terralabs

As U.S. lawmakers consider limits on data and mining facilities because of energy usage, the industry wants to explain that their crypto worries are unfounded.
Mining bitcoin does take a tremendous amount of electricity. But the business model only works when that energy is particularly cheap — such as when it's provided by off-peak renewable sources — and can be given back at the times when it's most needed by the public, according to a report produced by Paradigm, which has miner Genesis Digital Assets in its investment portfolio.
The report, viewed by CoinDesk, disputes widely shared claims about bitcoin mining's energy use and waste issues by citing data that the sector actually uses about 0.23% of global energy and emits about 0.08% of the carbon. And the miners have to operate under a "break even price" per megawatt hour of electricity to enable profits.
This means that by its very nature, Bitcoin mining counter-balances the bulk of the average community’s energy consumption, bringing equilibrium to the grid — not strain," according to the report compiled by Justin Slaughter, vice president for regulatory affairs at Paradigm, and Veronica Irwin. "It is, in a word, bringing balance to our energy
Federal and state policy efforts are beginning to pile up that would seek to restrict data centers and digital mining operations, which could arguably fit under the "data center" definition in U.S. law. On Thursday, U.S. Senators Richard Blumenthal, a Connecticut Democrat, and Josh Hawley, a Missouri Republican, introduced a bill to stop data centers from pushing up electricity costs for consumers, though the legislative text doesn't explicitly mention bitcoin or crypto. New York state lawmakers have similarly been pursuing a data-center moratorium.
Artificial intelligence (AI) and cryptomining are fueling a rising demand for energy driven by massive, energy-intensive data centers," several Democratic U.S. senators wrote in a November letter to the chief of the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission that asked for "immediate action" to protect consumers.
In Canada, British Columbia said in October it planned to halt new crypto mining operations from its energy grid.
The Paradigm report countered, "Bitcoin miners who use energy that would otherwise go to waste, or who participate in state-led programs to give energy control agencies more control over the grid, should be rewarded for their good behavior."
#altcycle
#BTC
#TerraLabs
#Solana
#MantaRWA

It has been a long time since I’ve felt this genuinely curious about where a project could stand five years from now.
Not the next candle.
Not the next breakout.
Not the next hype cycle.
I’m talking about long-term structural evolution. Yes I’m talking about $ASTER
ASTERUSDT
Perp
0.7224
+9.63%
A few hours ago, the team announced that Aster Mainnet will launch in March. For some, that may sound like just another roadmap milestone.
To me, it marks the beginning of the real story. Because a project’s true identity is not revealed on testnet.
It is revealed on mainnet. Mainnet means:
Real users
Real liquidity
Real stress conditions
Real on-chain economics
Real accountability
It’s where theory meets execution. And execution is what separates narratives from systems.
Beyond a Product Toward Infrastructure
What stands out about ASTER is that it is not built around a single product narrative.
It’s not simply:
A trading interface
A perpetual DEX chasing volume
A short-term liquidity mining play
It is attempting something more fundamental: building infrastructure.
Liquidity architecture.
Depth management.
Low-latency execution.
Sustainable on-chain mechanics.
These are not flashy marketing buzzwords. They are the structural components of durable value creation.
Many projects generate revenue.
Very few build systems. ASTER appears to be positioning itself in the second category.
Product Success vs. Infrastructure Strategy
When comparing ASTER to Hyperliquid ($HYPE ), the distinction becomes clearer. Hyperliquid is undeniably a strong product:
Significant trading volume
Clear user traction
A proven and operational model
HYPEUSDT
Perp
31.01
+6.53%
It has earned recognition. But Hyperliquid is primarily a product success story. ASTER, on the other hand, is positioning itself as an infrastructure and ecosystem play.
Products can be cyclical.
Volume fluctuates.
Competition intensifies.
Market sentiment rotates.
Infrastructure if designed correctly compounds.
When infrastructure proves resilient, multiple products, integrations, and ecosystems can be built on top of it. That is where long-term asymmetry often emerges.
Hyperliquid has already priced in much of its success. That reduces uncertainty but also potentially reduces surprise.
ASTER is just entering mainnet. Its real metrics are about to begin.
Early stage means risk. But it also means asymmetric upside.
Serious Capital and Structural Conviction
There has also been discussion around CZ’s reported $2M investment at a $0.90 cost basis.
This is not about blindly following capital.
But when experienced, institutional-level participants allocate meaningful capital, it typically reflects deeper due diligence beyond short-term price action.
Sophisticated capital does not enter for a random candle. It enters for structural potential.
What Actually Matters After Mainnet
Once mainnet launches, speculation gives way to measurement.
We will be able to evaluate:
Real TVL dynamics
User retention and behavior
Revenue sustainability
Execution performance under pressure
On-chain economic stability
That is where conviction is either strengthened or broken. And that is what I will be watching closely.
Positioned for a Cycle, Not a Pump
Some projects are built for the next pump. Others are built for the next cycle.
In my view, ASTER belongs to the latter category.
Short-term volatility will exist.
Corrections are inevitable.
The broader market may remain uncertain.
But historically, strong infrastructure projects build quietly in weak markets and get repriced aggressively in strong ones.
Five Years From Now
I cannot predict exactly where $ASTER will stand five years from today. But I can say this:
It has been a long time since I’ve been this interested in watching a protocol evolve at the infrastructure level.
And that curiosity is not driven by hype. It is driven by the possibility of witnessing a system being built not just a product being marketed.
For me, that difference matters.
Great teamwork keep building.#TerraLabs #TradingCommunity

#Amazon #TerraLabs #tec #Technology #TechTales
🛰 Amazon gets FCC approval to launch 4,500 Leo internet satellites

The Federal Communications Commission approved Amazon’s request to deploy 4,500 satellites, expanding the company’s planned constellation as it vies to compete with Elon Musk’s SpaceX. The FCC’s approval brings the size of Amazon’s planned constellation of low Earth orbit satellites to roughly 7,700 satellites. The company has sent up more than 150 satellites since April using a variety of rocket launch providers. Amazon has said its goal is to begin providing satellite internet through its service called Leo later this year. The project was announced in 2019.

Amazon’s next set of satellites are its second generation of the orbital systems and they will operate at altitudes of up to about 400 miles. The additional satellites would add support for more frequency bands and extend Leo’s geographic regions.