Here’s a 💥 Peter Schiff Doubles Down on Bearish BTC Treasury View
Legendary gold bug Peter Schiff just took a shot at Bitcoin and corporate BTC strategies, saying:
> Strategy is down about 3% on its Bitcoin investment. I’m sure the losses over the next five years will be much greater.”
Let’s unpack that.
📉 What Schiff Is Arguing
Schiff’s point isn’t just that Bitcoin lost some value — it’s a broader criticism of:
🔹 Holding Bitcoin as a **corporate treasury reserve**
🔹 Long-term viability of institutional BTC stacking
🔹 Bitcoin as a “safe asset” compared to traditional hedges like gold
To him, a 3% unrealized loss today is just a teaser — and bigger losses could come later if BTC remains volatile or macro pressures persist.
🧠 Why This Matters (or Doesn’t)
From Schiff’s POV:
* BTC behaves like a speculative risk asset
* Corporates that banked on BTC as a “store of value” may regret it if volatility keeps biting
* Bitcoin treasuries are a speculative gamble, not a risk-off strategy
But from the crypto crowd:
* Short-term unrealized losses are part of any long-term treasury strategy
* Bitcoin volatility is well-known — it’s baked into risk models
* Institutional accumulation often leans on time horizon, not price stability*l
So you have two worldviews:
🟨 Traditional macro skeptic
🟦 Crypto long-term believer
Both can read the same chart — and see different stories.
🧨 Crypto Community Mood
Schiff:
> “Loss now means bigger losses later.”
Hodler:
> “Unrealized losses don’t matter until you sell.”
Traders:
> “We care about levels, leverage, and liquidity — not ideology.”
🔥 Viral Angle
This is classic macro clash energy:
Gold bugs vs Bitcoin believers
Volatility skeptics vs Diamond hands
Throwback financial theory vs Digital native conviction
👉 When big names take public stances…
➡️ Traders move
➡️ Narrative shifts
➡️ BTC volatility reacts
#Bitcoin #BTC #PeterSchiff #Macro #DigitalGold $BTC