𝗚𝗢𝗩𝗘𝗥𝗡𝗔𝗡𝗖𝗘 𝗣𝗥𝗢𝗣𝗢𝗦𝗔𝗟𝗦 𝗕𝗘𝗖𝗢𝗠𝗘 𝗠𝗢𝗥𝗘 𝗠𝗘𝗔𝗡𝗜𝗡𝗚𝗙𝗨𝗟 𝗪𝗛𝗘𝗡 𝗧𝗛𝗘𝗜𝗥 𝗢𝗨𝗧𝗖𝗢𝗠𝗘𝗦 𝗔𝗥𝗘 𝗥𝗘𝗩𝗜𝗘𝗪𝗘𝗗
A governance decision should not be judged solely by whether it receives approval. The intended change and the results that follow are also important.
Participants can ask whether implementation matched the proposal, whether the original objective was achieved, and whether unexpected effects require further attention.
JST governance and JustLend Improvement Proposals provide a context for studying this connection between community decisions and protocol outcomes.
Post-decision review helps transform governance from a sequence of isolated votes into a process of learning and accountability. It also creates a clearer basis for future proposals by identifying which approaches worked as intended and which assumptions need reconsideration.
@Justin Sun孙宇晨 @DeFi_JUST #TRONEcoStar
A governance decision should not be judged solely by whether it receives approval. The intended change and the results that follow are also important.
Participants can ask whether implementation matched the proposal, whether the original objective was achieved, and whether unexpected effects require further attention.
JST governance and JustLend Improvement Proposals provide a context for studying this connection between community decisions and protocol outcomes.
Post-decision review helps transform governance from a sequence of isolated votes into a process of learning and accountability. It also creates a clearer basis for future proposals by identifying which approaches worked as intended and which assumptions need reconsideration.
@Justin Sun孙宇晨 @DeFi_JUST #TRONEcoStar