#dusk $DUSK @Dusk
The RWA number I would NOT use blindly

Dusk reports more than €300M in confirmed issuance/institutional activity. �

Dusk
That sounds impressive.
But I wouldn’t automatically convert €300M of issuance into a €300M valuation argument for DUSK.
Those are different things.

The real question is whether those assets generate recurring activity:
issue → trade → transfer → settle → pay fees
That’s where RWA activity could start becoming economically relevant to the base token.

So I’m less interested in the headline number by itself and more interested in what happens after issuance.

#dusk @Dusk
$HEMI
$TUT

What matters more for RWA chains?