Dusk is doing a Binance Square AMA today at 15:00 CEST and it's worth clearing your calendar for. You get both Emanuele Francioni the CEO and Hein Dauven the CTO in the same session which is rare, usually it's one or the other.If you've been following the DuskDS, DuskEVM, DuskVM structure and still have questions this is the place to bring them.
For now let me explain what i learn, I kept seeing "privacy" thrown around by different chains and honestly got skeptical because usually it just means one shielded pool bolted onto an otherwise public chain. So I went digging into how Dusk actually structures this across its stack and it wasn't what I expected.
Basically Dusk splits the job into three layers instead of cramming everything into one. DuskDS sits at the bottom and handles settlement consensus and data availability. It runs a proof of stake system called Succinct Attestation that gives deterministic finality which matters if you're settling regulated assets and can't afford probabilistic confirmation.
Here's what surprised me. On top of that sits DuskEVM which is built as an OP Stack rollup so Solidity developers get normal EVM tooling. Privacy there comes through something called Hedger which mixes homomorphic encryption with zero knowledge proofs instead of leaning on ZK alone.
Then there's DuskVM the native Rust and WASM environment where contracts are privacy aware from the start instead of having privacy added later.
That's when it clicked for me. Same settlement guarantees underneath the whole time but each layer gets privacy in a way that actually fits how developers build there instead of forcing one method everywhere.
#dusk $DUSK @Dusk
Which layer would you actually build on ?
For now let me explain what i learn, I kept seeing "privacy" thrown around by different chains and honestly got skeptical because usually it just means one shielded pool bolted onto an otherwise public chain. So I went digging into how Dusk actually structures this across its stack and it wasn't what I expected.
Basically Dusk splits the job into three layers instead of cramming everything into one. DuskDS sits at the bottom and handles settlement consensus and data availability. It runs a proof of stake system called Succinct Attestation that gives deterministic finality which matters if you're settling regulated assets and can't afford probabilistic confirmation.
Here's what surprised me. On top of that sits DuskEVM which is built as an OP Stack rollup so Solidity developers get normal EVM tooling. Privacy there comes through something called Hedger which mixes homomorphic encryption with zero knowledge proofs instead of leaning on ZK alone.
Then there's DuskVM the native Rust and WASM environment where contracts are privacy aware from the start instead of having privacy added later.
That's when it clicked for me. Same settlement guarantees underneath the whole time but each layer gets privacy in a way that actually fits how developers build there instead of forcing one method everywhere.
#dusk $DUSK @Dusk
Which layer would you actually build on ?
DuskEVM for familiar tooling
67%
DuskVM for native privacy
0%
Still deciding
33%
3 الأصوات • تمّ إغلاق التصويت