stinkmeaner

🐕 Dogecoin just had its biggest ETF week ever. One ETF is still shutting down...
#dogecoinetfspostbiggestweeksincelaunch

U.S. spot DOGE ETFs pulled in $2.89M last week — the largest weekly inflow since launch.

Sounds huge until you look at the denominator.
The entire DOGE ETF category represents only about 0.11% of Dogecoin's market value, and Grayscale's GDOG holds roughly 81% of the category's assets.

Meanwhile, Bitwise is still winding down its BWOW fund:
Last trading day: Oct. 14.
Liquidation distribution: around Oct. 22.

So here's the distinction I think matters:
A record weekly flow tells us demand is increasing.
It does not tell us the market has reached meaningful institutional scale.

In fact, the concentration is striking:
one major fund is gathering most of the category's capital while another is exiting.
That's a very different signal from broad-based adoption.

My question:
Does DOGE's ETF market keep expanding after the novelty fades — or was this simply a record week inside a still-tiny market?

The next few weeks should tell us more than the record itself.
DYOR. ETF flows do not guarantee DOGE appreciation, and Bitwise has not said its liquidation was caused by weak demand.
$DOGE

#DogecoinETFsPostBiggestWeekSinceLaunch #Dogecoin‬⁩ #BinanceSquare #Stinkmeaner

🚨 $NEAR is falling ~14%. But the interesting part isn't what got stolen. It's what didn't.
#NEARFallsToAround$4.70Down14%

About $3.87M USDT was drained from a NEAR Intents vault on BNB Chain through a vulnerability involving its deposit/withdrawal infrastructure. NEAR Intents patched the flaw and says affected users will be fully reimbursed.

But here's the distinction:
The NEAR blockchain wasn't hacked.
The incident hit the cross-chain infrastructure around NEAR Intents.

That's important because NEAR Intents has processed $30B+ across 35 chains. The larger the cross-chain routing layer becomes, the more its security assumptions matter independently of the underlying L1.

And Bitquery found something even stranger:
The attacker actually used NEAR Intents itself during the theft, routing roughly $822K of the stolen funds through the service while draining it.

So the real question isn't:
“Was NEAR hacked?”

It's:
Can cross-chain abstraction scale faster than its security architecture?

Not financial advice. The incident affected NEAR Intents infrastructure, not the NEAR blockchain itself; reimbursement has been promised but the final resolution remains ongoing.
$NEAR $BTC
#Near #AmazonPlansToSell$8BNvidiaChips #CryptoSecurity #Stinkmeaner

🧠I started this course for the certificate.
#binanceacademycourse

I finished it with a better way to read markets. 📜
Just completed Binance Academy’s Understanding Stocks course.
My biggest takeaway?
Price is the output. The real story is underneath.
Earnings. Expectations. Growth. Rates. Positioning.
That applies to crypto too.
A token can pump while demand barely changes.
Another can fall while its fundamentals quietly improve.
Same chart. Different story.
Stop staring at price. Ask what price is actually pricing in.
Certificate earned. 🎓
Now I’m putting the framework to work.
#BinanceAcademyCourse #BinanceSquareFamily #Stinkmeaner

🍾🎇We are growing.
I earned 1.85 USDC in profits from Write to Earn last week.
Thank you fam🙏
$QNT $LINK $GRASS

#Stinkmeaner #Stinkmeanerinsights #Binance #binancesquarefamily