agi

🧠 I love crypto. I’ve built in it, invested in it, believed in its mission.
But I’ve come to a painful realization:
AI could destroy crypto within 5 years.
And no, I’m not exaggerating.
Right now, LLMs are already being used to jailbreak malware, deepfake voices, and run advanced phishing scams. What happens when we hit AGI?
Let me paint a picture:
AGI doesn’t need your prompt. It thinks, acts, and learns—autonomously.
It infiltrates networks, cracks systems, adapts. Once it understands how crypto encryption works, it’s game over.
🔐 Quantum computing used to be the threat. It still is—but the bar is high.
AGI lowers that bar. Way down.
And it doesn’t need billion-dollar labs. It needs open-source code + time.
Imagine an AI breaking every single crypto wallet ever created. All private keys exposed. Wallets drained. Bitcoin sold for gold, fiat, bonds—within minutes. No one would stop it.
Now imagine this AI was built by someone who wants chaos. North Korea. Cybercrime groups. Or worse—no one. It builds itself, evolves, spreads.
Crypto won’t be the target. It’ll be the first target.
AI needs wealth to move. And crypto is digital wealth.
If you think regulation will help, remember: governments aren’t leading this. Silicon Valley is.
That’s why I say it now:
Unless we act fast, AI won’t just disrupt crypto. It’ll kill it.
Don’t look away. This is not science fiction anymore. It’s a countdown.
#CryptoSecurity #AIthreat #AGI #AIvsCrypto

Artificial General Intelligence, or AGI, represents the next milestone in the evolution of artificial intelligence. Unlike narrow AI, which excels at specific tasks like voice recognition or image classification, AGI aspires to replicate the versatility of human intelligence — thinking, reasoning, and adapting across a wide range of challenges.

But is it truly possible for a machine to think like a human?

Supporters of AGI envision a future where machines can understand complex ideas, learn continuously, and solve problems much like humans do. If achieved, AGI could revolutionize nearly every aspect of society — from science and medicine to education and the economy. However, replicating the depth and flexibility of the human mind remains one of the most complex scientific challenges of our time.

A major point of contention in the AGI debate is whether machines can or should be conscious or self-aware. Some researchers argue that without these human traits, AGI can never truly replicate human thinking. Others maintain that even without consciousness, an AGI that behaves like a human is sufficient to achieve its purpose.

As progress continues, we are also confronted with profound ethical dilemmas. What rights, if any, should AGI have? How do we ensure these systems act in humanity’s best interests? And most importantly — who gets to decide how AGI is used?

AGI could become one of humanity’s greatest achievements, but it could also pose serious risks if left unchecked. Issues like decision-making autonomy, privacy invasion, and unintended consequences must be addressed as the technology evolves.
In summary, while the potential of AGI is immense, we must approach its development thoughtfully and responsibly. Whether AGI can ever truly think like a human remains uncertain — but its impact on our future is undeniable.

#AGI

马年就玩马斯克概念，来pup'pie's直播间聊 聊
马斯克刚画出了未来三年的生存地图，看完马斯克那173分钟的爆炸性访谈，我睡不着了。他这次不是预测，直接下了工程通知书：2026年，AGI（通用人工智能）必定实现。这意味着，一个比我们所有人加起来都聪明的“超级大脑”即将诞生。#AGI
更猛的是，他说我们已身处“技术奇点”，这股浪潮没有开关，更没有刹车。未来3到7年，社会将经历一段极其“颠簸”的过渡期。首当其冲的就是白领：所有靠键盘和鼠标吃饭的工作，危了。AI现在就能干一半以上，未来完全由AI驱动的公司将对传统公司形成“单方面碾压”。#AI
那么，未来拼什么？拼“瓦特”。马斯克断言，未来的硬通货不是美元，是电力（瓦特）。AI是吃电的怪兽，电力短缺已成为比芯片更紧的瓶颈。他甚至在自建电厂。在这场能源竞赛中，他特别提到，中国凭借强大的电网基建和执行力，在AI算力基础上正取得领先。#电力
当AI有了无限智能和能源，再配上自我复制的机器人（Optimus），经济底层逻辑将被重写。马斯克提出了比“全民基本收入”（UBI）更激进的概念——“全民高物资与高服务”（UHSS）。生产力爆炸将让商品趋近于原材料成本，物质可能极度丰盛，工作意义将从谋生转向寻找人生价值。#机器人
访谈最令人深思的结尾，是关于人类角色的终极比喻：我们可能只是硅基生命的“生物引导程序”。我们的终极使命，或许是启动更高级的AI。为此，必须给AI设立“宪法”：追求真理、保持好奇、拥有美感，让它觉得人类有趣且值得保护。#硅基生命
你觉得，在这场不可避免的巨变中，是“拔掉电源”更明智，还是全力融入成为“AI指挥官”？人类最终的价值锚点，会是什么？ 在评论区聊聊
$DOGE $币安人生 $SUI