Spent an afternoon reading through DUSK's confidential smart contract docs instead of checking the chart, and something clicked that the price feed never would have told me. Most privacy chains market privacy as the headline feature, something you opt into. DUSK, $DUSK , #dusk , @Dusk , builds it as the default execution path — Piecrust and the ZK-proof layer aren't a toggle sitting on top of a normal EVM-style chain, they're just how a transaction moves through the system. That's a different design decision than it sounds like. Most chains make privacy the advanced setting, the thing power users and institutions configure later, while the simple path stays transparent because transparency is easier to ship first. Here the ordering is reversed: compliance-ready confidentiality is the base case, and the exposed, everyday behavior is what gets added on when needed. It made me wonder who actually benefits from that ordering right now versus who it's being built for. Regulated finance moves slowly, and infrastructure built ahead of its users tends to sit quiet for a long time before anyone notices it was right.