According to BlockBeats, on March 9th, the Uniswap community user-initiated proposal 'Uniswap V3 Fees: Factory Owner Amendment' failed to pass with a 59.89% opposition rate, as shown on the Snapshot governance page. The proposal aimed to introduce an amendment allowing Uniswap V3 Factory owners to let DAO make future changes to the fee mechanism. The head of the community, Super Jun, stated that the aforementioned proposal was not important, and the significant proposal (dividend proposal temperature test) had already passed. There will be more on-chain proposals in the future.
BlockBeats contacted 'Lurenbil', who is deeply involved in Uniswap governance. He said that the proposal rejected today was preemptively put forward by Abdullahbumar, Head of Governance at the University of Michigan Blockchain. The more aggressive design exposed more long-term risks for Uniswap Foundation and A16Z and created too much uncertainty for large token holders. He expects that within a month, the Uniswap Foundation will propose a new dividend proposal.
