I keep observing that people hear “Magic Labs built Newton” and instantly place it inside the embedded wallet box.
Hmm, I don’t think that’s the right read.
Embedded wallets solve access.

Newton is aiming at authorization.

That is a different layer.

A wallet can prove I signed.

But it does not always prove the action should be allowed.

That matters for normal users, DeFi apps, institutions, custody flows, and even AI agents...

The real issue is not just “can someone transact?” ...

It is “can the action be checked before money moves?”

To me, that is where @NewtonProtocol becomes interesting.

I’m not saying adoption is guaranteed.

Governance, neutrality, and transparent execution still have to prove themselves.

But I do think web3 is moving from Simple permission to programmable verification.

what u think about itt ??
What matters most for web3 scale?
#Newt
#BitcoinRetestsKeyResistanceAt$64400

#LABTokenDrops94%

#OracleFlags$20BAdditionalCapitalRaise

$TAC $BEAT
Better wallet UX
0%
Pre-settlement authorization
50%
Cheaper transactions
0%
Stronger governance
50%
2 الأصوات • تمّ إغلاق التصويت