I used to think privacy and compliance were almost opposite ideas.
then I looked deeper into what @Dusk is trying to solve.
Imagine you want to invest in a regulated asset, but the platform only needs to confirm one thing: are you eligible to invest?
why should proving that require handing over your entire identity?
Your name, address, date of birth, and other personal details may be sitting in a document, even when only one specific attribute actually needs to be verified.
Dusk’s selective disclosure approach is interesting because it focuses on proving the required information without unnecessarily exposing everything behind it.
that does not mean avoiding KYC or regulation.
it means making verification more targeted.
For me, that’s where blockchain privacy becomes practical.
The real question isn’t:
“Can you prove who you are?”
It’s:
“Can you prove what needs to be verified without revealing everything else?”
@Dusk #dusk $DUSK
then I looked deeper into what @Dusk is trying to solve.
Imagine you want to invest in a regulated asset, but the platform only needs to confirm one thing: are you eligible to invest?
why should proving that require handing over your entire identity?
Your name, address, date of birth, and other personal details may be sitting in a document, even when only one specific attribute actually needs to be verified.
Dusk’s selective disclosure approach is interesting because it focuses on proving the required information without unnecessarily exposing everything behind it.
that does not mean avoiding KYC or regulation.
it means making verification more targeted.
For me, that’s where blockchain privacy becomes practical.
The real question isn’t:
“Can you prove who you are?”
It’s:
“Can you prove what needs to be verified without revealing everything else?”
@Dusk #dusk $DUSK
