Everyone's flexing advanced proofs, but that's not the whole quantum story 🧵
You can have the cleanest proof system on the planet and still get cooked on the signature side. Transaction signatures are a totally separate attack surface.
Where $STRK stands:
• Programmable (native account abstraction) accounts can support alternative signature verification
• That means a path to swap in quantum-resistant schemes without breaking the chain
• BUT existing accounts do NOT magically become quantum-safe
Possible ≠ done. Users still have to migrate, wallets still have to ship support, and the old sig schemes don't just disappear.
So when someone says a chain is quantum-ready, ask which layer they mean: proofs or signatures. Most people mix them up.
Flexibility is a real edge for $STRK, but it's an upgrade path, not a shield. Don't confuse the two ⚠️
You can have the cleanest proof system on the planet and still get cooked on the signature side. Transaction signatures are a totally separate attack surface.
Where $STRK stands:
• Programmable (native account abstraction) accounts can support alternative signature verification
• That means a path to swap in quantum-resistant schemes without breaking the chain
• BUT existing accounts do NOT magically become quantum-safe
Possible ≠ done. Users still have to migrate, wallets still have to ship support, and the old sig schemes don't just disappear.
So when someone says a chain is quantum-ready, ask which layer they mean: proofs or signatures. Most people mix them up.
Flexibility is a real edge for $STRK, but it's an upgrade path, not a shield. Don't confuse the two ⚠️