HiSeven

In this round, the price trend of $DUSK , I started to pay attention to a point that is easily overlooked: response speed.

Every time it dips, the speed at which the price is caught is not slow; but when it goes up, it is not eager to continue. This indicates one thing - the market is managing risk, rather than chasing heights. Funds are more concerned about 'not falling through', rather than 'how high can it pull up immediately'.

For me personally, the trading idea under this structure will be more conservative:
Only when the rebound after a pullback starts to slow down, will I consider trying to go long;
If the upward movement does not continue, I will exit quickly, not giving emotions time.

Currently, $DUSK is more like refining a safe range.
The direction will come sooner or later, but it will not reward those who are impatient.

The above content is only personal analysis and does not constitute any investment advice.
@Dusk #Dusk $DUSK

In recent days, I've been watching $DUSK , and instead, I've been looking at 'false signals'.

The price repeatedly creates the illusion of breakthroughs within the range: it seems like it's going to strengthen, only to be pushed back immediately; it appears like it's going to weaken, but is quickly caught. Many people will be frequently triggered by this kind of trend, but this is precisely the stage where it's easiest to lose money.

For me, the core of this market condition is not to find direction, but to identify which signals should not be trusted. As long as the breakthrough is not accompanied by volume, I basically won’t chase; as soon as the decline starts to accelerate, I won’t rush to buy either. The real opportunity to open a position often appears after the false moves have ended.

Currently, $DUSK is more like using the trend to remind you:
Not every move is worth taking action on.

The above content is just personal analysis and does not constitute any investment advice.
@Dusk #Dusk $DUSK

In this round of $DUSK 's market, I changed my perspective: looking at 'who is being washed'.

The price fluctuates within a range, which is not directionless but is gradually squeezing out impatient traders using time. When it can't be pushed up, it doesn't rush to drop; when it drops, it is quickly bought back. This kind of movement itself is filtering people.

For me personally, the logic of opening an order is actually very clear:
Do not act in the middle of the range, that's the easiest position to be washed;
Either wait for a pullback to the lower edge, with obvious convergence in fluctuations, before trying to go long;
Or wait for a volume increase to break out of the range, then follow the trend for a while.

Currently, $DUSK is not lacking in volatility, but in patience.
Whether you can make a profit often depends on whether you are willing to wait for that moment to finish being 'washed'.

The above content is just personal analysis and does not constitute any investment advice.
@Dusk #Dusk $DUSK

The trend of this segment $DUSK , I began to see it as a 'patience test'.

The price is not in a hurry to rise, nor in a hurry to drop, but is repeatedly grinding within a range. For me personally, in such a market, it's not about making judgments, but about discipline. My thinking is very simple: as long as the key support is not broken, there’s no rush to be bearish; as long as there’s no significant volume breaking out of the range, there’s no chase for longs. The real opportunities to open positions often appear when everyone is the most impatient after being ground down.

What needs to be done now is to act less and wait more.

The above content is only personal analysis and does not constitute any investment advice.
@Dusk #Dusk $DUSK

The issue with stablecoins has never been about "whether they can be used" but rather "whether one dares to use them long-term." When funds start to circulate repeatedly, any instance of instability will be remembered.

The value of Plasma lies in addressing these latent issues in advance, allowing stablecoin transfers to no longer rely on on-chain sentiment and congestion, but to operate in a more controllable environment. This choice does not seek presence but directly affects confidence in use.

Whether $XPL is established depends on whether stablecoins truly enter a long-term operating phase. Once usage frequency becomes the norm, the importance of infrastructure will naturally increase.

The above content is solely personal analysis and does not constitute any investment advice.
@Plasma #plasma $XPL

From the price trend of the currency in the last 24 hours, WAL is still in a "compressed" state. The price fluctuates around $0.13, with not much volatility, but each pullback has not turned into a continuous decline, which is a signal in itself.

This indicates that at the current stage, the market has not formed a clear bearish consensus. Sell orders are more exploratory rather than decisive; buy orders, although not aggressive, have always been present at key positions. In terms of trends, this is a typical case of direction not being chosen, rather than a trend deteriorating.

Many people are only willing to think about trends when the market is moving, but truly valuable judgments often occur during these "almost motionless" times.

The above content is just personal analysis and does not constitute any investment advice.
@Walrus 🦭/acc #Walrus $WAL

If we consider the 24-hour trend of WAL as a trend line, it looks more like it's 'crawling along the ground.' The price repeatedly confirms around $0.125–$0.135, without a loss of control downward or an effective breakout, indicating that the market is not in a hurry to provide directional judgment.

This state can be very torturous for short-term traders, but from a trend logic perspective, it is rather neutral and stable. A real downward trend requires significant volume to break down, while a true upward trend needs a resonance of volume and price; currently, neither has appeared. WAL is not moving with the market but with time.

Many trends do not begin with passion but are slowly nurtured from such seemingly bland ranges.

The above content is merely personal analysis and does not constitute any investment advice.
@Walrus 🦭/acc #Walrus $WAL

From a trend perspective, WAL's most significant signal in the last 24 hours is not the rise or fall, but rather 'stability'. The price has consistently fluctuated around $0.13, with support below and a lack of volume for rebounds above, typical of a trend that has not yet started.
Such movements often occur when the market has not yet formed a consensus expectation. The reasons for bearish sentiment are not strong enough, and bullish catalysts have not appeared, so the price can only digest the discrepancies through sideways movement. For the trend, this is not the end, but rather a waiting period.
The true direction will not be revealed within this range, but will emerge at the moment the range is broken. Until then, all conclusions can only be observational.
The above content is for personal analysis only and does not constitute any investment advice.
@Walrus 🦭/acc #Walrus $WAL

In the past few days watching $DUSK , I changed my perspective: instead of focusing on price fluctuations, I looked at the 'quality of retracement'.

While both are retracements, some coins are a misstep, while others gradually test lower. $DUSK is closer to the latter, with a slow decline and controlled trading, which usually indicates that selling pressure is being dispersed rather than concentrated. The price is testing lower, but the market is not in a hurry.

For me personally, this structure is not suitable for emotional trading; it is more appropriate to wait for signals of 'the end of retracement'. If the price oscillates at a low level but cannot seem to drop further, I would consider trying to buy with a small position; conversely, as long as the retracement begins to accelerate, I would prefer to stay out and watch.

Currently, $DUSK seems more like a phase of testing traders' patience.
Whether or not one can make money often depends on whether you wait for the price to stop on its own.

The above content is only personal analysis and does not constitute any investment advice.
@Dusk #Dusk $DUSK

In the past 24 hours, the trend of $VANRY has a noticeable characteristic: the price has been oscillating in a low range, but the fluctuation range is not large. The current price is approximately **$0.0083**; the highest throughout the day is around **$0.0088**, and the lowest is about **$0.00825**. Overall, it shows a slight downward trend, with a decline of about **5%** in the last 24 hours, and the trading volume remains at a medium level. This market situation indicates a lack of short-term directional strength, and the market's pricing is still in a wait-and-see mode rather than being dominated by strong emotions.

@Vanarchain #Vanar $VANRY

From a trend perspective, WAL's core feature in the last 24 hours is clear: **no acceleration, nor a crash**. The price has been fluctuating within the range of $0.125–$0.135, repeatedly testing the lower range without breaking it, while the upper rebounds lack volume, typical of a trend vacuum period.

Such market conditions are often misjudged as weak, but a real trend decline is usually accompanied by increased volume and continuous breakdowns, which has not been the case for WAL. On the contrary, it seems to be digesting the expectation gap with time, allowing bulls and bears to rebalance.

For trends, the key is not the current fluctuations, but whether the range is broken. Until then, WAL is not following an emotional line but rather a patience line.

The above content is only personal analysis and does not constitute any investment advice.
@Walrus 🦭/acc #Walrus $WAL