CZ just dropped a spicy take: banks might be softer targets than crypto exchanges.

His logic? "For attack, you only need to find one crack. To defend yourself, you need to find all the cracks and then fix them."

Here's why TradFi is cooked:

AI is arming script kiddies with nation-state-level tools. Automated recon, scaled phishing, deepfake social engineering. Attackers are leveling up faster than compliance teams can spell "cybersecurity."

Banks are running on duct-taped legacy systems from the 90s. The OCC is literally warning that outdated tech and delayed patches are creating massive attack surfaces. Good luck patching COBOL.

Third-party vendors are the weakest link. Your bank's security is only as strong as some random payment processor's intern who clicked a phishing link. Fed study confirms: external providers = gaping holes.

Stolen creds are still the meta. IBM says 30% of breaches involve identity abuse. Infostealers, phishing, compromised employees. The human layer is still the easiest exploit.

Crypto transactions are final. Banks have fraud detection, chargebacks, compliance layers. Blockchain? Once it's confirmed, it's gone. One compromised withdrawal hot wallet = instant 9-figure loss.

IMF and Bank of England are already sounding alarms. AI will help attackers move faster than defenders can patch. The asymmetry is brutal.

This isn't FUD. It's math. The next major financial hack isn't a question of if, but when.

And when it hits, the institution with the oldest code and the most vendor dependencies will be the first domino.

Stay liquid. Stay paranoid. 🔐