نشر
Ansya
·
--
صاعد#seccancelscryptorulemakingmeeting
🚨 The SEC just hit pause on its most important crypto rulemaking effort — one day before it was set to happen.
On the evening of Thursday, August 13, the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission canceled a Friday meeting where its three commissioners were expected to vote on proposing "Regulation Crypto" — a tailored offering framework that would let certain token projects raise funds without completing full securities registration. The agency's stated reason: an "unforeseen scheduling issue." No new date has been announced.
Context matters here. The meeting had been called with unusual urgency just days earlier, and it would have marked the SEC's first-ever formal, agency-led crypto rulemaking — a step beyond the enforcement actions and guidance statements that have defined U.S. crypto policy so far. It also came right after the Senate left for recess without advancing the CLARITY Act, the broader market-structure bill much of the industry had been counting on for lasting clarity.
Some reporting points to concerns that SEC action could complicate ongoing CLARITY Act negotiations, alongside pushback from traditional finance groups on a related tokenization exemption. None of that has been confirmed by the agency itself.
Why it matters: rulemaking and legislation aren't interchangeable tools. An SEC rule can move faster than Congress, but a future commission can unwind it just as fast. A statute is harder to reverse but slower to pass. With this vote now shelved — and the CFTC holding its own crypto-focused session on August 20 — the path to U.S. regulatory clarity looks less like a single finish line and more like several moving pieces that all need to line up.
So — does meaningful crypto regulation come faster from Congress, or from agencies acting on their own? This week's the reminder that neither path is moving in a straight line. 🤔
$GPS $TUT $HEMI
🚨 The SEC just hit pause on its most important crypto rulemaking effort — one day before it was set to happen.
On the evening of Thursday, August 13, the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission canceled a Friday meeting where its three commissioners were expected to vote on proposing "Regulation Crypto" — a tailored offering framework that would let certain token projects raise funds without completing full securities registration. The agency's stated reason: an "unforeseen scheduling issue." No new date has been announced.
Context matters here. The meeting had been called with unusual urgency just days earlier, and it would have marked the SEC's first-ever formal, agency-led crypto rulemaking — a step beyond the enforcement actions and guidance statements that have defined U.S. crypto policy so far. It also came right after the Senate left for recess without advancing the CLARITY Act, the broader market-structure bill much of the industry had been counting on for lasting clarity.
Some reporting points to concerns that SEC action could complicate ongoing CLARITY Act negotiations, alongside pushback from traditional finance groups on a related tokenization exemption. None of that has been confirmed by the agency itself.
Why it matters: rulemaking and legislation aren't interchangeable tools. An SEC rule can move faster than Congress, but a future commission can unwind it just as fast. A statute is harder to reverse but slower to pass. With this vote now shelved — and the CFTC holding its own crypto-focused session on August 20 — the path to U.S. regulatory clarity looks less like a single finish line and more like several moving pieces that all need to line up.
So — does meaningful crypto regulation come faster from Congress, or from agencies acting on their own? This week's the reminder that neither path is moving in a straight line. 🤔
$GPS $TUT $HEMI
إخلاء مسؤولية: يتضمن آراء جهات خارجية. لا تُعدّ نصيحة. يُمكن استخدام Binance AI دون أي ضمان. اطلع على الشروط والأحكام.