At first I assumed DUSK’s story was mainly about solving the privacy problem.
The more I looked into it, the more I realized there are actually two different questions.
Can DUSK let institutions stay private while still proving compliance? The approach is interesting: rules like eligibility, ownership limits, and transfer restrictions can be verified without exposing all the underlying transaction data.
But solving that technical problem is only one side of it.
The bigger question is whether institutions will actually use it.
Because there’s a big difference between having infrastructure that can support regulated finance and having enough real activity to make that infrastructure economically meaningful for $DUSK.
That’s the part I’m watching now.
Privacy and compliance may be the product story.
Real institutional usage is what has to validate it.
@Dusk_Foundation #DUSK #dusk $DUSK
$WAL
$HEMI
The more I looked into it, the more I realized there are actually two different questions.
Can DUSK let institutions stay private while still proving compliance? The approach is interesting: rules like eligibility, ownership limits, and transfer restrictions can be verified without exposing all the underlying transaction data.
But solving that technical problem is only one side of it.
The bigger question is whether institutions will actually use it.
Because there’s a big difference between having infrastructure that can support regulated finance and having enough real activity to make that infrastructure economically meaningful for $DUSK.
That’s the part I’m watching now.
Privacy and compliance may be the product story.
Real institutional usage is what has to validate it.
@Dusk_Foundation #DUSK #dusk $DUSK
$WAL
$HEMI