$WDAY (Workday) - Don't buy $TSM (Taiwan) - Don't buy $PLTR (Palantir) - Strong buy at $198 $AAPL (apple) - Buy at $338 $SHOP (Shopify) - Buy at $166 $WMT (Walmart) - Strong buy at $110 $SPCX (SpaceX) - Strong buy at $170 $NVDA (Nvidia) - Strong buy at $238 $DDOG (Datadog) - Strong buy at $277
I often get asked why I don’t turn this into paid content, but for me, sharing stock information is just a hobby. I’m not financially struggling, so I choose to share it for free.
2020: BTC is done for 2021: BTC is done for 2022: BTC is done for 2023: BTC is done for 2024: BTC is done for 2025: BTC is done for 2026: BTC is done for
2030: "Why didn't I buy at $58,000?" You can buy Bitcoin now
📢Binance will airdrop 100% on‑chain $SPCX rewards to $MARSCOIN holders 🔸On top of that, 30% of Binance’s own trading fees will go as extra rewards to Marscoin holders! This is huge🎁 🔸Expect a strongly bullish Q4 for #Marscoin🚀📈 🔸Don’t stay on the sidelines. Buy some now❗️#lovebinence #BitcoinDunyamiz
10.9 ErBing around 2500, watching cautiously, defend at 2540, target 2420/2380.
For those looking to go long, wait for stabilization around 2410, defend at 2350, target 2480/2520.
ErBing 1H has dropped from 2779 all the way to 2405. The current price of 2482 is just a weak rebound. Moving averages are in a downtrend. 2500-2520 is the overhead resistance. If 2405 is broken again, the downside will continue to open up.
ETH ETF has seen outflows for 7 consecutive days, US Treasury yields are rising, coupled with blocked shipping in the Strait of Hormuz and high oil prices, risk sentiment hasn't recovered yet. We still need to guard against acceleration today.
9 years of trading, don't chase sharp drops, rebounds are the opportunities to act.
Only by grasping the rhythm can you qualify to eat the meat later. $ETHUSDT $BTCUSDT #FOMCMinutes:Hawkish
Take a step back and look at $SAND on the weekly chart. I have $0.05 in mind as a potential entry area if price pulls back. Looking at the bigger picture, I think $SAND could eventually make its way toward $0.22. It's a long way from here, but that's how I'm reading this chart. I've already shared my full $SAND outlook in the group, including the levels and scenarios I'm watching. #FedMinutesFocusOnOctoberPause
$81K $BTC. I talked about this before it happened. Not everyone believed that scenario. Now look at the charts. $BTC is around $81K, and $ETH, $SOL, $NEAR, $SAND and $ZEC are falling alongside it. I've shared my views on these moves before. This is why I always pay attention to $BTC first. When Bitcoin loses strength, the rest of the market often feels it even harder. It's not about being right every time. It's about reading the market before the move
I’ve learned something about opportunities in this market. The best ones rarely look obvious at first. Most people only start believing after the move has already happened. That’s why I share my market views before I know whether I’ll be right or wrong. Don’t follow me blindly. Watch the market, build your own view, and be ready when your opportunity comes.
Be honest. What do you really think about $ZEC right now? Every time I open X, I still see people holding and going long on $ZEC. But I'm looking at it differently. I'm short on $ZEC, and $732 is a level I can't get out of my head. I know that's a long way down from here, but it's a scenario I'm seriously watching. Am I seeing something others aren't, or am I wrong about $ZEC ?
CRV's most interesting shift isn't a price breakout. It's that Curve is slowly changing the economics of its stablecoin and lending business while new token supply keeps declining.
In August, borrower-minted crvUSD grew 97% to $72.2 million, backed by $146.4 million in collateral. But there's an important detail: one wstETH position accounted for more than half of that growth. That makes the expansion meaningful, but not yet proof of broad-based borrowing demand.
At the same time, Curve's scheduled annual CRV emissions fell from 115.5 million to roughly 97.2 million in August-the first time annual issuance dropped below 100 million. That is around 18.4 million fewer new CRV entering supply over the coming year.
This creates a more interesting setup than simply calling CRV "undervalued."
Curve is reducing its emission burden while trying to expand crvUSD and LlamaLend, including lending markets that accept productive yield-bearing collateral. The DAO also selected yRisk as a risk provider, with its funding vote executed on September 2.
But lower emissions alone don't guarantee a stronger token. The real test is whether borrowing and trading activity produce durable protocol revenue-and whether that revenue translates into meaningful value for CRV holders.
What I'd watch next: crvUSD growth beyond concentrated positions, lending-market risk, recurring fees, and whether declining emissions are matched by stronger organic demand. CRV's thesis is becoming less about how many tokens Curve emits and more about whether its stablecoin infrastructure can generate enough economic activity to justify holding the token.
LDO's biggest challenge is no longer token unlocks. It's proving that Lido's success can translate into lasting value for the token.
Lido DAO is fully unlocked, removing a major source of scheduled supply dilution. LDO trades around $0.44, still more than 93% below its all-time high of approximately $7.30.
But there's a more important development: Lido is beginning to build mechanisms aimed at improving LDO's market structure and value accrual.
The DAO approved a contingent market-making mandate capped at the lower of $1.5 million in LDO equivalent or 7.5 million LDO. The operational contracts were deployed on October 7. That may help protect exchange liquidity, but better liquidity is not the same as creating fundamental token demand.
Meanwhile, Lido's NEST buyback proposal points toward a more direct attempt to connect protocol economics with LDO. The crucial question is how much recurring revenue will actually be directed toward purchases-and whether those purchases can offset selling pressure over time.
There is also a near-term test: MetaMask Staking's precautionary exit of roughly 17,000 validators, representing about $1.4 billion in ETH, following an infrastructure compromise. The outflow does not automatically mean Lido itself was compromised, but it could affect staking deposits and confidence while users assess the situation.
My view: LDO's next chapter depends less on another staking-adoption headline and more on three measurable outcomes-retaining staked ETH, generating sustainable protocol revenue, and delivering credible value accrual to tokenholders.
The supply overhang has eased. Now the economics must do the work.