Trading NY/London liquidity with strict risk management.
Educational content – not financial advice.
More intraday thoughts on X: https://x.com/Crypt_O_Clock1
Do you want me to share these trades live? 1000 subs is enough for me to do live trading here on binance square, every week day before NY session starts.
Help me help other traders be profitable once again!
📍 BTC Perp – Session Update London session swept Asia lows, right into an area with rising OI → fresh positions added into liquidity. Volume is holding and funding remains neutral, so no clear long overcrowding yet. 🎯 As long as price reclaims and holds intraday levels, I see a likely push toward ~88.8k (next liquidity magnet). 🧠 NFA. Playing it level by level – reaction to reclaim/hold is key.
Do you want to be a profitable trader? It’s actually simple. You just need to truly understand 6 core elements: • Open Interest (OI) • Funding Rate • Liquidity • Price Action • Volume • Trading Sessions (London / NY) When you trade based on these six factors together, you stop guessing and start reading what the market is really doing. If you understand them and apply proper risk management, it becomes very hard to lose in the long run. If you want to learn what they really mean and how to use them in real trading — follow me. Educational content only. Not financial advice.
BTC – Short thesis 📍 Entry: 90,035 📍 London High: 90,450 Why short: • Rejection at London highs • Weak spot participation • OI elevated → late longs • Liquidity resting above → sweep & fade • No strong acceptance above highs Bias: Short continuation unless highs are reclaimed Invalidation: Acceptance above London high (15m close) NFA / trade your plan
I’m currently in a short on BTC. Why / what I’m watching (key factors): Key levels: 87k was a major level; now the big confirmation zone is ~90.8k–91k. Structure: we’re still in LTF compression / triangle, so I’m treating moves as potentially fakeouts until confirmed. Order flow & spot vs perps: I’m tracking whether the push is perp-led vs spot-led (I want real spot support, not just leverage). Open Interest / positioning: watching OI and whether shorts are actually closing (or getting trapped). Volume/TPO quality: looking for clean auction behavior (no “weak/poor” lows, clean acceptance/rejection). Liquidity / liquidation areas: mapping where liquidity sits and how price reacts around those zones. Trend signals (EMA cross): I note it, but treat it as lagging—price/flow comes first. Invalidation for my short: a clean reclaim + acceptance above ~90.8k–91k. Until then, I’m sticking with the short and staying nimble.
BTC Trade Update – NY Session Execution Entered a long after the New York session open. Classic NY behavior: First a sharp sweep to the downside, then a fast impulse move up. Sell-side liquidity was taken around the NY low near 87,500 (wick). 🛑 Stop-loss placement: My SL is intentionally placed below the NY sweep low at 87,500 - its tight. If price trades back below that level, the idea is invalidated — no emotions, just rules. 📊 Context: • NY sell-side liquidity swept • Strong reaction to the upside • Lower timeframes show acceptance above the sweep • Risk is clearly defined Now it’s about whether price can hold above the NY low and build continuation. Process > prediction. Not financial advice. Always manage risk.
BTC Trade Update – NY Session Play Entered a long after the New York session open. We saw a classic NY move: First a sharp sweep to the downside, followed by a strong impulse up. That downside move swept liquidity from the NY session low around 87,400 (wick). 🛑 Stop-loss placement: My SL is intentionally set below the NY sweep low, at 86,800. If price comes back below that level, the idea is invalidated — simple and clean. 📊 Context: Liquidity was taken on the downsideReaction was aggressive to the upsideStructure on lower timeframes suggests acceptance above the sweep Now it’s about whether price can hold above the NY low and build continuation. Risk is defined. Let’s see how the session develops. Not financial advice. Always manage risk.