While digging into fee math on DUSK, I noticed the headline gas price tells me almost nothing unless I pair it with actual gas used.

That becomes clearer across 100 fee scenarios. A transaction can carry a generous gas limit, yet pay only for the work it really consumes. So the useful metric is not limit alone, but actual gas used × gas price, then the unused-gas ratio around it.

DUSK also gets interesting at the smallest unit. With 1 DUSK split into 1 billion LUX, fees can move at 9-decimal precision. That sounds minor, but granularity matters when thousands of low-cost transactions start stacking up.

What I would watch is Moonlight vs
Phoenix vs contract calls across 100,000 transactions. If one type consistently reserves far more gas than it uses, that is a quiet efficiency signal.

People may also overread fee revenue. A block earning more from fees does not automatically mean healthier usage if most rewards still come from emission.

For DUSK, the real comparison is protocol activity vs economic efficiency.

My doubt is simple: as DUSK usage grows, do fees become a meaningful security contribution, or just a thin layer sitting on top of emissions?

@Dusk #dusk $DUSK