#dusk $DUSK @Dusk I was checking DUSK’s bridge math and one number bothered me more than the headline volume: how much supply is actually still sitting on ERC20 and BEP20 after mainnet migration?
That is the maturity test I care about.
If €10M moves out and €10M comes back, the bridge can report €20M of gross activity while net migration is zero. Movement is not migration. Volume is not completion.
I would rather track migration velocity each week, the percentage of legacy DUSK still outside mainnet, and the “dust ratio” left behind after users request migration. Those numbers would show whether the network is consolidating or just circulating.
The fixed bridge fee exposes another wrinkle. A 1 DUSK fee on 10 tokens is 10%. On 10,000 tokens it is 0.01%. Same infrastructure, completely different user economics.
And even after a mainnet bridge transfer is final, destination delivery can still depend on an external processing step. That matters more than it sounds.
The deeper question is similar for RWAs: €300M wrapped on-chain is not equivalent to €300M issued natively on-chain. One mirrors legacy infrastructure; the other replaces part of it.
I’m watching DUSK for migration completion, not bridge motion.
That is the maturity test I care about.
If €10M moves out and €10M comes back, the bridge can report €20M of gross activity while net migration is zero. Movement is not migration. Volume is not completion.
I would rather track migration velocity each week, the percentage of legacy DUSK still outside mainnet, and the “dust ratio” left behind after users request migration. Those numbers would show whether the network is consolidating or just circulating.
The fixed bridge fee exposes another wrinkle. A 1 DUSK fee on 10 tokens is 10%. On 10,000 tokens it is 0.01%. Same infrastructure, completely different user economics.
And even after a mainnet bridge transfer is final, destination delivery can still depend on an external processing step. That matters more than it sounds.
The deeper question is similar for RWAs: €300M wrapped on-chain is not equivalent to €300M issued natively on-chain. One mirrors legacy infrastructure; the other replaces part of it.
I’m watching DUSK for migration completion, not bridge motion.