NEW MARKET. SAME TOOLS !!!
Imagine building the next generation of financial markets…
Then being told to forget the tools you already know.
New language. New framework. New wallet. New everything.
That’s not innovation.
That’s friction.
Developers already have Solidity, Hardhat, Foundry, viem and ethers. So why rebuild the developer experience just because the financial infrastructure is changing?
That’s where @dusk caught my attention.
Dusk has 2 execution paths:
→ DuskEVM for Solidity/Vyper and familiar EVM tooling
→ DuskVM for Rust/WASM contracts on the Dusk L1
Both connect to DuskDS for settlement and data availability.
And this isn’t just a compatibility claim.
Dusk’s deployment docs list Mainnet Chain ID 744, with workflows for Hardhat and Foundry.
Then comes the interesting part.
Hedger combines homomorphic encryption + zero-knowledge proofs for confidential EVM workflows, with Dusk reporting under 2 seconds for client-side proof generation using lightweight circuits.
So the picture becomes pretty simple:
New financial rails.
Familiar developer tools.
Privacy when needed.
Settlement underneath.
That’s the part I like about the Dusk thesis.
The rails are new. The builders don’t have to be.
Would you rather build on new infrastructure with familiar tools, or start from zero?
It’s trying to make regulated finance feel native to onchain infrastructure — without making builders relearn everything from scratch.
If tokenized assets are going to become a real market, I believe the winners will be the networks that make the transition feel inevitable, not painful.
And Dusk is positioning itself right there.
New rails. Familiar builders. A different financial market.
#dusk @Dusk
$EDEN $COTI $DUSK
Imagine building the next generation of financial markets…
Then being told to forget the tools you already know.
New language. New framework. New wallet. New everything.
That’s not innovation.
That’s friction.
Developers already have Solidity, Hardhat, Foundry, viem and ethers. So why rebuild the developer experience just because the financial infrastructure is changing?
That’s where @dusk caught my attention.
Dusk has 2 execution paths:
→ DuskEVM for Solidity/Vyper and familiar EVM tooling
→ DuskVM for Rust/WASM contracts on the Dusk L1
Both connect to DuskDS for settlement and data availability.
And this isn’t just a compatibility claim.
Dusk’s deployment docs list Mainnet Chain ID 744, with workflows for Hardhat and Foundry.
Then comes the interesting part.
Hedger combines homomorphic encryption + zero-knowledge proofs for confidential EVM workflows, with Dusk reporting under 2 seconds for client-side proof generation using lightweight circuits.
So the picture becomes pretty simple:
New financial rails.
Familiar developer tools.
Privacy when needed.
Settlement underneath.
That’s the part I like about the Dusk thesis.
The rails are new. The builders don’t have to be.
Would you rather build on new infrastructure with familiar tools, or start from zero?
It’s trying to make regulated finance feel native to onchain infrastructure — without making builders relearn everything from scratch.
If tokenized assets are going to become a real market, I believe the winners will be the networks that make the transition feel inevitable, not painful.
And Dusk is positioning itself right there.
New rails. Familiar builders. A different financial market.
#dusk @Dusk
$EDEN $COTI $DUSK