​Parameter updates in protocol governance are generally assumed to execute under uniform timelock delays regardless of their risk profile.

​TermMax tokenizes positions into FT, XT, and GT. Order execution operates on range-order pricing curves, and FT is tradable before maturity.

​That shifted my perspective on parameter governance.

​The protocol uses an asymmetric timelock design where risk-reducing changes apply immediately without a timelock, while risk-increasing changes—such as decreasing timelock duration, increasing performance fee rates, or adding market whitelists—require a full timelock period (default: 1 day). Proposals undergo a structured Submit, Wait, and Accept process, during which the Guardian role holds explicit authority to review and potentially revoke pending changes.

​How Guardian oversight and the asymmetric timelock mechanism perform when curators need to adjust parameters during sudden market dislocations remains an execution variable.

​Eager to observe this execution live on-chain.

#termmax @TermMax