not automatically remove those requirements.
The thesis becomes stronger only if Dusk can make compliance and instant settlement operate in the same workflow rather than shifting the old friction elsewhere.
#DUSK $BLESS $TUT
I’ve been thinking about Dusk’s native issuance model from a slightly different angle: settlement speed may matter less than balance-sheet efficiency.
When a security is issued natively onchain, ownership and settlement can happen within the same system.That potentially removes a layer of reconciliation between the trade and the final transfer of ownership.
For an investor, the interesting consequence is what happens to capital that would otherwise sit against unsettled positions. Faster finality could reduce the duration of counterparty exposure and the amount of collateral tied up waiting for multiple parties to complete their processes.
“Settlement time is also capital allocation time.”
That is why T+0 is more interesting to me than simply being faster than T+1 or T+2. If native issuance genuinely compresses the gap between execution and final ownership, it could change how efficiently regulated markets use liquidity.
Still, I think there is an important uncertainty here. Traditional settlement delays often contain operational safeguards, exception handling and compliance checks. Moving the asset onchain does not automatically remove those requirements.
The thesis becomes stronger only if Dusk can make compliance and instant settlement operate in the same workflow rather than shifting the old friction elsewhere.
#DUSK $BLESS $TUT
