I've learned to slow down whenever a project puts a specific percentage reduction on a networking claim. Fifty percent is precise enough to sound measured and vague enough to be unfalsifiable without seeing the benchmark methodology.

Kadcast is Dusk's P2P protocol, built on a structured Kademlia-based topology rather than the gossip flooding that most blockchain networks use. Gossip protocols are simple and resilient but wasteful. Every node receives every message multiple times. Kadcast routes messages more deliberately, reducing redundant transmissions.

The efficiency argument is real. Structured routing does use less bandwidth than unstructured gossip under normal conditions.

My question is what happens under adversarial conditions. Gossip's redundancy is also its resilience. A more efficient routing topology can be more efficiently disrupted.

The fifty percent claim needs a published benchmark before I treat it as a specification.

#dusk $DUSK @Dusk
What matters most for Kadcast’s 50% efficiency claim?

$COW
$GAIX