the quiet reason most institutional chains fail is they ask developers to start over.
DuskEVM doesnt. Solidity or Vyper, Foundry, Hardhat, viem, ethers, standard EVM wallets, and DUSK pays the gas. a team thats shipped on ethereum can deploy without learning anything new
I used to read compatibility as a lazy choice. copy whats there, avoid the hard design work
now I think its the distribution strategy.
privacy tech has a long history of being technically excellent and completely unreachable. brilliant primitives, nobody building on them, becuse the entry cost was a year of learning a new language and a new mental model
for regulated assets that problem is worse, not better. the teams who understand securities workflows are not the teams who want to learn a novel VM. theyre integrators, custodians, venue engineers, and their tooling already speaks EVM
so DuskEVM being EVM equivalent isnt a technical achievement anyone should be impressed by on its own. its the thing that decides whether the privacy and compliance layers underneath ever get used by the people they were built for
DuskEVM settles through DuskDS, so the familiar tooling sits on top of the settlement guarantees rather than replacing them. Hedger provides the confidentiality on that layer
the honest counterpoint, the stronger privacy model lives on the other side, on DuskVM with Zedger. so the layer thats easiest to adopt is not the layer with the strongest guarantees, and most people will end up on the easier one
whats your take, does meeting developers where they are matter more than the strongest available privacy
@Dusk #dusk $DUSK
DuskEVM doesnt. Solidity or Vyper, Foundry, Hardhat, viem, ethers, standard EVM wallets, and DUSK pays the gas. a team thats shipped on ethereum can deploy without learning anything new
I used to read compatibility as a lazy choice. copy whats there, avoid the hard design work
now I think its the distribution strategy.
privacy tech has a long history of being technically excellent and completely unreachable. brilliant primitives, nobody building on them, becuse the entry cost was a year of learning a new language and a new mental model
for regulated assets that problem is worse, not better. the teams who understand securities workflows are not the teams who want to learn a novel VM. theyre integrators, custodians, venue engineers, and their tooling already speaks EVM
so DuskEVM being EVM equivalent isnt a technical achievement anyone should be impressed by on its own. its the thing that decides whether the privacy and compliance layers underneath ever get used by the people they were built for
DuskEVM settles through DuskDS, so the familiar tooling sits on top of the settlement guarantees rather than replacing them. Hedger provides the confidentiality on that layer
the honest counterpoint, the stronger privacy model lives on the other side, on DuskVM with Zedger. so the layer thats easiest to adopt is not the layer with the strongest guarantees, and most people will end up on the easier one
whats your take, does meeting developers where they are matter more than the strongest available privacy
@Dusk #dusk $DUSK