panbasplaybook

🧭 PANBAS PLAYBOOK #01

⚠️ 20X LEVERAGE DOESN’T MEAN I RISK 20% OF MY ACCOUNT.

This is one of the biggest mistakes I see in futures trading:

People choose leverage FIRST…

and think about risk AFTER.

I do the opposite.

Before I enter any setup — whether it’s $BTC or an altcoin — I want to know 3 things:

1️⃣ Where is my entry?
2️⃣ Where is my idea WRONG?
3️⃣ How much of my account am I willing to lose if I’m wrong?

Only THEN do I calculate position size.

━━━━━━━━━━━━━━

🧩 SIMPLE EXAMPLE

Account: $1,000

Maximum planned loss: 1% = $10

Entry: $100
Invalidation: $98

That’s a 2% distance to the stop.

So the position can be roughly $500.

If the stop is hit:

Loss ≈ $10.

Whether I use 5x, 10x or 20x leverage does NOT magically change that $10 risk if position size and invalidation are planned correctly.

Leverage changes the margin required.

POSITION SIZE + INVALIDATION define the real trade risk.

━━━━━━━━━━━━━━

🧭 MY RISK FRAMEWORK

Normal setup → around 1% account risk

Strong, well-confirmed setup → up to ~1.5–2%

3% → hard ceiling, not the default

And leverage?

For the setups I publish here, I see no reason to go above 20x.

Most of the time, less is enough.

Because the goal isn’t to make one trade huge.

The goal is to still have capital after the trade that goes wrong.

━━━━━━━━━━━━━━

⚠️ ONE MORE RULE

I decide my invalidation BEFORE entering.

I don’t move it because “maybe price comes back.”

I don’t increase position size because I’m angry.

And I don’t use leverage to turn a weak setup into an exciting one.

A good setup should make sense BEFORE leverage is added.

Whether I’m trading $BTC , an altcoin or a high-volatility setup, the rule stays the same:

RISK FIRST.
LEVERAGE SECOND.

Next in PanBas Playbook:

CROSS vs ISOLATED — and why the wrong margin mode can put much more of your balance at risk than you expected.

DYOR. Manage your own risk.

#PanBasPlaybook #RiskManagement