"150,000 TMX ISN'T THE ONLY REWARD YOU'RE MISSING"
I used to assume that writing a post on Binance Square for the CreatorPad campaign meant I was participating in exactly one competition, with exactly one leaderboard.
But when I re-read the Incentives section in TermMax's docs, I stopped at a seemingly harmless classification: XP measures depth of protocol usage, AP measures activity on Alpha, and MP is described as the level of influence you create beyond yourself which is precisely the reward for creating content. And all of this MP comes from a pre-mine pool of 40 million TMX, completely separate from the 150,000 TMX that this CreatorPad campaign is distributing to the Top 500.
At first, I thought simply: writing on Square automatically counts toward MP, since it's all content about TermMax. But reading more carefully, TermMax has its own separate leaderboard, distinct from Binance Square, which requires creators to bind their wallet along with their X account for accumulated points to be recorded.
I went back to check how these two systems operate, and realized they don't automatically sync with each other. A post that scores high on CreatorPad doesn't automatically get counted toward TermMax's MP if the writer has never registered on the other platform.
Looking back, the issue isn't about which competition offers more rewards. It's about the fact that both sides measure contributions in different ways, for different beneficiaries and the writer is the only one responsible for bridging them.
I still wonder: how many people are grinding for the Top 500 every single day, without ever knowing they still need to bind their wallet somewhere else.
@TermMax $BTC $BNB #TMX
#termmax @TermMax
I used to assume that writing a post on Binance Square for the CreatorPad campaign meant I was participating in exactly one competition, with exactly one leaderboard.
But when I re-read the Incentives section in TermMax's docs, I stopped at a seemingly harmless classification: XP measures depth of protocol usage, AP measures activity on Alpha, and MP is described as the level of influence you create beyond yourself which is precisely the reward for creating content. And all of this MP comes from a pre-mine pool of 40 million TMX, completely separate from the 150,000 TMX that this CreatorPad campaign is distributing to the Top 500.
At first, I thought simply: writing on Square automatically counts toward MP, since it's all content about TermMax. But reading more carefully, TermMax has its own separate leaderboard, distinct from Binance Square, which requires creators to bind their wallet along with their X account for accumulated points to be recorded.
I went back to check how these two systems operate, and realized they don't automatically sync with each other. A post that scores high on CreatorPad doesn't automatically get counted toward TermMax's MP if the writer has never registered on the other platform.
Looking back, the issue isn't about which competition offers more rewards. It's about the fact that both sides measure contributions in different ways, for different beneficiaries and the writer is the only one responsible for bridging them.
I still wonder: how many people are grinding for the Top 500 every single day, without ever knowing they still need to bind their wallet somewhere else.
@TermMax $BTC $BNB #TMX
#termmax @TermMax